Chronic Kidney DiseasePhase 2NCT04919564
Low Dose Continuous Furosemide Effect on Cardiac Surgery Patients With Kidney Dysfunction
A Phase 2 study testing Furosemide in 0.9 % NaCl 100 Mg/100 mL (1 mg/mL) and NaCl 0.9% in people with Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiac Disease, run by National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.
Trial summary
Chronic kidney disease is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease associated with increased mortality rate during cardiac surgery in proportion to the kidney function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Kidney Disease, Cardiac Disease
- What is being tested?
- Furosemide in 0.9 % NaCl 100 Mg/100 mL (1 mg/mL) and NaCl 0.9%
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndonesia
- Study dates
- 27 May 2021to 28 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 to 65 years old.
- Patient planned with elective cardiac surgery such as CABG, one cardiac valve replacement, one cardiac valve repair or two valves, CABG and replacement/repair one cardiac valve.
- Cardiac surgery performed using cardiopulmonary bypass machine.
- Patient with mild to moderate kidney dysfunction (GFR 30-89 mL/min/1.73m2) and never got renal replacement therapy before.
Who cannot join
- Cardiac ejection fraction <40%.
- Patient with new preoperative acute renal failure by any cause.
- Sudden shift in cardiac surgery timing (emergency cardiac surgery or repeated procedure).
- Complex cardiac disease associated with intra aortic balloon pump use, replacement of more than two cardiac valves, coronary artery disease with severe valve disease, and patient with pulmonary hypertension, and cardiac surgery procedures for congenital heart disease.
- Patient with aortic abnormality, and/or has direct effect on renal artery.
- Patients concurrently enrolled in other study with other drugs being studied.
- Patient with hemodynamic disturbance caused by hemorrhage, sepsis, anaphylactic, or cardiogenic shock.
- Patient refuses to participate in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Indonesia1 site
National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Jakarta
Jakarta, 11420
About this study
Chronic kidney disease is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease associated with increased mortality rate during cardiac surgery in proportion to the kidney function. Chronic kidney disease is defined by decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as classified by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO). Deterioration of kidney function has a complex and multifactorial pathophysiologic derangement. In order to counter kidney injury associated with cardiac surgery, several pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions have been studied to prevent perioperative deterioration of kidney function. Diuretics as pharmacologic measure are often used post-cardiac surgery to treat fluid overload and managing patient with acute kidney injury by preventing anuria. Loop diuretics (furosemide) may improve renal blood flow, decrease reabsorption in renal tubules, decrease oxygen demand and energy consumption (blocking potassium/sodium/2cloride co-transport in loop of Henle), and prevent hypoxic injury of renal medulla. Low dose continuous furosemide hypothetically has a protective effect on cardiac surgery patients with kidney dysfunction, measured improved glomerular filtration rate, decreased indication for therapeutic furosemide infusion, and decreased need of renal replacement therapy. On the other hand, administration of furosemide is rather harmful in severe kidney dysfunction. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the protective effect of low-dose continuous furosemide perioperative in cardiac surgery patients with mild to moderate kidney dysfunction.
Read the detailed description
The study was a double-blind randomized controlled trial to determine the protective effect of low-dose continuous furosemide perioperative in cardiac surgery patients with mild to moderate kidney dysfunction. Ethical clearance for the study was approved by Institutional Review Board of National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita. Patients eligible for the study was recruited and written informed consent was obtained after clear explanation of the study. Allocation of furosemide and control group was done using simple computer randomization by staff who was not involved in the study. Furosemide infusion and normal saline was prepared by independent pharmacist blinded to the study. Furosemide solution was prepared to contain 40 mg of furosemide diluted with normal saline to a total volume of 40 cc (1 mg / 1 cc) and control solution was prepared to contain only 40 cc of normal saline. Both solution was packaged in 50-cc syringe and prepared in similar fashion. The solution was administered after induction of anesthesia with rate of 2 cc per hour for 12 hours.
Baseline participant were collected before surgery. All cardiac surgery procedure was done in concordance to hospital standard operating procedure. The primary outcomes of the study were glomerular filtration rate, need of diuretic infusion dose after intervention, need of renal replacement therapy and the secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay and in hospital mortality. The calculated sample size estimated was 41 participants per group, accounting for drop-out rate, expected sample size was 45 participants per group (90 participants in total).
