Urinary Tract InfectionPhase 4NCT04882085
Efficacy and Safety of CAZ-AVI in the Treatment of Infections Due to Carbapenem-resistant G- Pathogens in Chinese Adults
A Phase 4 study testing Zavicefta, Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Best Available Treatment in people with Urinary Tract Infection and Acute Pyelonephritis, run by Pfizer at 37 sites in China.
Trial summary
This is an open-label, randomized, multi-center, interventional, active-controlled Phase 4 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI versus BAT in the treatment of infected participants with selected infection types (Hospital Acquired Pneumonia [HAP] (including Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia [VAP])… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Tract Infection, Acute Pyelonephritis, Hospital Acquired Pneumonia
- What is being tested?
- Zavicefta, Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Best Available Treatment
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 26 Aug 2021to 31 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female >18 years of age
- Participant must have a diagnosis of an infection (HAP/VAP, cUTI, cIAI, BSI) due to confirmed carbapenem-resistant aerobic Gram-negative pathogens, requiring administration of IV antibacterial therapy
- Participant who had received appropriate prior empiric antibacterial therapy for a carbapenem-resistant pathogen must meet at least 1 of the following criteria: no or no more than 24h; worsening of objective symptoms or signs after at least 48 hours of antibacterial therapy; no change of objective symptoms or signs after at least 72 hours of antibacterial therapy.
- Capable of giving signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Other medical or psychiatric condition may increase the risk of study participation or, in the investigator's judgment, make the participant inappropriate for the study.
- Participant is expected to require more than 21 days of treatment
- Participants who need more than 3 systemic antibiotics as part of best available treatment (BAT)
- Previous administration with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half lives preceding the first dose of study intervention used in this study (whichever is longer).
- Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score >30 or <10 using the most recent available data.
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 1 country.
37 sites in 1 country
China37 sites
Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University
Baoding, Hebei, 071000
Baotou Central Hospital
Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014000
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191
The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical
Bengbu, Anhui, 233000
The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College
Bengbu, Anhui, 233004
Chengdu Xinhua Hospital
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610055
Chizhou People's Hospital
Chizhou, Anhui, 247000
Fuyang People's Hospital
Fuyang, Anhui, 236000
Guangzhou First People's Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180
Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical College
Guilin, Guangxi, 541001
Zhejiang Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310013
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014
Jiangyin People's Hospital
Jiangyin, Jiangsu, 214400
Jiangyin People's Hospital
Jiangyin, 214400
The First People's Hospital of Kunming (South Hospital)
Kunming, Yunnan, 650034
The First people's Hospital of Kunming
Kunming, Yunnan, 650034
The First People's Hospital of Kunming Ganmei Hospital (North Hospital)
Kunming, Yunnan, 650224
Lishui People's Hospital
Lishui, Zhejiang, 323000
Luoyang Central Hospital
Luoyang, Henan, 471009
Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006
NanYang central hospital
Nanyang, Henan, 473000
Qingyuan People's Hospital
Qingyuan, Guangdong, 511518
Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200040
Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, 200240
Shenzhen People's Hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020
The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518035
Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province
Taizhou, Zhejiang, 317000
Tianjin Chest Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300222
The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of WMU
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325035
Wenzhou Central Hospital
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325099
Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University
Xiamen, Fujian, 361004
Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221006
Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu province
Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225001
Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University
Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524000
Henan provincial people's hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000
Henan provincial people's hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003
Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University
Zunyi, Guizhou, 563000
About this study
Official title: AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, MULTI-CENTER, ACTIVE-CONTROLLED STUDY TO ESTIMATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CEFTAZIDIME-AVIBACTAM (CAZ-AVI) VERSUS BEST AVAILABLE TREATMENT (BAT) IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIONS DUE TO CARBAPENEM-RESISTANT GRAM-NEGATIVE PATHOGENS IN CHINESE ADULTS
This is an open-label, randomized, multi-center, interventional, active-controlled Phase 4 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI versus BAT in the treatment of infected participants with selected infection types (Hospital Acquired Pneumonia [HAP] (including Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia [VAP]); Complicated Urinary-Tract Infection [cUTI]; Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection [cIAI]; Bloodstream Infection [BSI]) due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in China.This study will be an estimation study. The statistical inference will be based on point estimate and confidence interval.
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infection, Acute Pyelonephritis, Hospital Acquired Pneumonia, Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, Bacteremia, Intra-abdominal Infection
- Being tested
- Zavicefta, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, Best Available Treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Tract Infections, Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, Bacteremia, Intraabdominal Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Zavicefta, Ceftazidime-AvibactamDrug
CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as a 2 hour infusion every 8 hours. Dose adjustments are available for participants with CrCL ≤50 mL/min.
