Parkinson DiseaseSonicWalkNCT04876339
Sonification Techniques for Gait Training
A study testing Gait rehabilitation with "sonification" and Standard gait rehabilitation (without sonification) in people with Parkinson Disease and Stroke, run by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Music therapy is widely used in relational and rehabilitation settings. In addition to Neurologic Music Therapy and other music-based techniques, "sonification" approaches were recently introduced in the field of rehabilitation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease, Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis
- What is being tested?
- Gait rehabilitation with "sonification" and Standard gait rehabilitation (without sonification)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 18 Jan 2021to 30 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age < 80
- Mini Mental State Examination > 24
- Modified Rankin Scale: 1-3
- Single hemisphere lesion
- Stabilized disease (> 6 months after the acute event)
- Impairment in gait parameters (e.g. velocity, perceived fatigue etc)
Show all 19Show fewer
- Motor independence during walking (without orthotic devices and aids) but with pathological pattern (spasticity level: Ashworth < 2)
- Age < 80
- Mini Mental State Examination > 24
- Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale score (Parte III): < 28
- Stabilized disease and drug therapy
- Altered gait patterns
- Motor independence during walking (without orthotic devices and aids) but with pathological pattern
- Age < 60
- Mini Mental State Examination > 24
- Expanded Disability Status Scale score: 3-5
- Stabilized disease in the last 6 months (without relapse or disability progression)
- Altered gait patterns (i.e., careening, slowing down, spasticity: Ashworth < 2, etc.)
- Motor independence during walking
Who cannot join
- Multiple or bilateral lesions
- Neglect
- Equinism
- Spasticity: Ashworth >2
- Structured (non-elastic) Achilles tendon retraction
- Neurotoxin in the 3 months prior to the study
Show all 18Show fewer
- Baclofen introduced or modified in the week before the start of the study
- Previous or concurrent diseases disabling the lower limb functions
- Rehabilitative treatments with music in the year before the study
- Previous or concurrent diseases disabling the lower limb functions
- Changes of drug therapy during the study
- Rehabilitative treatments with music in the year before the study
- Previous or concurrent diseases disabling the lower limb functions
- Neurotoxin in the 3 months prior to the study
- Baclofen introduced or modified in the week before the start of the study
- Spasticity: Ashworth >2
- Structured (non-elastic) Achilles tendon retraction
- Rehabilitative treatments with music in the year before the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS
Pavia, 27100
Isabella Springhetti, MD, isabella.springhetti@icsmaugeri.it
About this study
Official title: Sonification Techniques for Gait Training: a Pilot Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial
Music therapy is widely used in relational and rehabilitation settings. In addition to Neurologic Music Therapy and other music-based techniques, "sonification" approaches were recently introduced in the field of rehabilitation. The "sonification" can be defined as a properly selected set of sonorous-music stimuli are associated with patient movements mapping. In fact, the auditory-motor feedback can replace damaged proprioceptive circuits with a consequent improvement of the rehabilitation process. Interventions with "sonification" facilitate sensorimotor learning, proprioception and movements planning and execution improving global motor parameters. This study proposes the use of musical auditory cues which includes the melodic-harmonic component of the music. This kind of sonification makes the feedback pleasant and predictable as well as potentially effective. The investigators propose to apply and assess the effectiveness of this kind of sonification on gait training and other secondary outcomes in stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis population. Also, the investigators will assess the impact of "sonification" on the level of fatigue perceived during the rehabilitation process and on the quality of life. The study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial and will involve 120 patients that will undergo standard motor rehabilitation or the same rehabilitation but with the sonification support. The interventions will be evaluated at the baseline, after 10 sessions, after 20 sessions and at follow-up (one month after the end of the treatment). The assessment will include functional, motor, fatigue and quality of life evaluations. The collected data will be statistically processed.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Music therapy is widely used in relational settings. The sound can engage limbic and paralimbic areas and a variety of other brain areas strictly connected with movement (motor cortex, supplementary motor area, cerebellum, basal ganglia, etc.). For this reason, music can be considered a useful tool in rehabilitation settings and, in particular, for neuromotor rehabilitation.
