AzTrials
AzTrials

Allergy, PeanutPhase 3NCT04984876

Efficacy and Safety of QGE031 (Ligelizumab) in Patients With Peanut Allergy

A Phase 3 study testing ligelizumab in people with Allergy, Peanut, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 55 sites in 10 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a 52-week, Phase 3 multi-center, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of two dosing regimens of ligelizumab (240 mg and 120 mg) SC q4w (subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks) in participants with a medically confirmed diagnosis of Immunoglobulin E… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Allergy, Peanut
What is being tested?
ligelizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
211 participants
Where
55 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
7 Dec 2021to 27 Nov 2023
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signed informed consent and/or assent (where applicable) was obtained prior to study participation. Participant (and parent/legal guardian) was able to understand and provide informed consent and assent, as applicable. If a minor participant providing assent reaches the age of legal majority (as defined by local law), he/she was re-consented (ICF) at the next study visit.
  • Male or female participants who were 6 to 55 yrs of age at the time of signing informed consent/assent.
  • Documented medical history of allergy to peanuts or peanut-containing foods.
  • Positive peanut-specific IgE (peanut sIgE), ≥ 0.35 kUA/L at Screening Visit 1.
  • Positive SPT for peanut allergen at Screening Visit 1. This is defined as the average diameter (longest diameter and mid-point orthogonal diameter) ≥ 4 mm wheal compared to the negative control.
  • A positive peanut DBPCFC at baseline (Screening Visit 2, Part 1 and Part 2 DBPCFC) defined as the occurrence of dose-limiting symptoms at a single dose ≤ 100 mg of peanut protein. Eligibility to proceed with the DBPCFC requires presence of all inclusion and absence of all exclusion criteria.
  • Participants must weigh ≥ 20 kg at Screening Visit 1.
  • Participants must be able to receive injections (study treatment), participate in the DBPCFC, and must be willing to continue avoiding exposure to peanuts and any other foods that they are allergic to throughout this study.

Who cannot join

  • History of hypersensitivity to ligelizumab or its excipients, or to other biologics (i.e., to murine, chimeric or human antibodies).
  • Hypersensitivity or intolerance to any of the matrix components used within the material for the oral food challenge.
  • History of severe or life-threatening hypersensitivity event needing an ICU (intensive care unit) admission or intubation within 60 days prior to baseline DBPCFC (Screening Visit 2).
  • Total IgE >2000 IU/mL at Screening Visit 1.
  • Participants with uncontrolled asthma (according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, GINA 2020) who meet any of the following criteria:
  • FEV1 <80% of participant's predicted normal value at Screening Visit 1
Show all 11Show fewer
  • One hospitalization for asthma within 12 months prior to Screening Visit 1
  • Current or previous history of a mast cell disorder, including mastocytosis.
  • Platelets < 100'000/μL at Screening Visit 1.
  • Female participants not on oral contraception with a stable dose for a minimum of 3 months prior to taking study treatment.
  • Participants with evidence of helminthic parasitic infection as evidenced by stools being positive for a pathogenic organism according to local guidelines at Screening Visit 1 (before start of Screening Visit 2). If stool testing is positive for pathogenic organisms, the participant should not be randomized and should not be allowed to be rescreened.

Trial locations and contacts

55 sites in 10 countries.

55 sites in 10 countries

United States29 sites
  • University of Michigan Clinical Trials Office

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Childrens Healthcare of Atlanta

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • UCHealth Outpatient Pavilion

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Johns Hopkins Childrens Center

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • Allervie Clinical Research

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35209

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Boston Childrens Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • UBMD Pediatrics

    Buffalo, New York, 14203

  • University Of NC At Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599 9500

  • Ann and Robert H Lurie Childrens Hospital of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Cincinnati Childrens Hospital MC

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3039

  • Bernstein Clinical Research Center

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45231

  • Asthma and Allergy Associates P C

    Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907

  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75235

  • Colorado Allergy and Asthma Ctr PC

    Denver, Colorado, 80230

  • Texas Childrens Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Indiana University

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Arkansas Children's Hospital

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202

  • Family Allergy and Asthma

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40217

  • Atlanta Allergy and Asthma Clinic

    Marietta, Georgia, 30062

  • Northwell Health

    New York, New York, 10028

  • Mt Sinai Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10029-6574

  • Childrens Hospital Of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Allergy and Asthma Associates of Santa Clara Vally Center

    San Jose, California, 95117

  • Allergy and Immunology Associates

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251

  • Seattle Allergy and Asthma Rsch

    Seattle, Washington, 98115

  • Univ of South Florida Asthma Allergy and Immunology CRU

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • Allergy and Asthma Clinical Research Inc

