StrokeBALANCENCT04874051
Sensor-based Assessment and Rehabilitation of Balance in Neurological Diseases
A study testing Experimental Group in people with Stroke and Multiple Sclerosis, run by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy at 5 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Balance impairment is one of the most common disorders due to a neurological diseases. Sensor-based technologies may be useful for falls prevention and balance recovery during patients hospitalization. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- Experimental Group
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 2 Sep 2019to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Common criteria:
- Berg Balance Scale < 50/56;
- Ability to maintain the standing position with o without one support for 1 minute;
- Functional Independence measure < 100/126;
- Barthel Index < 80/100.
- Stroke:
Show all 15Show fewer
- Single ischemic stroke;
- Lesion occured after 2 and within 18 months;
- National Institute of Health Stroke Scale ≤ 14.
- Parkinson:
- 1.5 < Hoehn \& Yahr < 3;
- Subitem "freezing when walking"of the UPDRS ≤ 2.
- Multiple Sclerosis:
- Relapsing remitting or secondary progressive Multiple Sclerosis;
- Expanded Disability Status Scale ≤ 6.5.
Who cannot join
- Untreated epilepsy;
- Major depressive disorder;
- Fractures;
- Dementia;
- Ideomotor Apraxia;
- Neglect;
- Severe impairment of verbal comprehension;
- Severe acoustic and visual disorders.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Italy5 sites, 5 recruiting
- Recruiting
IRCCS Fondazione Mondino
Pavia, 27100
Cristina Tassorelli, Prof., 0382380425, cristina.tassorelli@unipv.it
Roberto De Icco
- Recruiting
IRCCS ICS Maugeri Spa SB
Pavia, 27100
Giorgio Maggioni, Dr., 0322884711, giorgio.maggioni@icsmaugeri.it
- Recruiting
IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana
Rome, 00163
Marco Franceschini, Dr., marco.franceschini@sanraffaele.it
06660581
- Recruiting
IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia
Rome, 00179
Giovanni Morone, Dr., g.morone@hsantalucia.it
- Recruiting
San Camillo IRCCS
Venice, 30126
Francesca Baldan
Sara Federico
About this study
Official title: Sensor-Based Analysis And rehabiLitation of bAlance in Neurological Diseases: a multiCentric randomizEd Clinical Trial
Balance impairment is one of the most common disorders due to a neurological diseases. Sensor-based technologies may be useful for falls prevention and balance recovery during patients hospitalization. OAK Elderly Care System (Khymeia Group, Noventa Padovana, Italy) allows the assessment of fall risk, the centre of pressure and the execution of balance exercises in a virtual environment.
Read the detailed description
The aim of the study is to compare the therapy provided by means of the OAK Elderly Care System with conventional physiotherapy for balance rehabilitation in patients affected by stroke, Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson Disease (PD).
OAK Elderly Care System consists of two independent balance boards and three sensors for the kinematic tracking of the trunk and lower limbs. These components allow the assessment of the centre of pressure and the execution of exercises in a virtual environment.
120 patients (40 stroke, 40 MS, 40 PK) hospitalized at 4 different italian hospitals, were enrolled according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and randomly assigned to two groups (i.e. intervention group, control group). Intervention group received 1 daily hour of technology-based treatment, while the control group underwent 1 daily hour of physiotherapy for balance rehabilitation, in addiction to 1 hour of conventional physiotherapy. Both treatments lasted 15 sessions. Before and after treatment balance, walking, daily living autonomy and pathology-specific features were assessed.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- Experimental Group, Control Group
- Keywords
- Balance, Sensor-based rehabilitation, Virtual Reality
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental GroupDevice
The experimental treatment will be provided by means of the OAK system. This device consists of 1 cabinet with 2 independent balance boards, 2 monitors (one for the physiotherapist and one for the patient) and 3 wireless IMUs (one for the left lower limb, one for the right lower limb and one for the trunk). The 2 balance boards provide body weight transfer exercises, while the wireless motion sensors provide one leg stance exercises or trunk exercises in a virtual environment.
Control GroupOther
The Control Group will perform conventional balance exercises similar to the exercises provided with the OAK system.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group (EG) | Experimental | In the EG the subjects will perform balance exercises using the OAK system under the supervision of a trained physiotherapist. The treatment will last 3 weeks with daily sessions of 60 minutes, 5 times per week. Receives: Device: Experimental Group |
| Control Group (CG) | Active comparator | In the CG the subjects will be asked to perform conventional balance exercises under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The treatment will last 3 weeks with daily sessions of 60 minutes, 5 times per week. Receives: Other: Control Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means better outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 56).
Measured: Change from baseline Berg Balance Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Number of falls during the last year
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions).
Measured: Change from baseline number of falls during the last year scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC)
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means better outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 5).
Measured: Change from baseline Functional Ambulation Classification at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Activities specific-Balance Confidence scale (ABC)
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means better outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 100).
Measured: Change from baseline Activities specific-Balance Confidence scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means better outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 126).
Measured: Change from baseline Functional Independence Measure at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Barthel Index (BI)
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means better outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 100).
