Allergy, PeanutPhase 3NCT04984876
Efficacy and Safety of QGE031 (Ligelizumab) in Patients With Peanut Allergy
A Phase 3 study testing ligelizumab in people with Allergy, Peanut, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 55 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
This was a 52-week, Phase 3 multi-center, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of two dosing regimens of ligelizumab (240 mg and 120 mg) SC q4w (subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks) in participants with a medically confirmed diagnosis of Immunoglobulin E… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergy, Peanut
- What is being tested?
- ligelizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 211 participants
- Where
- 55 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 7 Dec 2021to 27 Nov 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed informed consent and/or assent (where applicable) was obtained prior to study participation. Participant (and parent/legal guardian) was able to understand and provide informed consent and assent, as applicable. If a minor participant providing assent reaches the age of legal majority (as defined by local law), he/she was re-consented (ICF) at the next study visit.
- Male or female participants who were 6 to 55 yrs of age at the time of signing informed consent/assent.
- Documented medical history of allergy to peanuts or peanut-containing foods.
- Positive peanut-specific IgE (peanut sIgE), ≥ 0.35 kUA/L at Screening Visit 1.
- Positive SPT for peanut allergen at Screening Visit 1. This is defined as the average diameter (longest diameter and mid-point orthogonal diameter) ≥ 4 mm wheal compared to the negative control.
- A positive peanut DBPCFC at baseline (Screening Visit 2, Part 1 and Part 2 DBPCFC) defined as the occurrence of dose-limiting symptoms at a single dose ≤ 100 mg of peanut protein. Eligibility to proceed with the DBPCFC requires presence of all inclusion and absence of all exclusion criteria.
- Participants must weigh ≥ 20 kg at Screening Visit 1.
- Participants must be able to receive injections (study treatment), participate in the DBPCFC, and must be willing to continue avoiding exposure to peanuts and any other foods that they are allergic to throughout this study.
Who cannot join
- History of hypersensitivity to ligelizumab or its excipients, or to other biologics (i.e., to murine, chimeric or human antibodies).
- Hypersensitivity or intolerance to any of the matrix components used within the material for the oral food challenge.
- History of severe or life-threatening hypersensitivity event needing an ICU (intensive care unit) admission or intubation within 60 days prior to baseline DBPCFC (Screening Visit 2).
- Total IgE >2000 IU/mL at Screening Visit 1.
- Participants with uncontrolled asthma (according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, GINA 2020) who meet any of the following criteria:
- FEV1 <80% of participant's predicted normal value at Screening Visit 1
Show all 11Show fewer
- One hospitalization for asthma within 12 months prior to Screening Visit 1
- Current or previous history of a mast cell disorder, including mastocytosis.
- Platelets < 100'000/μL at Screening Visit 1.
- Female participants not on oral contraception with a stable dose for a minimum of 3 months prior to taking study treatment.
- Participants with evidence of helminthic parasitic infection as evidenced by stools being positive for a pathogenic organism according to local guidelines at Screening Visit 1 (before start of Screening Visit 2). If stool testing is positive for pathogenic organisms, the participant should not be randomized and should not be allowed to be rescreened.
Trial locations and contacts
55 sites in 10 countries.
55 sites in 10 countries
United States29 sites
University of Michigan Clinical Trials Office
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Childrens Healthcare of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
UCHealth Outpatient Pavilion
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Johns Hopkins Childrens Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Allervie Clinical Research
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Boston Childrens Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
UBMD Pediatrics
Buffalo, New York, 14203
University Of NC At Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599 9500
Ann and Robert H Lurie Childrens Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Cincinnati Childrens Hospital MC
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3039
Bernstein Clinical Research Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45231
Asthma and Allergy Associates P C
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Colorado Allergy and Asthma Ctr PC
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Texas Childrens Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202
Family Allergy and Asthma
Louisville, Kentucky, 40217
Atlanta Allergy and Asthma Clinic
Marietta, Georgia, 30062
Northwell Health
New York, New York, 10028
Mt Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029-6574
Childrens Hospital Of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Allergy and Asthma Associates of Santa Clara Vally Center
San Jose, California, 95117
Allergy and Immunology Associates
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251
Seattle Allergy and Asthma Rsch
Seattle, Washington, 98115
Univ of South Florida Asthma Allergy and Immunology CRU
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Allergy and Asthma Clinical Research Inc
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
Respiratory Medicine Research Institute of Michigan
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197
Canada5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5
Novartis Investigative Site
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4G2
Novartis Investigative Site
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4W2
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M3B 3S6
France4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Angers, 49933
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, 59000
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, 31400
Novartis Investigative Site
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Germany4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13353
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, 01307
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt, 60590
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt, 60596
Spain4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036
Novartis Investigative Site
Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08950
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28009
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28040
Australia3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brisbane, Queensland, 4101
Novartis Investigative Site
Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009
Novartis Investigative Site
Parkville, Victoria, 3052
Japan3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0392
Novartis Investigative Site
Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535
Novartis Investigative Site
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8666
About this study
Official title: A 52 Week, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligelizumab (QGE031) in Decreasing the Sensitivity to Peanuts in Patients With Peanut Allergy
This was a 52-week, Phase 3 multi-center, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of two dosing regimens of ligelizumab (240 mg and 120 mg) SC q4w (subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks) in participants with a medically confirmed diagnosis of Immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated peanut allergy.
