AzTrials
AzTrials

High Bleeding RiskDEBORANCT04885816

Drug-eluting Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent for High Bleeding Risk Angioplasty

A study testing Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB) and Drug Eluting Stents (DES) in people with High Bleeding Risk and Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), run by Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez at 1 site in Mexico.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Randomized, single-blind, single-center, non-inferiority clinical trial to compare target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months in high bleeding risk patients undergoing elective coronary percutaneous intervention comparing limus-eluting balloon vs. limus-eluting stents. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB) and Drug Eluting Stents (DES)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
5 participants
Where
1 siteMexico
Study dates
20 Apr 2021to 29 Sep 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients 18 years old or older with an ischemic de-novo lesion(s) in a 2.5 - 4.0 mm reference diameter coronary artery suitable for elective percutaneous coronary intervention, in context of acute coronary syndrome or chronic coronary syndrome with evidence of ischemia by non-invasive study or pressure guidewire that can be treated by DEB or DES, and has at least 1 major or 2 minor Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk criteria:
  • Major criteria:
  • Anticipated use of long-term oral anticoagulation
  • Severe or end-stage CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min)
  • Hemoglobin < 11 g/dL
  • Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or transfusion in the last 6 months, or any time, if recurrent.
Show all 23Show fewer
  • Moderate or severe baseline thrombocytopenia (<100,000/uL)
  • Chronic bleeding diathesis
  • Liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension
  • Active malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) within the past 12 months
  • Previous spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage
  • Previous traumatic intracranial hemorrhage within the past 12 months
  • Presence of Brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM)
  • Moderate or severe ischemic stroke (NIHSS score equal or more than 5) within the past 6 months
  • Non deferrable major surgery while on DAPT
  • Recent major surgery or major trauma within 30 days before PCI
  • Minor Criteria:
  • Age 75 years old and older
  • Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) (eGFR 30-59 mL/min)
  • Hemoglobin 11 - 12.9 g/dL in men and 11 - 11.9 g/dL in women
  • Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 12 months, not meeting major criterion
  • Long term use of NSAIDs or steroids
  • Any ischemic stroke at any time not meeting major criterion

Who cannot join

  • STEMI undergoing primary PCI
  • Any ACS undergoing urgent PCI
  • Cardiogenic shock or resuscitation with uncertain neurological status at arrival to PCI
  • Unprotected left main lesion
  • Life expectancy < 12 months
  • Reference vessel diameter < 2.5 mm or > 4.0 mm
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Bifurcation lesion requiring 2-stent technique
  • Chronic total occlusion
  • In-stent restenosis
  • Dissection affecting the flow (TIMI<3) or significant recoil (>30% in main branch, >50% in side branch) after predilatation
  • Inability to give written consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mexico1 site
  • Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia "Ignacio Chávez"

    Mexico City, 14080

Other trials in Mexico

About this study

Official title: Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent On de Novo coRonary Artery Disease in Patients With High Bleeding Risk

Randomized, single-blind, single-center, non-inferiority clinical trial to compare target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months in high bleeding risk patients undergoing elective coronary percutaneous intervention comparing limus-eluting balloon vs. limus-eluting stents.

Read the detailed description

Drug Eluting Stents (DES) are the devices of choice for coronary angioplasty, including in patients with high-bleeding risk.

Different studies have been done to determine which strategy improves bleeding outcomes without risking the benefit of stenting. Different Double Anti-Platelet Therapy (DAPT) durations in different devices have shown that it is safe to reduce DAPT, with an increase in ischemic events but a better net clinical outcome.

Safety and efficacy of Drug Eluting Balloons (DEB) were proved when it was compared with Bare Metal Stents (BMS) in de-novo coronary lesions by presenting no events of target vessel closure after treatment.

Our hypothesis is that treating this group of high-bleeding risk patients with DEB will be no-inferior in terms of target vessel failure at 12 months when compared with DES for treatment of de-novo coronary lesions in high bleeding risk population, reducing incidence of significant bleeding events with DAPT reduction.

Being tested
Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB), Drug Eluting Stents (DES)
Keywords
Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB), Drug Eluting Stent (DES), High bleeding risk (HBR), High hemorrhagic risk, Dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT)
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB)Device

    Also called MagicTouch, Sirolimus coated balloon catheter, diameters 2.5 - 4.0 mm (Concept Medicals, Surat, India)

    Size (diameter and length) will be chosen at operator's discretion aid by simple angiography, quantitative coronary analysis (QCA), or intravascular image; so that the lesion previously prepared and 2 mm at each end are covered by DEB, and the diameter and pressure used aims a balloon to artery ratio of 1. In case of significant recoil (more than 30% for main vessels and 50% for side vessels), coronary perforation or flow limiting dissection, provisional stent will be implanted with a stent to artery ratio of 1.1 with stent post-dilatation when indicated. Device will be used in accordance with the CE mark instructions.

