SclerodermaNCT04875078
UVA-1 for Treatment of Skin Tightening and Improvement of Hand Function in Scleroderma
A study testing UVA-1 Phototherapy and UV-Blocking Glove in people with Scleroderma, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
UVA-1 has been reported to be beneficial to skin changes in scleroderma in several case reports and a few small studies. (Jacobe 2020) Interpretation of these reports has been difficult based on the small numbers of subjects involved and the non-blinded non-randomized nature of the reports. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Scleroderma
- What is being tested?
- UVA-1 Phototherapy and UV-Blocking Glove
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 9 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Dec 2020to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be able to understand and provide written informed consent
- Scleroderma skin involvement affecting both hands approximately equally
- Age of at least 18-years-old
- Male or female
- Ability to engage in twice weekly UVA1 sessions
- No changes in systemic therapy during the first 100 days of the study period
Who cannot join
- On photosensitizing medication
- Inability to complete study visits
- UV light therapy in the 4 weeks prior to entering the study
- Commercial tanning or excessive sun exposure in the 4 weeks prior to entering the study
- Current pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study period
- Use of topical therapies other than emollients (suprapotent corticosteroids) in the 2 weeks prior to entering the study
- History of intolerance to ultraviolet light
- Any other condition that will disqualify the patient from the study in the opinion of the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Utah MidValley Dermatology
Murray, Utah, 84107
About this study
Official title: UVA-1 for Treatment of Skin Tightening and Improvement of Hand Function in Scleroderma: a Randomized, Intra-patient, Dominant/Non-dominant Hand Clinical Trial.
UVA-1 has been reported to be beneficial to skin changes in scleroderma in several case reports and a few small studies. (Jacobe 2020) Interpretation of these reports has been difficult based on the small numbers of subjects involved and the non-blinded non-randomized nature of the reports. In a single controlled study with half-side comparison of 9 patients, the investigators could not demonstrate improvement with UVA-1 in the treated hand. (Thomas 2007) This study was limited by a small number of patients and the long disease duration prior to treatment (mean of 13 years). A more recent report of a patient with scleroderma for 2.5 years and severe acrosclerosis that responded to 21 sessions of UVA-1 with improved mobility and functionality renews interest in this treatment modality. (Cuenca-Barrales 2019)
In this trial patients will be randomized to have their dominant or non-dominant hand undergo 30 sessions of UVA1 therapy. We will assess patient's hand mobility, hand function, skin hardening (assessed by durometer measurements), skin thickness, as well as patient reported outcomes to determine efficacy.
This study will use a single-blind, prospective, randomized (dominant/non-dominant hand) comparator design to assess the effect of high dose (80-120 J/cm2) UVA1 therapy on hand function in scleroderma in a paired t-test design. This study is a randomized, investigator-blinded, intra-patient, UV-blocking glove-controlled clinical trial. A follow up period of 12 months following completion of UVA1 therapy will prospectively follow patients to monitor for relapse of their disease to assess the durability of the clinical response to UVA1 therapy on hand scleroderma.
Read the detailed description
Systemic sclerosis (SSc), also called scleroderma, is a rare chronic autoimmune disease that can have a wide range of cutaneous, joint, and internal organ involvement. In the skin, SSc is characterized by enhanced fibroblast activity leading to hypertrophic dermal collagen that results in thickened, less flexible skin. (Hassani, 2016) SSc is often divided into two types based on extent of cutaneous involvement: diffuse SSc and limited SSc. The hand is a frequent area of involvement in both subtypes of SSc. Hand disability in SSc leads to a high burden on quality of life for patients as it limits both work and activities of daily living. Treatment for hand sclerosis remains limited with generally progressive disease despite aggressive treatment with anti-fibrotic medications, immunosuppressive agents, and topical approaches. Specific hand therapies include physiotherapy and injections of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction into the fingers with some success. (Guillaume-Jugnot, 2016; Liem, 2019)
Ultraviolet therapy has been used in dermatology for several decades. UVA-1 is a form of phototherapy that utilizes the longest wavelengths in the UV spectrum from 340-400 nm. It is able to penetrate deeper in the skin than other types of phototherapy and target different types of cells including fibroblasts. In sclerosing skin conditions UVA-1 appears to be superior to other forms of UV light. Medium to high dose UVA-1 also appears to be superior to low dose UVA-1 for sclerosing conditions. (Kreuter 2006).
