DysphagiaNCT04901182
Nutrition-dense Smoothie Diets Reduced Dysphagia Risk in the Elderly
A study testing the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in people with Dysphagia, run by Mahidol University at 1 site in Thailand.
Trial summary
The investigators aimed to compare the effect of consuming high protein (23-34% energy ratio) and low carbohydrate (25-38% energy ratio) smoothie formulas vs. consuming Ensure (a conventional well-known commercial formula) on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dysphagia
- What is being tested?
- the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 63 participants
- Where
- 1 siteThailand
- Study dates
- 8 Jan 2019to 30 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- swallowing difficulty group (SSD) who with symptomatic swallowing difficulties or with a history of swallowing difficulties, coughing or choking when eating or drinking or a sign of malnutrition
- control group (WSD) who without a history of swallowing difficulties, coughing or choking when eating or drinking or a sign of malnutrition
Who cannot join
- People with chronic illnesses and tube feeding
- People with anterior bone deformity e.g. facial fracture, sino-nasal or anterior skill-based tumor/surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Thailand1 site
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Nutrition-dense, Blenderized Enteral Nutrition From Natural Ingredients on Swallowing Capacity to Prevent Suffocation in the Elderly by Using Flexible Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES)
The investigators aimed to compare the effect of consuming high protein (23-34% energy ratio) and low carbohydrate (25-38% energy ratio) smoothie formulas vs. consuming Ensure (a conventional well-known commercial formula) on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in the elderly people with dysphagia risk.
Read the detailed description
The investigators aimed to determine the effect of 3 high protein (23-34% energy ratio) and low carbohydrate (25-38% energy ratio) smoothie formulas ((1) white sesame soy milk smoothie (WS), (2) black sesame soy milk smoothie (low carbohydrate, BSLC), and (3) Chicken shitake smoothie (CS); 1 kcal/ml) from natural ingredients as compared with Ensure. The double blind randomized placebo controlled cross-over design study involved 63 subjects aged above 65 years old. They were also divided into asymptomatic (n=32) or symptomatic swallowing difficulty (n=31) group based on self-reported swallowing difficulty symptoms. All subjects assessed five drinks (WS, BSLC, CS vs. Ensure) for sensory testing, product acceptance and marketing survey using questionnaires. Swallowing capacity was determined by using Flexible Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES) only for each of the three drinks (SW, CS vs. Ensure) in a blinded random sequence.
- Conditions
- Dysphagia
- Being tested
- the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
- Keywords
- aging, smoothie drink, dysphagia, swallowing capacity
- Medical subject headings
- Deglutition Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)Diagnostic test
the effect of consuming white sesame soy milk smoothie (WS), Chicken shitake smoothie (CS) vs. Ensure on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| White sesame soy milk smoothie (WS) | Active comparator | a formula developed from natural ingredients such as soybean and white sesame Receives: Diagnostic Test: the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) |
| Chicken shitake smoothie (CS) | Active comparator | a formula developed from natural ingredients such as chicken and shitake mushroom Receives: Diagnostic Test: the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) |
| Ensure | Placebo comparator | a conventional well-known commercial formula Receives: Diagnostic Test: the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Level of severity of dysphagia as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES
Sum of FEES score from three symptoms consists of premature spillage of material, retention/pooling of material and/or secretion, and entrance of material and/or secretion into the larynx or trachea.
A healthcare professional evaluated in the five-point scoring system of each symptom.
FEES score = 5 means there were not exhibit disorder, FEES score = 1 means there were abnormalities at severe level
Measured: Baseline
Secondary outcomes (3)
Premature spillage of material as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES
levels of severity of food passed down through the pharynx before swallowing using the five-point scoring system FEES score = 5 means there were not exhibit disorder, FEES score = 1 means there were abnormalities at severe level
Measured: Baseline
Retention/pooling of material and/or secretion as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES
levels of severity of food or saliva residue in the vallecular and/or pyriform regions of the pharynx after swallowing using the five-point scoring system FEES score = 5 means there were not exhibit disorder, FEES score = 1 means there were abnormalities at severe level
Measured: Baseline
Entrance of material and/or secretion into the larynx or trachea; presence/absence of reflex cough as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES
levels of severity of food passes through the larynx or trachea when swallowed with or without the cough reflex using the five-point scoring system FEES score = 5 means there were not exhibit disorder, FEES score = 1 means there were abnormalities at severe level
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 May 2021
- Study start8 Jan 2019
- Primary completion30 Apr 2019
- Study completion30 Apr 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DysphagiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mahidol UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mahidol University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Korapat Mayurasakorn, MD., Principal investigator, Doctor in Family Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04901182
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 460/2560(EC3)
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 18 May 2021
- Last updated
- 25 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mongkolsucharitkul P, Pinsawas B, Watcharachaisoponsiri T, Suta S, Pumeiam S, Ophakas S, Surawit A, Ongard S, Keskool P, Thitisakulchai P, Srichayet P, Mayurasakorn K. Evaluating swallowing capacity in older adults with dysphagia: high protein, low carbohydrate smoothie formulas versus commercial formula. BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06126-x.
