Vaccine RefusalNCT04960228
Exploring Changes in COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions by Prompting Altruistic Motives Using a Video Intervention
A study testing Altruism Video and COVID-19 Informational Text in people with Vaccine Refusal, run by Zeev Rosberger at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
As Canada records over 1,400,000 COVID-19 infections and 26,000 deaths, the need to stop the spread of the virus has become increasingly critical. Although younger individuals (aged 20-39) have lower hospitalisation and death rates than older adults, they have high rates of infection and may be less willing to accept… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 39 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Vaccine Refusal
- What is being tested?
- Altruism Video and COVID-19 Informational Text
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,097 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 30 Jul 2021to 13 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 39 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Residing within Canada and aged between 20 and 39 years.
Who cannot join
- Having received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Lady Davis Insitutute for Medical Research
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
About this study
Official title: Enhancing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions by Eliciting Prosocial Altruistic Motives: Evaluating the Efficacy of a Brief Video-Based Intervention
As Canada records over 1,400,000 COVID-19 infections and 26,000 deaths, the need to stop the spread of the virus has become increasingly critical. Although younger individuals (aged 20-39) have lower hospitalisation and death rates than older adults, they have high rates of infection and may be less willing to accept a vaccine because they consider the disease to be less dangerous for themselves. It is of concern that around 30% of Canadians, especially younger adults, will not be willing to accept a COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccination will be the best method to control the pandemic in the future and protect those at higher risk of hospitalisation and death (e.g., elderly, those with chronic diseases). Therefore, achieving high rates of vaccination coverage among younger adults is very important in the long run to protect not only themselves but also others. For the experimental condition, the investigators will develop a brief video that will promote the vaccine's protection of others (altruism). For the control condition, the investigators will create an informational text on COVID-19 preventative health measures based on recommendations from the Public Health Agency of Canada. 2630 younger adults (aged 20 to 39) who have not yet received a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine will be recruited. To match Canadian demographics, participants will be recruited using the following quotas to reflect census data from Statistics Canada: 50% male and 50% female; 80% Anglophone and 20% Francophone; 80% urban and 20% rural; and 50% household income level less than $75,000 and 50% household income greater than $75,000. Half of the participants will be randomly assigned to watch the video, with the other half reading the text. In both groups, participants will complete a short online survey before and after viewing the video or reading the text. The goal is to assess the efficacy of the video on increasing younger adults' willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine. The research team is partnering in this study with key agencies, e.g., Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI), and the Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec (INSPQ) to help communicate the research findings to the general population.
Read the detailed description
The COVID-19 vaccine is the most effective way to arrest the pandemic. A high vaccine acceptance rate is needed to achieve community immunity; however, current COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate remains low, particularly among younger Canadians. There have been no studies that have examined the impact of altruism on COVID-19 vaccine intentions using a video-based intervention. The investigators will examine the efficacy of a video intervention eliciting altruism on increasing younger Canadians' (ages 20-39) intentions to receive the COVID-19 vaccine using a randomized control trial. The results of this study will be used by public health authorities to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake. There are two objectives of the study: 1) to assess the within-participant efficacy of the video intervention in increasing vaccine intentions; 2) to assess the between-participant efficacy of the video intervention in increasing vaccine intentions.
A 10-minute survey will be administered online to a sample of 2630 Canadian residents aged 20-39 years old and is available in both English and French. To calculate the required sample size for the within-participant change in vaccine hesitancy (i.e., pre-post video intervention) the investigators used survey data showing that approximately 40% of Canadians in this age group are COVID-19 vaccine hesitant i.e., don't know yet or would refuse vaccination. Estimating a 5% decrease of hesitancy in the video intervention group and a correlation of about 0.45 between paired observations, this group requires a sample size of 1315 pairs for detecting a 5% change of marginal proportions at a power of 80% and two-sided significance of 5%.
