AzTrials
AzTrials

Stress Urinary IncontinenceNCT04881721

Mesh-free Suture Urethropexy for Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence, Efficacy and Durability Trial

An observational study of Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by Endeavor Health at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this proposed study, the investigators aim to evaluate a modified suture urethropexy technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Participants will be followed with postoperative visits after 2 weeks, 2 months, and 12 months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Stress Urinary Incontinence
What is being tested?
Urethropexy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
15 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
25 Aug 2021to 31 Dec 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants with female pelvic anatomy, 18 years or older, with stress dominant urinary incontinence interested and eligible for surgical treatment

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years or older with stress dominant urinary incontinence
  • Stress urinary incontinence confirmed by testing (e.g. urodynamics)
  • Able to provide informed consent and attend post-operative visits

Who cannot join

  • Detrusor overactivity (> 40cm H2O)
  • Maximum Urethral Closure Pressure (< 40 cm H2O)
  • Post void residual > 150 mL
  • Prior surgery for stress urinary incontinence with retained material (e.g. bulking agent, sling)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • NorthShore University HealthSystem

    Skokie, Illinois, 60076

Other trials in United States

About this study

In this proposed study, the investigators aim to evaluate a modified suture urethropexy technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Participants will be followed with postoperative visits after 2 weeks, 2 months, and 12 months. Pelvic floor ultrasound imaging will be performed before surgery and after 2 months and 12 months, to evaluate urethral mobility.

Read the detailed description

This study is designed as a prospective observational study. The hypothesis is that suture urethropexy will improve stress urinary incontinence symptoms in participants with stress urinary incontinence and normal urethral closure pressure at 2 months and 12 months after surgery.

Specific Aims:

Aim 1: Investigate the efficacy of this mesh-free suture based surgical technique for improving SUI symptoms

Aim 2: Investigate the efficacy of this mesh-free suture based surgical technique on key urethral support defects observed with 3D ultrasound

Being tested
Urethropexy
Medical subject headings
Urinary Incontinence, Stress

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • UrethropexyProcedure or surgery

    Suture based (Mesh-free) surgery to stabilize the urethra for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Stress urinary incontinence symptoms

    Severity of stress urinary incontinence symptoms by questionnaire

    Measured: 2 weeks

  2. Stress urinary incontinence symptoms

    Severity of stress urinary incontinence symptoms by questionnaire

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Stress urinary incontinence symptoms

    Severity of stress urinary incontinence symptoms by questionnaire

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Voiding dysfunction

    Rate of urinary retention after surgery

    Measured: Within 1 year of surgery

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Distal Urethral Motion

    Distal urethral swing angle during Valsalva measured via pelvic ultrasound

    Measured: 2 months

  2. Distal Urethral Motion

    Distal urethral swing angle during Valsalva measured via pelvic ultrasound

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Proximal Urethral Motion

    Proximal urethral swing angle during Valsalva measured via pelvic ultrasound

    Measured: 2 months

  4. Proximal Urethral Motion

    Proximal urethral swing angle during Valsalva measured via pelvic ultrasound

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Post-operative complications

    Rate of post-operative complications

    Measured: Within 1 year of surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 May 2021
  2. Study start25 Aug 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
15 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04881721
Sponsor's protocol ID
EH21-062
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
8 Apr 2021
Last updated
13 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.

    PubMed 28756647
  • Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, Kraus SR, Chai TC, Lemack GE, Dandreo KJ, Varner RE, Menefee S, Ghetti C, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Khandwala S, Rozanski TA, Johnson H, Schaffer J, Stoddard AM, Holley RL, Nager CW, Moalli P, Mueller E, Arisco AM, Corton M, Tennstedt S, Chang TD, Gormley EA, Litman HJ; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2066-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912658. Epub 2010 May 17.

    PubMed 20479459
  • Kenton K, Stoddard AM, Zyczynski H, Albo M, Rickey L, Norton P, Wai C, Kraus SR, Sirls LT, Kusek JW, Litman HJ, Chang RP, Richter HE. 5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings. J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.089. Epub 2014 Aug 23.

    PubMed 25158274
  • Nolfi AL, Brown BN, Liang R, Palcsey SL, Bonidie MJ, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA. Host response to synthetic mesh in women with mesh complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):206.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Apr 16.

    PubMed 27094962
  • Frenkl TL, Rackley RR, Vasavada SP, Goldman HB. Management of iatrogenic foreign bodies of the bladder and urethra following pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(6):491-5. doi: 10.1002/nau.20558.

    PubMed 18537142
  • Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME, Chai TC, Dandreo KJ, Lloyd KL, Lowder JL, Sirls LT, Lemack GE, Arisco AM, Xu Y, Kusek JW; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;205(5):498.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

    PubMed 21925636
  • Baracat F, Mitre AI, Kanashiro H, Montellato NI. Endoscopic treatment of vesical and urethral perforations after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for female stress urinary incontinence. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2005 Oct;60(5):397-400. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322005000500008. Epub 2005 Oct 24.

    PubMed 16254676
  • Giri SK, Drumm J, Flood HD. Endoscopic holmium laser excision of intravesical tension-free vaginal tape and polypropylene suture after anti-incontinence procedures. J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1306-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000173926.04596.55.

    PubMed 16145408
  • Koduri S, Goldberg RP, Sand PK. Transvaginal therapy of genuine stress incontinence. Urology. 2000 Dec 4;56(6 Suppl 1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00509-4.

    PubMed 11114559

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by Endeavor Health at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Stress urinary incontinence symptoms (time frame: 2 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04881721, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in