Read the detailed description
Participants were randomized to ligelizumab 240 mg, ligelizumab 120 mg, or placebo (5 treatment arms, randomization ratio of 2:2:2:2:1) for the double-blind placebo-controlled treatment period (up to Week 12).
Participants initially assigned to the 8-week placebo arms received the first dose of blinded ligelizumab treatment at the Week 8 visit. Participants initially assigned to the 16-week placebo arm received the last dose of placebo before the Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC) at Week 12 and the first dose of blinded ligelizumab treatment at the Week 16 visit.
At the start of the study, recruitment was restricted to 12-55-year-old participants. After approximately 60 adolescent participants (defined as 12-17 yrs of age) had completed all Week 12 assessments, an interim analysis (IA1) on Pharmacokinetics (PK) and selected Pharmacodynamics (PD) data (total IgE and basophil bound High affinity immunoglobulin E receptor 1 (FcƐRI)) was performed (safety was reviewed by a Data Monitoring Committee - DMC). Independent sponsor members who were responsible for PK/ PD data analysis and Modeling \& Simulation were unblinded to the results of this interim analysis. The planned intent of this analysis was to confirm the dosing strategy for the youngest age group, 6-11 yrs and once the dose was to be confirmed, recruitment was supposed to be open for this age group. However, Novartis made a strategic decision to close recruitment in the study CQGE031G12301 and to terminate the study early, once all eligible participants in the study had completed week 12 assessments and the 16-week safety follow-up period. This decision was based on a blinded data review, which showed evidence of efficacy without the detection of any safety signal and that efficacy may be optimized with a different dosing regimen. Due to this decision, the final population size was 211, with only adolescent and adult participants (12 - 17yrs, and 18 - 55yrs) recruited.
- Conditions
- Allergy, Peanut
- Being tested
- ligelizumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Food allergy, Peanut allergy, Oral food challenge, IgE, ligelizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Peanut Hypersensitivity, Food Hypersensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ligelizumabDrug
Subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks
PlaceboDrug
Subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ligelizumab 240 mg | Experimental | ligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks Receives: Drug: ligelizumab |
| ligelizumab 120 mg | Experimental | ligelizumab 120 mg subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks Receives: Drug: ligelizumab |
| Placebo 8 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg | Experimental | Placebo subcutaneous injection for first 8 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg subcutaneous injection for 44 weeks Receives: Drug: ligelizumab; Drug: Placebo |
| Placebo 16 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg/240 mg | Experimental | Placebo subcutaneous injection for first 16 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg OR 240 mg subcutaneous injection for 36 weeks Receives: Drug: ligelizumab; Drug: Placebo |
| Placebo 8 weeks and ligelizumab 240 mg | Experimental | Placebo subcutaneous injection for first 8 weeks and ligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneous injection for 44 weeks Receives: Drug: ligelizumab; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12
Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (14)
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12
Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of 3000 mg (5044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12
Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of 3000 mg (5044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12
Symptom severity occurring at any challenge dose of peanut protein up to and including 1000 mg during the DBPCFC conducted at Week 12 was categorized as 4 levels: None, Mild, Moderate, Severe. The CoFAR grading system was used to categorize the symptom severity as mild, moderate and severe. Symptom severity for participants who completed DBPCFC without any symptom were categorized as none.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12 After 4 Weeks of Treatment
Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12 after 4 weeks of treatment (8 weeks of placebo + 4 weeks of ligelizumab treatment versus 12 weeks of placebo). The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52
Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating the specified peanut protein doses (>= 600 mg (1044 mg cumulative tolerated dose), >= 1000 mg (2044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) or 3000 mg (5044 mg cumulative tolerated dose)) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 52. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms.