Best Available TreatmentDrug
main treatment expected to be used as either monotherapy or in combination are colistin, tigecycline, fosfomycin, amikacin, and meropenem
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CAZ-AVI | Experimental | ceftazidime 2g plus avibactam 0.5g Receives: Drug: Zavicefta, Ceftazidime-Avibactam |
| Best Available Treatment | Active comparator | Based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline Receives: Drug: Best Available Treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit - Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e, complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], complicated urinary-tract infection [cUTI], hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia [HAP/VAP] or bloodstream infection [BSI]) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Measured: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Secondary outcomes (14)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC Visit - Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set
Clinical cure: improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for index infection (i.e. cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since initial procedure. 95% CI based on Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set (sub-set of mMITT): participants who received 3 days of study intervention, or received study intervention for >=48 hours with >= 80% compliance, or for <48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms genetically confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at end of treatment (EOT) or TOC visits, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Measured: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit -mMITT Analysis Set
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Measured: At EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set
Clinical cure: improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since initial procedure. 95% CI based on Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set (sub-set of mMITT): participants who received 3 days of study intervention, or received study intervention for >=48 hours with >= 80% compliance, or for <48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms genetically confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT or TOC visits, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Measured: At EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification <10^3 colony forming units per milliliter [CFU/mL] for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/ clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Measured: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - ME Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response=eradication: absence (or urine quantification <10^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from appropriately obtained specimen at site of infection or presumed eradication: repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in participant who had clinical cure (specific to cIAI,HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set: participants received 3 days of study intervention,or received study intervention for >= 48 hours with >=80% compliance or for <48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT/TOC, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Measured: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification <10^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Measured: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response=eradication: absence (or urine quantification <10^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from appropriately obtained specimen at site of infection or presumed eradication: repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in participant who had clinical cure (specific to cIAI,HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set: participants received 3 days of study intervention,or received study intervention for >= 48 hours with >=80% compliance or for <48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT/TOC, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Measured: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification <10^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Measured: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification <10^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Measured: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause Until Day 28
Percentage of participants who died due to any cause up to Day 28 was reported in this outcome measure. The 95% CI was calculated using the Jeffrey's method.
Measured: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to Day 28
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that started after the study intervention start date and time.
Measured: From start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days)
Number of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events
Number of participants who discontinued the study due to adverse events were reported in this outcome measure. Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs included all participants with an AE record indicating that the AE caused permanent discontinuation from the study. Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs included participants with an AE record indicating that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn but AE did not cause the participant to be discontinued from study.
Measured: From start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Hematology Values
Potentially clinically significant hematology parameters included Hemoglobin (gram/deciliter), Hematocrit (%), Erythrocytes (10^12/Liter [L]): value < 0.8*lower limit of normal (LLN) and change (Chg) > 20% decrease, value > 1.3*upper limit of normal (ULN) and Chg > 30% increase. Platelets (10^9/L): Value < 0.65*LLN and Chg > 50% decrease, Value > 1.5*ULN and Chg > 100% increase. Leukocytes (10^9/L): Value < 0.65*LLN and Chg > 60% decrease, Value > 1.6*ULN and Chg > 100% increase. Lymphocytes (10^9/L): Value < 0.25*LLN and Chg > 75% decrease, Value > 1.5*ULN and Chg > 100% increase. Neutrophils (10^9/L): Value < 0.65*LLN and Chg > 75% decrease, Value > 1.6*ULN and Chg > 100% increase. Basophils (10^9/L), Eosinophils (10^9/L), Monocytes (10^9/L): Value > 4.0*ULN and Chg > 300% increase. Number of participants with potentially clinically significant values for any hematology parameters were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Chemistry Values
Potentially clinically significant criteria included Bilirubin(mg/dL): >2.0*ULN and Chg >150% increase (inc).Aspartate Aminotransferase,Alanine Aminotransferase(Units/Liter[U/L]):>3.0*ULN and Chg >200% inc.Alkaline Phosphatase(U/L):<0.5*LLN and Chg >80% decrease (dec),> 2.0*ULN and Chg >100% inc.Protein,Albumin(g/dL):<0.5*LLN and Chg >50% dec,>1.5*ULN and Chg >50% inc.Blood Urea Nitrogen(mg/dL):<0.2*LLN and Chg >100% dec, >3.0*ULN and Chg >200% inc.Creatinine(mg/dL):>2.0*ULN and Chg >100% inc.Sodium(milliequivalent[mEq]/L):<0.85*LLN and Chg >10% dec, >1.1*ULN and Chg >10% inc.Potassium,Chloride(mEq/L):<0.8*LLN and Chg >20% dec, >1.2*ULN and Chg >20% inc.Calcium(mg/dL):<0.7*LLN and Chg >30% dec,> 1.3*ULN and Chg >30% inc.Bicarbonate(mEq/L):<0.7*LLN and Chg >40% dec, >1.3*ULN and Chg >40% inc.Glucose(mg/dL):<0.6*LLN and Chg >40% dec, >3.0*ULN and Chg >200% inc.Number of participants with potentially clinically significant values for any clinical chemistry parameters were reported.
