HealthyNCT04979351
The Effect of Post Colonoscopy Abdominal Massage on Abdominal Pain, Distension, Discomfort and Patient Satisfaction
A study testing Abdominal Massage in people with Healthy, run by Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Background: Abdominal pain, distension, and discomfort are the most frequently seen side effects after colonoscopy. These side effects can cause physical and mental results and increased workloads and care costs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Abdominal Massage
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 9 Nov 2020to 31 May 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- being of 18 years of age and above
- owning a cell phone
- having a body mass index below 30
- being conscious and having location
- people, and time orientation
- having no communication barriers
- being able to communicate in Turkish
- giving written informed consent to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- were receiving sedation
- having previously received intestine resection or other intestinal surgery
- having an uncontrolled psychopathological illness
- receiving colonoscopy for treatment
- having active lower gastrointestinal system bleeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, 34384
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Post Colonoscopy Abdominal Massage on Abdominal Pain, Distension, Discomfort and Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Study Protocol
Background: Abdominal pain, distension, and discomfort are the most frequently seen side effects after colonoscopy. These side effects can cause physical and mental results and increased workloads and care costs. Additionally, the satisfaction of the patients with the colonoscopy process may affect their willingness to undergo repeated colonoscopies in the future which may be required for the surveillance of colon malignity. Currently, there are no studies evaluating the effects of abdominal massage on post colonoscopy these abdominal symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of post colonoscopy abdominal massage on abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction.
Methods: This study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled study. Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be assigned to intervention and control groups using a random number generator. Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive abdominal massages twice a day after colonoscopy, and participants assigned to the control group will receive only "routine care". The abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and satisfaction levels of the patients will be evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale.
Conclusions: New approaches are needed to improve the physiological and psychological health levels of patients after colonoscopy and help them return to their daily life activities and social lives faster. The trial will provide valuable evidence to inform clinical application and help evaluate the effects of the use of the relevant intervention.
Read the detailed description
Abdominal pain, bloating, and discomfort are the most frequently problems experienced by patients undergoing colonoscopy. These problems are thought to be caused by several factors such as the duration of the process, the technical difficulty level of the process, distension caused by air insufflation, and the expertise level of the endoscopist. These problems are experienced by approximately a third of patients undergoing colonoscopy, and may last from a few hours to a few days. In a recent study, 44% of patients were found to experience such minor side effects 24 hours after colonoscopy, and 23% were found to experience them after a 30 day follow up. Although these problems are dubbed minor side effects, they may cause serious results for patients with regard to physical comfort and mental stress and may necessitate patients to be monitored post colonoscopy and followed up closely. This may lead to an increase in costs by increasing the length of hospital stay and nursing care requirements. Additionally, the satisfaction of the patients with the colonoscopy process may affect their willingness to undergo repeated colonoscopies in the future which may be required for the surveillance of colon malignity. For these reasons, decreasing post colonoscopy abdominal pain, distension, and discomfort and increasing patient satisfaction may increase the acceptance of future colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancers.
Studies focused on decreasing abdominal symptoms after colonoscopy and increasing patient comfort and satisfaction have yielded varying results. For example, while some studies have reported that rectal tube application after colonoscopy reduces pain and increases patient comfort and satisfaction, in another study, it was determined that rectal tube application post colonoscopy had no effect on abdominal distension, pain, discomfort, and patient satisfaction after the process and 24 hours later. In another study, rectal aspiration applied right after colonoscopy was found to be more effective in decreasing abdominal symptoms compared to the application of rectal tubes after colonoscopy. In another study where total colonic decompression through repeating cecal intubation after colonoscopy was applied, the method was found to decrease the distension complaints of patients in the early post colonoscopy period from 59% to 25%. However, in this study, no significant difference between the groups that did and did not receive decompression with regard to abdominal pain and distension could be found 24 to 48 hours after the procedure. In yet another study, no significant difference with regard to pain intensity could be found between the aspiration of air in the curves of the colon without repeated intubation while the colonoscope was being taken out and rectal aspiration.
Abdominal massaging has been shown to help improve symptoms in patients with severe constipation. In the literature, it has been reported that abdominal massage relaxes the abdominal muscles and stimulates the excretory activity by supporting the intestine, decrease discomfort and pain in individuals with abdominal pain related to cramps or flatulence, and increase the quality of life. Moreover, it is a non-invasive and safe non-pharmacological method. It has no known side effects and does not require any cost.