The use of specific music-based techniques can induce plastic changes from childhood to elderly. These changes involve both brain motor and auditory sensory-motor areas thanks to the improved connectivity between brain areas induced by the sound and music that would not happen without the auditory stimuli. As suggested in previous studies the plastic changes induced by music in the nodal points of the cerebral network can cause effects that tend to persist even beyond the duration of rehabilitation training. The music also in the rehabilitation process determines an emotional involvement and creates a strong motivational basis reinforcing its action through the coupling of the auditory stimulus with sensory-motor component.
Neurologic Music Therapy (NTM) could be defined as a codified use of music-based techniques aimed at recovering sensory, cognitive and motor deficits due to a neurological pathology. NMT consists in several specific techniques among which Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) is one of the most used and well documented in scientific literature. RAS is based on the application of the rhythmic component of the music to gait and gait-related rehabilitation. Music effects in stroke rehabilitation are well documented: music can improve gait (velocity, cadence, stride length and balance), upper limbs movements , language, but also mood and psychological aspects.
Gait rehabilitation studies for Parkinson's Disease (PD) and Multiple Sclerosis (MS) show similar results.
Recent studies are related to the "sonification" technique: a properly selected set of sonorous-music stimuli are associated with patient movements mapping. The auditory-motor feedback can replace damaged proprioceptive circuits with a consequent improvement of the rehabilitation process. Interventions with "sonification" facilitate sensorimotor learning, proprioception and movements planning and execution improving global motor parameters. Studies related to "sonification" mainly concern upper limb rehabilitation and only a few of them concern the lower limbs rehabilitation. In particular, this study proposes the use of musical auditory cues which includes the melodic-harmonic component of the music. This kind of sonification makes the feedback pleasant and predictable as well as potentially effective. The investigators propose to apply this particular kind of sonification to gait training and other secondary outcomes in stroke, PD and SM population.
Aims:
- To assess the effectiveness of the sonification in the gait rehabilitation in stroke, PD and MS patients.
- To assess the effectiveness of sonification on the level of fatigue perceived during the rehabilitation process
- To assess the impact of the sonification on the quality of life
Materials and methods:
The study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial and will involve 120 clinically stabilized patients with stroke (n=40), Parkinsons' disease (n=40) and multiple sclerosis (n=40). Each of these three arms will be divided in two groups: a control group (n=20) will undergo standard motor rehabilitation and an experimental group (n=20) will undergo the same rehabilitation but with the sonification support. The gait training program includes 20 sessions, 30 minutes each 3 times a week (see next chapter for details).
A unique randomization list will be generated according to the trial's design and managed by the Principal Investigator. Each subject will be associated with a unique identifier that will allow its identification throughout the duration of the study. The evaluation of the questionnaires and the statistical analysis will be carried out blindly
Assessment:
The interventions will be evaluated at the baseline (T0), after 10 sessions (T1), after 20 sessions (T2, end of the treatment) and at follow-up (T3, one month after the end of the treatment). The scales used for the assessments will be the following:
Functional evaluation:
- Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Motor parameter evaluation:
- 6 minutes Walking Test (velocity)
- Mini BesTest (balance)
- Dynamic Gait Index (dynamic balance, gait and risk of falls)
- Timed Up \& Go (mobility)
Fatigue assessments, quality of life and perceived overall effect of the intervention:
- VAS (Visual Analogue Scale, for assessing perceived fatigue at the end of each session)
- McGill Quality of Life- it (quality of life assessment)
- Global Perceived Effect (GPE) Statistics The collected data will be presented by descriptive statistics: continuous variables having a normal distribution as mean and standard deviation, continuous variables having a non-normal distribution as median and interquartile range. Binary and categorical variables will be presented as a percentage or absolute number.
For each group of patients involved in this study (stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis), the homogeneity of demographic data and outcome measures between the experimental subgroup and the control subgroup will be verified. Finally, for all outcome measures detected (6 minutes Walking Test, FIM, Dynamic Gait Index, Timed Up \& Go, VAS fatigue, McGill Quality of Life-it and GPE) it is expected to perform the analysis of the variance or mixed linear model for repeated measurements (p<0.05) in order to evaluate the effects of the treatment type, time and their interaction. For those outcomes where the assumptions of applicability of the variance analysis will not be verified, non-parametric methods will be applied to assess the main effects and interaction separately.
