The Objective of the Study is to Prospectively Compare the Success Rate of ab Externo and Interno ImplantationNCT04943185
A Prospective, Single Surgeon, Randomized Control Study Comparing ab Interno XEN Gel Microstent Implantation vs Closed Conjunctiva ab Externo Implantation Performed at the Slit Lamp for the Treatment of Uncontrolled Glaucoma
A study testing XEN gel microstent implantation in people with The Objective of the Study is to Prospectively Compare the Success Rate of ab Externo and Interno Implantation, run by Institut de l'oeil des Laurentides at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The objective of the study is to prospectively compare the success rate of ab externo implantation and outcome measures of glaucoma filtering surgery namely IOP (intraocular pressure), number of glaucoma medications, adjunct procedure and adverse events rate compared to the traditional ab interno implantation… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- The Objective of the Study is to Prospectively Compare the Success Rate of ab Externo and Interno Implantation
- What is being tested?
- XEN gel microstent implantation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2021to 1 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with maximally tolerated medically treated (MTMT) uncontrolled glaucoma (POAG, PEX G, PDS G)
- Male or female who was in good general health and >18 years of age at the time of the preoperative exam
- The subject complied with post-operative instructions and made their scheduled office appointments
Who cannot join
- Non-Ocular
- Known or suspected allergy or sensitivity to any medications/diagnostic agents (eg, topical anesthetic, dilating drops, fluorescein) required for this protocol or any of the XEN components (eg, porcine products or glutaraldehyde)
- Known history of bleeding disorder or prolonged bleeding after surgery (in the opinion of the investigator) or those on pharmacologic blood thinners other than aspirin (up to 100 mg/day)
- Chemotherapy for cancer treatment within 6 months of screening
- History of dermatologic keloid formation
- Participation in another drug/device/observational clinical trial concurrently or concluding within 30 days of screening
Show all 29Show fewer
- Any condition that would preclude the patient's ability to comply with study requirements, including completion of the study
- Any condition or a situation which, in the investigator's opinion, may put the patient at significant risk, may confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the patient's participation in the study Ocular
- Close-angle glaucoma (previous iridotomy laser accepted) active acute angle closure attack, secondary glaucomas (eg, anterior subluxation of the lens, iris or ciliary body cysts, active iris and angle neovascularization, iridocorneal endothelial syndrome,) in the study eye
- History of following surgeries in the study eye:
- incisional refractive surgery (eg, radial keratotomy), other than astigmatic keratotomy or limbal relaxing incisions
- corneal graft including partial grafts such as Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty
- previous laser SLT or incisional intraocular surgery that might interfere with the outcome of this trial less than 6 weeks prior to XEN surgery However, previous incisional and laser glaucoma surgeries (eg, trabeculectomy, glaucoma shunt implantation, laser trabeculoplasty, iridotomy, cilioablative procedures) or uncomplicated phacoemulsification with IOL, occurring more than 6 weeks prior to screening, are allowed in the study eye.
- Previous glaucoma shunt implantation in the target quadrant in the study eye
- Anticipated need for ocular incisional and/or laser surgery in the study eye during the 12-month follow-up period
- Ocular (in the study eye) or systemic corticosteroid use within 30 days prior to screening (continuing chronic systemic corticosteroid use is allowed) or known corticosteroid responder
- Clinically significant inflammation or infection in either eye within 30 days prior to screening (eg, blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, herpes simplex infection)
- Active or history of chronic uveitis in the study eye
- Corneal or other ocular abnormalities (eg, bullous keratopathy, keratoconus) in the study eye that would preclude accurate readings with an applanation tonometer and/or a contact pachymeter, or could confound study results
- Nanophthalmos in either eye
- Central corneal thickness ≤ 460 microns or ≥ 620 microns in the study eye
- Unable to discontinue contact lens wear in the study eye during the studyrevised 2021-03-09 page 6 of 10 protocol: SLX
- Impaired episcleral venous drainage (eg, Sturge-Weber or other evidence of elevated venous pressure) in the study eye
- Aphakia, anterior chamber intraocular lens, or previous complicated phacoemulsification surgery in the study eye
- Vitreous present in the anterior chamber in the study eye
- Presence of intraocular silicone oil in the study eye
- Active diabetic retinopathy, choroidal neovascularization, branch retinal vein occlusion, central retinal vein occlusion, proliferative retinopathy, or other ophthalmic disease or disorder in the study eye that could confound study results
- Female patients who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy during the study, or who are of childbearing potential and not using a reliable means of contraception during the study.