- Conditions
- Chronic Kidney Disease, Cardiac Disease
- Being tested
- Furosemide in 0.9 % NaCl 100 Mg/100 mL (1 mg/mL), NaCl 0.9%
- Keywords
- Furosemide, Kidney Dysfunction, Glomerular Filtration Rate
- Medical subject headings
- Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Heart Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Furosemide in 0.9 % NaCl 100 Mg/100 mL (1 mg/mL)Drug
Also called Lasix injection
Furosemide 2 mg/hour infusion for 12 hours since induction
NaCl 0.9%Drug
NaCl 0.9% 2 cc/hour for a period of 12 hours since anesthetic induction
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Furosemide group | Experimental | Continuous furosemide 2 mg/hour for a period of 12 hours begins since anesthetic induction Receives: Drug: Furosemide in 0.9 % NaCl 100 Mg/100 mL (1 mg/mL) |
| Placebo group | Placebo comparator | Continuous NaCl 0.9% 2 cc/hour for a period of 12 hours begins since anesthetic induction Receives: Drug: NaCl 0.9% |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Glomerular Filtration Rate at Baseline
Glomerular Filtration Rate measured at baseline
Measured: baseline / before induction to anesthesia
Glomerular Filtration Rate at 12 Hours From Drug Infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate measured at 12 hours from the initiation of drug infusion
Measured: 12 hours from drug infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate at 24 Hours From Drug Infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate measured at 24 hours from the initiation of drug infusion
Measured: 24 hours after from infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate at 48 Hours From Drug Infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate measured at 48 hours from the initiation of drug infusion
Measured: 48 hours from drug infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate at 120 Hours From Drug Infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate measured at 120 hours from the initiation of drug infusion
Measured: 120 hours from drug infusion
Therapeutic Dose of Continuous Diuretic Infusion
number of participants with Therapeutic Dose of Continuous Diuretic Infusion
Measured: 28 days (or until hospital discharge)
Renal Replacement Therapy
number of participant with Renal Replacement Therapy
Measured: 28 days (or until hospital discharge)
Secondary outcomes (2)
ICU Length of Stay
The length of stay in ICU
Measured: 28 days (or until hospital discharge)
In Hospital Mortality
number of In Hospital mortality
Measured: 28 days (or until hospital discharge)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jun 2021
- Study start27 May 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2021
- Study completion28 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic Kidney DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital Indonesia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prieta Adriane MD, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital Indonesia
- Investigators
- Bambang Widyantoro, PhD, Study director, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04919564
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LB.02.01/VII/533/KEP024/2021
- Other IDs
- NationalCCHK
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 27 May 2021
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Low Dose Continuous Furosemide Effect on Cardiac Surgery Patients With Kidney Dysfunction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04919564
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LB.02.01/VII/533/KEP024/2021
- Conditions
- Chronic Kidney Disease, Cardiac Disease
- Keywords
- Furosemide, Kidney Dysfunction, Glomerular Filtration Rate
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital IndonesiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 5 Jan 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic kidney disease is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease associated with increased mortality rate during cardiac surgery in proportion to the kidney function. Chronic kidney disease is defined by decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as classified by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO). Deterioration of kidney function has a complex and multifactorial pathophysiologic derangement. In order to counter kidney injury associated with cardiac surgery, several pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions have been studied to prevent perioperative deterioration of kidney function. Diuretics as pharmacologic measure are often used post-cardiac surgery to treat fluid overload and managing patient with acute kidney injury by preventing anuria. Loop diuretics (furosemide) may improve renal blood flow, decrease reabsorption in renal tubules, decrease oxygen demand and energy consumption (blocking potassium/sodium/2cloride co-transport in loop of Henle), and prevent hypoxic injury of renal medulla. Low dose continuous furosemide hypothetically has a protective effect on cardiac surgery patients with kidney dysfunction, measured improved glomerular filtration rate, decreased indication for therapeutic furosemide infusion, and decreased need of renal replacement therapy. On the other hand, administration of furosemide is rather harmful in severe kidney dysfunction. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the protective effect of low-dose continuous furosemide perioperative in cardiac surgery patients with mild to moderate kidney dysfunction.