Patients will be asked to sign an Informed Consent before joining the study.
Adverse events No indication of any risk associated with the protocol because the rehabilitative treatments will be performed according to the usual procedures laid down in clinical practice in accordance with the guidelines relating to the gait rehabilitation.
Informed consent to participate in the study. All patients participating in the study will have to give their informed consent as required by the attachment for the execution of the study and for the processing of personal data.
Insurance The activation of an additional insurance is not foreseen as the study and the procedures applied fall within the coverage of the insurance policy currently in force for the conduct of the clinical trial.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease, Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis
- Being tested
- Gait rehabilitation with "sonification", Standard gait rehabilitation (without sonification)
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease, Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gait rehabilitation with "sonification"Device
The sonification system is composed by 2 inertial sensors, a computer and a pair of bluetooth headphones connected with the computer. The sensors will be placed one per leg at the ankle and connected with Matlab software. An home-made ad-hoc software associates patient's movements with music patterns. The patient's natural rhythm is detected and used at the beginning of the intervention. The first part of each exercise is supported by a pre-recorded chord progression with a click on the background. In the second part (sonification approach) the software notices and records the contact of the heel with the ground. Each contact activates musical stimuli listened to via headphones. The steps succession will build a regular and predictable musical progression in relation to the correct sequence of steps. The exercises planned in this intervention are the same as those planned in the gait standard rehabilitation (see below).
Standard gait rehabilitation (without sonification)Other
The training will be carried out without any musical support. Exercises I Phase
- Load shift in anteroposterior standing in tandem position, left foot forward (3 minutes exercise with a short break in the middle)
- Load shift in anteroposterior standing in tandem position, right foot forward (3 minutes exercise with a short break in the middle)
- Left foot swing (3 minutes exercise with a short break in the middle)
- Right foot swing (3 minutes exercise with a short break in the middle)
- March in place (3 minutes exercise with a short break in the middle) Exercises II phase (15 minutes): the patient will perform 14 minutes of walking with a 1 minute of break in the middle (7 minutes of walking, 1 minute rest, 7 minutes of walking). In the second part of walking the patient will be asked to slightly increase the pace of the step up to the maximum possible speed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Gait rehabilitation with "sonification" | Experimental | The rehabilitation exercises with sonification are supported by the musical component (see "Interventions" section for details). Receives: Device: Gait rehabilitation with "sonification" |
| Standard gait rehabilitation (without sonification) | Active comparator | The same rehabilitation exercises are performed without musical support. Receives: Other: Standard gait rehabilitation (without sonification) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the Six Minutes Walking Test
The gait speed will be evaluated (using the Six Minutes Walking Test) by comparing the variations of the test scores in the experimental and control group
Measured: Change from Baseline Six Minutes Walking Test at 7 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Mini BesTest
The balance will be evaluated (using the Mini BesTest) by comparing the variations of the test scores in the experimental and control group
Measured: Up to 11 weeks
Dynamic Gait Index
Dynamic balance and gait and risk of falls will be evaluated (using the Dynamic Gait Index) by comparing the variations of the test scores in the experimental and control group
Measured: Up to 11 weeks
Timed Up & Go
The mobility will be evaluated (using the Timed Up \& Go test) by comparing the variations of the test scores in the experimental and control group
Measured: Up to 11 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2021
- Study start18 Jan 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (46)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alfredo Raglio, PhD, Principal investigator, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04876339
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2419 CE
- Acronym
- SonicWalk
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 2 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Altenmuller E, Marco-Pallares J, Munte TF, Schneider S. Neural reorganization underlies improvement in stroke-induced motor dysfunction by music-supported therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:395-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04580.x.
PubMed 19673814Ashoori A, Eagleman DM, Jankovic J. Effects of Auditory Rhythm and Music on Gait Disturbances in Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurol. 2015 Nov 11;6:234. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00234. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26617566Bangert M, Altenmuller EO. Mapping perception to action in piano practice: a longitudinal DC-EEG study. BMC Neurosci. 2003 Oct 15;4:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-4-26.
