Meningococcal VaccinePhase 4NCT04893811
Trial to Describe the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Trumenba When Administered to Immunocompromised Participants ≥10 Years of Age
A Phase 4 study testing Trumenba in people with Meningococcal Vaccine, run by Pfizer at 14 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of 2 doses of Trumenba® (on a 0- and 6-month schedule) in immunocompromised participants by functionally assessing antibody production in asplenic and complement-deficient individuals ≥10 years of age. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Meningococcal Vaccine
- What is being tested?
- Trumenba
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 18 Aug 2021to 6 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female participants ≥10 years of age at the time of consent.
- Participants with an increased risk for meningococcal disease due to anatomic asplenia or functional asplenia (eg, sickle cell anemia) or complement deficiencies.
- Negative urine pregnancy test for all female participants.
Who cannot join
- Previous vaccination with any meningococcal serogroup B vaccine.
- Participants who are receiving any allergen immunotherapy with a nonlicensed product or receiving allergen immunotherapy with a licensed product and are not on stable maintenance doses.
- History of microbiologically proven disease caused by N meningitidis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
- Significant neurological disorder or history of seizure (excluding simple febrile seizure).
- Any neuroinflammatory or autoimmune condition, including, but not limited to, transverse myelitis, uveitis, optic neuritis, and multiple sclerosis.
- Any confirmed or suspected human immunodeficiency virus infection.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Other medical or psychiatric condition including recent (within the past year) or active suicidal ideation/behavior or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk of study participation or, in the investigator's judgment, make the participant inappropriate for the study.
- Receipt of immunoglobulin infusion or injection during the 42 days preceding enrollment.
- Current chronic use of systemic antibiotics.
- Previous receipt or current use of complement inhibitors (eg, eculizumab, ravulizumab).
- Participation in other studies involving investigational drug(s) within 28 days prior to study entry and/or during study participation.
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 3 countries.
14 sites in 3 countries
Turkey (Türkiye)7 sites
Baskent Universitesi Dr. Turgut Noyan Adana Uygulama ve Arastirma Merkezi
Adana, Yüreği̇r, 01120
Baskent Universitesi Dr. Turgut Noyan Adana Uygulama ve Arastirma Merkezi
Adana, Yüreği̇r
Baskent Universitesi Dr. Turgut Noyan Adana Uygulama ve Arastirma Merkezi
Adana, 01120
Acibadem Adana Hastanesi
Adana, 01130
Baskent Universitesi Dr. Turgut Noyan Adana Uygulama ve Arastirma Merkezi
Adana, 01240
Hacettepe Universitesi Tip Fakultesi
Ankara, 06230
Mersin Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Mersin, 33343
Poland4 sites
IN-VIVO Sp. z o.o.
Bydgoszcz, 85-048
Centrum Badań Klinicznych Jagiellońskie Centrum Innowacji sp. z o.o.
Krakow, 30-348
WIP Warsaw IBD Point Profesor Kierkus
Warsaw, 00-728
Szpital Bielański im. Ks. Jerzego Popiełuszki SPZOZ
Warsaw, 01-809
Czechia3 sites
Fakultni Nemocnice Brno - Detska Nemocnice - Klinika Detskych Infekcnich Nemoci Center 3
Brno, 613 00
Fakultni Nemocnice Brno - Detska Nemocnice - Klinika Detskych Infekcnich Nemoci Center 3
Brno, 61300
Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
Prague, 150 06
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 4, OPEN-LABEL, SINGLE-ARM TRIAL TO DESCRIBE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF TRUMENBA(REGISTERED) WHEN ADMINISTERED TO IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PARTICIPANTS ≥10 YEARS OF AGE
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of 2 doses of Trumenba® (on a 0- and 6-month schedule) in immunocompromised participants by functionally assessing antibody production in asplenic and complement-deficient individuals ≥10 years of age.