UVA-1 has been reported to be beneficial to skin changes in SSc in several case reports and a few small studies. (Jacobe 2020) Interpretation of these reports has been difficult based on the small numbers of subjects involved and the non-blinded non-randomized nature of the reports. In a single controlled study with half-side comparison of 9 patients, the investigators could not demonstrate improvement with UVA-1 in the treated hand. (Thomas 2007) This study was limited by a small number of patients and the long disease duration prior to treatment (mean of 13 years). A more recent report of a patient with SSc for 2.5 years and severe acrosclerosis that responded to 21 sessions of UVA-1 with improved mobility and functionality renews interest in this treatment modality. (Cuenca-Barrales 2019)
If UVA1 therapy can significantly improve hand involvement in SSc with regards to functionality and disability, it may be a cost-effective and beneficial treatment for this patient segment with debilitating disease.
Purpose and Objectives:
- To assess the efficacy of 30 sessions of ultraviolet-1 (UVA1) therapy in treating hand involvement of SSc in a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, intra-patient, UV-blocking glove-controlled, clinical trial.
- To compare improvement in hand function as measured by the Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test, in the UVA1-treated hand compared to control hand (gloved).
Study Design:
This study will use a single-blind, prospective, randomized (dominant/non-dominant hand) comparator design to assess the effect of high dose (80-120 J/cm2) UVA1 therapy on hand function in scleroderma in a paired t-test design. This study is a randomized, investigator-blinded, intra-patient, UV-blocking glove-controlled clinical trial. A follow up period of 12 months following completion of UVA1 therapy will prospectively follow patients to monitor for relapse of their disease to assess the durability of the clinical response to UVA1 therapy on hand scleroderma.
Procedures:
This is a single-blinded, randomized, UV-blocking glove controlled, dominant/non-dominant hand, study to determine the efficacy of UVA1 in the treatment of hand scleroderma. Each participant will have at least one hand treated with UVA1 during the active treatment period of the study. The study will be performed at the University of Utah Dermatology Department using both the University of Utah E12 Clinic space as well as the Midvalley Clinic space. UVA1 lights boxes are located at both E12 and Midvalley locations. Personnel involved in the study will include the PI, the co-investigators, and the study coordinators. Approximately 27 patients will be enrolled to account for a 25% drop-out rate. The number needed to treat to show a difference in the treatment vs. control hands is 21.
Screening:
For screening, subjects with qualifying scleroderma involving both hands will be asked to read and sign the informed consent document. They will be reminded that they are to take their time and, if necessary, take it home for further consideration. Questions will be answered. Those meeting inclusion / exclusion criteria who have signed informed consent will be enrolled.
After answering questions and prior to the first treatment the Principal Investigator (PI) will examine the entire patient and assess for the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis with bilateral hand involvement and perform the following assessments: HAMIS, CHFDS, durometer measurements, and mRSS. (Please see efficacy assessment section for details of HAMIS, CHFDS, durometer, and mRSS). Photographs of the hands and other affected areas will be taken. The patient will be asked to identify their dominant (writing) hand and their answer will be noted. Using a random number generator, the patient will be randomized to undergo UVA1 treatment vs UV-blocking glove (control) on the dominant hand. The non-dominant hand will receive the other modality. A study coordinator will perform the randomization on the day of first treatment and the PI will be blinded to the treatment assignment.
UVA1 Treatments:
Blinding:
A UV-blocking glove will be placed on the control hand as determined by the randomization process. Subjects will wear eyewear that occludes external light.