PubMed 14575529Bangert M, Peschel T, Schlaug G, Rotte M, Drescher D, Hinrichs H, Heinze HJ, Altenmuller E. Shared networks for auditory and motor processing in professional pianists: evidence from fMRI conjunction. Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 15;30(3):917-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.044. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
PubMed 16380270Baram Y, Miller A. Auditory feedback control for improvement of gait in patients with Multiple Sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2007 Mar 15;254(1-2):90-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.003. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
PubMed 17316692Baumann S, Koeneke S, Schmidt CF, Meyer M, Lutz K, Jancke L. A network for audio-motor coordination in skilled pianists and non-musicians. Brain Res. 2007 Aug 3;1161:65-78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.05.045. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
PubMed 17603027Bella SD, Benoit CE, Farrugia N, Keller PE, Obrig H, Mainka S, Kotz SA. Gait improvement via rhythmic stimulation in Parkinson's disease is linked to rhythmic skills. Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 24;7:42005. doi: 10.1038/srep42005.
PubMed 28233776Bevilacqua F, Boyer EO, Francoise J, Houix O, Susini P, Roby-Brami A, Hanneton S. Sensori-Motor Learning with Movement Sonification: Perspectives from Recent Interdisciplinary Studies. Front Neurosci. 2016 Aug 25;10:385. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00385. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27610071Brodie MA, Dean RT, Beijer TR, Canning CG, Smith ST, Menant JC, Lord SR. Symmetry matched auditory cues improve gait steadiness in most people with Parkinson's disease but not in healthy older people. J Parkinsons Dis. 2015;5(1):105-16. doi: 10.3233/JPD-140430.
PubMed 25468233Cha Y, Kim Y, Hwang S, Chung Y. Intensive gait training with rhythmic auditory stimulation in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(4):681-8. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141182.
PubMed 25318784Chong HJ, Han SJ, Kim YJ, Park HY, Kim SJ. Relationship between output from MIDI-keyboard playing and hand function assessments on affected hand after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(4):673-80. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141166.
PubMed 25318775Colombo R, Raglio A, Panigazzi M, Mazzone A, Bazzini G, Imarisio C, Molteni D, Caltagirone C, Imbriani M. The SonicHand Protocol for Rehabilitation of Hand Motor Function: A Validation and Feasibility Study. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019 Apr;27(4):664-672. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2905076. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
PubMed 30872238Conklyn D, Stough D, Novak E, Paczak S, Chemali K, Bethoux F. A home-based walking program using rhythmic auditory stimulation improves gait performance in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Nov-Dec;24(9):835-42. doi: 10.1177/1545968310372139. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
PubMed 20643882Ghai S, Ghai I. Effects of (music-based) rhythmic auditory cueing training on gait and posture post-stroke: A systematic review & dose-response meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 18;9(1):2183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38723-3.
PubMed 30778101Ghai S, Ghai I, Schmitz G, Effenberg AO. Effect of rhythmic auditory cueing on parkinsonian gait: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 11;8(1):506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16232-5.
PubMed 29323122
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sonification Techniques for Gait Training: a Pilot Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04876339
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SonicWalk / 2419 CE
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease, Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpAUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Music therapy is widely used in relational and rehabilitation settings. In addition to Neurologic Music Therapy and other music-based techniques, "sonification" approaches were recently introduced in the field of rehabilitation. The "sonification" can be defined as a properly selected set of sonorous-music stimuli are associated with patient movements mapping. In fact, the auditory-motor feedback can replace damaged proprioceptive circuits with a consequent improvement of the rehabilitation process. Interventions with "sonification" facilitate sensorimotor learning, proprioception and movements planning and execution improving global motor parameters. This study proposes the use of musical auditory cues which includes the melodic-harmonic component of the music. This kind of sonification makes the feedback pleasant and predictable as well as potentially effective. The investigators propose to apply and assess the effectiveness of this kind of sonification on gait training and other secondary outcomes in stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis population. Also, the investigators will assess the impact of "sonification" on the level of fatigue perceived during the rehabilitation process and on the quality of life. The study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial and will involve 120 patients that will undergo standard motor rehabilitation or the same rehabilitation but with the sonification support. The interventions will be evaluated at the baseline, after 10 sessions, after 20 sessions and at follow-up (one month after the end of the treatment). The assessment will include functional, motor, fatigue and quality of life evaluations. The collected data will be statistically processed.
