AzTrials
AzTrials

EmpathyNCT04921423

The Study on the Attitude and Empathy of Nursing Students Towards the Elderly

A study testing Situational simulation teaching in people with Empathy and Attitude, run by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences at 1 site in Taiwan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The effect of situational simulation teaching intervention on the attitude and empathy of nursing students towards the elderly can be divided into two stages. The first stage is a cross-sectional study on the aging knowledge, attitude and empathy of nursing students. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 19 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Empathy, Attitude
What is being tested?
Situational simulation teaching
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
142 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
4 Mar 2021to 25 Jun 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 19 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Sophomores of Nursing College

Who cannot join

  • Students with nursing practice experience

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • St. Mary's Medicine Nursing and Management College

    Yilan, Sanxing Township, 266

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: To Investigate the Effect of Situational Simulation Teaching Intervention on Nursing Students' Attitude and Empathy Towards the Elderly

The effect of situational simulation teaching intervention on the attitude and empathy of nursing students towards the elderly can be divided into two stages. The first stage is a cross-sectional study on the aging knowledge, attitude and empathy of nursing students. The second stage was the change of nursing students' attitude and empathy towards the elderly after the intervention of situational simulation teaching. The intervention measures included communication theory and skills, aging trend and knowledge, teaching plans for elderly nursing, activities for the elderly and visual experience, application and debriefing of empathy. This study collected and analyzed the data of aging knowledge, attitude and empathy towards the elderly at the end of the term and one month later, in order to explore the changes of attitude and empathy towards the elderly of nursing students after the intervention of situational simulation teaching.

Read the detailed description

Taiwan has entered an aging society and will enter a super aging society in 2026. With the increase of chronic diseases and aging of the elderly, they are gradually weakened. When they are unable to take care of themselves in the future, the demand for institutional care is increasing, and the future labor force is gradually decreasing. The training of care manpower is facing a test. The purpose of this study is to explore the aging knowledge, attitude towards the elderly and empathy of nursing students, and then to explore the change of students' aging knowledge, attitude towards the elderly and empathy after the intervention of simulated situational teaching course, and to explore the change of their willingness to join the elderly career in the future.

In the first stage, a cross-sectional study was conducted to extract 139 nursing science students from an Eastern college. In order to explore the aging knowledge, attitude and empathy towards the elderly, and future career involvement willingness of nursing students, Pearson product difference correlation analysis and Spearman grade correlation coefficient analysis were used to predict the relationship between variables, and multiple linear regression model was used to analyze the data. In the second stage of the study, the subjects were the same as those in the first stage. The experimental group and the control group were randomly assigned by drawing lots, with at least 51 participants. At the beginning, the end and one month after the course, we explored the change of students' ability to take care of the elderly and their willingness to devote to the elderly related career in the future. For inferential analysis, independent sample t-test and chi square test were used to analyze whether there were statistically significant differences in basic information, aging knowledge and attitude towards the elderly between the intervention group and the control group, and then generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to check the effectiveness of situational simulation course after controlling relevant interference factors. It is expected that nursing students can experience the inconvenience of daily life of the elderly in the way of situational simulation, use empathy skills, carry out role play of teaching plan, and simulate the care behavior and empathy of the elderly in the clinical situation, so as to improve their willingness to choose jobs related to the elderly after graduation.

Conditions
Empathy, Attitude
Being tested
Situational simulation teaching
Keywords
situational simulation teaching, Attitude towards the elderly, Empathy towards the elderly
Medical subject headings
Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Situational simulation teachingBehavioural

    The intervention included communication theory and skills, aging trend and knowledge, teaching plans for elderly nursing, activities for the elderly and visual experience, application and debriefing of empathy.

Study groups in NCT04921423
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
situational simulation teachingExperimentalClinical case role play and empathy skill practice
Receives: Behavioral: Situational simulation teaching
Clinical Case (Problem Based Learning)No interventionClinical Case discuss (Problem Based Learning)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Aging knowledge

    The Aging Knowledge Questionnaire contains 16 true or false questions, and each correct answer gets one point. The higher the score, the better the knowledge of aging. There is no subscale. The score of range from 0-16.

    Measured: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)

  2. The Aging knowledge

    The Aging Knowledge Questionnaire contains 16 true or false questions, and each correct answer gets one point. The higher the score, the better the knowledge of aging. There is no subscale. The score of range from 0-16.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months(T1)

  3. The Aging knowledge

    The Aging Knowledge Questionnaire contains 16 true or false questions, and each correct answer gets one point. The higher the score, the better the knowledge of aging. There is no subscale. The score of range from 0-16.

    Measured: One month after the completion of the intervention(T2)

  4. Old People Scale

    There are 11 questions in the scale of attitude towards the elderly. The higher the score of Likerts Scale 1-7, the more negative the attitude towards the elderly. The score of range from 1-49.

    Measured: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)

  5. Old People Scale

    There are 11 questions in the scale of attitude towards the elderly. The higher the score of Likerts Scale 1-7, the more negative the attitude towards the elderly.The score of range from 1-49.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months(T1)

  6. Old People Scale

    There are 11 questions in the scale of attitude towards the elderly. The higher the score of Likerts Scale 1-7, the more negative the attitude towards the elderly.The score of range from 1-49.

    Measured: One month after the completion of the intervention(T2)

  7. Chinese Version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy

    There are 20 questions in the empathy scale consists of three sub-scales.The higher the score of Likerts Scale 1-7, the better the empathy. The score of range from 1-140.

    Measured: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)

  8. Chinese Version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy

    There are 20 questions in the empathy scale consists of three sub-scales.The higher the score of Likerts Scale 1-7, the better the empathy.The score of range from 1-140.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months(T1)

  9. Chinese Version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy

    There are 20 questions in the empathy scale consists of three sub-scales.The higher the score of Likerts Scale 1-7, the better the empathy.The score of range from 1-140.

    Measured: One month after the completion of the intervention(T2)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Clinical Situational Empathy Scales

    There are two teaching plans of the Clinical Situation Empathy Scale, which has 4 subs-cales and total of 32 questions. The score of the Likerts Scale is 1-4, and the higher the score, the better the demonstration of empathy.The score of range from 1-128.

    Measured: One month after the completion of the intervention(T2)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jun 2021
  2. Study start4 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion4 Apr 2021
  4. Study completion25 Jun 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
142 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04921423
Sponsor's protocol ID
SMHIRB109012
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
20 May 2021
Last updated
10 Jun 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Jeffries PR. A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005 Mar-Apr;26(2):96-103.

    PubMed 15921126
  • Cant RP, Cooper SJ. Simulation-based learning in nurse education: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jan;66(1):3-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05240.x.

    PubMed 20423432
  • Lee KC, Yu CC, Hsieh PL, Li CC, Chao YC. Situated teaching improves empathy learning of the students in a BSN program: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 May;64:138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

    PubMed 29476960
  • Zhang S, Liu YH, Zhang HF, Meng LN, Liu PX. Determinants of undergraduate nursing students' care willingness towards the elderly in China: Attitudes, gratitude and knowledge. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Aug;43:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.021. Epub 2016 May 2.

    PubMed 27286941
  • Mennenga HA, Bassett S, Pasquariello L. Empathy Development Through Case Study and Simulation. Nurse Educ. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):139-42. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000226.

    PubMed 26448156
  • Elliott R, Bohart AC, Watson JC, Greenberg LS. Empathy. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011 Mar;48(1):43-9. doi: 10.1037/a0022187.

    PubMed 21401273

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Situational simulation teaching in people with Empathy and Attitude, run by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Aging knowledge (time frame: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04921423, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in