Measured: Week 52
Change From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52
Change from baseline in maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52
Change from baseline of serum levels of peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52
Change from baseline of serum levels of peanut-specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Skin Prick Test (SPT) Mean Wheal Diameters at Week 16/Week 56
The Skin Prick Test (SPT) is a widely used diagnostic tool for identifying allergen-specific IgE-mediated allergies. During the test, a small amount of allergen, in this case, peanut allergen, is introduced into the skin. The allergen interacts with specific IgE antibodies bound to cutaneous mast cells. This interaction can cause a reaction, resulting in a wheal and flare on the skin. The size of the wheal and flare, specifically the longest diameter and the midpoint orthogonal diameter, were evaluated at each site and the average size of the wheal and flare across all sites was summarized and reported. Considering the study termination, SPT originally scheduled at Week 56 was performed 4 weeks after Week 12 assessment in some patients.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16/Week 56
Change From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)
The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adolescents aged 13-17 to assess the impact of food allergy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The questionnaire includes three domains (Emotional Impact (EI), Allergen Avoidance and Dietary Restrictions (AADR) and Risk of Accidental Exposure (RAE)). Each item is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a higher score indicating greater impairment in HRQoL. The total score and the domain scores are calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If more than one item in any domain is missing, a domain score should not be calculated for that case. However, a total score could still be calculated if 20% or fewer of the items are missing. Therefore, the range for each item, domain, and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the impairment in HRQoL.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))
Change From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)
The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adults aged 18-55 to assess the impact of food allergy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The questionnaire includes four domains (Emotional Impact (EI), Allergen Avoidance and Dietary Restrictions (AADR), Risk of Accidental Exposure (RAE) and Food Allergy Related Health (FAH)). Each item is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a higher score indicating greater impairment in HRQoL. The total score and the domain scores are calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If more than one item in any domain is missing, a domain score should not be calculated for that case. However, a total score could still be calculated if 20% or fewer of the items are missing. Therefore, the range for each item, domain, and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the impairment in HRQoL.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))
Change From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)
The Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adolescents aged 13-17. It aims to reflect the participant's perceived food allergy severity and food allergy-related risk.
The questionnaire consists of six questions; The first four questions assess the participant's food allergy expectation outcomes and the remaining two questions reflect aspects of the perceived severity of food allergy. Each question is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a greater score indicating a higher level of perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring. The total score is calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If less than 80% of the items within the score are complete, the total score is not calculated. Therefore, the range for each item and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))
Change From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)
The Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adults aged 18-55. It aims to reflect the participant's perceived food allergy severity and food allergy-related risk.
The questionnaire consists of six questions; The first four questions assess the participant's food allergy expectation outcomes and the remaining two questions reflect aspects of the perceived severity of food allergy. Each question is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a greater score indicating a higher level of perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring. The total score is calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If less than 80% of the items within the score are complete, the total score is calculated. Therefore, the range for each item and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))
Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)
The SF-36v2 Health Survey is a 36-item instrument that measures generic health-related quality of life. It is designed for use in surveys of general and specific populations, health policy evaluations and clinical practice and research. It contains 8 scales and 2 component summary indices evaluating physical, social and emotional functioning in addition to general health perceptions and mental health. Responses to items allow for direct calculation of scale scores, while the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores are computed from weighted scale scores. For all scales and summary measures, higher scores indicate better health outcomes (PCS and MCS scores range 0 to 100).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2021
- Study start7 Dec 2021
- Primary completion27 Nov 2023
- Study completion27 Nov 2023
Why it stopped: Study terminated by sponsor
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Allergy, PeanutStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 211 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04984876
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CQGE031G12301
- Other IDs
- 2020-005339-56, EMEA-001811-PIP03-20
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 52 Week, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligelizumab (QGE031) in Decreasing the Sensitivity to Peanuts in Patients With Peanut Allergy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04984876
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CQGE031G12301
- Conditions
- Allergy, Peanut
- Keywords
- Food allergy, Peanut allergy, Oral food challenge, IgE, ligelizumab
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study terminated by sponsor
- Enrolment
- 211 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Nov 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 8 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a 52-week, Phase 3 multi-center, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of two dosing regimens of ligelizumab (240 mg and 120 mg) SC q4w (subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks) in participants with a medically confirmed diagnosis of Immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated peanut allergy.
Detailed description
Participants were randomized to ligelizumab 240 mg, ligelizumab 120 mg, or placebo (5 treatment arms, randomization ratio of 2:2:2:2:1) for the double-blind placebo-controlled treatment period (up to Week 12).
Participants initially assigned to the 8-week placebo arms received the first dose of blinded ligelizumab treatment at the Week 8 visit. Participants initially assigned to the 16-week placebo arm received the last dose of placebo before the Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC) at Week 12 and the first dose of blinded ligelizumab treatment at the Week 16 visit.