Evaluations for adverse effects will be carried out by the UVA1 operator (a nurse not involved in any assessments) and the blinded investigator at prescribed intervals. Evaluation of UVA1 efficacy on hand scleroderma will be assessed by a trained and experienced evaluator who is blinded as to the UVA1-treated side (covered / not covered). The efficacy evaluations will be carried out prior to treatments on days both evaluations and treatments are completed. After participants have been evaluated at the 3-month post-treatment study visit the blinded evaluator will become unblinded to the UVA1-treated side for the purpose of allowing participants to receive standard of care therapy. Therefore, participants will be allowed to receive additional UVA-1 treatments to one or both hands in addition to any other necessary standard of care treatments after the 3-month post-treatment visit.
Dosing Schedule:
Prior studies with UVA1 have shown that high and medium dose protocols (>40-120 J/cm2) are more effective than low dose (20-40 J/cm2) to treat sclerosing skin conditions. (Hassani, 2016) Thus, we will set the initiation dose at 50 J. The hands will be positioned approximately 9 inches from the bulbs. The palmar surface of the hand will be exposed for half the treatment and the dorsal surface for half the treatment. If tolerating well after three treatments, the dose will be increased to 60 J for three treatments and then 70 J for the remaining treatments.
Patients will return to clinic two-to-three times per week for 30 treatments over a 100-day period to receive UVA1 treatments. If the patient experiences redness, burning, pain, or blistering at the treatment site, treatment will be held if active symptoms persist at the time of the next scheduled treatment. If the symptoms have resolved and the patient has healed by the next scheduled treatment, the UVA1 energy will be reduced by 10 J of the previously delivered dose. Dose escalation will then proceed by increasing the UVA1 energy after three well tolerated treatments.
Efficacy Evaluations:
- Efficacy evaluations will be performed at baseline, after 15 UVA1 treatment sessions, after 30 UVA1 treatment sessions, and at 3 and 12 months after completion of all UVA1 treatments. For each evaluation prior to the 12-month evaluation, one of the sub-Investigators who is blinded to the treatment assignments will generate and record the HAMIS, CHFDS, Durometer, and mRSS. Hands will be photographed. Patients will complete all PROM including using Skindex-16, Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ), PROMIS-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis - Digital Ulcers(HDISS-DU), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The blinded evaluator will also perform safety evaluation and document study-related adverse events.
Endpoint measure descriptions:
HAMIS is a hand function test developed for adults with systemic sclerosis. HAMIS consists of 9 items designed to measure all movements assessed in an ordinary range of motion (ROM)-measured hand test. Specific items test finger flexion and extension, thumb abduction, pincer grip, finger abduction/swelling, dorsal extension and volar extension of the wrist, and pronation and supination. Each item is graded on a 0-3 scale, where 0 corresponds to normal function and 3 denotes that the individual is unable to perform the item. Each hand is assessed separately. The minimum score for HAMIS is 0, representing normal hand function. The maximum score of HAMIS is 27, representing a high degree of dysfunction. (Sandqvist, 2000)
- Conditions
- Scleroderma
- Being tested
- UVA-1 Phototherapy, UV-Blocking Glove
- Medical subject headings
- Scleroderma, Diffuse
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
UVA-1 PhototherapyDevice
UVA-1 Phototherapy treatments
UV-Blocking GloveOther
A UV-blocking glove was placed over the hand randomized to the control condition during UVA1 phototherapy sessions. The glove prevented UVA1 exposure to the control hand, allowing within-participant comparison of the UVA1-treated hand with the contralateral control hand. Each participant had one hand assigned to UVA1 treatment and the other hand assigned to the UV-blocking glove control condition.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| All Study Participants | Experimental | All participants received both intervention conditions in a randomized, split-person (intra-patient) design. One hand was randomized to receive UVA1 phototherapy, and the contralateral hand served as the control and was covered with a UV-blocking glove during UVA1 treatment sessions. Treatment-hand assignment was determined using a random number generator. Receives: Device: UVA-1 Phototherapy; Other: UV-Blocking Glove |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) Score at Treatment 30
The Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test assesses hand mobility in systemic sclerosis. Each hand is assessed separately using 9 items evaluating hand and wrist movements. Each item is scored from 0 to 3. Total scores range from 0 to 27 for each hand, with 0 representing normal hand function and higher scores indicating greater hand dysfunction.