    DAPT will be given for a month with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel will be favored). Single anti-platelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin will be continued thereafter.

  • Drug Eluting Stents (DES)Device

    Also called Orsiro, Sirolimus eluting stent, diameters 2.5 - 4.0 mm (Biotronik AG, Bülach, Switzerland), Resolute Onyx, Zotarolimus eluting stent, diameters 2.5 - 4.0 mm (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA), Xiencie Sierra, Everolimus eluting stent, diameters 2.5 - 4.0 mm (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA), Synergy, Everolimus eluting stent, diameters 2.5 - 4.0 mm (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA)

    Size (diameter and length) will be chosen at operator's discretion aid by simple angiography, quantitative coronary analysis (QCA), or intravascular image; so that the lesion previously prepared and 2 mm at each end are covered by DES with an stent to artery ratio of 1.1. Post-dilatation will be performed when indicated. Devices will be used in accordance with the CE mark instructions.

    DAPT will be indicated according to actual international guidelines.

Study groups in NCT04885816
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB)ExperimentalHigh Bleeding Risk patients treated with 2.5 - 4.0 mm drug-eluting balloons (DEB). Bailout stenting is permitted in case of a flow-limiting dissection or significant recoil (>30% in main branch and >50% side-branch), includes both stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients undergoing elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI).
Receives: Device: Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB)
Drug Eluting Stents (DES)Active comparatorHigh Bleeding Risk patients treated with 2.5 - 4.0 mm drug-eluting stents (DES). Includes both stable CAD and ACS patients undergoing elective PCI.
Receives: Device: Drug Eluting Stents (DES)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

    Composed of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction related to the treated vessel or ischemia driven target lesion revascularization

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Cardiovascular death

    Rate of death resulting from cardiovascular causes in each group:

    Death caused by acute MI Death caused by sudden cardiac, including unwitnessed, death Death resulting from heart failure Death caused by stroke Death caused by cardiovascular procedures Death resulting from cardiovascular hemorrhage Death resulting from other cardiovascular cause Any MI not clearly attributable to a non-target vessel will be considered as target-vessel MI.

    Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) related MI is termed type 4a MI.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Myocardial Infarction related to the treated vessel

    Rate of myocardial infarction related to the treated vessel (according to the 4th international definition of myocardial infarction) in each group: detection of an increase or decrease in cardiac troponin values with at least 1 of the values above the upper reference limit of the 99th percentile and at least 1 of the following conditions :

    Symptoms of acute myocardial ischemia. New ischemic changes in the electrocardiogram. Appearance of pathological Q waves. Imaging evidence of loss of viable myocardium or new regional abnormalities in myocardial wall mobility following a pattern compatible with ischemic etiology.

    Identification of a coronary thrombus by angiography with intracoronary imaging or by autopsy Any MI that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the revascularized one will be considered as MI related to the treated vessel.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Target Lesion Revascularization

    Rate of repeated percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

    Rate of TVF in each group (composed of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction related to the treated vessel or ischemia driven target vessel revascularization)

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Target Vessel Revascularization

    Rate of repeated percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel in each group.

    Measured: 12 months

  6. Non-cardiovascular death

    Rate of any death that is not thought to be the result of a cardiovascular cause in each group:

    1. Death resulting from malignancy
    2. Death resulting from pulmonary causes
    3. Death caused by infection (includes sepsis)
    4. Death resulting from gastrointestinal causes
    5. Death resulting from accident/trauma
    6. Death caused by other noncardiovascular organ failure
    7. Death resulting from other noncardiovascular cause

    Measured: 12 months

  7. Major Bleeding

    Incidence of bleeding complications according to The Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2 (BARC-2) scale: 3 or greater

    Measured: 12 months

  8. Technical success

    Rate of restoration of antegrade Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 2 or 3 and a <30% residual stenosis.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  9. Subgroup analysis of target lesion failure

    Rate of TLF in treatment of bifurcations vs no bifurcation, by vessel size, in diabetes, by clinical Presentation (acute or chronic).

    Measured: 12 months

  10. Subgroup analysis of major bleeding events

    Rate of BARC 3-5 bleeding events in patients with anticoagulation vs no anticoagulation, by DAPT duration, by inclusion criteria

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 May 2021
  2. Study start20 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion29 Sep 2021
  4. Study completion29 Sep 2021

Why it stopped: Slow recruitment

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial enrolling high bleeding risk patients and coronary artery disease to be treated by percutaneous coronary intervention at the National Institute of Cardiology "Ignacio Chávez" in México. Included patients will have follow-up at the outpatient clinic through 1 year, until death or study exit, whichever comes first.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
5 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04885816
Sponsor's protocol ID
INCAR-DG-DACEP-020-2021
Other IDs
21-1223
Acronym
DEBORA
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
8 May 2021
Last updated
26 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The individual patient data will not be shared with other researchers.