Detailed description
Background:
Music therapy is widely used in relational settings. The sound can engage limbic and paralimbic areas and a variety of other brain areas strictly connected with movement (motor cortex, supplementary motor area, cerebellum, basal ganglia, etc.). For this reason, music can be considered a useful tool in rehabilitation settings and, in particular, for neuromotor rehabilitation.
The use of specific music-based techniques can induce plastic changes from childhood to elderly. These changes involve both brain motor and auditory sensory-motor areas thanks to the improved connectivity between brain areas induced by the sound and music that would not happen without the auditory stimuli. As suggested in previous studies the plastic changes induced by music in the nodal points of the cerebral network can cause effects that tend to persist even beyond the duration of rehabilitation training. The music also in the rehabilitation process determines an emotional involvement and creates a strong motivational basis reinforcing its action through the coupling of the auditory stimulus with sensory-motor component.
Neurologic Music Therapy (NTM) could be defined as a codified use of music-based techniques aimed at recovering sensory, cognitive and motor deficits due to a neurological pathology. NMT consists in several specific techniques among which Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) is one of the most used and well documented in scientific literature. RAS is based on the application of the rhythmic component of the music to gait and gait-related rehabilitation. Music effects in stroke rehabilitation are well documented: music can improve gait (velocity, cadence, stride length and balance), upper limbs movements , language, but also mood and psychological aspects.
Gait rehabilitation studies for Parkinson's Disease (PD) and Multiple Sclerosis (MS) show similar results.
Recent studies are related to the "sonification" technique: a properly selected set of sonorous-music stimuli are associated with patient movements mapping. The auditory-motor feedback can replace damaged proprioceptive circuits with a consequent improvement of the rehabilitation process. Interventions with "sonification" facilitate sensorimotor learning, proprioception and movements planning and execution improving global motor parameters. Studies related to "sonification" mainly concern upper limb rehabilitation and only a few of them concern the lower limbs rehabilitation. In particular, this study proposes the use of musical auditory cues which includes the melodic-harmonic component of the music. This kind of sonification makes the feedback pleasant and predictable as well as potentially effective. The investigators propose to apply this particular kind of sonification to gait training and other secondary outcomes in stroke, PD and SM population.
Aims:
- To assess the effectiveness of the sonification in the gait rehabilitation in stroke, PD and MS patients.
- To assess the effectiveness of sonification on the level of fatigue perceived during the rehabilitation process
- To assess the impact of the sonification on the quality of life
Materials and methods:
The study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial and will involve 120 clinically stabilized patients with stroke (n=40), Parkinsons' disease (n=40) and multiple sclerosis (n=40). Each of these three arms will be divided in two groups: a control group (n=20) will undergo standard motor rehabilitation and an experimental group (n=20) will undergo the same rehabilitation but with the sonification support. The gait training program includes 20 sessions, 30 minutes each 3 times a week (see next chapter for details).
A unique randomization list will be generated according to the trial's design and managed by the Principal Investigator. Each subject will be associated with a unique identifier that will allow its identification throughout the duration of the study. The evaluation of the questionnaires and the statistical analysis will be carried out blindly
Assessment:
The interventions will be evaluated at the baseline (T0), after 10 sessions (T1), after 20 sessions (T2, end of the treatment) and at follow-up (T3, one month after the end of the treatment). The scales used for the assessments will be the following:
Functional evaluation:
- Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Motor parameter evaluation:
- 6 minutes Walking Test (velocity)
- Mini BesTest (balance)
- Dynamic Gait Index (dynamic balance, gait and risk of falls)
- Timed Up \& Go (mobility)
Fatigue assessments, quality of life and perceived overall effect of the intervention:
- VAS (Visual Analogue Scale, for assessing perceived fatigue at the end of each session)
- McGill Quality of Life- it (quality of life assessment)
- Global Perceived Effect (GPE) Statistics The collected data will be presented by descriptive statistics: continuous variables having a normal distribution as mean and standard deviation, continuous variables having a non-normal distribution as median and interquartile range. Binary and categorical variables will be presented as a percentage or absolute number.