- For purposes of this study, females will be considered of childbearing potential unless they are naturally postmenopausal or permanently sterilized (ie, tubal occlusion, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and/or bilateral oophorectomy). Natural menopause is defined as the permanent cessation of menstrual periods, determined retrospectively after a woman has experienced 12 months of amenorrhea without any other obvious pathological or physiological cause.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Institutdeloeil
Boisbriand, Quebec, J7H0E8
Janik Denis, SC, 4504196345 ext. 227, janik.denis@institutdeloeil.com
Audrey Louis-Seize, SC, 4504196345 ext. 154, audrey.louis-seize@institutdeloeil.com
About this study
Official title: SLX vs Ab Interno XEN
The objective of the study is to prospectively compare the success rate of ab externo implantation and outcome measures of glaucoma filtering surgery namely IOP (intraocular pressure), number of glaucoma medications, adjunct procedure and adverse events rate compared to the traditional ab interno implantation technique.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE The XEN gel stent (Allergan inc.) is a gelatin stent that has been developed for the surgical treatment of medically uncontrolled glaucoma and allows the filtration of aqueous humour from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space. The ab interno placement and outcomes of the XEN implant has been described (1,2,3). We describe an ab externo approach to implant the XEN microstent; ab externo closed conjunctiva implantation. This approach has many potential advantages over the ab interno technique, notably a quicker procedure, a potentially better subconjunctival placement of the implant and cost effectiveness due to absent need to rely on an operating room to perform the procedure as it can be done in an office setting.
Ab interno technique Approximately 6 mm long and as wide as a human hair, this soft gelatinous stent is implanted via an ab interno surgical approach through a small, self-sealing corneal incision, to facilitate aqueous humor drainage from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space. The gelatin imparts hydrophilic properties that allow the Gel Implant to conform to the ocular tissue by expanding when hydrated upon contact with the aqueous humor. This expansion might minimize issues such as migration, erosion, and corneal endothelial damage observed in stents with synthetic materials. The ab interno surgical approach for XEN is less invasive than traditional glaucoma surgeries and has several other advantages, including minimal trauma to the conjunctiva, maintenance of the natural drainage pathways, reduced scarring response, and the ability to accurately place the device under direct visualization of anatomy. Minimizing damage to the conjunctiva allows the possibility of future glaucoma surgery. Ab externo technique The transconjunctival ab externo technique is modification of the ab interno procedure. Topical anesthesia with tetracaine 0.5% eye drops is performed before the ocular surface is disinfected with 5% povidone iodine drops. A full blade speculum was used to retract the patient's eyelid, and the patient was positioned at the slit lamp. While the patient gazed down toward the nose, a mixture of an antimetabolite, lidocaine, and epinephrine was injected in the exposed surgical site of the superotemporal quadrant. The antimetabolite is mitomycin C (MMC). The mixture contained either 0.1 cc of MMC (0.2 mg/ml) and 0.05 cc of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, for a total volume of 0.15 cc. The speculum was then removed. After 5 to 7 minutes, topical anesthesia and disinfection were repeated, and the speculum was secured again. An inserter with a preloaded gel stent is directed to enter the conjunctiva approximately 2 to 3 mm lateral to the intended scleral entry point, and 6 to 7 mm from the limbus, using an aseptic no-touch technique. The inserter was then directed downward to enter the sclera 2.5 mm posterior to the limbus. Once the tip of the inserter needle was visualized in the AC, the plunger of the inserter was advanced while the inserter needle was slowly and simultaneously withdrawn until the gel stent was fully released. The ideal target position of the stent is approximately 3 mm within the subconjunctiva, 2 mm within the sclera, and 1 mm within the AC.
