GallstoneML_vs_EHLNCT04970030
Comparison Between Mechanical Intracanal (ML) Lithotripsy and Electrohydraulic Intracolangioscopic (EHL) Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Difficult Main Biliary Tract Lithiasis
A study testing ML lithotripsy and EHL lithotripsy in people with Gallstone and Lithiasis, run by Azienda Usl di Bologna at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Difficult gallstones are found in about 10-15% of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) performed for choledocholithiasis. There are several options for the treatment of difficult biliary lithiasis including mechanical lithotripsy and peroral cholangioscopy with electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- What is being tested?
- ML lithotripsy and EHL lithotripsy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2021to 1 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients with "difficult" biliary tract lithiasis that could not be treated by standard techniques, such as balloon and/or basket catheter under fluoroscopic vision.
Who cannot join
- surgically-altered gastrointestinal anatomy
- any evidence of biliopancreatic malignancy
- patients under 18 years of age
- patients in a state of pregnancy or are breastfeeding
- no informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Azienda USL di Bologna
Bologna
Vincenzo Cennamo, MD, +39 051 6478844, vincenzo.cennamo@ausl.bo.it
About this study
Difficult gallstones are found in about 10-15% of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) performed for choledocholithiasis. There are several options for the treatment of difficult biliary lithiasis including mechanical lithotripsy and peroral cholangioscopy with electrohydraulic lithotripsy.
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of treating difficult biliary lithiasis with ML and with EHL. The effectiveness is defined by the complete cleanliness of the biliary tract in a single endoscopic session
Read the detailed description
Difficult gallstones are found in about 10-15% of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) performed for choledocholithiasis. There are several options for the treatment of difficult biliary lithiasis including mechanical lithotripsy and peroral cholangioscopy with electrohydraulic lithotripsy.
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of treating difficult biliary lithiasis with ML and with EHL. The effectiveness is defined by the complete cleanliness of the biliary tract in a single endoscopic session.
The secondary objectives of the study are as follows:
- Within 30 days of the procedure, the effective clearance of the biliary tract will be assessed with CholangioRM (or EUS where MRI is contraindicated). If residual choledocholithiasis is present, patients will be considered as late failures.
- Comparison of the safety of the treatments under study, defined by the incidence of adverse events during the procedure (e.g. perforation, hemobilia) and in the observation period after the procedure (e.g. cholangitis, pancreatitis, bleeding).
Patients that can be enrolled:
All patients with "difficult" biliary tract lithiasis that could not be treated by standard techniques, such as balloon and/or basket catheter under fluoroscopic vision.
Patients cannot be enrolled:
- if they have a surgically-altered gastrointestinal anatomy
- if they have any evidence of biliopancreatic malignancy
- if they are under 18 years of age
- if they are in a state of pregnancy or are breastfeeding
- if it's impossible to obtain informed consent
If, while performing ERCP for choledocholithiasis, stones are found that cannot be removed using standard treatment, they will be treated by assigning these patients to either the treatment group with ML under fluoroscopic vision or to the EHL treatment group.
Patients will be assigned using a randomization method in blocks with a ratio of 1:1 for each patient enrolled.
Subjects will undergo ERCP, either under general anesthesia, or under observation by an anesthesiologist, and depending on which group they have been assigned to, will be treated with:
- EHL: after administration of IV antibiotic therapy, we will proceed to cholangioscopy with SpyGlass ™ DS (Boston Scientific Corporation, USA), treatment of difficult biliary lithiasis with electrohydraulic lithotripsy with Autolith probe (Northgate Technologies Inc USA) and subsequent complete cleaning of the biliary tract using the fluoroscopic technique.
- ML: we will proceed under fluoroscopic vision with TTS mechanical lithotripter (Trapezoid, RX Wireguided Retrieval Basket, Boston Scientific) with mechanical fragmentation of the stone and subsequent complete cleaning of the biliary tract using the fluoroscopic technique.
During each procedure, the following will be recorded:
- the execution time from the insertion of the cholangioscope or lithotripter inside the biliary tract until the complete cleaning of the biliary tract is finished.
- the occurrence of possible adverse events related to the procedures and/or anesthetic issues.