In this study, it was assumed post-colonoscopy abdominal massage can improve their abdominal symptoms. However, to date, there is no study evaluating the effects of abdominal massage on abdominal symptoms after colonoscopy. Therefore, a prospective study was designed to evaluate the aspect of post-colonoscopy abdominal massage that concerns endoscopy nurses, namely its effect on abdominal pain, bloating, discomfort and patient satisfaction.
Aim
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of post colonoscopy abdominal massage on abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction.
Null hypothesis
There will be no significant difference between patients receiving abdominal massage post colonoscopy and those not receiving such an intervention with regard to abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction.
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Abdominal Massage
- Keywords
- Colonoscopy, abdominal massage, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, abdominal discomfort, patient satisfaction
- Medical subject headings
- Abdominal Pain, Patient Satisfaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Abdominal MassageOther
Abdominal massage will be applied twice a day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Massage Group | Experimental | Abdominal massage for 15 minutes twice a day application. Receives: Other: Abdominal Massage |
| Placebo Group | No intervention | Abdominal massage was not applied. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Abdominal pain
Abdominal pain will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale Zero = minimum value Ten = maximum value
Measured: The end of the second day.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Abdominal distension
Abdominal distension will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale Zero = minimum value Ten = maximum value
Measured: The end of the second day.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jul 2021
- Study start9 Nov 2020
- Primary completion31 May 2021
- Study completion31 May 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dilek Ozturk, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
- Investigators
- DİLEK ÖZTÜRK, MSc, Principal investigator, specify UnaffiliatedAysel GÜRKAN, PhD, Study director, specify Unaffiliated
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04979351
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CemilTascıogluERHO
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 14 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Study results will be shared.
Publications
Devitt J, Shellman L, Gardner K, Nichols LW. Using positioning after a colonoscopy for patient comfort management. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;34(2):93-100. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31820f9ac3.
PubMed 21455041Kim SY, Kim HS, Park HJ. Adverse events related to colonoscopy: Global trends and future challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 14;25(2):190-204. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i2.190.
PubMed 30670909Lynch I, Hayes A, Buffum MD, Conners EE. Insufflation using carbon dioxide versus room air during colonoscopy: comparison of patient comfort, recovery time, and nursing resources. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;38(3):211-7. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000109.
PubMed 25946475Liu Z, Sakakibara R, Odaka T, Uchiyama T, Yamamoto T, Ito T, Hattori T. Mechanism of abdominal massage for difficult defecation in a patient with myelopathy (HAM/TSP). J Neurol. 2005 Oct;252(10):1280-2. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0825-9. Epub 2005 May 20. No abstract available.
PubMed 15895308Arabul M, Kandemir A, Celik M, Alper E, Akpinar Z, Aslan F, Vatansever S, Unsal B. Impact of an information video before colonoscopy on patient satisfaction and anxiety. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2012;23(5):523-9. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2012.0416.
PubMed 23161296Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008.
PubMed 26827847Ayan M, Tas U, Sogut E, Arici S, Karaman S, Esen M, Demirturk F. [Comparing efficiencies of diclofenac sodium and paracetamol in patients with primary dysmenorrhea pain by using Visual Analog Scale]. Agri. 2013;25(2):78-82. doi: 10.5505/agri.2013.42103. Turkish.
PubMed 23720082Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.118863.
PubMed 11719741Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VWS. The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain. 2005 Oct;117(3):412-420. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.004.
PubMed 16153776Uysal N, Eser I, Akpinar H. The effect of abdominal massage on gastric residual volume: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2012 Mar-Apr;35(2):117-23. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31824c235a.
PubMed 22472671Preece J. Introducing abdominal massage in palliative care for the relief of constipation. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery. 2002 May;8(2):101-5. doi: 10.1054/ctnm.2002.0610.
PubMed 12188155Steffenssen MW, Al-Najami I, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Baatrup G. Patient-reported complications related to colonoscopy: a prospective feasibility study of an email-based survey. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(sup1):S65-S70. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1535188. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
PubMed 30523730Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM, Rawlinson J, Salena B, Marshall JK, Stevenson GW, Hunt RH. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Aug;56(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70176-4.