The positioning of the stent was considered successful if a connection was made by the stent between the subconjunctival space and the AC, and a bleb formed. Gonioscopy was performed to confirm proper seating of the gel microstent and slit lamp biomicroscopy was performed to confirm a formed bleb.
- Being tested
- XEN gel microstent implantation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
XEN gel microstent implantationDevice
Two differents implantation :
Ab interno : Operative intervention Ab externo : Slit lamp intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ab interno technique | Other | Ab Interno is traditional method of stent XEN implantation, where the device will injected through a small corneal incision that closes with the preloaded XEN injector. Receives: Device: XEN gel microstent implantation |
| Ab externo technique | Other | The ab externo approach does this without any incision, less invasive, and the implant is directly injected through the conjunctiva into the anterior chamber of the eye. Both methods create a new way out through the subconjunctival space, which is the traditional target of trabeculectomy. Receives: Device: XEN gel microstent implantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compared the success of interno / externo implantation
The objective of the study is to prospectively compare the success rate of ab externo implantation and outcome measures of glaucoma filtering surgery namely IOP (intraocular pressure), number of glaucoma medications, adjunct procedure and adverse events rate compared to the traditional ab interno implantation technique
Measured: 15 minutes by implantation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jun 2021
- Study start1 Aug 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for The Objective of the Study is to Prospectively Compare the Success Rate of ab Externo and Interno ImplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The XEN gel stent (Allergan inc.) is a gelatin stent that has been developed for the surgical treatment of medically uncontrolled glaucoma and allows the filtration of aqueous humour from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space. The ab interno placement and outcomes of the XEN implant has been described (1,2,3). We describe an ab externo approach to implant the XEN microstent; ab externo closed conjunctiva implantation. This approach has many potential advantages over the ab interno technique, notably a quicker procedure, a potentially better subconjunctival placement of the implant and cost effectiveness due to absent need to rely on an operating room to perform the procedure as it can be done in an office setting.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institut de l'oeil des Laurentides
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04943185
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IIT-2018-10526
- Status last verified
- Jun 2021
- First submitted
- 21 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: See after the study
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- SLX vs Ab Interno XEN
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04943185
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IIT-2018-10526
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut de l'oeil des LaurentidesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of the study is to prospectively compare the success rate of ab externo implantation and outcome measures of glaucoma filtering surgery namely IOP (intraocular pressure), number of glaucoma medications, adjunct procedure and adverse events rate compared to the traditional ab interno implantation technique.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE The XEN gel stent (Allergan inc.) is a gelatin stent that has been developed for the surgical treatment of medically uncontrolled glaucoma and allows the filtration of aqueous humour from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space. The ab interno placement and outcomes of the XEN implant has been described (1,2,3). We describe an ab externo approach to implant the XEN microstent; ab externo closed conjunctiva implantation. This approach has many potential advantages over the ab interno technique, notably a quicker procedure, a potentially better subconjunctival placement of the implant and cost effectiveness due to absent need to rely on an operating room to perform the procedure as it can be done in an office setting.