Measured: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (approximately 100 days from baseline)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) Scores
The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) is a 37-item validated instrument assessing six domains: overall hand function, activities of daily living, pain, work performance, aesthetics, and satisfaction with hand function. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better performance for all domains except pain, for which higher scores indicate greater pain. Hand function, activities of daily living, pain, aesthetics, and satisfaction were analyzed separately by hand.
Measured: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)
Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) of the Hands and Fingers
The modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) assesses skin thickness by palpation. In this study, the hand and fingers were scored separately. The hand score ranges from 0 to 3 and the finger score ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates normal skin thickness, 1 indicates mild skin thickening, 2 indicates moderate skin thickening, and 3 indicates severe skin thickening. Lower scores indicate less skin thickening and therefore a better outcome.
Measured: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)
Skindex-16 Scores
Skindex-16 is a 16-item validated patient-reported assessment measuring the impact of skin disease on quality of life across three domains: symptoms, emotions, and physical functioning. Scores are normalized to a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 represents no impact on quality of life and 100 represents maximal impact. Lower scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) Score
PROMIS Physical Function is a computer-adaptive patient-reported assessment of physical functioning. Results are reported as standardized T-scores, with 50 representing the national population mean. Scores greater than 50 indicate higher physical function and scores below 50 indicate lower physical function.
Measured: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) Score
The Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) is a 24-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms and disability related to digital ulcers. Individual items are scored from 1 to 6, and the overall score is calculated as the mean of non-missing item scores when sufficient items are available. Overall scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Measured: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2021
- Study start12 Dec 2020
- Primary completion31 Mar 2023
- Study completion31 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SclerodermaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of UtahThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- All participants received both intervention conditions in a split-person, intra-patient design. Within each participant, one hand was randomized to UVA1 phototherapy and the contralateral hand was assigned to the UV-blocking glove control condition. Treatment-hand assignment was determined using a random number generator.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Utah
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Christopher B Hansen, University of Utah
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04875078
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB_00134454
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 2 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hassani J, Feldman SR. Phototherapy in Scleroderma. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016 Dec;6(4):519-553. doi: 10.1007/s13555-016-0136-3. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
PubMed 27519050Sandler RD, Matucci-Cerinic M, Hughes M. Musculoskeletal hand involvement in systemic sclerosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020 Apr;50(2):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
PubMed 31812353Guillaume-Jugnot P, Daumas A, Magalon J, Jouve E, Nguyen PS, Truillet R, Mallet S, Casanova D, Giraudo L, Veran J, Dignat-George F, Sabatier F, Magalon G, Granel B. Autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction in patients with systemic sclerosis: 12-month follow-up. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Feb;55(2):301-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev323. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
PubMed 26350489Liem SIE, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Schoones JW, de Vries-Bouwstra JK. The effect and safety of exercise therapy in patients with systemic sclerosis: a systematic review. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2019 Dec 9;3(2):rkz044. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkz044. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31858074Connolly KL, Griffith JL, McEvoy M, Lim HW. Ultraviolet A1 phototherapy beyond morphea: experience in 83 patients. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2015 Nov;31(6):289-95. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12185. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
PubMed 26052743Kroft EB, van de Kerkhof PC, Gerritsen MJ, de Jong EM. Period of remission after treatment with UVA-1 in sclerodermic skin diseases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Jul;22(7):839-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02576.x. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
PubMed 18452527Bongi SM, Del Rosso A, Galluccio F, Sigismondi F, Miniati I, Conforti ML, Nacci F, Cerinic MM. Efficacy of connective tissue massage and Mc Mennell joint manipulation in the rehabilitative treatment of the hands in systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Oct;28(10):1167-73. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1216-x. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
PubMed 19554274Sandqvist G, Eklund M. Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test: the reliability of a novel hand function test. Arthritis Care Res. 2000 Dec;13(6):369-74.
PubMed 14635312Khanna D, Furst DE, Clements PJ, Allanore Y, Baron M, Czirjak L, Distler O, Foeldvari I, Kuwana M, Matucci-Cerinic M, Mayes M, Medsger T Jr, Merkel PA, Pope JE, Seibold JR, Steen V, Stevens W, Denton CP. Standardization of the modified Rodnan skin score for use in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2017 Jan-Apr;2(1):11-18. doi: 10.5301/jsrd.5000231.