- Conditions
- Meningococcal Vaccine
- Being tested
- Trumenba
- Keywords
- Meningococcal Vaccine, Meningitis Vaccine, Asplenia, Sickle cell anemia, Complement deficiencies
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Hereditary Complement Deficiency Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TrumenbaBiological
Bivalent recombinant lipoprotein 2086 vaccine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Experimental | Bivalent recombinant lipoprotein 2086 vaccine Receives: Biological: Trumenba |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Serum Bactericidal Assay Using Human Complement (hSBA) Titer => Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Neisseria Meningitidis Serogroup B (MnB) Test Strains at Baseline
Four primary MnB strains were PMB80 (A22), PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). The percentage of participants who achieved an hSBA titer PMB80 (A22) more than or equal to (=>)1:16, and hSBA titer PMB2001 (A56), PMB2001 (B24), and PMB2707 (B44) =>1:8 are reported. Evaluable immunogenicity population (EIP) included all participants who were eligible through 1 month after Vaccination 2, received the study vaccination at Visit 1 and Visit 3 as planned, had blood drawn for assay testing within the required time frames at Visit 1 (before Vaccination 1) and 1 month after Vaccination 2 (28-42 days after Visit 3), had at least 1 valid and determinate assay result 1 month after Vaccination 2, received no prohibited vaccines or medications through Visit 4, and had no major protocol deviations through Visit 4.
Measured: Baseline (Before Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Percentage of Participants With hSBA Titer => LLOQ for Each of the 4 Primary MnB Test Strains at 1 Month After Vaccination 2
Four primary MnB strains were PMB80 (A22), PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). The percentage of participants who achieved an hSBA titer PMB80 (A22) =>1:16, and hSBA titer PMB2001 (A56), PMB2001 (B24), and PMB2707 (B44) =>1:8 were reported.
Measured: 1 Month after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Vaccination 1
Local reactions (redness, swelling, and pain) at the site of investigational product administration were recorded in electronic diary (e-diary). Redness and swelling were measured and recorded in caliper units. Each caliper unit = 0.5 centimeter (cm). Redness and swelling were graded as mild (more than [>]2.0 to 5.0cm), moderate (>5.0 to 10.0cm) and severe (>10.0cm). Pain at injection site was graded as mild (did not interfere with activity), moderate (interfered with activity), and severe (prevented daily activity).
Measured: Within 7 Days after Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Vaccination 2
Local reactions (redness, swelling, and pain) at the site of investigational product administration were recorded in electronic diary (e-diary). Redness and swelling were measured and recorded in caliper units. Each caliper unit = 0.5 cm. Redness and swelling were graded as mild (>2.0 to 5.0cm), moderate (>5.0 to 10.0cm) and severe (>10.0cm). Pain at injection site was graded as mild (did not interfere with activity), moderate (interfered with activity), and severe (prevented daily activity).
Measured: Within 7 Days after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Vaccination 1
Systemic events included: fever, fatigue, headache, chills, muscle pain, joint pain, vomiting, and diarrhea. Fever classified as =>38.0 degree Celsius (C), 38.0-38.4, >38.4-38.9, >38.9 40.0 and >40.0-degree C. Fatigue, headache, chills, muscle pain and joint pain graded as mild (did not interfere with activity), moderate (some interference with activity) and severe (prevented daily activity). Vomiting graded as mild (1-2 times in 24 hours [hrs]), moderate (>2 times in 24 hrs) and severe (required intravenous [IV] hydration). Diarrhea graded as mild (2-3 loose stools in 24 hrs), moderate (4-5 loose stools in 24 hrs) and severe (=>6 in 24 hrs).
Measured: Within 7 Days after Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Vaccination 2
Systemic events included: fever, fatigue, headache, chills, muscle pain, joint pain, vomiting, and diarrhea. Fever classified as =>38.0 degree C, 38.0-38.4, >38.4-38.9, >38.9 40.0 and >40.0-degree C. Fatigue, headache, chills, muscle pain and joint pain graded as mild (did not interfere with activity), moderate (some interference with activity) and severe (prevented daily activity). Vomiting graded as mild (1-2 times in 24 hrs), moderate (>2 times in 24 hrs) and severe (required IV hydration). Diarrhea graded as mild (2-3 loose stools in 24 hrs), moderate (4-5 loose stools in 24 hrs) and severe (=>6 in 24 hrs).