Participants will be randomized using a one-to-one ratio. Thus, 50% will be allocated to the video intervention and 50% to the text intervention. Using equal size groups will allow for the detection of a between group difference in vaccine intentions of 5-6% with a power of 0.8 and a two-sided significance of 5%. The total sample required for this study is 2630 participants i.e., 1315 in the video intervention group and 1315 in the text intervention group.
The investigators have contracted Dynata, the world's largest first-party data and insight platform, to conduct recruitment and host the survey. Dynata will send invitations in various forms (e.g., e-mail invitations, text messages and in-app alerts) to recruit eligible participants from their existing panel (individuals who have signed with Dynata and have expressed willingness to receive invitations to various appropriate surveys) until recruitment goals and quotas are met.
Stratified randomization will be used to allocate participants to either: 1) video intervention: viewing a 2-minute altruism-eliciting video, or 2) text intervention: reading a text containing information from the Public Health Agency of Canada about general health behaviours and public health recommendations concerning COVID-19, e.g., hand hygiene and respiratory etiquette, wearing non-medical masks, physical distancing, etc. Within each stratum (first language, sex, population density and household income), participants will be allocated randomly using a one-to-one ratio (one to the video intervention and one to the text intervention).
Participants will first be asked to answer several socio-demographic questions and will be asked to choose one of the following categories which describe their COVID-19 vaccine decision-making stage according to the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM): unengaged, undecided, decided not to receive the vaccine, or decided to receive the vaccine. Subsequently, depending on their randomly assigned condition, participants will either be shown a 2-minute altruism-eliciting video, or a brief informational text. After viewing this content, to ensure that participants paid attention, participants will answer questions about the contents to check their understanding. Finally, participants will: 1) once again be asked to choose their COVID-19 vaccine decision-making stage; 2) be asked questions regarding previous vaccination history (e.g., seasonal influenza), lifestyle factors, self-perceived health status, personal history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and preferred health-information channels; and 3) complete validated scales regarding altruism, empathy, personal distress, and vaccine hesitancy.
To test the outcome for objective 1, the McNemar's test will be used to compare paired (pre-post video intervention) proportions. To control for the potential effect of other factors (e.g., sociodemographics, previous influenza vaccination, lifestyle factors), the investigators will conduct multivariate analyses (General Estimating Equations) and estimate the associations between these factors and changes in COVID-19 vaccine intentions. For objective 2, the difference in proportions between the video intervention and text intervention will be analyzed using the Chi-square test. The investigators will test for significant differences in predictor variables between the two groups and use logistic regression analyses to estimate the associations between these variables and the outcome (vaccine acceptability). The significance level will be set at α = 0.05.
- Conditions
- Vaccine Refusal
- Being tested
- Altruism Video, COVID-19 Informational Text
- Keywords
- Vaccine Hesitancy, Vaccine Decision Making, COVID-19
- Medical subject headings
- Vaccination Refusal, Vaccination Hesitancy, COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Altruism VideoBehavioural
The video provides three vignettes about a diverse set of people who may be more vulnerable to serious health consequences from COVID-19. In each of the stories, high vaccine uptake of those around these vulnerable individuals serves to protect them. This communicates that getting the COVID-19 vaccine can be done for prosocial reasons and to foster a sense of community, as it provides protection not only to oneself, but also to others.
COVID-19 Informational TextBehavioural
The topics included in the text are how COVID-19 spreads, hygiene, physical distancing, and travel restrictions. Participants will complete three comprehension questions, one after each of the following sections: hygiene, physical distancing, and travel restrictions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Altruism Video Intervention | Experimental | Participants will watch a 3-minute video about COVID-19 vaccination that elicits altruistic motives. The role of this arm is to test whether altruistic themes are an effective way to promote COVID-19 vaccination amongst young people and whether a video format is preferable for this group. Receives: Behavioral: Altruism Video |
| Informational Text Intervention | Active comparator | Participants will read a brief informational text including information drawn from the Public Health Agency of Canada website (https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/2019-novel-coronavirus-infection/prevention-risks.html#self). The purpose of this arm is to provide an active comparator with information about COVID-19 preventative health behaviors that has been strongly recommended to the public since the beginning of the pandemic. By doing this, we will assess if the video intervention changes vaccination intentions more than a presentation of general, well-known COVID-19 related information. Receives: Behavioral: COVID-19 Informational Text |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Post Intervention Vaccine Intentions
Vaccine intentions are measured using one item: "Which of the following best describes your thoughts about a COVID-19 vaccine?". Participants will then indicate their vaccine intention stage, adapted from the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM): I have not thought about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, I am undecided about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, I do not want to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, and I do want to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Participants will answer this item before (pre) and after (post) the intervention has been administered, all within the same survey.