Measured: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 May 2021
- Study start26 Aug 2021
- Primary completion31 Aug 2023
- Study completion31 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary Tract InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04882085
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C3591033
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 27 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Yuan J, Wang H, Zhang X, Xie F, Wang P, Zhu H, Irani P, Lu J, Liu F, Mu Y, Huang H, Zhang Y. Ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in Chinese patients: A phase IV, multi-center, open-label study. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2026 Oct 3:108030. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2026.108030. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42829121
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, MULTI-CENTER, ACTIVE-CONTROLLED STUDY TO ESTIMATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CEFTAZIDIME-AVIBACTAM (CAZ-AVI) VERSUS BEST AVAILABLE TREATMENT (BAT) IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIONS DUE TO CARBAPENEM-RESISTANT GRAM-NEGATIVE PATHOGENS IN CHINESE ADULTS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04882085
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C3591033
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infection, Acute Pyelonephritis, Hospital Acquired Pneumonia, Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, Bacteremia, Intra-abdominal Infection
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 26 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 21 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an open-label, randomized, multi-center, interventional, active-controlled Phase 4 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI versus BAT in the treatment of infected participants with selected infection types (Hospital Acquired Pneumonia [HAP] (including Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia [VAP]); Complicated Urinary-Tract Infection [cUTI]; Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection [cIAI]; Bloodstream Infection [BSI]) due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in China.This study will be an estimation study. The statistical inference will be based on point estimate and confidence interval.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CAZ-AVI | Experimental | Drug: Zavicefta, Ceftazidime-Avibactamceftazidime 2g plus avibactam 0.5g |
| Best Available Treatment | Active comparator | Drug: Best Available TreatmentBased on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or female >18 years of age
- Participant must have a diagnosis of an infection (HAP/VAP, cUTI, cIAI, BSI) due to confirmed carbapenem-resistant aerobic Gram-negative pathogens, requiring administration of IV antibacterial therapy
- Participant who had received appropriate prior empiric antibacterial therapy for a carbapenem-resistant pathogen must meet at least 1 of the following criteria: no or no more than 24h; worsening of objective symptoms or signs after at least 48 hours of antibacterial therapy; no change of objective symptoms or signs after at least 72 hours of antibacterial therapy.
- Capable of giving signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Other medical or psychiatric condition may increase the risk of study participation or, in the investigator's judgment, make the participant inappropriate for the study.
- Participant is expected to require more than 21 days of treatment
- Participants who need more than 3 systemic antibiotics as part of best available treatment (BAT)
- Previous administration with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half lives preceding the first dose of study intervention used in this study (whichever is longer).
- Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Zavicefta, Ceftazidime-AvibactamCAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as a 2 hour infusion every 8 hours. Dose adjustments are available for participants with CrCL ≤50 mL/min. | Drug | CAZ-AVI |
| Best Available Treatmentmain treatment expected to be used as either monotherapy or in combination are colistin, tigecycline, fosfomycin, amikacin, and meropenem | Drug | Best Available Treatment |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit - Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set
Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e, complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], complicated urinary-tract infection [cUTI], hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia [HAP/VAP] or bloodstream infection [BSI]) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
14 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC Visit - Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set
Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit -mMITT Analysis Set
Time frame: At EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set
Time frame: At EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - ME Analysis Set
Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Time frame: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set
Time frame: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Time frame: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause Until Day 28
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to Day 28
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Time frame: From start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days)
Number of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events
Time frame: From start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Hematology Values
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Chemistry Values
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Oct 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42829121Yuan J, Wang H, Zhang X, Xie F, Wang P, Zhu H, Irani P, Lu J, Liu F, Mu Y, Huang H, Zhang Y. Ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in Chinese patients: A phase IV, multi-center, open-label study. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2026 Oct 3:108030. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2026.108030. Online ahead of print.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Urinary Tract Infection
Recruiting
Diagnosis and Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection Using DNA Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Urine Culture
Urinary Tract Infections
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Clinical Performance Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx® cUTI Plus AMR
Complicated Urinary Tract Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
Recruiting
INterest of the Negative Predictive Value of Integrons in the reduCtion of Large Broad-spectrum anTibiotics Consumption for Urinary Tract infectionS
Drug Resistance, Microbial, Biomarkers
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparative Study of the Genomic Characteristics of Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli According to the Severity of Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections in Guadeloupe (COLIGENURI)
Urinary Tract Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
37 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Zavicefta, Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Best Available Treatment in people with Urinary Tract Infection and Acute Pyelonephritis, run by Pfizer at 37 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit - Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set (time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04882085, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2024.