Detailed description
The study was a double-blind randomized controlled trial to determine the protective effect of low-dose continuous furosemide perioperative in cardiac surgery patients with mild to moderate kidney dysfunction. Ethical clearance for the study was approved by Institutional Review Board of National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita. Patients eligible for the study was recruited and written informed consent was obtained after clear explanation of the study. Allocation of furosemide and control group was done using simple computer randomization by staff who was not involved in the study. Furosemide infusion and normal saline was prepared by independent pharmacist blinded to the study. Furosemide solution was prepared to contain 40 mg of furosemide diluted with normal saline to a total volume of 40 cc (1 mg / 1 cc) and control solution was prepared to contain only 40 cc of normal saline. Both solution was packaged in 50-cc syringe and prepared in similar fashion. The solution was administered after induction of anesthesia with rate of 2 cc per hour for 12 hours.
Baseline participant were collected before surgery. All cardiac surgery procedure was done in concordance to hospital standard operating procedure. The primary outcomes of the study were glomerular filtration rate, need of diuretic infusion dose after intervention, need of renal replacement therapy and the secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay and in hospital mortality. The calculated sample size estimated was 41 participants per group, accounting for drop-out rate, expected sample size was 45 participants per group (90 participants in total).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Furosemide group | Experimental | Drug: Furosemide in 0.9 % NaCl 100 Mg/100 mL (1 mg/mL)Continuous furosemide 2 mg/hour for a period of 12 hours begins since anesthetic induction |
| Placebo group | Placebo comparator | Drug: NaCl 0.9%Continuous NaCl 0.9% 2 cc/hour for a period of 12 hours begins since anesthetic induction |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 18 to 65 years old.
- Patient planned with elective cardiac surgery such as CABG, one cardiac valve replacement, one cardiac valve repair or two valves, CABG and replacement/repair one cardiac valve.
- Cardiac surgery performed using cardiopulmonary bypass machine.
- Patient with mild to moderate kidney dysfunction (GFR 30-89 mL/min/1.73m2) and never got renal replacement therapy before.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Cardiac ejection fraction <40%.
- Patient with new preoperative acute renal failure by any cause.
- Sudden shift in cardiac surgery timing (emergency cardiac surgery or repeated procedure).
- Complex cardiac disease associated with intra aortic balloon pump use, replacement of more than two cardiac valves, coronary artery disease with severe valve disease, and patient with pulmonary hypertension, and cardiac surgery procedures for congenital heart disease.
- Patient with aortic abnormality, and/or has direct effect on renal artery.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Furosemide in 0.9 % NaCl 100 Mg/100 mL (1 mg/mL)Also: Lasix injectionFurosemide 2 mg/hour infusion for 12 hours since induction | Drug | Furosemide group |
| NaCl 0.9%NaCl 0.9% 2 cc/hour for a period of 12 hours since anesthetic induction | Drug | Placebo group |
Primary outcome
Glomerular Filtration Rate at Baseline
Time frame: baseline / before induction to anesthesia
Glomerular Filtration Rate measured at baseline
Glomerular Filtration Rate at 12 Hours From Drug Infusion
Time frame: 12 hours from drug infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate measured at 12 hours from the initiation of drug infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate at 24 Hours From Drug Infusion
Time frame: 24 hours after from infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate measured at 24 hours from the initiation of drug infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate at 48 Hours From Drug Infusion
Time frame: 48 hours from drug infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate measured at 48 hours from the initiation of drug infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate at 120 Hours From Drug Infusion
Time frame: 120 hours from drug infusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate measured at 120 hours from the initiation of drug infusion
Therapeutic Dose of Continuous Diuretic Infusion
Time frame: 28 days (or until hospital discharge)
number of participants with Therapeutic Dose of Continuous Diuretic Infusion
Renal Replacement Therapy
Time frame: 28 days (or until hospital discharge)
number of participant with Renal Replacement Therapy
2 secondary outcomes
ICU Length of Stay
Time frame: 28 days (or until hospital discharge)
In Hospital Mortality
Time frame: 28 days (or until hospital discharge)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Kidney Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Empagliflozin in Hemodialysis
End Stage Renal Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Assess the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Atrasentan in Pediatric Patients With Primary IgAN
Berger Disease, Bergers Disease
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Not yet recruiting
An Individuation Intervention to Reduce Socioeconomic Disparities in Chronic Kidney Disease Care
Chronic Kidney Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bambang Widyantoro, PhD study director
National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Furosemide in 0.9 % NaCl 100 Mg/100 mL (1 mg/mL) and NaCl 0.9% in people with Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiac Disease, run by National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Indonesia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jan 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Glomerular Filtration Rate at Baseline (time frame: baseline / before induction to anesthesia). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2024.