Publications

  • Rissanen TT, Uskela S, Eranen J, Mantyla P, Olli A, Romppanen H, Siljander A, Pietila M, Minkkinen MJ, Tervo J, Karkkainen JM; DEBUT trial investigators. Drug-coated balloon for treatment of de-novo coronary artery lesions in patients with high bleeding risk (DEBUT): a single-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):230-239. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31126-2. Epub 2019 Jun 13.

    PubMed 31204115
  • Kandzari DE, Kirtane AJ, Windecker S, Latib A, Kedhi E, Mehran R, Price MJ, Abizaid A, Simon DI, Worthley SG, Zaman A, Choi JW, Caputo R, Kanitkar M, McLaurin B, Potluri S, Smith T, Spriggs D, Tolleson T, Nazif T, Parke M, Lee LC, Lung TH, Stone GW; Onyx ONE US/Japan Investigators. One-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in High-Bleeding-Risk Patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009565. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009565. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

    PubMed 33167705
  • Urban P, Meredith IT, Abizaid A, Pocock SJ, Carrie D, Naber C, Lipiecki J, Richardt G, Iniguez A, Brunel P, Valdes-Chavarri M, Garot P, Talwar S, Berland J, Abdellaoui M, Eberli F, Oldroyd K, Zambahari R, Gregson J, Greene S, Stoll HP, Morice MC; LEADERS FREE Investigators. Polymer-free Drug-Coated Coronary Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2038-47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503943. Epub 2015 Oct 14.

    PubMed 26466021
  • Alfonso F, Scheller B. State of the art: balloon catheter technologies - drug-coated balloon. EuroIntervention. 2017 Aug 25;13(6):680-695. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00494.

    PubMed 28844030
  • Varenne O, Cook S, Sideris G, Kedev S, Cuisset T, Carrie D, Hovasse T, Garot P, El Mahmoud R, Spaulding C, Helft G, Diaz Fernandez JF, Brugaletta S, Pinar-Bermudez E, Mauri Ferre J, Commeau P, Teiger E, Bogaerts K, Sabate M, Morice MC, Sinnaeve PR; SENIOR investigators. Drug-eluting stents in elderly patients with coronary artery disease (SENIOR): a randomised single-blind trial. Lancet. 2018 Jan 6;391(10115):41-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32713-7. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

    PubMed 29102362
  • Urban P, Mehran R, Colleran R, Angiolillo DJ, Byrne RA, Capodanno D, Cuisset T, Cutlip D, Eerdmans P, Eikelboom J, Farb A, Gibson CM, Gregson J, Haude M, James SK, Kim HS, Kimura T, Konishi A, Laschinger J, Leon MB, Magee PFA, Mitsutake Y, Mylotte D, Pocock S, Price MJ, Rao SV, Spitzer E, Stockbridge N, Valgimigli M, Varenne O, Windhoevel U, Yeh RW, Krucoff MW, Morice MC. Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation. 2019 Jul 16;140(3):240-261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040167. Epub 2019 May 22.

    PubMed 31116032
  • Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, Prescott E, Storey RF, Deaton C, Cuisset T, Agewall S, Dickstein K, Edvardsen T, Escaned J, Gersh BJ, Svitil P, Gilard M, Hasdai D, Hatala R, Mahfoud F, Masip J, Muneretto C, Valgimigli M, Achenbach S, Bax JJ; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425. No abstract available.

    PubMed 31504439
  • Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimsky P; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28886621
  • Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, Barthelemy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL, Dendale P, Dorobantu M, Edvardsen T, Folliguet T, Gale CP, Gilard M, Jobs A, Juni P, Lambrinou E, Lewis BS, Mehilli J, Meliga E, Merkely B, Mueller C, Roffi M, Rutten FH, Sibbing D, Siontis GCM; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32860058
  • Zocca P, Kok MM, van der Heijden LC, Danse PW, Schotborgh CE, Scholte M, Hartmann M, Linssen GCM, Doggen CJM, von Birgelen C. High Bleeding Risk Patients Treated with Very Thin-Strut Biodegradable Polymer or Thin-Strut Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in the BIO-RESORT Trial. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2018 Dec;32(6):567-576. doi: 10.1007/s10557-018-6823-9.

    PubMed 30143879

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB) and Drug Eluting Stents (DES) in people with High Bleeding Risk and Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), run by Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez at 1 site in Mexico.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 23 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Slow recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Target Lesion Failure (TLF) (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04885816, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in