AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic StenosisCEPTAVINCT04930510

Coronary Artery Disease in Elderly People Referred for TAVI

An observational study of Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Ang, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators prognostic impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) and of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with indication of TAVI is controversial, particularly in elderly population where CAD and aortic stenosis (AS) are frequent and commonly coexisted. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 80 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aortic Stenosis, Coronary Ang
How many people
170 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Nov 2020to 1 Nov 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 80 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Study population: Patients aged of 80 years or over who are admitted in cardiology for TAVI

Who may be able to join

  • patient aged 80 and over
  • hospital admission for evaluation before TAVI indicated for symptomatic and severe aortic stenosis
  • patient's consent

Who cannot join

  • absence of coronarography
  • severe angina (class 3 or 4)
  • stenosis of left main coronary artery > 50%
  • stenosis of the left anterior descending artery > 90%
  • decision of surgical valve replacement

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Uhmontpellier

    Montpellier, 34295

    Florence Leclercq, PUPH, 04.67.33.67.33 ext. 33, f-leclercq@chu-montpellier.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: IncIncidence and Prognosis of Coronary Artery Disease in Elderly People Over 80 Years Referred for TAVI

The investigators prognostic impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) and of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with indication of TAVI is controversial, particularly in elderly population where CAD and aortic stenosis (AS) are frequent and commonly coexisted. (1-2) The primary end point of this prospective study is to compare major cardiovascular event at one year of follow up in patients over 80 years with severe aortic stenosis who referred for TAVI with or without associated CAD.

The investigators will also assess (secondary endpoint) the impact of PCI on symptoms, major events and quality of life using geriatric parameters. The study will be conducted in the University hospital of Montpellier between November 2020 and November 2022

Read the detailed description

Patients will be prospectively included in the study when aged of 80 years old or over and referred for TAVI at the university hospital of Montpellier.

Two groups of patients will be considered after coronary angiography which is systematic before TAVI Group 1: patients with significant > 50 % narrowing coronary stenosis ( revascularization by PCI / no revascularization) Group 2: No coronary lesion

Considering an end point at 1 year and a precision wished to i ± 6 percent with an alpha risk of 5 %, it's proposed , by the formula p= [(1.96)2 x [p(1-p)] / i2 ], a number of 170 subjects needed to highlight a incidence of major cardio-vascular event of 20 percent in the studied population.

Data collection by informatic files will include :

  • Cardio vascular risk factor and medical history with evaluation of Charlston score
  • Previous drug therapy
  • Lifestyle : living alone or not, nursing home, ; home help
  • Symptoms (angina (CSS classification) ; dyspnea (NHYA classification))
  • Renal function (DFG) at admission
  • Results of coronary angiography (number of lesions, proximal or non proximal, location of coronary stenosis)
  • Geriatric assessment : autonomy, disability in daily living, weigh, BMI, falls, cognitive functions tests, assessment of the mood state by GDS
  • Results of TAVI (success and complications of the procedure according to VARC2 criteria)
  • Results of coronary revascularization if performed
  • Length of hospitalisation for TAVI (days), length of stay in ICU (Intensive Care Unit) if necessary
  • Events during the hospitalisation for TAVI (VARC and BARC criterias)

Follow up at 6 month (middle analysis) and at one year (primary end point) by phone conversation with the patient for assessment of :

  • Major cardio-vascular events
  • Hospitalisation occurred
  • Short geriatric evaluation including :
  • cognition by Ottawa3DY
  • autonomy by ADL
  • polypharmacy
  • number of fall in the past 6 month
  • last weight
  • quality of life (Fried criterias)
  • mood state by GDS If neurocognitive disorders are known or discovers, data patient's validity will be check by calling his caregiver and/or his general practitioner (if caregiver not available).

Analysis associated of the computerized patient record.

Keywords
Patients over 80 years, TAVI, coronary artery disease, quality of life
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis, Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT04930510
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1 : Elderly 80 years or over patients referred for TAVI with CADElderly 80 years or over patients referred for TAVI with CAD Group 1: Coronary lesion defined as significant (>50% narrowing) on the coronary angiography performed before TAVI, with or without PCI (decision of the heart team) Description of the coronary lesions included: proximal/non proximal, number of lesions, location of lesion
Group 2 : No significant coronary disease groupNo significant coronary disease group in the cohort of elderly 80 years or over referred for TAVI

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of the incidence of major cardio-vascular event

    Comparison of the incidence of major cardio-vascular event at one year follow up in elderly 80 or over referred for TAVI with (group 1) or without CAD (group 2).

    Major cardio vascular events evaluated at 1 year follow-up include:

    • Death (total and cardiovascular)
    • ischemic stroke,
    • haemorrhagic stroke,
    • acute coronary syndrome,
    • severe angina (> class 2),
    • major bleeding or vascular complications (>BARC2),
    • Re-hospitalisation for cardiac events

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Incidence of CAD

    Incidence of CAD in the elderly over 80 years old during the pre TAVI evaluation Evaluate the coronary disease impact in the elderly over 80 referred for TAVI by the number of patients over 80 years with significant coronary lesions compared to global TAVI population over 80 years

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Length of hospitalisation

    Length of hospitalisation with or without coronary disease, with or without PCI.

    Length of hospitalisation in total and in the ICU if it's happened to evaluated the economic impact of CAD and therapeutic strategy.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Rate of ischaemic

    ischaemic event (acute coronary syndrome, severe angina)

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Rate of vascular/bleeding events according to strategy of care (PCI/no PCI)

    minor bleeding (BARC 1 and 2) and major (BARC 3 et 4) event or vascular complication (VARC 2).

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Re-hospitalization for cardiac events

    Re-hospitalization for cardiac events

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Quality of life with assessment of clinical status

    Quality of life with assessment of clinical status by geriatrics tests geriatrics tests by phone interview of the patient

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jun 2021
  2. Study start1 Nov 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
170 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04930510
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECHMPL21_0208
Acronym
CEPTAVI
Status last verified
May 2021
First submitted
25 May 2021
Last updated
18 Jun 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: NC

Publications

  • Cao D, Chiarito M, Pagnotta P, Reimers B, Stefanini GG. Coronary Revascularisation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Candidates: Why, Who, When? Interv Cardiol. 2018 May;13(2):69-76. doi: 10.15420/icr.2018:2:2.

    PubMed 29928311
  • Matta AG, Lhermusier T, Parada FC, Bouisset F, Canitrot R, Nader V, Blanco S, Elbaz M, Roncalli J, Carrie D. Impact of Coronary Artery Disease and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Mar 24;2021:6672400. doi: 10.1155/2021/6672400. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 33824628

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Ang, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Florence Leclercq, PU PH (4.67.33.67.33 ext. 33, f-leclercq@chu-montpellier.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of the incidence of major cardio-vascular event (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04930510, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in