- any failure of a technique and / or the need to switch a patient to the other treatment group.
At least 50 patients eligible for the study will be required.
- Being tested
- ML lithotripsy, EHL lithotripsy
- Keywords
- Gallstone, Lithiasis, ML lithotripsy, EHL lithotripsy
- Medical subject headings
- Gallstones, Lithiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ML lithotripsyProcedure or surgery
we will proceed under fluoroscopic vision with TTS mechanical lithotripter (Trapezoid, RX Wireguided Retrieval Basket, Boston Scientific) with mechanical fragmentation of the stone and subsequent complete cleaning of the biliary tract using the fluoroscopic technique.
EHL lithotripsyProcedure or surgery
after administration of IV antibiotic therapy, we will proceed to cholangioscopy with SpyGlass ™ DS (Boston Scientific Corporation, USA), treatment of difficult biliary lithiasis with electrohydraulic lithotripsy with Autolith probe (Northgate Technologies Inc USA) and subsequent complete cleaning of the biliary tract using the fluoroscopic technique
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| mechanical intracanal (ML) lithotripsy | Active comparator | TTS mechanical lithotripter Receives: Procedure: ML lithotripsy |
| electrohydraulic intracolangioscopic (EHL) lithotripsy | Experimental | electrohydraulic lithotripsy with Autolith probe Receives: Procedure: EHL lithotripsy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
ML - EHL comparison
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of treating difficult biliary lithiasis with ML and with EHL. The effectiveness is defined by the complete cleanliness of the biliary tract in a single endoscopic session
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (2)
effective clearance of the biliary tract
Within 30 days of the procedure, the effective clearance of the biliary tract will be assessed with CholangioRM (or EUS where MRI is contraindicated). If residual choledocholithiasis is present, patients will be considered as late failures.
Measured: 30 days
Comparison of the safety of the treatments under study
Comparison of the safety of the treatments under study, defined by the incidence of adverse events during the procedure (e.g. perforation, hemobilia) and in the observation period after the procedure (e.g. cholangitis, pancreatitis, bleeding).
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2021
- Study start1 Jun 2021
- Primary completion1 Jul 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Aug 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GallstoneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Usl di Bologna
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04970030
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 397-2021-SPER-AUSLBO
- Acronym
- ML_vs_EHL
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 16 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Mechanical Intracanal (ML) Lithotripsy and Electrohydraulic Intracolangioscopic (EHL) Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Difficult Main Biliary Tract Lithiasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04970030
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML_vs_EHL / 397-2021-SPER-AUSLBO
- Keywords
- Gallstone, Lithiasis, ML lithotripsy, EHL lithotripsy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Usl di BolognaOther government
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Difficult gallstones are found in about 10-15% of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) performed for choledocholithiasis. There are several options for the treatment of difficult biliary lithiasis including mechanical lithotripsy and peroral cholangioscopy with electrohydraulic lithotripsy.
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of treating difficult biliary lithiasis with ML and with EHL. The effectiveness is defined by the complete cleanliness of the biliary tract in a single endoscopic session
Detailed description
Difficult gallstones are found in about 10-15% of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) performed for choledocholithiasis. There are several options for the treatment of difficult biliary lithiasis including mechanical lithotripsy and peroral cholangioscopy with electrohydraulic lithotripsy.
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of treating difficult biliary lithiasis with ML and with EHL. The effectiveness is defined by the complete cleanliness of the biliary tract in a single endoscopic session.
The secondary objectives of the study are as follows:
- Within 30 days of the procedure, the effective clearance of the biliary tract will be assessed with CholangioRM (or EUS where MRI is contraindicated). If residual choledocholithiasis is present, patients will be considered as late failures.
- Comparison of the safety of the treatments under study, defined by the incidence of adverse events during the procedure (e.g. perforation, hemobilia) and in the observation period after the procedure (e.g. cholangitis, pancreatitis, bleeding).
Patients that can be enrolled:
All patients with "difficult" biliary tract lithiasis that could not be treated by standard techniques, such as balloon and/or basket catheter under fluoroscopic vision.