PubMed 28516167Prasad S, Coias J, Chen HW, Jacobe H. Utilizing UVA-1 Phototherapy. Dermatol Clin. 2020 Jan;38(1):79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2019.08.011.
PubMed 31753195Kreuter A, Hyun J, Stucker M, Sommer A, Altmeyer P, Gambichler T. A randomized controlled study of low-dose UVA1, medium-dose UVA1, and narrowband UVB phototherapy in the treatment of localized scleroderma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Mar;54(3):440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.11.1063. Epub 2006 Jan 30.
PubMed 16488295Mouthon L, Poiraudeau S, Vernon M, Papadakis K, Perchenet L, Khanna D. Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU(R)) patient-reported outcome instrument. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jan 6;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2087-4.
PubMed 31907061
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- UVA-1 for Treatment of Skin Tightening and Improvement of Hand Function in Scleroderma: a Randomized, Intra-patient, Dominant/Non-dominant Hand Clinical Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04875078
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB_00134454
- Conditions
- Scleroderma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of UtahUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 2 Nov 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
UVA-1 has been reported to be beneficial to skin changes in scleroderma in several case reports and a few small studies. (Jacobe 2020) Interpretation of these reports has been difficult based on the small numbers of subjects involved and the non-blinded non-randomized nature of the reports. In a single controlled study with half-side comparison of 9 patients, the investigators could not demonstrate improvement with UVA-1 in the treated hand. (Thomas 2007) This study was limited by a small number of patients and the long disease duration prior to treatment (mean of 13 years). A more recent report of a patient with scleroderma for 2.5 years and severe acrosclerosis that responded to 21 sessions of UVA-1 with improved mobility and functionality renews interest in this treatment modality. (Cuenca-Barrales 2019)
In this trial patients will be randomized to have their dominant or non-dominant hand undergo 30 sessions of UVA1 therapy. We will assess patient's hand mobility, hand function, skin hardening (assessed by durometer measurements), skin thickness, as well as patient reported outcomes to determine efficacy.
This study will use a single-blind, prospective, randomized (dominant/non-dominant hand) comparator design to assess the effect of high dose (80-120 J/cm2) UVA1 therapy on hand function in scleroderma in a paired t-test design. This study is a randomized, investigator-blinded, intra-patient, UV-blocking glove-controlled clinical trial. A follow up period of 12 months following completion of UVA1 therapy will prospectively follow patients to monitor for relapse of their disease to assess the durability of the clinical response to UVA1 therapy on hand scleroderma.
Detailed description
Systemic sclerosis (SSc), also called scleroderma, is a rare chronic autoimmune disease that can have a wide range of cutaneous, joint, and internal organ involvement. In the skin, SSc is characterized by enhanced fibroblast activity leading to hypertrophic dermal collagen that results in thickened, less flexible skin. (Hassani, 2016) SSc is often divided into two types based on extent of cutaneous involvement: diffuse SSc and limited SSc. The hand is a frequent area of involvement in both subtypes of SSc. Hand disability in SSc leads to a high burden on quality of life for patients as it limits both work and activities of daily living. Treatment for hand sclerosis remains limited with generally progressive disease despite aggressive treatment with anti-fibrotic medications, immunosuppressive agents, and topical approaches. Specific hand therapies include physiotherapy and injections of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction into the fingers with some success. (Guillaume-Jugnot, 2016; Liem, 2019)
Ultraviolet therapy has been used in dermatology for several decades. UVA-1 is a form of phototherapy that utilizes the longest wavelengths in the UV spectrum from 340-400 nm. It is able to penetrate deeper in the skin than other types of phototherapy and target different types of cells including fibroblasts. In sclerosing skin conditions UVA-1 appears to be superior to other forms of UV light. Medium to high dose UVA-1 also appears to be superior to low dose UVA-1 for sclerosing conditions. (Kreuter 2006).