PubMed 12145595Erstad DJ, Krowsoski LS, Kaafarani HM. Abdominal Pain After Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2017 Feb;152(3):486-487. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.060. Epub 2017 Jan 3. No abstract available.
PubMed 28056353Yi CH, Liu TT, Lei WY, Hung JS, Chen CL. Influence of Rectal Decompression on Abdominal Symptoms and Anorectal Physiology following Colonoscopy in Healthy Adults. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:4101248. doi: 10.1155/2016/4101248. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
PubMed 27651788
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Post Colonoscopy Abdominal Massage on Abdominal Pain, Distension, Discomfort and Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Study Protocol
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04979351
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CemilTascıogluERHO
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Keywords
- Colonoscopy, abdominal massage, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, abdominal discomfort, patient satisfaction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital OrganizationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Abdominal pain, distension, and discomfort are the most frequently seen side effects after colonoscopy. These side effects can cause physical and mental results and increased workloads and care costs. Additionally, the satisfaction of the patients with the colonoscopy process may affect their willingness to undergo repeated colonoscopies in the future which may be required for the surveillance of colon malignity. Currently, there are no studies evaluating the effects of abdominal massage on post colonoscopy these abdominal symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of post colonoscopy abdominal massage on abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction.
Methods: This study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled study. Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be assigned to intervention and control groups using a random number generator. Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive abdominal massages twice a day after colonoscopy, and participants assigned to the control group will receive only "routine care". The abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and satisfaction levels of the patients will be evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale.
Conclusions: New approaches are needed to improve the physiological and psychological health levels of patients after colonoscopy and help them return to their daily life activities and social lives faster. The trial will provide valuable evidence to inform clinical application and help evaluate the effects of the use of the relevant intervention.
Detailed description
Abdominal pain, bloating, and discomfort are the most frequently problems experienced by patients undergoing colonoscopy. These problems are thought to be caused by several factors such as the duration of the process, the technical difficulty level of the process, distension caused by air insufflation, and the expertise level of the endoscopist. These problems are experienced by approximately a third of patients undergoing colonoscopy, and may last from a few hours to a few days. In a recent study, 44% of patients were found to experience such minor side effects 24 hours after colonoscopy, and 23% were found to experience them after a 30 day follow up. Although these problems are dubbed minor side effects, they may cause serious results for patients with regard to physical comfort and mental stress and may necessitate patients to be monitored post colonoscopy and followed up closely. This may lead to an increase in costs by increasing the length of hospital stay and nursing care requirements. Additionally, the satisfaction of the patients with the colonoscopy process may affect their willingness to undergo repeated colonoscopies in the future which may be required for the surveillance of colon malignity. For these reasons, decreasing post colonoscopy abdominal pain, distension, and discomfort and increasing patient satisfaction may increase the acceptance of future colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancers.
Studies focused on decreasing abdominal symptoms after colonoscopy and increasing patient comfort and satisfaction have yielded varying results. For example, while some studies have reported that rectal tube application after colonoscopy reduces pain and increases patient comfort and satisfaction, in another study, it was determined that rectal tube application post colonoscopy had no effect on abdominal distension, pain, discomfort, and patient satisfaction after the process and 24 hours later. In another study, rectal aspiration applied right after colonoscopy was found to be more effective in decreasing abdominal symptoms compared to the application of rectal tubes after colonoscopy. In another study where total colonic decompression through repeating cecal intubation after colonoscopy was applied, the method was found to decrease the distension complaints of patients in the early post colonoscopy period from 59% to 25%. However, in this study, no significant difference between the groups that did and did not receive decompression with regard to abdominal pain and distension could be found 24 to 48 hours after the procedure. In yet another study, no significant difference with regard to pain intensity could be found between the aspiration of air in the curves of the colon without repeated intubation while the colonoscope was being taken out and rectal aspiration.
Abdominal massaging has been shown to help improve symptoms in patients with severe constipation. In the literature, it has been reported that abdominal massage relaxes the abdominal muscles and stimulates the excretory activity by supporting the intestine, decrease discomfort and pain in individuals with abdominal pain related to cramps or flatulence, and increase the quality of life. Moreover, it is a non-invasive and safe non-pharmacological method. It has no known side effects and does not require any cost.
