AzTrials
AzTrials

SiblingsR03 CA259898NCT04889755

SibACCESS: Developing a Telehealth Intervention to Address Unmet Psychosocial Needs of Siblings of Children With Cancer

A study testing SibACCESS in people with Siblings and Childhood Cancer, run by Boston University Charles River Campus at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to address barriers to psychosocial care for siblings of children with cancer by piloting a group-based telehealth program for adolescent siblings of youth with cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Siblings, Childhood Cancer, Pediatric Cancer
What is being tested?
SibACCESS
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
6 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2023to 10 Jun 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 2 or more children in the family (i.e., child with cancer and >1 sibling)
  • Sibling(s) and child with cancer each under the age of 18 at the time of cancer diagnosis
  • Sibling(s) can be biologically-related, step-siblings, foster-siblings, or adopted-siblings
  • Parent and sibling(s) fluent in English
  • Sibling(s) 12-17 years of age
  • Sibling report of at least mild posttraumatic stress (score >11 on the Child Posttraumatic Stress Scale for DSM-5)
  • Child with cancer must have received cancer diagnosis at least 3 months prior to the family's enrollment in the study

Who cannot join

  • A cognitive impairment that would interfere with pilot program and interview completion (as reported by parent)
  • Bereavement
  • Significant externalizing behaviors that would interfere with group participation (as reported by parent)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Boston University

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study aims to address barriers to psychosocial care for siblings of children with cancer by piloting a group-based telehealth program for adolescent siblings of youth with cancer. The pilot trial will be preceded by a treatment development stage during which study staff will interview English- and Spanish-speaking families and psychosocial providers to assess preferences for program content, format, timing, and cultural feasibility and acceptability, while considering ideas to minimize participation barriers. Information from interviews will inform any revisions to the proposed pilot program. Then, the new SibACCESS program will be tested with a small group of families located in Massachusetts, Delaware, or Rhode Island using video-teleconferencing technology. Families will complete exit interviews to assess program acceptability and perceived benefits.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Prolonged, complicated, and intensive pediatric cancer treatment regimens challenge and disrupt the entire family. Siblings of youth with cancer are a psychosocially at-risk and underserved group. Siblings frequently report strong negative emotions, disruptions to family life, poorer academic functioning, more school absenteeism (school-aged siblings), and riskier health behaviors and poorer health outcomes than comparisons (adult siblings). Approximately one-quarter of siblings meet diagnostic criteria for cancer-related posttraumatic stress disorders. Outcomes are worse for siblings from under-represented minority groups and those with fewer socioeconomic resources. Additionally, siblings report low social support and indicate a strong desire to connect with other siblings. The need for sibling support is well established, as outlined in the recently developed evidence- and consensus-based Standards for Psychosocial Care for Children with Cancer and Their Families. Unfortunately, the Sibling Standard is among those least likely to be met within pediatric oncology programs nationwide.

SibACCESS Program Description:

SibACCESS (Acceptance, Coping, Communication, Engagement, and Social Support) targets the proposed mechanisms of sibling difficulties. The primary goal is to increase siblings' exposure and opportunities to process cancer-related cues to decrease the onset or intensification of posttraumatic stress (PTS). Treatment targets include emotional acceptance, treatment involvement, family communication (via between-session assignments), and social support (fostered by the group format).

SibACCESS is based on acceptance-based cognitive-behavioral frameworks, drawing primarily on trauma-focused CBT (TF-CBT). TF-CBT is a structured, short-term treatment that incorporates cognitive-behavioral approaches to promote recovery from trauma. It is a logical starting point for the present study for multiple reasons: (a) TF-CBT was developed specifically for children and adolescents; parent participation is recommended but not required; (b) it has been tested in a group format and using telehealth; (c) it has demonstrated effectiveness across cultural groups; and (d) it is appropriate for youth who meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD and those with sub-clinical PTS. TF-CBT has not yet been evaluated in the context of childhood cancer and may require some adaptations. Thus, SibACCESS also includes skills from Dialectical and Behavioral Therapy (i.e., self-validation of emotions, mindfulness, radical acceptance) to better address distress tolerance and acceptance of the aspects of cancer that are beyond siblings' control.

SibACCESS sessions will be facilitated remotely using Zoom. The intervention includes one pre-recorded parent webinar, one brief orientation meeting (sibling and parent), seven weekly sibling group sessions, one individual sibling session, and one individual parent session. The 30-minute parent webinar will provide a program overview, psychoeducation, and brief skills training. Parents will be given "discussion starter" questions to facilitate communication throughout the program. Sibling group sessions are 75 minutes and will include an ice breaker, review of last week's homework (except first session), introduction of new topics, interactive practice of new skills, and assignment of home practice (except final session). Exposure to cancer-related emotions and cues will be emphasized throughout the program, including talking about cancer, confronting cancer-related thoughts and emotions, selecting several individualized cancer-related exposures, and crafting a sibling narrative.

Being tested
SibACCESS
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SibACCESSBehavioural

    Also called SibACCESS (Acceptance, Coping, Communication, Engagement, and Social Support)

    The primary goal of the SibACCESS program is to increase siblings' exposure to and opportunity to process cancer-related cues to decrease onset or intensification of posttraumatic stress. The program is focused on siblings, with a brief parent education component. Parents will receive psychoeducation and brief skills training to support siblings enrolled in the program. Siblings will participate in 7 group sessions and one individual session in which they will learn skills and strategies to confront information about cancer and tolerate uncomfortable thoughts and feelings related to cancer, and thereby reduce avoidance of cancer-related emotions.