Ab interno technique Approximately 6 mm long and as wide as a human hair, this soft gelatinous stent is implanted via an ab interno surgical approach through a small, self-sealing corneal incision, to facilitate aqueous humor drainage from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space. The gelatin imparts hydrophilic properties that allow the Gel Implant to conform to the ocular tissue by expanding when hydrated upon contact with the aqueous humor. This expansion might minimize issues such as migration, erosion, and corneal endothelial damage observed in stents with synthetic materials. The ab interno surgical approach for XEN is less invasive than traditional glaucoma surgeries and has several other advantages, including minimal trauma to the conjunctiva, maintenance of the natural drainage pathways, reduced scarring response, and the ability to accurately place the device under direct visualization of anatomy. Minimizing damage to the conjunctiva allows the possibility of future glaucoma surgery. Ab externo technique The transconjunctival ab externo technique is modification of the ab interno procedure. Topical anesthesia with tetracaine 0.5% eye drops is performed before the ocular surface is disinfected with 5% povidone iodine drops. A full blade speculum was used to retract the patient's eyelid, and the patient was positioned at the slit lamp. While the patient gazed down toward the nose, a mixture of an antimetabolite, lidocaine, and epinephrine was injected in the exposed surgical site of the superotemporal quadrant. The antimetabolite is mitomycin C (MMC). The mixture contained either 0.1 cc of MMC (0.2 mg/ml) and 0.05 cc of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, for a total volume of 0.15 cc. The speculum was then removed. After 5 to 7 minutes, topical anesthesia and disinfection were repeated, and the speculum was secured again. An inserter with a preloaded gel stent is directed to enter the conjunctiva approximately 2 to 3 mm lateral to the intended scleral entry point, and 6 to 7 mm from the limbus, using an aseptic no-touch technique. The inserter was then directed downward to enter the sclera 2.5 mm posterior to the limbus. Once the tip of the inserter needle was visualized in the AC, the plunger of the inserter was advanced while the inserter needle was slowly and simultaneously withdrawn until the gel stent was fully released. The ideal target position of the stent is approximately 3 mm within the subconjunctiva, 2 mm within the sclera, and 1 mm within the AC.
The positioning of the stent was considered successful if a connection was made by the stent between the subconjunctival space and the AC, and a bleb formed. Gonioscopy was performed to confirm proper seating of the gel microstent and slit lamp biomicroscopy was performed to confirm a formed bleb.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The XEN gel stent (Allergan inc.) is a gelatin stent that has been developed for the surgical treatment of medically uncontrolled glaucoma and allows the filtration of aqueous humour from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space. The ab interno placement and outcomes of the XEN implant has been described (1,2,3). We describe an ab externo approach to implant the XEN microstent; ab externo closed conjunctiva implantation. This approach has many potential advantages over the ab interno technique, notably a quicker procedure, a potentially better subconjunctival placement of the implant and cost effectiveness due to absent need to rely on an operating room to perform the procedure as it can be done in an office setting.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ab interno technique | Other | Device: XEN gel microstent implantationAb Interno is traditional method of stent XEN implantation, where the device will injected through a small corneal incision that closes with the preloaded XEN injector. |
| Ab externo technique | Other | Device: XEN gel microstent implantationThe ab externo approach does this without any incision, less invasive, and the implant is directly injected through the conjunctiva into the anterior chamber of the eye. Both methods create a new way out through the subconjunctival space, which is the traditional target of trabeculectomy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with maximally tolerated medically treated (MTMT) uncontrolled glaucoma (POAG, PEX G, PDS G)
- Male or female who was in good general health and >18 years of age at the time of the preoperative exam
- The subject complied with post-operative instructions and made their scheduled office appointments
Key exclusion criteria (29 listed)
- Non-Ocular
- Known or suspected allergy or sensitivity to any medications/diagnostic agents (eg, topical anesthetic, dilating drops, fluorescein) required for this protocol or any of the XEN components (eg, porcine products or glutaraldehyde)
- Known history of bleeding disorder or prolonged bleeding after surgery (in the opinion of the investigator) or those on pharmacologic blood thinners other than aspirin (up to 100 mg/day)
- Chemotherapy for cancer treatment within 6 months of screening
- History of dermatologic keloid formation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| XEN gel microstent implantationTwo differents implantation : Ab interno : Operative intervention Ab externo : Slit lamp intervention | Device | Ab externo technique, Ab interno technique |
Primary outcome
Compared the success of interno / externo implantation
Time frame: 15 minutes by implantation
The objective of the study is to prospectively compare the success rate of ab externo implantation and outcome measures of glaucoma filtering surgery namely IOP (intraocular pressure), number of glaucoma medications, adjunct procedure and adverse events rate compared to the traditional ab interno implantation technique
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. See after the study
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing XEN gel microstent implantation in people with The Objective of the Study is to Prospectively Compare the Success Rate of ab Externo and Interno Implantation, run by Institut de l'oeil des Laurentides at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compared the success of interno / externo implantation (time frame: 15 minutes by implantation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.