PubMed 40604458
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Nutrition-dense, Blenderized Enteral Nutrition From Natural Ingredients on Swallowing Capacity to Prevent Suffocation in the Elderly by Using Flexible Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04901182
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 460/2560(EC3)
- Conditions
- Dysphagia
- Keywords
- aging, smoothie drink, dysphagia, swallowing capacity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mahidol UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators aimed to compare the effect of consuming high protein (23-34% energy ratio) and low carbohydrate (25-38% energy ratio) smoothie formulas vs. consuming Ensure (a conventional well-known commercial formula) on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in the elderly people with dysphagia risk.
Detailed description
The investigators aimed to determine the effect of 3 high protein (23-34% energy ratio) and low carbohydrate (25-38% energy ratio) smoothie formulas ((1) white sesame soy milk smoothie (WS), (2) black sesame soy milk smoothie (low carbohydrate, BSLC), and (3) Chicken shitake smoothie (CS); 1 kcal/ml) from natural ingredients as compared with Ensure. The double blind randomized placebo controlled cross-over design study involved 63 subjects aged above 65 years old. They were also divided into asymptomatic (n=32) or symptomatic swallowing difficulty (n=31) group based on self-reported swallowing difficulty symptoms. All subjects assessed five drinks (WS, BSLC, CS vs. Ensure) for sensory testing, product acceptance and marketing survey using questionnaires. Swallowing capacity was determined by using Flexible Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES) only for each of the three drinks (SW, CS vs. Ensure) in a blinded random sequence.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| White sesame soy milk smoothie (WS) | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)a formula developed from natural ingredients such as soybean and white sesame |
| Chicken shitake smoothie (CS) | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)a formula developed from natural ingredients such as chicken and shitake mushroom |
| Ensure | Placebo comparator | Diagnostic Test: the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)a conventional well-known commercial formula |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- swallowing difficulty group (SSD) who with symptomatic swallowing difficulties or with a history of swallowing difficulties, coughing or choking when eating or drinking or a sign of malnutrition
- control group (WSD) who without a history of swallowing difficulties, coughing or choking when eating or drinking or a sign of malnutrition
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- People with chronic illnesses and tube feeding
- People with anterior bone deformity e.g. facial fracture, sino-nasal or anterior skill-based tumor/surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)the effect of consuming white sesame soy milk smoothie (WS), Chicken shitake smoothie (CS) vs. Ensure on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) | Diagnostic test | Chicken shitake smoothie (CS), Ensure, White sesame soy milk smoothie (WS) |
Primary outcome
Level of severity of dysphagia as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES
Time frame: Baseline
Sum of FEES score from three symptoms consists of premature spillage of material, retention/pooling of material and/or secretion, and entrance of material and/or secretion into the larynx or trachea. A healthcare professional evaluated in the five-point scoring system of each symptom. FEES score = 5 means there were not exhibit disorder, FEES score = 1 means there were abnormalities at severe level
3 secondary outcomes
Premature spillage of material as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES
Time frame: Baseline
Retention/pooling of material and/or secretion as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES
Time frame: Baseline
Entrance of material and/or secretion into the larynx or trachea; presence/absence of reflex cough as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 May 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40604458Mongkolsucharitkul P, Pinsawas B, Watcharachaisoponsiri T, Suta S, Pumeiam S, Ophakas S, Surawit A, Ongard S, Keskool P, Thitisakulchai P, Srichayet P, Mayurasakorn K. Evaluating swallowing capacity in older adults with dysphagia: high protein, low carbohydrate smoothie formulas versus commercial formula. BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06126-x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dysphagia
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Administration of K-CAB Tab./K-CAB ODT(Tegoprazan) 25 mg as Maintenance Therapy Following the Treatment of GERD
Maintenance Therapy Following Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(GERD)
Recruiting
The Esophageal String Test as a Diagnostic Screening Tool for Eosinophilic Esophagitis Among Africans With Dysphagia in Mali and the United States
Dysphagia, Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Recruiting
taVNS in Infants Severe Dysphagia
Dysphagia, Swallowing Disorders
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Early Feeding TL Trial
Total Laryngectomy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
RETHINK REFLUX Registry
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Korapat Mayurasakorn, MD. principal investigator
Doctor in Family Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in people with Dysphagia, run by Mahidol University at 1 site in Thailand.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Level of severity of dysphagia as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04901182, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2021.