AzTrials
AzTrials

Rectal Cancer Stage IINCT04970498

Application of MRI in Identifying Myelosuppression Risk of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

An observational study of Rectal Cancer Stage II and Rectal Cancer Stage III, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in Peking University Third Hospital in 2021 are divided into acute myelosuppression group, chronic myelosuppression group and normal group. The differences of magnetic resonance parameters between the groups were compared. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
MRI and blood routine test
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Feb 2021to 31 Oct 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: From February 2021 to August 2022, patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the Third Hospital of Peking University

Who may be able to join

  • From February 2021 to August 2022, patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the Third Hospital of Peking University.
  • There were blood routine before radiotherapy, 1 week, 2 weeks and 90 days after radiotherapy, and MRI examination including routine MRI sequence and IDEAL-IQ sequence before radiotherapy, 1-2 weeks and 90 days after radiotherapy.
  • Each patient used the same chemotherapy regimen.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with metabolic bone diseases such as hyperparathyroidism and Cushing's syndrome.
  • Patients with history of pelvic radiotherapy or systemic chemotherapy.
  • Patients with leukocytes below 4.0×10^9/L or long-term severe anemia before radiotherapy.
  • Patients with tumor bone metastases; patients with pelvic trauma, fracture, and infectious diseases.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

宁 朗, Professor contact

13501241339

13501241339@126.com

Ning 朗, Professor contact

13501241339

13501241339@126.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Peking University third hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100089

    Ning Lang, +861082265571, langning800129@126.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Application of MRI Quantitative Parameters in Identifying Myelosuppression Risk of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

Rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in Peking University Third Hospital in 2021 are divided into acute myelosuppression group, chronic myelosuppression group and normal group. The differences of magnetic resonance parameters between the groups were compared. The risk identification model of acute and chronic myelosuppression after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was established by clinical risk factors and quantitative parameters of magnetic resonance imaging, and the prediction efficiency of the model was evaluated.

Read the detailed description

The patients with locally advanced rectal cancer diagnosed in Peking University Third Hospital and undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were collected. The basic information of patients (including age, sex, BMI, TNM stage of rectal cancer (T2, T3 stage)) was collected. The blood routine was collected before radiotherapy, 1 week, 2 weeks and 90 days after radiotherapy. MRI including T1WI, DWI sequence and IDEAL-IQ sequence before radiotherapy, 1-2 weeks after radiotherapy and 90 days after radiotherapy were performed, and the corresponding parameters were obtained. The white blood cell values and quantitative parameters of magnetic resonance (including T1WI, DWI signal intensity (b = 1000) and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) of sacrilium and proximal femur were collected. Patients were divided into acute myelosuppression group and non-acute myelosuppression group according to blood routine results 14 days after radiotherapy, and chronic myelosuppression group and non-chronic myelosuppression group according to blood routine results 90 days after radiotherapy. The magnetic resonance parameters difference between 1-2 weeks after radiotherapy and before radiotherapy, and the magnetic resonance parameters difference between 90 days after radiotherapy and before radiotherapy were calculated. By comparing the differences of clinical risk factors and quantitative parameters of MRI between the two groups, the meaningful variables were screened out, and the risk identification model of acute and chronic myelosuppression was established.

Being tested
MRI, blood routine test
Keywords
Rectal Cancer, Myelosuppression, magnetic resonance imaging, IDEAL-IQ
Medical subject headings
Rectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MRIDiagnostic test

    MRI including T1WI, DWI sequence and IDEAL-IQ sequence before radiotherapy, 1-2 weeks after radiotherapy and 90 days after radiotherapy were performed

  • blood routine testDiagnostic test

    The blood routine was collected before radiotherapy, 1 week, 2 weeks and 90 days after radiotherapy.

Study groups in NCT04970498
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
acute myelosuppression groupWBC <4.0×10^9 14 days after radiotherapy
Receives: Diagnostic Test: MRI; Diagnostic Test: blood routine test
chronic myelosuppression groupWBC <4.0×10^9 90 days after radiotherapy
Receives: Diagnostic Test: MRI; Diagnostic Test: blood routine test
no myelosuppression groupWBC >4.0×10^9 during radiotherapy
Receives: Diagnostic Test: MRI; Diagnostic Test: blood routine test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes of IDEAL-IQ sequence of MRI

    The differences of PDFF(%) between the acute myelosuppression group and no suppression group

    Measured: 1-2 weeks after radiotherapy

  2. Changes of T1WI sequence of MRI

    The differences of T1WI signal intensity(IU) between the acute myelosuppression group and no suppression group

    Measured: 1-2 weeks after radiotherapy

  3. Changes of DWI sequence of MRI

    The differences of DWI signal intensity(IU)between the acute myelosuppression group and no suppression group

    Measured: 1-2 weeks after radiotherapy

  4. Changes of ADC map of MRI

    The differences of ADC value(mm^2/s) between the acute myelosuppression group and no suppression group

    Measured: 1-2 weeks after radiotherapy

  5. Changes of IDEAL-IQ sequence of MRI

    The differences of PDFF(%) between the chronic myelosuppression group and no suppression group

    Measured: 90 days after radiotherapy

  6. Changes of T1WI sequence of MRI

    The differences T1WI signal intensity(IU)between the chronic myelosuppression group and no suppression group

    Measured: 90 days after radiotherapy

  7. Changes of DWI sequence of MRI

    The differences of DWI signal intensity(IU)between the chronic myelosuppression group and no suppression group

    Measured: 90 days after radiotherapy

  8. Changes of ADC map of MRI

    The differences of ADC value(mm^2/s) between the chronic myelosuppression group and no suppression group

    Measured: 90 days after radiotherapy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jul 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04970498
Sponsor's protocol ID
M2021111
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
30 Jun 2021
Last updated
21 Jul 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Rectal Cancer Stage II and Rectal Cancer Stage III, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact 宁 朗, Professor (13501241339, 13501241339@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes of IDEAL-IQ sequence of MRI (time frame: 1-2 weeks after radiotherapy). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in