    Walnut Creek, California, 94598

  • Respiratory Medicine Research Institute of Michigan

    Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197

Other trials in United States

Canada5 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4G2

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 4W2

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M3B 3S6

Other trials in Canada

France4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Angers, 49933

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lille, 59000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Toulouse, 31400

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511

Other trials in France

Germany4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Berlin, 13353

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Dresden, 01307

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Frankfurt, 60590

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Frankfurt, 60596

Other trials in Germany

Spain4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08950

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28009

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28040

Other trials in Spain

Australia3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Brisbane, Queensland, 4101

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Parkville, Victoria, 3052

Other trials in Australia

Japan3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0392

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8666

Other trials in Japan

Denmark1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Odense, 5000

Other trials in Denmark

Italy1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Padova, PD, 35128

Other trials in Italy

Netherlands1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Utrecht, 3584CX

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: A 52 Week, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligelizumab (QGE031) in Decreasing the Sensitivity to Peanuts in Patients With Peanut Allergy

This was a 52-week, Phase 3 multi-center, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of two dosing regimens of ligelizumab (240 mg and 120 mg) SC q4w (subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks) in participants with a medically confirmed diagnosis of Immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated peanut allergy.

Read the detailed description

Participants were randomized to ligelizumab 240 mg, ligelizumab 120 mg, or placebo (5 treatment arms, randomization ratio of 2:2:2:2:1) for the double-blind placebo-controlled treatment period (up to Week 12).

Participants initially assigned to the 8-week placebo arms received the first dose of blinded ligelizumab treatment at the Week 8 visit. Participants initially assigned to the 16-week placebo arm received the last dose of placebo before the Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC) at Week 12 and the first dose of blinded ligelizumab treatment at the Week 16 visit.

At the start of the study, recruitment was restricted to 12-55-year-old participants. After approximately 60 adolescent participants (defined as 12-17 yrs of age) had completed all Week 12 assessments, an interim analysis (IA1) on Pharmacokinetics (PK) and selected Pharmacodynamics (PD) data (total IgE and basophil bound High affinity immunoglobulin E receptor 1 (FcƐRI)) was performed (safety was reviewed by a Data Monitoring Committee - DMC). Independent sponsor members who were responsible for PK/ PD data analysis and Modeling \& Simulation were unblinded to the results of this interim analysis. The planned intent of this analysis was to confirm the dosing strategy for the youngest age group, 6-11 yrs and once the dose was to be confirmed, recruitment was supposed to be open for this age group. However, Novartis made a strategic decision to close recruitment in the study CQGE031G12301 and to terminate the study early, once all eligible participants in the study had completed week 12 assessments and the 16-week safety follow-up period. This decision was based on a blinded data review, which showed evidence of efficacy without the detection of any safety signal and that efficacy may be optimized with a different dosing regimen. Due to this decision, the final population size was 211, with only adolescent and adult participants (12 - 17yrs, and 18 - 55yrs) recruited.

Conditions
Allergy, Peanut
Being tested
ligelizumab, Placebo
Keywords
Food allergy, Peanut allergy, Oral food challenge, IgE, ligelizumab
Medical subject headings
Peanut Hypersensitivity, Food Hypersensitivity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ligelizumabDrug

    Subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks

  • PlaceboDrug

    Subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks

Study groups in NCT04984876
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ligelizumab 240 mgExperimentalligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks
Receives: Drug: ligelizumab
ligelizumab 120 mgExperimentalligelizumab 120 mg subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks
Receives: Drug: ligelizumab
Placebo 8 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mgExperimentalPlacebo subcutaneous injection for first 8 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg subcutaneous injection for 44 weeks
Receives: Drug: ligelizumab; Drug: Placebo
Placebo 16 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg/240 mgExperimentalPlacebo subcutaneous injection for first 16 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg OR 240 mg subcutaneous injection for 36 weeks
Receives: Drug: ligelizumab; Drug: Placebo
Placebo 8 weeks and ligelizumab 240 mgExperimentalPlacebo subcutaneous injection for first 8 weeks and ligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneous injection for 44 weeks
Receives: Drug: ligelizumab; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12

    Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12

    Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Week 12

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of 3000 mg (5044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12

    Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of 3000 mg (5044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Week 12

  3. Percentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12

    Symptom severity occurring at any challenge dose of peanut protein up to and including 1000 mg during the DBPCFC conducted at Week 12 was categorized as 4 levels: None, Mild, Moderate, Severe. The CoFAR grading system was used to categorize the symptom severity as mild, moderate and severe. Symptom severity for participants who completed DBPCFC without any symptom were categorized as none.