For each group of patients involved in this study (stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis), the homogeneity of demographic data and outcome measures between the experimental subgroup and the control subgroup will be verified. Finally, for all outcome measures detected (6 minutes Walking Test, FIM, Dynamic Gait Index, Timed Up \& Go, VAS fatigue, McGill Quality of Life-it and GPE) it is expected to perform the analysis of the variance or mixed linear model for repeated measurements (p<0.05) in order to evaluate the effects of the treatment type, time and their interaction. For those outcomes where the assumptions of applicability of the variance analysis will not be verified, non-parametric methods will be applied to assess the main effects and interaction separately.
Patients will be asked to sign an Informed Consent before joining the study.
Adverse events No indication of any risk associated with the protocol because the rehabilitative treatments will be performed according to the usual procedures laid down in clinical practice in accordance with the guidelines relating to the gait rehabilitation.
Informed consent to participate in the study. All patients participating in the study will have to give their informed consent as required by the attachment for the execution of the study and for the processing of personal data.
Insurance The activation of an additional insurance is not foreseen as the study and the procedures applied fall within the coverage of the insurance policy currently in force for the conduct of the clinical trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Gait rehabilitation with "sonification" | Experimental | Device: Gait rehabilitation with "sonification"The rehabilitation exercises with sonification are supported by the musical component (see "Interventions" section for details). |
| Standard gait rehabilitation (without sonification) | Active comparator | Other: Standard gait rehabilitation (without sonification)The same rehabilitation exercises are performed without musical support. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Age < 80
- Mini Mental State Examination > 24
- Modified Rankin Scale: 1-3
- Single hemisphere lesion
- Stabilized disease (> 6 months after the acute event)
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Multiple or bilateral lesions
- Neglect
- Equinism
- Spasticity: Ashworth >2
- Structured (non-elastic) Achilles tendon retraction
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gait rehabilitation with "sonification"The sonification system is composed by 2 inertial sensors, a computer and a pair of bluetooth headphones connected with the computer. The sensors will be placed one per leg at the ankle and connected with Matlab software. An home-made ad-hoc software associates patient's movements with music patterns. The patient's natural rhythm is detected and used at the beginning of the intervention. The first part of each exercise is supported by a pre-recorded chord progression with a click on the background. In the second part (sonification approach) the software notices and records the contact of the heel with the ground. Each contact activates musical stimuli listened to via headphones. The steps succession will build a regular and predictable musical progression in relation to the correct sequence of steps. The exercises planned in this intervention are the same as those planned in the gait standard rehabilitation (see below). | Device | Gait rehabilitation with "sonification" |
| Standard gait rehabilitation (without sonification)The training will be carried out without any musical support. Exercises I Phase 1. Load shift in anteroposterior standing in tandem position, left foot forward (3 minutes exercise with a short break in the middle) 2. Load shift in anteroposterior standing in tandem position, right foot forward (3 minutes exercise with a short break in the middle) 3. Left foot swing (3 minutes exercise with a short break in the middle) 4. Right foot swing (3 minutes exercise with a short break in the middle) 5. March in place (3 minutes exercise with a short break in the middle) Exercises II phase (15 minutes): the patient will perform 14 minutes of walking with a 1 minute of break in the middle (7 minutes of walking, 1 minute rest, 7 minutes of walking). In the second part of walking the patient will be asked to slightly increase the pace of the step up to the maximum possible speed. | Other | Standard gait rehabilitation (without sonification) |
Primary outcome
Change in the Six Minutes Walking Test
Time frame: Change from Baseline Six Minutes Walking Test at 7 weeks
The gait speed will be evaluated (using the Six Minutes Walking Test) by comparing the variations of the test scores in the experimental and control group
3 secondary outcomes
Mini BesTest
Time frame: Up to 11 weeks
Dynamic Gait Index
Time frame: Up to 11 weeks
Timed Up & Go
Time frame: Up to 11 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 19673814Altenmuller E, Marco-Pallares J, Munte TF, Schneider S. Neural reorganization underlies improvement in stroke-induced motor dysfunction by music-supported therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:395-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04580.x.