UVA-1 has been reported to be beneficial to skin changes in SSc in several case reports and a few small studies. (Jacobe 2020) Interpretation of these reports has been difficult based on the small numbers of subjects involved and the non-blinded non-randomized nature of the reports. In a single controlled study with half-side comparison of 9 patients, the investigators could not demonstrate improvement with UVA-1 in the treated hand. (Thomas 2007) This study was limited by a small number of patients and the long disease duration prior to treatment (mean of 13 years). A more recent report of a patient with SSc for 2.5 years and severe acrosclerosis that responded to 21 sessions of UVA-1 with improved mobility and functionality renews interest in this treatment modality. (Cuenca-Barrales 2019)
If UVA1 therapy can significantly improve hand involvement in SSc with regards to functionality and disability, it may be a cost-effective and beneficial treatment for this patient segment with debilitating disease.
Purpose and Objectives:
- To assess the efficacy of 30 sessions of ultraviolet-1 (UVA1) therapy in treating hand involvement of SSc in a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, intra-patient, UV-blocking glove-controlled, clinical trial.
- To compare improvement in hand function as measured by the Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test, in the UVA1-treated hand compared to control hand (gloved).
Study Design:
This study will use a single-blind, prospective, randomized (dominant/non-dominant hand) comparator design to assess the effect of high dose (80-120 J/cm2) UVA1 therapy on hand function in scleroderma in a paired t-test design. This study is a randomized, investigator-blinded, intra-patient, UV-blocking glove-controlled clinical trial. A follow up period of 12 months following completion of UVA1 therapy will prospectively follow patients to monitor for relapse of their disease to assess the durability of the clinical response to UVA1 therapy on hand scleroderma.
Procedures:
This is a single-blinded, randomized, UV-blocking glove controlled, dominant/non-dominant hand, study to determine the efficacy of UVA1 in the treatment of hand scleroderma. Each participant will have at least one hand treated with UVA1 during the active treatment period of the study. The study will be performed at the University of Utah Dermatology Department using both the University of Utah E12 Clinic space as well as the Midvalley Clinic space. UVA1 lights boxes are located at both E12 and Midvalley locations. Personnel involved in the study will include the PI, the co-investigators, and the study coordinators. Approximately 27 patients will be enrolled to account for a 25% drop-out rate. The number needed to treat to show a difference in the treatment vs. control hands is 21.
Screening:
For screening, subjects with qualifying scleroderma involving both hands will be asked to read and sign the informed consent document. They will be reminded that they are to take their time and, if necessary, take it home for further consideration. Questions will be answered. Those meeting inclusion / exclusion criteria who have signed informed consent will be enrolled.
After answering questions and prior to the first treatment the Principal Investigator (PI) will examine the entire patient and assess for the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis with bilateral hand involvement and perform the following assessments: HAMIS, CHFDS, durometer measurements, and mRSS. (Please see efficacy assessment section for details of HAMIS, CHFDS, durometer, and mRSS). Photographs of the hands and other affected areas will be taken. The patient will be asked to identify their dominant (writing) hand and their answer will be noted. Using a random number generator, the patient will be randomized to undergo UVA1 treatment vs UV-blocking glove (control) on the dominant hand. The non-dominant hand will receive the other modality. A study coordinator will perform the randomization on the day of first treatment and the PI will be blinded to the treatment assignment.
UVA1 Treatments:
Blinding:
A UV-blocking glove will be placed on the control hand as determined by the randomization process. Subjects will wear eyewear that occludes external light.
Evaluations for adverse effects will be carried out by the UVA1 operator (a nurse not involved in any assessments) and the blinded investigator at prescribed intervals. Evaluation of UVA1 efficacy on hand scleroderma will be assessed by a trained and experienced evaluator who is blinded as to the UVA1-treated side (covered / not covered). The efficacy evaluations will be carried out prior to treatments on days both evaluations and treatments are completed. After participants have been evaluated at the 3-month post-treatment study visit the blinded evaluator will become unblinded to the UVA1-treated side for the purpose of allowing participants to receive standard of care therapy. Therefore, participants will be allowed to receive additional UVA-1 treatments to one or both hands in addition to any other necessary standard of care treatments after the 3-month post-treatment visit.