In this study, it was assumed post-colonoscopy abdominal massage can improve their abdominal symptoms. However, to date, there is no study evaluating the effects of abdominal massage on abdominal symptoms after colonoscopy. Therefore, a prospective study was designed to evaluate the aspect of post-colonoscopy abdominal massage that concerns endoscopy nurses, namely its effect on abdominal pain, bloating, discomfort and patient satisfaction.
Aim
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of post colonoscopy abdominal massage on abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction.
Null hypothesis
There will be no significant difference between patients receiving abdominal massage post colonoscopy and those not receiving such an intervention with regard to abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Massage Group | Experimental | Other: Abdominal MassageAbdominal massage for 15 minutes twice a day application. |
| Placebo Group | No intervention | –Abdominal massage was not applied. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- being of 18 years of age and above
- owning a cell phone
- having a body mass index below 30
- being conscious and having location
- people, and time orientation
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- were receiving sedation
- having previously received intestine resection or other intestinal surgery
- having an uncontrolled psychopathological illness
- receiving colonoscopy for treatment
- having active lower gastrointestinal system bleeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal MassageAbdominal massage will be applied twice a day. | Other | Abdominal Massage Group |
Primary outcome
Abdominal pain
Time frame: The end of the second day.
Abdominal pain will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale Zero = minimum value Ten = maximum value
1 secondary outcome
Abdominal distension
Time frame: The end of the second day.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Mar 2025.
- Background: PubMed 21455041Devitt J, Shellman L, Gardner K, Nichols LW. Using positioning after a colonoscopy for patient comfort management. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;34(2):93-100. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31820f9ac3.
- Background: PubMed 30670909Kim SY, Kim HS, Park HJ. Adverse events related to colonoscopy: Global trends and future challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 14;25(2):190-204. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i2.190.
- Background: PubMed 25946475Lynch I, Hayes A, Buffum MD, Conners EE. Insufflation using carbon dioxide versus room air during colonoscopy: comparison of patient comfort, recovery time, and nursing resources. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;38(3):211-7. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000109.
- Background: PubMed 15895308Liu Z, Sakakibara R, Odaka T, Uchiyama T, Yamamoto T, Ito T, Hattori T. Mechanism of abdominal massage for difficult defecation in a patient with myelopathy (HAM/TSP). J Neurol. 2005 Oct;252(10):1280-2. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0825-9. Epub 2005 May 20. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23161296Arabul M, Kandemir A, Celik M, Alper E, Akpinar Z, Aslan F, Vatansever S, Unsal B. Impact of an information video before colonoscopy on patient satisfaction and anxiety. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2012;23(5):523-9. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2012.0416.
- Background: PubMed 26827847Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008.
- Background: PubMed 23720082Ayan M, Tas U, Sogut E, Arici S, Karaman S, Esen M, Demirturk F. [Comparing efficiencies of diclofenac sodium and paracetamol in patients with primary dysmenorrhea pain by using Visual Analog Scale]. Agri. 2013;25(2):78-82. doi: 10.5505/agri.2013.42103. Turkish.
- Background: PubMed 11719741Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.118863.
- Background: PubMed 16153776Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VWS. The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain. 2005 Oct;117(3):412-420. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.004.
- Background: PubMed 22472671Uysal N, Eser I, Akpinar H. The effect of abdominal massage on gastric residual volume: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2012 Mar-Apr;35(2):117-23. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31824c235a.
- Background: PubMed 12188155Preece J. Introducing abdominal massage in palliative care for the relief of constipation. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery. 2002 May;8(2):101-5. doi: 10.1054/ctnm.2002.0610.
- Results publication: PubMed 30523730Steffenssen MW, Al-Najami I, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Baatrup G. Patient-reported complications related to colonoscopy: a prospective feasibility study of an email-based survey. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(sup1):S65-S70. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1535188. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Study results will be shared.
Related trials for Healthy
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Not yet recruiting
Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)
Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
DİLEK ÖZTÜRK, MSc principal investigator
specify Unaffiliated
Aysel GÜRKAN, PhD study director
specify Unaffiliated
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Abdominal Massage in people with Healthy, run by Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Abdominal pain (time frame: The end of the second day.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04979351, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2025.