Measured: Change from baseline Barthel Index at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
National Institution of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means worse outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 42).
Measured: Change from baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means worse outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 147).
Measured: Change from baseline Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Hoehn & Yahr Scale (H&Y)
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means worse outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 5).
Measured: Change from baseline Hoehn & Yahr Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Kurtzke Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means worse outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 10).
Measured: Change from baseline Kurtzke Extended Disability Status Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 May 2021
- Study start2 Sep 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The experimental group is treated through a sensor-based devices in a virtual environment, while the control group is treated through conventional physiotherapy for balance rehabilitation
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- IRCCS San Raffaele, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA, IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation, I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andrea Turolla, PhD, Principal investigator, San Camillo IRCCS
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04874051
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1099/IRCCS San Camillo
- Acronym
- BALANCE
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 30 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 22 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sensor-Based Analysis And rehabiLitation of bAlance in Neurological Diseases: a multiCentric randomizEd Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04874051
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BALANCE / 1099/IRCCS San Camillo
- Conditions
- Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson Disease
- Keywords
- Balance, Sensor-based rehabilitation, Virtual Reality
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- IRCCS San Raffaele, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA, IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation, I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia
- Study start
- 2 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Balance impairment is one of the most common disorders due to a neurological diseases. Sensor-based technologies may be useful for falls prevention and balance recovery during patients hospitalization. OAK Elderly Care System (Khymeia Group, Noventa Padovana, Italy) allows the assessment of fall risk, the centre of pressure and the execution of balance exercises in a virtual environment.
Detailed description
The aim of the study is to compare the therapy provided by means of the OAK Elderly Care System with conventional physiotherapy for balance rehabilitation in patients affected by stroke, Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson Disease (PD).
OAK Elderly Care System consists of two independent balance boards and three sensors for the kinematic tracking of the trunk and lower limbs. These components allow the assessment of the centre of pressure and the execution of exercises in a virtual environment.
120 patients (40 stroke, 40 MS, 40 PK) hospitalized at 4 different italian hospitals, were enrolled according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and randomly assigned to two groups (i.e. intervention group, control group). Intervention group received 1 daily hour of technology-based treatment, while the control group underwent 1 daily hour of physiotherapy for balance rehabilitation, in addiction to 1 hour of conventional physiotherapy. Both treatments lasted 15 sessions. Before and after treatment balance, walking, daily living autonomy and pathology-specific features were assessed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The experimental group is treated through a sensor-based devices in a virtual environment, while the control group is treated through conventional physiotherapy for balance rehabilitation
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group (EG) | Experimental | Device: Experimental GroupIn the EG the subjects will perform balance exercises using the OAK system under the supervision of a trained physiotherapist. The treatment will last 3 weeks with daily sessions of 60 minutes, 5 times per week. |
| Control Group (CG) | Active comparator | Other: Control GroupIn the CG the subjects will be asked to perform conventional balance exercises under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The treatment will last 3 weeks with daily sessions of 60 minutes, 5 times per week. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Berg Balance Scale < 50/56;
- Ability to maintain the standing position with o without one support for 1 minute;
- Functional Independence measure < 100/126;
- Barthel Index < 80/100.
- Single ischemic stroke;
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Untreated epilepsy;
- Major depressive disorder;
- Fractures;
- Dementia;
- Ideomotor Apraxia;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental GroupThe experimental treatment will be provided by means of the OAK system. This device consists of 1 cabinet with 2 independent balance boards, 2 monitors (one for the physiotherapist and one for the patient) and 3 wireless IMUs (one for the left lower limb, one for the right lower limb and one for the trunk). The 2 balance boards provide body weight transfer exercises, while the wireless motion sensors provide one leg stance exercises or trunk exercises in a virtual environment. | Device | Experimental Group (EG) |
| Control GroupThe Control Group will perform conventional balance exercises similar to the exercises provided with the OAK system. | Other | Control Group (CG) |
Primary outcome
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time frame: Change from baseline Berg Balance Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means better outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 56).
9 secondary outcomes
Number of falls during the last year
Time frame: Change from baseline number of falls during the last year scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC)
Time frame: Change from baseline Functional Ambulation Classification at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Activities specific-Balance Confidence scale (ABC)
Time frame: Change from baseline Activities specific-Balance Confidence scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time frame: Change from baseline Functional Independence Measure at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Barthel Index (BI)
Time frame: Change from baseline Barthel Index at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
National Institution of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Time frame: Change from baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)
Time frame: Change from baseline Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Hoehn & Yahr Scale (H&Y)
Time frame: Change from baseline Hoehn & Yahr Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Kurtzke Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Time frame: Change from baseline Kurtzke Extended Disability Status Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Mar 2023.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrea Turolla, PhD principal investigator
San Camillo IRCCS
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental Group in people with Stroke and Multiple Sclerosis, run by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy at 5 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Andrea Turolla, PhD (00390412207 ext. 531, andrea.turolla@ospedalesancamillo.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (time frame: Change from baseline Berg Balance Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2023.