Measured: Pre-post intervention, within the same survey. The length of the survey is projected to be about 10 minutes.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2021
- Study start30 Jul 2021
- Primary completion13 Sep 2021
- Study completion13 Sep 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Vaccine RefusalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be assigned to either the video intervention or informational text control condition using a 1:1 randomization ratio.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 2,097 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zeev Rosberger
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Zeev Rosberger, Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General Hospital
- Investigators
- Zeev Rosberger, PhD, Principal investigator, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04960228
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022-2877
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 21 Feb 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Consent form, data collection method, and organizational policy means only aggregated data will be shared with other researchers.
Publications
Li M, Taylor EG, Atkins KE, Chapman GB, Galvani AP. Stimulating Influenza Vaccination via Prosocial Motives. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 26;11(7):e0159780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159780. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27459237Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Rothman AJ, Leask J, Kempe A. Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 Dec;18(3):149-207. doi: 10.1177/1529100618760521.
PubMed 29611455Rieger M. Triggering altruism increases the willingness to get vaccinated against COVID- 19. Social Health and Behavior. 2020; 3(3): 78.
Zhu P, Tatar O, Griffin-Mathieu G, Perez S, Haward B, Zimet G, Tunis M, Dube E, Rosberger Z. The Efficacy of a Brief, Altruism-Eliciting Video Intervention in Enhancing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions Among a Population-Based Sample of Younger Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 30;8(5):e37328. doi: 10.2196/37328.
PubMed 35544437
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Feb 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Enhancing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions by Eliciting Prosocial Altruistic Motives: Evaluating the Efficacy of a Brief Video-Based Intervention
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04960228
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022-2877
- Conditions
- Vaccine Refusal
- Keywords
- Vaccine Hesitancy, Vaccine Decision Making, COVID-19
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,097 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zeev RosbergerUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Sep 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 21 Feb 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
As Canada records over 1,400,000 COVID-19 infections and 26,000 deaths, the need to stop the spread of the virus has become increasingly critical. Although younger individuals (aged 20-39) have lower hospitalisation and death rates than older adults, they have high rates of infection and may be less willing to accept a vaccine because they consider the disease to be less dangerous for themselves. It is of concern that around 30% of Canadians, especially younger adults, will not be willing to accept a COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccination will be the best method to control the pandemic in the future and protect those at higher risk of hospitalisation and death (e.g., elderly, those with chronic diseases). Therefore, achieving high rates of vaccination coverage among younger adults is very important in the long run to protect not only themselves but also others. For the experimental condition, the investigators will develop a brief video that will promote the vaccine's protection of others (altruism). For the control condition, the investigators will create an informational text on COVID-19 preventative health measures based on recommendations from the Public Health Agency of Canada. 2630 younger adults (aged 20 to 39) who have not yet received a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine will be recruited. To match Canadian demographics, participants will be recruited using the following quotas to reflect census data from Statistics Canada: 50% male and 50% female; 80% Anglophone and 20% Francophone; 80% urban and 20% rural; and 50% household income level less than $75,000 and 50% household income greater than $75,000. Half of the participants will be randomly assigned to watch the video, with the other half reading the text. In both groups, participants will complete a short online survey before and after viewing the video or reading the text. The goal is to assess the efficacy of the video on increasing younger adults' willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine. The research team is partnering in this study with key agencies, e.g., Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI), and the Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec (INSPQ) to help communicate the research findings to the general population.