Measured: Within 7 Days after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Use of Antipyretic Medication Within 7 Days After Vaccination 1
Measured: Within 7 Days after Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Use of Antipyretic Medication Within 7 Days After Vaccination 2
Measured: Within 7 Days after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) During 30 Days After Vaccination 1
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs excluded local reactions and systematic events.
Measured: 30 Days after Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Percentage of Participants Reporting AEs During 30 Days After Vaccination 2
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs excluded local reactions and systematic events.
Measured: 30 Days after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Percentage of Participants Reporting AEs During 30 Days After Any Vaccination
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs excluded local reactions and systematic events.
Measured: 30 Days after any Vaccination
Percentage of Participants Reporting AEs During the Vaccination Phase
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs excluded local reactions and systematic events.
Measured: Vaccination Phase: From Vaccination 1 through one Month after Vaccination 2 (approximately 7 Months)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 30 Days After Vaccination 1
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening (immediate risk of death), required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions), resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that was considered to be an important medical event.
Measured: 30 Days after Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Percentage of Participants Reporting SAEs During 30 Days After Vaccination 2
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening (immediate risk of death), required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions), resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that was considered to be an important medical event.
Measured: 30 Days after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Percentage of Participants Reporting SAEs During 30 Days After Any Vaccination
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening (immediate risk of death), required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions), resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that was considered to be an important medical event.
Measured: 30 Days after any Vaccination
Percentage of Participants Reporting SAEs During the Vaccination Phase
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening (immediate risk of death), required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions), resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that was considered to be an important medical event.
Measured: Vaccination Phase: From Vaccination 1 through 1 Month after Vaccination 2 (approximately 7 Months)
Percentage of Participants Reporting SAEs During the Follow-up Phase
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening (immediate risk of death), required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions), resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that was considered to be an important medical event.
Measured: Follow-up Phase: From 1 Month after Vaccination 2 through 6 Months after Vaccination 2 (approximately 5 Months)
Percentage of Participants Reporting SAEs During the Entire Study
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening (immediate risk of death), required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions), resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Or that was considered to be an important medical event.
Measured: Entire Study: From Vaccination 1 through 6 Months after Vaccination 2 (approximately 12 Months)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Medically Attended Adverse Event (MAEs) During 30 Days After Vaccination 1
MAEs was defined as a nonserious AE that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Measured: 30 Days after Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Percentage of Participants Reporting MAEs During 30 Days After Vaccination 2
MAEs was defined as a nonserious AE that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Measured: 30 Days after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Percentage of Participants Reporting MAEs During 30 Days After Any Vaccination
MAEs was defined as a nonserious AE that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Measured: 30 Days after any Vaccination
Percentage of Participants Reporting MAEs During the Vaccination Phase
MAEs was defined as a nonserious AE that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Measured: Vaccination Phase: From Vaccination 1 through 1 Month after Vaccination 2 (approximately 7 Months)
Percentage of Participants Reporting MAEs During the Follow-up Phase
MAEs was defined as a nonserious AE that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Measured: Follow-up Phase: From 1 Month after Vaccination 2 through 6 Months after Vaccination 2 (approximately 5 Months)
Percentage of Participants Reporting MAEs During the Entire Study
MAEs was defined as a nonserious AE that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Measured: Entire Study: From Vaccination 1 through 6 Months after Vaccination 2 (approximately 12 Months)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Immediate AEs After Vaccination 1
Immediate AE was defined as AE occurring within the first 30 minutes after study intervention administration.
Measured: 30 Minutes post Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Immediate AEs After Vaccination 2
Immediate AE was defined as AE occurring within the first 30 minutes after study intervention administration.
Measured: 30 Minutes post Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Percentage of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition (NDCMC) During the Vaccination Phase
A NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, not previously identified, that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects.
Measured: Vaccination Phase: From Vaccination 1 through 1 Month after Vaccination 2 (approximately 7 Months)
Percentage of Participants With NDCMC During the Follow-up Phase
A NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, not previously identified, that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects.