Study groups in NCT04889755
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SibACCESSOtherThis is a single-arm trial of a group-based, posttraumatic stress intervention for adolescent siblings of children with cancer. The intervention includes a parent educational webinar, seven group sibling sessions, one individual parent session, and one individual sibling session.
Receives: Behavioral: SibACCESS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Child Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale for DSM-5

    The Child PTSD Symptom Scale for DSM-5 (CPSS-V) [citation] is a 27-item measure of posttraumatic stress. Strong test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and convergent validity with other child PTSD measures have been established. This survey was administered only to sibling participants. Measure was scored by a total summation, scores may range from 0 to 80.

    *Higher scores reflect higher levels of post-traumatic stress symptoms

    Measured: Within 2 weeks post-intervention, data were collected over a period of up to 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Strengths & Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

    The Strengths \& Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman, 1997) is a 25-item measure of children's psychosocial adjustment. It has five scales: Emotional Symptoms, Conduct Symptoms, Hyperactivity/ Inattention Symptoms, Peer Relationship Problems, and Prosocial Behavior. Adapted versions were given to sibling (self-report) and parent (parent-report) participants. Measure was scored by a total summation reflecting total child difficulties, scores may range from 0-40.

    *Higher scores reflect worse child difficulties

    Measured: Within 2 weeks post-intervention, data were collected over a period of up to 4 weeks

  2. Sibling Perception Questionnaire (SPQ)

    The Sibling Perception Questionnaire (SPQ) evaluates group interventions for siblings and parents designed to increase sibling understanding of and adjustment to chronic illness and developmental disability (CI/DD). Present measure was adapted from Sahler \& Carpenter (1989) and Lobato \& Kao (2002) versions to reflect cancer-related topics and create a parent-report version. Siblings and parents completed Sibling-report and Parent-report versions respectively. Measure was scored by a total summation, scores may range from 18 to 72.

    *Higher scores reflect more negative sibling adjustment

    Measured: Within 2 weeks post-intervention, data were collected over a period of up to 4 weeks

  3. Coping Self-efficacy Scale

    The Coping self-efficacy scale (Chesney et. al, 2006) was used to assess participants' confidence in performing coping behaviors when faced with life challenges. This measure was only used with sibling participants. Measure was scored by a total summation, scores may range from 0 to 260.

    *Higher scores reflect higher levels of coping self-efficacy

    Measured: Within 2 weeks post-intervention, data were collected over a period of up to 4 weeks

  4. Emotional Avoidance Strategy Inventory For Adolescents

    The Emotional Avoidance Strategy Inventory for Adolescents (Kennedy \& Ehrenreich-May, 2017) is a 17-item measure of emotional avoidance with acceptable psychometrics. Measure was scored by a total summation, scores may range from 0-68.

    Measured: Within 2 weeks post-intervention, data were collected over a period of up to 4 weeks

  5. Perceived Filial Self-Efficacy Scale

    The Perceived Filial Self-Efficacy Scale (PFSES) (Caprara et. al, 2004) is a 16-item measure that assess efficacy beliefs that family members hold about their role as spouse, parent, and child, as well as about the functioning of family as a holistic system. This survey was administered only to sibling participants. Measure was scored by a total summation, scores may range from 16 to 112.

    *Higher scores reflect better efficacy beliefs

    Measured: Within 2 weeks post-intervention, data were collected over a period of up to 4 weeks

  6. Sibling Cancer Needs Inventory (SCNI)

    The Sibling Cancer Needs Inventory (SCNI) (Patterson et. al, 2014) is a 45 item measure that assesses psychosocial needs of siblings are established to assist in the provision of appropriate support. This survey was administered only to sibling participants. The overall SCNI score are determined by summing the responses to all items, giving a possible range of SCNI scores from 45 to 180.

    *Higher scores reflect higher sibling psychosocial needs

    Measured: Within 2 weeks post-intervention, data were collected over a period of up to 4 weeks

  7. Acceptability of Program

    Based from the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (Roberts et. el, 1984), this measure assesses participants general acceptability of the SibACCESS intervention. Measure was scored by a total summation, scores may range from 0 to 52.

    *Higher scores reflect higher levels of acceptability

    Measured: Within 2 weeks post-intervention, data were collected over a period of up to 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 May 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion10 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion10 Jun 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Parent Pre-session: Webinar on Supporting Siblings Session 1 (Sibling Group): Program Introduction Session 2 (Sibling Group): Understanding Emotions Session 3 (Sibling Group): Adaptive Thinking Session 4 (Sibling Group): Sitting with Emotions Session 5 (Sibling Group): Avoidance vs. Sitting with Emotions Sessions 6 (Sibling Individual): Telling Your Story Session 7 (Sibling Group): Keeping up with Skills Session 8 (Parent Individual): Parent/caregiver Check-In Session 9 (Sibling Group): Wrap-Up
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
6 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04889755
Sponsor's protocol ID
5870E
Other IDs
R03CA259898
Acronym
R03 CA259898
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
11 May 2021
Last updated
17 Feb 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing SibACCESS in people with Siblings and Childhood Cancer, run by Boston University Charles River Campus at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Child Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale for DSM-5 (time frame: Within 2 weeks post-intervention, data were collected over a period of up to 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in