- Background: PubMed 26617566Ashoori A, Eagleman DM, Jankovic J. Effects of Auditory Rhythm and Music on Gait Disturbances in Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurol. 2015 Nov 11;6:234. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00234. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 14575529Bangert M, Altenmuller EO. Mapping perception to action in piano practice: a longitudinal DC-EEG study. BMC Neurosci. 2003 Oct 15;4:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-4-26.
- Background: PubMed 16380270Bangert M, Peschel T, Schlaug G, Rotte M, Drescher D, Hinrichs H, Heinze HJ, Altenmuller E. Shared networks for auditory and motor processing in professional pianists: evidence from fMRI conjunction. Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 15;30(3):917-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.044. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
- Background: PubMed 17316692Baram Y, Miller A. Auditory feedback control for improvement of gait in patients with Multiple Sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2007 Mar 15;254(1-2):90-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.003. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
- Background: PubMed 17603027Baumann S, Koeneke S, Schmidt CF, Meyer M, Lutz K, Jancke L. A network for audio-motor coordination in skilled pianists and non-musicians. Brain Res. 2007 Aug 3;1161:65-78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.05.045. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
- Background: PubMed 28233776Bella SD, Benoit CE, Farrugia N, Keller PE, Obrig H, Mainka S, Kotz SA. Gait improvement via rhythmic stimulation in Parkinson's disease is linked to rhythmic skills. Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 24;7:42005. doi: 10.1038/srep42005.
- Background: PubMed 27610071Bevilacqua F, Boyer EO, Francoise J, Houix O, Susini P, Roby-Brami A, Hanneton S. Sensori-Motor Learning with Movement Sonification: Perspectives from Recent Interdisciplinary Studies. Front Neurosci. 2016 Aug 25;10:385. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00385. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 25468233Brodie MA, Dean RT, Beijer TR, Canning CG, Smith ST, Menant JC, Lord SR. Symmetry matched auditory cues improve gait steadiness in most people with Parkinson's disease but not in healthy older people. J Parkinsons Dis. 2015;5(1):105-16. doi: 10.3233/JPD-140430.
- Background: PubMed 25318784Cha Y, Kim Y, Hwang S, Chung Y. Intensive gait training with rhythmic auditory stimulation in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(4):681-8. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141182.
- Background: PubMed 25318775Chong HJ, Han SJ, Kim YJ, Park HY, Kim SJ. Relationship between output from MIDI-keyboard playing and hand function assessments on affected hand after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(4):673-80. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141166.
- Background: PubMed 30872238Colombo R, Raglio A, Panigazzi M, Mazzone A, Bazzini G, Imarisio C, Molteni D, Caltagirone C, Imbriani M. The SonicHand Protocol for Rehabilitation of Hand Motor Function: A Validation and Feasibility Study. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019 Apr;27(4):664-672. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2905076. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Behavioral and/or Mirabegron to Treat Urinary Symptoms in Parkinson Disease
Overactive Bladder, Parkinson Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab Alone in Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥ 50% (MK-2870-007)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
RecruitingObservational study
Parkinson's Disease in Type 1 Gaucher Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD), Type 1 Gaucher Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Investigational Agents in Participants With Previously Treated Stage IV Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (MK-3475-01H/KEYMAKER-U01)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, PK, Safety, and Tolerability of VIM0423 in Adults With Parkinson's Disease Tremor Insufficiently Responsive to Dopaminergic Therapy
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Alfredo Raglio, PhD principal investigator
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Gait rehabilitation with "sonification" and Standard gait rehabilitation (without sonification) in people with Parkinson Disease and Stroke, run by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Paola Baiardi, PhD (+390382592599, paola.baiardi@icsmaugeri.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the Six Minutes Walking Test (time frame: Change from Baseline Six Minutes Walking Test at 7 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04876339, which also lists 46 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2026.