    Measured: Week 12

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12 After 4 Weeks of Treatment

    Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12 after 4 weeks of treatment (8 weeks of placebo + 4 weeks of ligelizumab treatment versus 12 weeks of placebo). The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Week 12

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52

    Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating the specified peanut protein doses (>= 600 mg (1044 mg cumulative tolerated dose), >= 1000 mg (2044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) or 3000 mg (5044 mg cumulative tolerated dose)) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 52. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms.

    Measured: Week 52

  6. Change From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52

    Change from baseline in maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 52

  7. Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52

    Change from baseline of serum levels of peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 52

  8. Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52

    Change from baseline of serum levels of peanut-specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 52

  9. Change From Baseline in Skin Prick Test (SPT) Mean Wheal Diameters at Week 16/Week 56

    The Skin Prick Test (SPT) is a widely used diagnostic tool for identifying allergen-specific IgE-mediated allergies. During the test, a small amount of allergen, in this case, peanut allergen, is introduced into the skin. The allergen interacts with specific IgE antibodies bound to cutaneous mast cells. This interaction can cause a reaction, resulting in a wheal and flare on the skin. The size of the wheal and flare, specifically the longest diameter and the midpoint orthogonal diameter, were evaluated at each site and the average size of the wheal and flare across all sites was summarized and reported. Considering the study termination, SPT originally scheduled at Week 56 was performed 4 weeks after Week 12 assessment in some patients.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16/Week 56

  10. Change From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)

    The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adolescents aged 13-17 to assess the impact of food allergy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The questionnaire includes three domains (Emotional Impact (EI), Allergen Avoidance and Dietary Restrictions (AADR) and Risk of Accidental Exposure (RAE)). Each item is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a higher score indicating greater impairment in HRQoL. The total score and the domain scores are calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If more than one item in any domain is missing, a domain score should not be calculated for that case. However, a total score could still be calculated if 20% or fewer of the items are missing. Therefore, the range for each item, domain, and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the impairment in HRQoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))

  11. Change From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)

    The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adults aged 18-55 to assess the impact of food allergy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The questionnaire includes four domains (Emotional Impact (EI), Allergen Avoidance and Dietary Restrictions (AADR), Risk of Accidental Exposure (RAE) and Food Allergy Related Health (FAH)). Each item is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a higher score indicating greater impairment in HRQoL. The total score and the domain scores are calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If more than one item in any domain is missing, a domain score should not be calculated for that case. However, a total score could still be calculated if 20% or fewer of the items are missing. Therefore, the range for each item, domain, and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the impairment in HRQoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))

  12. Change From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)

    The Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adolescents aged 13-17. It aims to reflect the participant's perceived food allergy severity and food allergy-related risk.

    The questionnaire consists of six questions; The first four questions assess the participant's food allergy expectation outcomes and the remaining two questions reflect aspects of the perceived severity of food allergy. Each question is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a greater score indicating a higher level of perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring. The total score is calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If less than 80% of the items within the score are complete, the total score is not calculated. Therefore, the range for each item and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))

  13. Change From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)

    The Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adults aged 18-55. It aims to reflect the participant's perceived food allergy severity and food allergy-related risk.

    The questionnaire consists of six questions; The first four questions assess the participant's food allergy expectation outcomes and the remaining two questions reflect aspects of the perceived severity of food allergy. Each question is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a greater score indicating a higher level of perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring. The total score is calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If less than 80% of the items within the score are complete, the total score is calculated. Therefore, the range for each item and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))

  14. Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)

    The SF-36v2 Health Survey is a 36-item instrument that measures generic health-related quality of life. It is designed for use in surveys of general and specific populations, health policy evaluations and clinical practice and research. It contains 8 scales and 2 component summary indices evaluating physical, social and emotional functioning in addition to general health perceptions and mental health. Responses to items allow for direct calculation of scale scores, while the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores are computed from weighted scale scores. For all scales and summary measures, higher scores indicate better health outcomes (PCS and MCS scores range 0 to 100).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Aug 2021
  2. Study start7 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion27 Nov 2023
  4. Study completion27 Nov 2023

Why it stopped: Study terminated by sponsor

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
211 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04984876
Sponsor's protocol ID
CQGE031G12301
Other IDs
2020-005339-56, EMEA-001811-PIP03-20
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
29 Jul 2021
Last updated
29 Apr 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing ligelizumab in people with Allergy, Peanut, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 55 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 55 sites in United States, Canada, France, Germany, Spain and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in