Dosing Schedule:
Prior studies with UVA1 have shown that high and medium dose protocols (>40-120 J/cm2) are more effective than low dose (20-40 J/cm2) to treat sclerosing skin conditions. (Hassani, 2016) Thus, we will set the initiation dose at 50 J. The hands will be positioned approximately 9 inches from the bulbs. The palmar surface of the hand will be exposed for half the treatment and the dorsal surface for half the treatment. If tolerating well after three treatments, the dose will be increased to 60 J for three treatments and then 70 J for the remaining treatments.
Patients will return to clinic two-to-three times per week for 30 treatments over a 100-day period to receive UVA1 treatments. If the patient experiences redness, burning, pain, or blistering at the treatment site, treatment will be held if active symptoms persist at the time of the next scheduled treatment. If the symptoms have resolved and the patient has healed by the next scheduled treatment, the UVA1 energy will be reduced by 10 J of the previously delivered dose. Dose escalation will then proceed by increasing the UVA1 energy after three well tolerated treatments.
Efficacy Evaluations:
- Efficacy evaluations will be performed at baseline, after 15 UVA1 treatment sessions, after 30 UVA1 treatment sessions, and at 3 and 12 months after completion of all UVA1 treatments. For each evaluation prior to the 12-month evaluation, one of the sub-Investigators who is blinded to the treatment assignments will generate and record the HAMIS, CHFDS, Durometer, and mRSS. Hands will be photographed. Patients will complete all PROM including using Skindex-16, Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ), PROMIS-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis - Digital Ulcers(HDISS-DU), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The blinded evaluator will also perform safety evaluation and document study-related adverse events.
Endpoint measure descriptions:
HAMIS is a hand function test developed for adults with systemic sclerosis. HAMIS consists of 9 items designed to measure all movements assessed in an ordinary range of motion (ROM)-measured hand test. Specific items test finger flexion and extension, thumb abduction, pincer grip, finger abduction/swelling, dorsal extension and volar extension of the wrist, and pronation and supination. Each item is graded on a 0-3 scale, where 0 corresponds to normal function and 3 denotes that the individual is unable to perform the item. Each hand is assessed separately. The minimum score for HAMIS is 0, representing normal hand function. The maximum score of HAMIS is 27, representing a high degree of dysfunction. (Sandqvist, 2000)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- All participants received both intervention conditions in a split-person, intra-patient design. Within each participant, one hand was randomized to UVA1 phototherapy and the contralateral hand was assigned to the UV-blocking glove control condition. Treatment-hand assignment was determined using a random number generator.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| All Study Participants | Experimental | Device: UVA-1 Phototherapy, Other: UV-Blocking GloveAll participants received both intervention conditions in a randomized, split-person (intra-patient) design. One hand was randomized to receive UVA1 phototherapy, and the contralateral hand served as the control and was covered with a UV-blocking glove during UVA1 treatment sessions. Treatment-hand assignment was determined using a random number generator. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Must be able to understand and provide written informed consent
- Scleroderma skin involvement affecting both hands approximately equally
- Age of at least 18-years-old
- Male or female
- Ability to engage in twice weekly UVA1 sessions
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- On photosensitizing medication
- Inability to complete study visits
- UV light therapy in the 4 weeks prior to entering the study
- Commercial tanning or excessive sun exposure in the 4 weeks prior to entering the study
- Current pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study period
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| UVA-1 PhototherapyUVA-1 Phototherapy treatments | Device | All Study Participants |
| UV-Blocking GloveA UV-blocking glove was placed over the hand randomized to the control condition during UVA1 phototherapy sessions. The glove prevented UVA1 exposure to the control hand, allowing within-participant comparison of the UVA1-treated hand with the contralateral control hand. Each participant had one hand assigned to UVA1 treatment and the other hand assigned to the UV-blocking glove control condition. | Other | All Study Participants |
Primary outcome
Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) Score at Treatment 30
Time frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (approximately 100 days from baseline)
The Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test assesses hand mobility in systemic sclerosis. Each hand is assessed separately using 9 items evaluating hand and wrist movements. Each item is scored from 0 to 3. Total scores range from 0 to 27 for each hand, with 0 representing normal hand function and higher scores indicating greater hand dysfunction.
