Chronic Low-back PainPhase 4BACPACNCT04870957
The Back Pain Consortium Research Program Study
A Phase 4 study testing PainGuide, MBSR and PT and exercise in people with Chronic Low-back Pain, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is being completed to better understand who benefits from different chronic pain treatments and how these treatments work. This study will include a four week run-in period for all cLBP participants. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Low-back Pain
- What is being tested?
- PainGuide, MBSR and PT and exercise
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 494 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 9 Jun 2021to 14 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion Criteria for Light Phenotyping (all participants):
- Definition of cLBP described in the NIH Task Force Report on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain (for example (i.e.), low back pain present at least six months, and present more than half of those days.
- Individuals must have the eligible protocol pain interference score on PROMIS Pain Interference.
- Individuals must be willing to be randomized to receive any of the four proposed treatments.
Exclusion Criteria for Light Phenotyping (all participants):
- History of discitis osteomyelitis (spine infection) or spine tumor
- History of ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, or psoriatic arthritis, lupus
- History of cauda equina syndrome or spinal radiculopathy with functional motor deficit (strength <4/5 on manual motor testing)
- Diagnosis of any vertebral fracture in the last 6 months
- Osteoporosis requiring treatment other than vitamin D and calcium supplements
- Cancer (History of any bone-related cancer or cancer that metastasized to the bone, Currently in treatment for any cancer or plan to start cancer treatment in the next 12 months, History of any cancer treatment in the last 24 months)
- Life expectancy less than 2 years
- Unable to speak and write English
- Visual or hearing difficulties that would preclude participation
- Presence of any history that would preclude scanning in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Uncontrolled drug/alcohol addiction
- Individuals receiving disability or compensation within the past year, or involved in litigation
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- History of allergy to duloxetine
- Individuals on high doses of opioids (over 100 oral morphine equivalents (OME) per day)
- Scheduled back surgery, back surgery within the last year, or more than one back surgery in the past.
- Expecting to receive an injection of surgical procedure within the next year for their cLBP
- Current/planned (in the next 2 years) enrollment in another study of a device or investigational drug that would interfere with this study, this may include participation in a blinded trial.
- Any other diseases or conditions that would make a patient unsuitable for study participation as determined by the site principal investigators. This would include but not be limited to severe psychiatric disorders, active suicidal ideations or history of suicide attempts, and an uncontrolled drug and/or alcohol addiction
Contraindications to Study Intervention: duloxetine
- certain medications (per protocol)
- renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance <30 milliliters per minute (mL/min) or End- Stage Renal Failure)
- Hepatic dysfunction: Liver function tests (LFTs) elevated times 1.5
Contraindications to Study Intervention: Acupressure
- Currently receiving acupressure or acupuncture through formal therapy
Contraindications to Study Intervention: MBSR
- Current participation in a structured MBSR program
Contraindications to Study Intervention: PT \& Exercise
- Currently receiving any type of structured manual therapy or exercise treatment for low-back pain.
- Contraindication for manual therapy and/or participation in an exercise program
Inclusion Criteria for Deep Phenotyping (subset 160 participants):
- Right hand dominant (such as the hand used when writing or throwing/catching a ball)
- Normal visual acuity or correctable (with corrective lenses- glasses or contacts) to at least 20/40 for reading instructions in the MRI and visual sensitivity testing
- No contraindications to MRI (i.e., metal implants)
- Willingness to refrain from taking any "as needed" medications, including pain medications such as Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (i.e., Motrin, Advil, Aleve), acetaminophen, and opioids, for 8 hours before undergoing neuroimaging and 10.1 Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
- Willingness to refrain from alcohol and nicotine on the day of QST and neuroimaging (alcohol and nicotine consumption is allowed after testing is completed)
- Willingness to refrain from any unusual physical activity or exercise that would cause muscle and/or joint soreness for 48 hours prior to testing (routine exercise or activity that does not lead to soreness is acceptable)
- Able to lie still on back for 2 hours during MRI
Exclusion Criteria for Deep Phenotyping (subset 160 participants):
- Severe claustrophobia precluding MRI and evoked pain testing during scanning
- Diagnosed peripheral neuropathy
- Current, recent (within the last 6 months), or habitual use of artificial nails or nail enhancements. (Artificial nails can influence pressure pain sensitivity at the thumbnail)
- Body Mass Index greater than 45 or unable to comfortably fit in the bore of the MRI magnet
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: University of Michigan Mechanistic Research Center -The Back Pain Consortium Research Program
This study is being completed to better understand who benefits from different chronic pain treatments and how these treatments work.
