AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Rupture of Achilles TendonNCT04935281

Percutaneous Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture With Assistance of Intraoperative Ultrasound

An observational study of Acute Rupture of Achilles Tendon, run by Tanta University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective randomized controlled study carried out between May 2016 and December 2020. It included 98 patients presented with acute rupture of Achilles tendon The patients were randomly distributed by closed envelop technique (49 in each group). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Rupture of Achilles Tendon
What is being tested?
percutaneous repair with an intraoperative assisted ultrasound and percutaneous repair without an intraoperative assisted ultrasound
How many people
91 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
May 2016to Dec 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Study population: a prospective randomized control study

Who may be able to join

  • age between 18 and 50 years
  • acute ( not more than two weeks) closed complete injury
  • injury of Achilles tendon in zone 2 (the area between 3 and 6 cm from the insertion) according to Langergran and Lindholm

Who cannot join

  • incomplete injury
  • recurrent injury
  • associated fracture ankle or foot
  • previous history of local corticosteroids injection
  • patients with neurovascular problem (e.g. diabetic, autoimmune …etc), smoking, and alcoholics

About this study

Official title: Percutaneous Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture With Assistance of Intraoperative Ultrasound: Does it Improves the Results of Repair?

This is a prospective randomized controlled study carried out between May 2016 and December 2020. It included 98 patients presented with acute rupture of Achilles tendon The patients were randomly distributed by closed envelop technique (49 in each group). Group A included those managed with the assistant of an intra-operative ultrasound. Group B included those done without ultrasound assistant

Read the detailed description

A preoperative prophylactic dose of antibiotic was given intravenously in the form of 2gm of cephalosporin one hour before operation. Under general or regional anesthesia, the patient laid in prone position without a tourniquet and both feet out of the table for easily mobilization of the ankle joint. In group A, an intraoperative ultrasound was done by a radiologist before the repair for identification the course of sural nerve and outline the medial and lateral edges of torn tendon. Then ultrasound was repeated after repair for confirmation of adequate contact of both stumps and satisfactory strength of the repair by visualization of the tendon with passive motion of the ankle. For patients in group B, the course of the sural nerve was determined according to the technique described by Blackmon et al. This technique depends on the leg length for location the point where the nerve crosses the lateral edge of the tendon. The medial and lateral borders of both stumps were outlined by palpation with identification of the gap in-between. The technique of repair was standardized for all patients in both groups. We used the technique described by Maffulli et al

Being tested
percutaneous repair with an intraoperative assisted ultrasound, percutaneous repair without an intraoperative assisted ultrasound

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • percutaneous repair with an intraoperative assisted ultrasoundOther

    Under general or regional anesthesia, the patient laid in prone position In group A, an intraoperative ultrasound was done by a radiologist before the repair .

  • percutaneous repair without an intraoperative assisted ultrasoundOther

    For patients in group B, the course of the sural nerve was determined according to the technique described by Blackmon et al.The medial and lateral borders of both stumps were outlined by palpation with identification of the gap in-between. We used the technique described byMaffulli et al with six stab incisions, one cm each. Four incisions were on medial and lateral edge of the proximal stump and the other two were around distal stump.

Study groups in NCT04935281
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
percutaneous repair with an intraoperative assissted ultrasounda radiologist did an intraoperative ultrasound before the repair for identification the course of sural nerve and outline the medial and lateral edges of torn tendon.
Receives: Other: percutaneous repair with an intraoperative assisted ultrasound
percutaneous repair without an intraoperative assissted ultrasoundthe course of the sural nerve was determined according to the technique described by Blackmon et al .This technique depends on the leg length for location the point where the nerve crosses the lateral edge of the tendon
Receives: Other: percutaneous repair without an intraoperative assisted ultrasound

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. American Orthopedic Foot and An¬kle Society score

    score from 0 to 100 with highest score is better

    Measured: 4 years

  2. single leg rising

    ability to stand on one leg

    Measured: 3 years

  3. magnetic resonance image

    assessment of healing of torn tendon

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jun 2021
  2. Study startMay 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2020
  4. Study completionDec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
91 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04935281
Sponsor's protocol ID
Tanta H
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
27 May 2021
Last updated
22 Jun 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Samy AM. Intra-operative ultrasound: does it improve the results of percutaneous repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):4061-4068. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01926-x. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

    PubMed 35275242

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Rupture of Achilles Tendon, run by Tanta University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

American Orthopedic Foot and An¬kle Society score (time frame: 4 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04935281, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in