At the start of the study, recruitment was restricted to 12-55-year-old participants. After approximately 60 adolescent participants (defined as 12-17 yrs of age) had completed all Week 12 assessments, an interim analysis (IA1) on Pharmacokinetics (PK) and selected Pharmacodynamics (PD) data (total IgE and basophil bound High affinity immunoglobulin E receptor 1 (FcƐRI)) was performed (safety was reviewed by a Data Monitoring Committee - DMC). Independent sponsor members who were responsible for PK/ PD data analysis and Modeling \& Simulation were unblinded to the results of this interim analysis. The planned intent of this analysis was to confirm the dosing strategy for the youngest age group, 6-11 yrs and once the dose was to be confirmed, recruitment was supposed to be open for this age group. However, Novartis made a strategic decision to close recruitment in the study CQGE031G12301 and to terminate the study early, once all eligible participants in the study had completed week 12 assessments and the 16-week safety follow-up period. This decision was based on a blinded data review, which showed evidence of efficacy without the detection of any safety signal and that efficacy may be optimized with a different dosing regimen. Due to this decision, the final population size was 211, with only adolescent and adult participants (12 - 17yrs, and 18 - 55yrs) recruited.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ligelizumab 240 mg | Experimental | Drug: ligelizumabligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks |
| ligelizumab 120 mg | Experimental | Drug: ligelizumabligelizumab 120 mg subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks |
| Placebo 8 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg | Experimental | Drug: ligelizumab, Drug: PlaceboPlacebo subcutaneous injection for first 8 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg subcutaneous injection for 44 weeks |
| Placebo 16 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg/240 mg | Experimental | Drug: ligelizumab, Drug: PlaceboPlacebo subcutaneous injection for first 16 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg OR 240 mg subcutaneous injection for 36 weeks |
| Placebo 8 weeks and ligelizumab 240 mg | Experimental | Drug: ligelizumab, Drug: PlaceboPlacebo subcutaneous injection for first 8 weeks and ligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneous injection for 44 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Signed informed consent and/or assent (where applicable) was obtained prior to study participation. Participant (and parent/legal guardian) was able to understand and provide informed consent and assent, as applicable. If a minor participant providing assent reaches the age of legal majority (as defined by local law), he/she was re-consented (ICF) at the next study visit.
- Male or female participants who were 6 to 55 yrs of age at the time of signing informed consent/assent.
- Documented medical history of allergy to peanuts or peanut-containing foods.
- Positive peanut-specific IgE (peanut sIgE), ≥ 0.35 kUA/L at Screening Visit 1.
- Positive SPT for peanut allergen at Screening Visit 1. This is defined as the average diameter (longest diameter and mid-point orthogonal diameter) ≥ 4 mm wheal compared to the negative control.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- History of hypersensitivity to ligelizumab or its excipients, or to other biologics (i.e., to murine, chimeric or human antibodies).
- Hypersensitivity or intolerance to any of the matrix components used within the material for the oral food challenge.
- History of severe or life-threatening hypersensitivity event needing an ICU (intensive care unit) admission or intubation within 60 days prior to baseline DBPCFC (Screening Visit 2).
- Total IgE >2000 IU/mL at Screening Visit 1.
- Participants with uncontrolled asthma (according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, GINA 2020) who meet any of the following criteria:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ligelizumabSubcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks | Drug | Placebo 16 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg/240 mg, Placebo 8 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg, Placebo 8 weeks and ligelizumab 240 mg, ligelizumab 120 mg, ligelizumab 240 mg |
| PlaceboSubcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks | Drug | Placebo 16 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg/240 mg, Placebo 8 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg, Placebo 8 weeks and ligelizumab 240 mg |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.
14 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of 3000 mg (5044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12 After 4 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Change From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Skin Prick Test (SPT) Mean Wheal Diameters at Week 16/Week 56
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16/Week 56
Change From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))
Change From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))
Change From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))
Change From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))
Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on www.novctrd.comLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Related trials for Allergy, Peanut
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Phase 2b Study of RPT904 as Monotherapy in Participants With IgE-Mediated Food Allergy
Immune System Diseases, Ig-E Mediated Food Allergy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Safety and Efficacy Study of PVX108 in Children and Adolescents With Peanut Allergy
Peanut Allergy, Peanut Hypersensitivity
Not yet recruiting
Oral Immunotherapy for Children With Peanut Allergy
Peanut Allergic Subjects, Peanut Allergies
RecruitingObservational study
Study of Oral Food Challenge Biomarkers (SAFER)
Allergy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
EPAP, Interviewstudy
Food Allergy, Food Allergy Peanut
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
55 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ligelizumab in people with Allergy, Peanut, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 55 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 55 sites in United States, Canada, France, Germany, Spain and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2025.