AzTrials
AzTrials

Indications and Effectiveness for Extended Posterior Circumferential DecompressionNCT04910737

Safety and Effectiveness of Extended Circumferential Decompression for Thoracic Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

An observational study of Indications and Effectiveness for Extended Posterior Circumferential Decompression, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study was to evaluate the indications, efficiency and safety of the extended posterior circumferential decompression technique for the treatment of thoracic ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (TOPLL) with dura adhesions or ossification. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
extended posterior circumferential decompressive surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
8 Jun 2020to 1 Apr 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: No limit

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • spinal deformities; (2) thoracic spine fractures; (3) syringomyelia, spinal tumor, myelitis, etc.; (4) coexisted with cervical spondylosis and lumbar stenosis; (5) post operation of thoracic spinal stenosis; (6) recurrent myelopathy caused by lesions in other levels than the decompressed segments.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University, School of medicine

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, +86 310000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Safety and Effectiveness of Extended Circumferential Decompression for Thoracic Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament:a Single-center Experience

The study was to evaluate the indications, efficiency and safety of the extended posterior circumferential decompression technique for the treatment of thoracic ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (TOPLL) with dura adhesions or ossification.

Read the detailed description

The clinical characteristics of patients with TOPLL combined with dura adhesions who underwent extended circumferential decompression in our hospital were retrospectively investigated. TOPLL adhered with dura matter or dura ossification were detected intraoperatively in all the cases. Imaging evaluation included the ossification-kyphosis angle and the fixed-segment kyphosis angle. A modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score (JOA score) was applied for the evaluation of clinical outcomes.

Being tested
extended posterior circumferential decompressive surgery
Keywords
circumferential decompression, thoracic ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, kyphosis, neurological outcomes
Medical subject headings
Kyphosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • extended posterior circumferential decompressive surgeryProcedure or surgery

    After the pedicle screws were implanted, laminectomy was performed. Kyphotic correction was done through a temporary rod to reduce the tension of spinal cord. The posterior 1/3 of the vertebral body was resected using a high-speed drill, preserving the anterior wall of the spinal canal to protect the cord from disturbance. The dissection of adhesion at the anterior side of spinal cord was to be done through a posterolateral direction. The region of posterior resection was expanded, including bilateral residual articular processes, transverse processes and pedicles. Slightly press down the ossified lesion, and detach it from the dura mater (perform a sharp dissection if necessary) followed by completely removal. If cerebrospinal fluid leakage was encountered during the process, autologous fat, fascia or gelatin sponge can be applied locally for packaging.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. A modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score

    Spinal neurological function evaluation by Japanese Orthopedic Association

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jun 2021
  2. Study start8 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04910737
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020-439
Status last verified
May 2021
First submitted
28 May 2021
Last updated
2 Jun 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Indications and Effectiveness for Extended Posterior Circumferential Decompression, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

A modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in