Measured: Follow-up Phase: From 1 Month after Vaccination 2 through 6 Months after Vaccination 2 (approximately 5 Months)
Percentage of Participants With NDCMC During the Entire Study
A NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, not previously identified, that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects.
Measured: Entire Study: From Vaccination 1 through 6 Months after Vaccination 2 (approximately 12 Months)
Mean Number of Days Participants Missed School or Work Because of AEs During the Vaccination Phase
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
Measured: Vaccination Phase: From Vaccination 1 through 1 Month after Vaccination 2 (approximately 7 Months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2021
- Study start18 Aug 2021
- Primary completion6 Sep 2023
- Study completion6 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Meningococcal VaccineStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04893811
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B1971060
- Other IDs
- 2018-002588-24, 2018
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 14 May 2021
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 4, OPEN-LABEL, SINGLE-ARM TRIAL TO DESCRIBE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF TRUMENBA(REGISTERED) WHEN ADMINISTERED TO IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PARTICIPANTS ≥10 YEARS OF AGE
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04893811
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B1971060
- Conditions
- Meningococcal Vaccine
- Keywords
- Meningococcal Vaccine, Meningitis Vaccine, Asplenia, Sickle cell anemia, Complement deficiencies
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 18 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 16 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of 2 doses of Trumenba® (on a 0- and 6-month schedule) in immunocompromised participants by functionally assessing antibody production in asplenic and complement-deficient individuals ≥10 years of age.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Experimental | Biological: TrumenbaBivalent recombinant lipoprotein 2086 vaccine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male or female participants ≥10 years of age at the time of consent.
- Participants with an increased risk for meningococcal disease due to anatomic asplenia or functional asplenia (eg, sickle cell anemia) or complement deficiencies.
- Negative urine pregnancy test for all female participants.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Previous vaccination with any meningococcal serogroup B vaccine.
- Participants who are receiving any allergen immunotherapy with a nonlicensed product or receiving allergen immunotherapy with a licensed product and are not on stable maintenance doses.
- History of microbiologically proven disease caused by N meningitidis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
- Significant neurological disorder or history of seizure (excluding simple febrile seizure).
- Any neuroinflammatory or autoimmune condition, including, but not limited to, transverse myelitis, uveitis, optic neuritis, and multiple sclerosis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TrumenbaBivalent recombinant lipoprotein 2086 vaccine | Biological | Single Arm |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Serum Bactericidal Assay Using Human Complement (hSBA) Titer => Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Neisseria Meningitidis Serogroup B (MnB) Test Strains at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline (Before Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Four primary MnB strains were PMB80 (A22), PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). The percentage of participants who achieved an hSBA titer PMB80 (A22) more than or equal to (=>)1:16, and hSBA titer PMB2001 (A56), PMB2001 (B24), and PMB2707 (B44) =>1:8 are reported. Evaluable immunogenicity population (EIP) included all participants who were eligible through 1 month after Vaccination 2, received the study vaccination at Visit 1 and Visit 3 as planned, had blood drawn for assay testing within the required time frames at Visit 1 (before Vaccination 1) and 1 month after Vaccination 2 (28-42 days after Visit 3), had at least 1 valid and determinate assay result 1 month after Vaccination 2, received no prohibited vaccines or medications through Visit 4, and had no major protocol deviations through Visit 4.
Percentage of Participants With hSBA Titer => LLOQ for Each of the 4 Primary MnB Test Strains at 1 Month After Vaccination 2
Time frame: 1 Month after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Four primary MnB strains were PMB80 (A22), PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). The percentage of participants who achieved an hSBA titer PMB80 (A22) =>1:16, and hSBA titer PMB2001 (A56), PMB2001 (B24), and PMB2707 (B44) =>1:8 were reported.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Vaccination 1
Time frame: Within 7 Days after Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Local reactions (redness, swelling, and pain) at the site of investigational product administration were recorded in electronic diary (e-diary). Redness and swelling were measured and recorded in caliper units. Each caliper unit = 0.5 centimeter (cm). Redness and swelling were graded as mild (more than [>]2.0 to 5.0cm), moderate (>5.0 to 10.0cm) and severe (>10.0cm). Pain at injection site was graded as mild (did not interfere with activity), moderate (interfered with activity), and severe (prevented daily activity).