5 secondary outcomes
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) Scores
Time frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)
Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) of the Hands and Fingers
Time frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)
Skindex-16 Scores
Time frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) Score
Time frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) Score
Time frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Nov 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 27519050Hassani J, Feldman SR. Phototherapy in Scleroderma. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016 Dec;6(4):519-553. doi: 10.1007/s13555-016-0136-3. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
- Background: PubMed 31812353Sandler RD, Matucci-Cerinic M, Hughes M. Musculoskeletal hand involvement in systemic sclerosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020 Apr;50(2):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
- Background: PubMed 26350489Guillaume-Jugnot P, Daumas A, Magalon J, Jouve E, Nguyen PS, Truillet R, Mallet S, Casanova D, Giraudo L, Veran J, Dignat-George F, Sabatier F, Magalon G, Granel B. Autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction in patients with systemic sclerosis: 12-month follow-up. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Feb;55(2):301-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev323. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
- Background: PubMed 31858074Liem SIE, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Schoones JW, de Vries-Bouwstra JK. The effect and safety of exercise therapy in patients with systemic sclerosis: a systematic review. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2019 Dec 9;3(2):rkz044. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkz044. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 26052743Connolly KL, Griffith JL, McEvoy M, Lim HW. Ultraviolet A1 phototherapy beyond morphea: experience in 83 patients. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2015 Nov;31(6):289-95. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12185. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
- Background: PubMed 18452527Kroft EB, van de Kerkhof PC, Gerritsen MJ, de Jong EM. Period of remission after treatment with UVA-1 in sclerodermic skin diseases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Jul;22(7):839-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02576.x. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
- Background: PubMed 19554274Bongi SM, Del Rosso A, Galluccio F, Sigismondi F, Miniati I, Conforti ML, Nacci F, Cerinic MM. Efficacy of connective tissue massage and Mc Mennell joint manipulation in the rehabilitative treatment of the hands in systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Oct;28(10):1167-73. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1216-x. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 14635312Sandqvist G, Eklund M. Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test: the reliability of a novel hand function test. Arthritis Care Res. 2000 Dec;13(6):369-74.
- Background: PubMed 28516167Khanna D, Furst DE, Clements PJ, Allanore Y, Baron M, Czirjak L, Distler O, Foeldvari I, Kuwana M, Matucci-Cerinic M, Mayes M, Medsger T Jr, Merkel PA, Pope JE, Seibold JR, Steen V, Stevens W, Denton CP. Standardization of the modified Rodnan skin score for use in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2017 Jan-Apr;2(1):11-18. doi: 10.5301/jsrd.5000231.
- Background: PubMed 31753195Prasad S, Coias J, Chen HW, Jacobe H. Utilizing UVA-1 Phototherapy. Dermatol Clin. 2020 Jan;38(1):79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2019.08.011.
- Background: PubMed 16488295Kreuter A, Hyun J, Stucker M, Sommer A, Altmeyer P, Gambichler T. A randomized controlled study of low-dose UVA1, medium-dose UVA1, and narrowband UVB phototherapy in the treatment of localized scleroderma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Mar;54(3):440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.11.1063. Epub 2006 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 31907061Mouthon L, Poiraudeau S, Vernon M, Papadakis K, Perchenet L, Khanna D. Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU(R)) patient-reported outcome instrument. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jan 6;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2087-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Scleroderma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Hyaluronidase Injections for Sclerodactyly in Patients With Scleroderma
Scleroderma, Sclerodactyly
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Quantification of Calcinosis Cutis Disease Burden Using Computed Tomography Images
Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), Calcinosis Cutis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of AD-PluReceptor Plus Tafasitamab-cxix and Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy in Patients With Autoimmune Disorders
Autoimmune Disorders, Systemic Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing UVA-1 Phototherapy and UV-Blocking Glove in people with Scleroderma, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Nov 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) Score at Treatment 30 (time frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (approximately 100 days from baseline)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04875078, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2026.