Detailed description
The COVID-19 vaccine is the most effective way to arrest the pandemic. A high vaccine acceptance rate is needed to achieve community immunity; however, current COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate remains low, particularly among younger Canadians. There have been no studies that have examined the impact of altruism on COVID-19 vaccine intentions using a video-based intervention. The investigators will examine the efficacy of a video intervention eliciting altruism on increasing younger Canadians' (ages 20-39) intentions to receive the COVID-19 vaccine using a randomized control trial. The results of this study will be used by public health authorities to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake. There are two objectives of the study: 1) to assess the within-participant efficacy of the video intervention in increasing vaccine intentions; 2) to assess the between-participant efficacy of the video intervention in increasing vaccine intentions.
A 10-minute survey will be administered online to a sample of 2630 Canadian residents aged 20-39 years old and is available in both English and French. To calculate the required sample size for the within-participant change in vaccine hesitancy (i.e., pre-post video intervention) the investigators used survey data showing that approximately 40% of Canadians in this age group are COVID-19 vaccine hesitant i.e., don't know yet or would refuse vaccination. Estimating a 5% decrease of hesitancy in the video intervention group and a correlation of about 0.45 between paired observations, this group requires a sample size of 1315 pairs for detecting a 5% change of marginal proportions at a power of 80% and two-sided significance of 5%.
Participants will be randomized using a one-to-one ratio. Thus, 50% will be allocated to the video intervention and 50% to the text intervention. Using equal size groups will allow for the detection of a between group difference in vaccine intentions of 5-6% with a power of 0.8 and a two-sided significance of 5%. The total sample required for this study is 2630 participants i.e., 1315 in the video intervention group and 1315 in the text intervention group.
The investigators have contracted Dynata, the world's largest first-party data and insight platform, to conduct recruitment and host the survey. Dynata will send invitations in various forms (e.g., e-mail invitations, text messages and in-app alerts) to recruit eligible participants from their existing panel (individuals who have signed with Dynata and have expressed willingness to receive invitations to various appropriate surveys) until recruitment goals and quotas are met.
Stratified randomization will be used to allocate participants to either: 1) video intervention: viewing a 2-minute altruism-eliciting video, or 2) text intervention: reading a text containing information from the Public Health Agency of Canada about general health behaviours and public health recommendations concerning COVID-19, e.g., hand hygiene and respiratory etiquette, wearing non-medical masks, physical distancing, etc. Within each stratum (first language, sex, population density and household income), participants will be allocated randomly using a one-to-one ratio (one to the video intervention and one to the text intervention).
Participants will first be asked to answer several socio-demographic questions and will be asked to choose one of the following categories which describe their COVID-19 vaccine decision-making stage according to the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM): unengaged, undecided, decided not to receive the vaccine, or decided to receive the vaccine. Subsequently, depending on their randomly assigned condition, participants will either be shown a 2-minute altruism-eliciting video, or a brief informational text. After viewing this content, to ensure that participants paid attention, participants will answer questions about the contents to check their understanding. Finally, participants will: 1) once again be asked to choose their COVID-19 vaccine decision-making stage; 2) be asked questions regarding previous vaccination history (e.g., seasonal influenza), lifestyle factors, self-perceived health status, personal history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and preferred health-information channels; and 3) complete validated scales regarding altruism, empathy, personal distress, and vaccine hesitancy.