Percentage of Participants Reporting Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Vaccination 2
Time frame: Within 7 Days after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Local reactions (redness, swelling, and pain) at the site of investigational product administration were recorded in electronic diary (e-diary). Redness and swelling were measured and recorded in caliper units. Each caliper unit = 0.5 cm. Redness and swelling were graded as mild (>2.0 to 5.0cm), moderate (>5.0 to 10.0cm) and severe (>10.0cm). Pain at injection site was graded as mild (did not interfere with activity), moderate (interfered with activity), and severe (prevented daily activity).
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Vaccination 1
Time frame: Within 7 Days after Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Systemic events included: fever, fatigue, headache, chills, muscle pain, joint pain, vomiting, and diarrhea. Fever classified as =>38.0 degree Celsius (C), 38.0-38.4, >38.4-38.9, >38.9 40.0 and >40.0-degree C. Fatigue, headache, chills, muscle pain and joint pain graded as mild (did not interfere with activity), moderate (some interference with activity) and severe (prevented daily activity). Vomiting graded as mild (1-2 times in 24 hours [hrs]), moderate (>2 times in 24 hrs) and severe (required intravenous [IV] hydration). Diarrhea graded as mild (2-3 loose stools in 24 hrs), moderate (4-5 loose stools in 24 hrs) and severe (=>6 in 24 hrs).
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Vaccination 2
Time frame: Within 7 Days after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Systemic events included: fever, fatigue, headache, chills, muscle pain, joint pain, vomiting, and diarrhea. Fever classified as =>38.0 degree C, 38.0-38.4, >38.4-38.9, >38.9 40.0 and >40.0-degree C. Fatigue, headache, chills, muscle pain and joint pain graded as mild (did not interfere with activity), moderate (some interference with activity) and severe (prevented daily activity). Vomiting graded as mild (1-2 times in 24 hrs), moderate (>2 times in 24 hrs) and severe (required IV hydration). Diarrhea graded as mild (2-3 loose stools in 24 hrs), moderate (4-5 loose stools in 24 hrs) and severe (=>6 in 24 hrs).
Percentage of Participants Reporting Use of Antipyretic Medication Within 7 Days After Vaccination 1
Time frame: Within 7 Days after Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Use of Antipyretic Medication Within 7 Days After Vaccination 2
Time frame: Within 7 Days after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Percentage of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) During 30 Days After Vaccination 1
Time frame: 30 Days after Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs excluded local reactions and systematic events.
Percentage of Participants Reporting AEs During 30 Days After Vaccination 2
Time frame: 30 Days after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs excluded local reactions and systematic events.
Percentage of Participants Reporting AEs During 30 Days After Any Vaccination
Time frame: 30 Days after any Vaccination
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs excluded local reactions and systematic events.
Percentage of Participants Reporting AEs During the Vaccination Phase
Time frame: Vaccination Phase: From Vaccination 1 through one Month after Vaccination 2 (approximately 7 Months)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs excluded local reactions and systematic events.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 30 Days After Vaccination 1
Time frame: 30 Days after Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening (immediate risk of death), required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions), resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that was considered to be an important medical event.
Percentage of Participants Reporting SAEs During 30 Days After Vaccination 2
Time frame: 30 Days after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening (immediate risk of death), required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions), resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that was considered to be an important medical event.
Percentage of Participants Reporting SAEs During 30 Days After Any Vaccination
Time frame: 30 Days after any Vaccination
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening (immediate risk of death), required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions), resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that was considered to be an important medical event.
Percentage of Participants Reporting SAEs During the Vaccination Phase
Time frame: Vaccination Phase: From Vaccination 1 through 1 Month after Vaccination 2 (approximately 7 Months)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening (immediate risk of death), required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions), resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that was considered to be an important medical event.
Percentage of Participants Reporting SAEs During the Follow-up Phase
Time frame: Follow-up Phase: From 1 Month after Vaccination 2 through 6 Months after Vaccination 2 (approximately 5 Months)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening (immediate risk of death), required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions), resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that was considered to be an important medical event.