Patients cannot be enrolled:
- if they have a surgically-altered gastrointestinal anatomy
- if they have any evidence of biliopancreatic malignancy
- if they are under 18 years of age
- if they are in a state of pregnancy or are breastfeeding
- if it's impossible to obtain informed consent
If, while performing ERCP for choledocholithiasis, stones are found that cannot be removed using standard treatment, they will be treated by assigning these patients to either the treatment group with ML under fluoroscopic vision or to the EHL treatment group.
Patients will be assigned using a randomization method in blocks with a ratio of 1:1 for each patient enrolled.
Subjects will undergo ERCP, either under general anesthesia, or under observation by an anesthesiologist, and depending on which group they have been assigned to, will be treated with:
- EHL: after administration of IV antibiotic therapy, we will proceed to cholangioscopy with SpyGlass ™ DS (Boston Scientific Corporation, USA), treatment of difficult biliary lithiasis with electrohydraulic lithotripsy with Autolith probe (Northgate Technologies Inc USA) and subsequent complete cleaning of the biliary tract using the fluoroscopic technique.
- ML: we will proceed under fluoroscopic vision with TTS mechanical lithotripter (Trapezoid, RX Wireguided Retrieval Basket, Boston Scientific) with mechanical fragmentation of the stone and subsequent complete cleaning of the biliary tract using the fluoroscopic technique.
During each procedure, the following will be recorded:
- the execution time from the insertion of the cholangioscope or lithotripter inside the biliary tract until the complete cleaning of the biliary tract is finished.
- the occurrence of possible adverse events related to the procedures and/or anesthetic issues.
- any failure of a technique and / or the need to switch a patient to the other treatment group.
At least 50 patients eligible for the study will be required.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| mechanical intracanal (ML) lithotripsy | Active comparator | Procedure: ML lithotripsyTTS mechanical lithotripter |
| electrohydraulic intracolangioscopic (EHL) lithotripsy | Experimental | Procedure: EHL lithotripsyelectrohydraulic lithotripsy with Autolith probe |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients with "difficult" biliary tract lithiasis that could not be treated by standard techniques, such as balloon and/or basket catheter under fluoroscopic vision.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- surgically-altered gastrointestinal anatomy
- any evidence of biliopancreatic malignancy
- patients under 18 years of age
- patients in a state of pregnancy or are breastfeeding
- no informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ML lithotripsywe will proceed under fluoroscopic vision with TTS mechanical lithotripter (Trapezoid, RX Wireguided Retrieval Basket, Boston Scientific) with mechanical fragmentation of the stone and subsequent complete cleaning of the biliary tract using the fluoroscopic technique. | Procedure or surgery | mechanical intracanal (ML) lithotripsy |
| EHL lithotripsyafter administration of IV antibiotic therapy, we will proceed to cholangioscopy with SpyGlass ™ DS (Boston Scientific Corporation, USA), treatment of difficult biliary lithiasis with electrohydraulic lithotripsy with Autolith probe (Northgate Technologies Inc USA) and subsequent complete cleaning of the biliary tract using the fluoroscopic technique | Procedure or surgery | electrohydraulic intracolangioscopic (EHL) lithotripsy |
Primary outcome
ML - EHL comparison
Time frame: 1 day
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of treating difficult biliary lithiasis with ML and with EHL. The effectiveness is defined by the complete cleanliness of the biliary tract in a single endoscopic session
2 secondary outcomes
effective clearance of the biliary tract
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison of the safety of the treatments under study
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gallstone
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Prophylactic Dexamethasone vs Placebo on Airway Dimensions Assessed by Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Airway Edema, Postoperative Complications
Not yet recruiting
Two Bupivacaine Concentrations for Recto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Analgesic Strategies for Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC)
Gallstones, Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Electrosurgical Patterns and Learning Curve in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholelithiasis
Recruiting
Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis
Acute Pancreatitis, Cholelithiasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ML lithotripsy and EHL lithotripsy in people with Gallstone and Lithiasis, run by Azienda Usl di Bologna at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Vincenzo Cennamo, Md (+39 051 6478844, vincenzo.cennamo@ausl.bo.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
ML - EHL comparison (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2021.