To test the outcome for objective 1, the McNemar's test will be used to compare paired (pre-post video intervention) proportions. To control for the potential effect of other factors (e.g., sociodemographics, previous influenza vaccination, lifestyle factors), the investigators will conduct multivariate analyses (General Estimating Equations) and estimate the associations between these factors and changes in COVID-19 vaccine intentions. For objective 2, the difference in proportions between the video intervention and text intervention will be analyzed using the Chi-square test. The investigators will test for significant differences in predictor variables between the two groups and use logistic regression analyses to estimate the associations between these variables and the outcome (vaccine acceptability). The significance level will be set at α = 0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be assigned to either the video intervention or informational text control condition using a 1:1 randomization ratio.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Altruism Video Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Altruism VideoParticipants will watch a 3-minute video about COVID-19 vaccination that elicits altruistic motives. The role of this arm is to test whether altruistic themes are an effective way to promote COVID-19 vaccination amongst young people and whether a video format is preferable for this group. |
| Informational Text Intervention | Active comparator | Behavioral: COVID-19 Informational TextParticipants will read a brief informational text including information drawn from the Public Health Agency of Canada website (https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/2019-novel-coronavirus-infection/prevention-risks.html#self). The purpose of this arm is to provide an active comparator with information about COVID-19 preventative health behaviors that has been strongly recommended to the public since the beginning of the pandemic. By doing this, we will assess if the video intervention changes vaccination intentions more than a presentation of general, well-known COVID-19 related information. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 39 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Residing within Canada and aged between 20 and 39 years.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Having received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Altruism VideoThe video provides three vignettes about a diverse set of people who may be more vulnerable to serious health consequences from COVID-19. In each of the stories, high vaccine uptake of those around these vulnerable individuals serves to protect them. This communicates that getting the COVID-19 vaccine can be done for prosocial reasons and to foster a sense of community, as it provides protection not only to oneself, but also to others. | Behavioural | Altruism Video Intervention |
| COVID-19 Informational TextThe topics included in the text are how COVID-19 spreads, hygiene, physical distancing, and travel restrictions. Participants will complete three comprehension questions, one after each of the following sections: hygiene, physical distancing, and travel restrictions. | Behavioural | Informational Text Intervention |
Primary outcome
Post Intervention Vaccine Intentions
Time frame: Pre-post intervention, within the same survey. The length of the survey is projected to be about 10 minutes.
Vaccine intentions are measured using one item: "Which of the following best describes your thoughts about a COVID-19 vaccine?". Participants will then indicate their vaccine intention stage, adapted from the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM): I have not thought about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, I am undecided about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, I do not want to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, and I do want to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Participants will answer this item before (pre) and after (post) the intervention has been administered, all within the same survey.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Feb 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 27459237Li M, Taylor EG, Atkins KE, Chapman GB, Galvani AP. Stimulating Influenza Vaccination via Prosocial Motives. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 26;11(7):e0159780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159780. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 29611455Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Rothman AJ, Leask J, Kempe A. Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 Dec;18(3):149-207. doi: 10.1177/1529100618760521.
- BackgroundRieger M. Triggering altruism increases the willingness to get vaccinated against COVID- 19. Social Health and Behavior. 2020; 3(3): 78.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35544437Zhu P, Tatar O, Griffin-Mathieu G, Perez S, Haward B, Zimet G, Tunis M, Dube E, Rosberger Z. The Efficacy of a Brief, Altruism-Eliciting Video Intervention in Enhancing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions Among a Population-Based Sample of Younger Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 30;8(5):e37328. doi: 10.2196/37328.
- Recent poll detailing levels of vaccine hesitancy among Canadians, including young Canadians.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Summary of COVID-19 statistics in CanadaLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Consent form, data collection method, and organizational policy means only aggregated data will be shared with other researchers.
Related trials for Vaccine Refusal
Active, not recruiting
Conversational AI for Adult Flu Vaccination Decisions
Influenza, Human, Vaccine Hesitancy
Recruiting
Intrahospital Influenza Vaccination in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk (VACC-UP)
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Heart Failure
Not yet recruiting
Development and Evaluation of a Digital Educational Intervention to Improve Vaccine Confidence and Communication Among Registered Nurses: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (VaxNurse-RCT).
Vaccine Hesitancy, Vaccine Acceptance
Active, not recruiting
Communication Strategies to Increase HPV Vaccinations
Papilloma Viral Infection, Vaccine Hesitancy
Not yet recruiting
Parents' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Vaccinating Their Children
Vaccine Hesitancy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zeev Rosberger, PhD principal investigator
Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Altruism Video and COVID-19 Informational Text in people with Vaccine Refusal, run by Zeev Rosberger at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Feb 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Post Intervention Vaccine Intentions (time frame: Pre-post intervention, within the same survey. The length of the survey is projected to be about 10 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04960228, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2022.