Percentage of Participants Reporting SAEs During the Entire Study
Time frame: Entire Study: From Vaccination 1 through 6 Months after Vaccination 2 (approximately 12 Months)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening (immediate risk of death), required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions), resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Or that was considered to be an important medical event.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Medically Attended Adverse Event (MAEs) During 30 Days After Vaccination 1
Time frame: 30 Days after Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
MAEs was defined as a nonserious AE that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Percentage of Participants Reporting MAEs During 30 Days After Vaccination 2
Time frame: 30 Days after Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
MAEs was defined as a nonserious AE that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Percentage of Participants Reporting MAEs During 30 Days After Any Vaccination
Time frame: 30 Days after any Vaccination
MAEs was defined as a nonserious AE that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Percentage of Participants Reporting MAEs During the Vaccination Phase
Time frame: Vaccination Phase: From Vaccination 1 through 1 Month after Vaccination 2 (approximately 7 Months)
MAEs was defined as a nonserious AE that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Percentage of Participants Reporting MAEs During the Follow-up Phase
Time frame: Follow-up Phase: From 1 Month after Vaccination 2 through 6 Months after Vaccination 2 (approximately 5 Months)
MAEs was defined as a nonserious AE that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Percentage of Participants Reporting MAEs During the Entire Study
Time frame: Entire Study: From Vaccination 1 through 6 Months after Vaccination 2 (approximately 12 Months)
MAEs was defined as a nonserious AE that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Immediate AEs After Vaccination 1
Time frame: 30 Minutes post Vaccination 1 (Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)
Immediate AE was defined as AE occurring within the first 30 minutes after study intervention administration.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Immediate AEs After Vaccination 2
Time frame: 30 Minutes post Vaccination 2 (Vaccination 2 at Month 6)
Immediate AE was defined as AE occurring within the first 30 minutes after study intervention administration.
Percentage of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition (NDCMC) During the Vaccination Phase
Time frame: Vaccination Phase: From Vaccination 1 through 1 Month after Vaccination 2 (approximately 7 Months)
A NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, not previously identified, that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects.
Percentage of Participants With NDCMC During the Follow-up Phase
Time frame: Follow-up Phase: From 1 Month after Vaccination 2 through 6 Months after Vaccination 2 (approximately 5 Months)
A NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, not previously identified, that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects.
Percentage of Participants With NDCMC During the Entire Study
Time frame: Entire Study: From Vaccination 1 through 6 Months after Vaccination 2 (approximately 12 Months)
A NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, not previously identified, that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects.
Mean Number of Days Participants Missed School or Work Because of AEs During the Vaccination Phase
Time frame: Vaccination Phase: From Vaccination 1 through 1 Month after Vaccination 2 (approximately 7 Months)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Meningococcal Vaccine
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Single-center, Open-label Study: Immunogenicity and Safety Observation After Vaccination With ACYW135 Meningococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine in Junior High School Students Aged 13-15 Years
Meningococcal Disease; Meningococcal Meningitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Immunogenicity and Safety Study of an Investigational Quadrivalent Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine Administered in Healthy Infants and Toddlers in China
Meningococcal Infection, Healthy Volunteers
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Study on an Investigational Quadrivalent Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine (MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine) Administered as a 5- and/or 10-year Booster Doses in Children and Adolescents Vaccinated 5 or 10 Years Earlier as Toddlers
Meningococcal Immunisation, Healthy Volunteers
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Learn About the Safety of PENBRAYA During Pregnancy
Meningococcal Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Phase Ⅲ Trial of Group ACYW135 Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Children Aged 3-5 Months
Epidemic Meningitis, Meningococcal Vaccines
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
14 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Trumenba in people with Meningococcal Vaccine, run by Pfizer at 14 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Turkey (Türkiye), Poland, Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Serum Bactericidal Assay Using Human Complement (hSBA) Titer => Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Neisseria Meningitidis Serogroup B (MnB) Test Strains at Baseline (time frame: Baseline (Before Vaccination 1 on Day 1/Month 0)). The study lists 30 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2024.