This study will include a four week run-in period for all cLBP participants. After completing the PainGuide (online or smart phone accessible website) run-in period, participants will be assessed using either the light or light plus deep phenotyping assessment battery and those who minimal or modest improvement in their pain (based on PGIC) will be randomized to one of four 8-week treatments (mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), physical therapy (PT) and exercise, acupressure self-management, or duloxetine).
Read more
In addition, participants will complete study visits including physical exams, complete surveys, provide samples (blood,saliva, etc.), wear an electronic wrist device at certain times, and have Magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) during the study.
Following one of the 4 treatments (8 weeks) if participants have a certain level of pain (that meets eligibility for more treatment) they will be then randomized to complete one of the 3 treatments that was not already assigned to them.
The study hypothesizes the following:
that this interventional response phenotyping can identify individuals with different underlying mechanisms for their pain who thus respond differentially to evidence-based interventions for chronic lower back pain (cLBP).
Read the detailed description
In addition, the following mechanistic hypothesis and Aims are included:
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction:
Aim 2: the study predicts that patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) will preferentially respond to this therapy if PROs indicate higher levels of pain catastrophizing, as measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, or lower scores on the Experiences Questionnaire.
Aim 3: the study hypothesizes that cLBP patients with decreased activation in response to pain in the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) and Prefrontal Cortex and increased activation in somatosensory cortex (S1) and thalamus will respond preferentially to MBSR.
Physical Therapy (PT) and Exercise
Aim 2: The primary hypothesis for the light phenotyping protocol is those individuals with the highest scores on the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and lowest scores for PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms will be most likely to improve from PT/Exercise program.
Aim 3: the study hypothesis that low vagal tone and high basal inflammation will predict responsiveness to the PT/Exercise program.
Acupressure:
Aim 2: The study hypothesizes that females with cLBP will respond better to acupressure than men, as will those with higher scores on the 2011 Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire.
Aim 3: The study predicts that cLBP patients with higher posterior insula glutamate and/or greater insula - Default Mode Network (DMN) connectivity (as well as increased DMN-S1 connectivity
Duloxetine:
Aim 2: the study hypothesizes that it will replicate previous studies suggesting that participants with cLBP will preferentially respond to this therapy if patient reported outcomes indicate stronger elements of either neuropathic pain (indicated by a high PainDETECT score) or centralized/nociplastic pain (indicated by more widespread pain on the 2011 Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire).
Aim 3: the study anticipates then that deficient pain inhibition on quantitative sensory testing, decreased periaqueductal gray (PAG)-insula connectivity, and elevated stimulated inflammatory responses will be associated with a positive response to centrally-acting duloxetine.
Additionally, a subset of individuals (n=160) from these groups will be asked to participate in an expanded phenotyping study that will include structural and functional brain neuroimaging, quantitative sensory testing (QST), plasma measures of inflammation, and digital measurement of autonomic tone.
- Conditions
- Chronic Low-back Pain
- Being tested
- PainGuide, MBSR, PT and exercise, Self -administered acupressure, Duloxetine
- Keywords
- Pain, Back Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PainGuideBehavioural
A 4-week, online, self-management program for pain known as PainGuide (online or smart phone). Participants will use this during the run-in period as well as after the run-in period.
MBSRBehavioural
In this group (mindfulness-based stress reduction) participants will take part in 9 group sessions.
The groups sessions will be divided into 8 weekly 2-hour groups sessions and one 6-hour "retreat". During the sessions participants will practice mindfulness exercises directed by the a MBSR therapist. Additionally, participants will also be asked to practice daily formal mindfulness at home using audio recordings of 30-45 minute guided meditation exercises. These audio recordings can be accessed online. The sessions may take place in-person or virtually.
PT and exerciseBehavioural
Participants will take part in 10 physical therapy visits over the course of 8 weeks. Participants will meet with the physical therapist twice a week for a 1-hour session for weeks 1 and 2 and then weekly for the remaining 6 weeks. The physical therapist will tailor a program to the participant's needs according to recommended PT practice guidelines that will include in-person treatment, home exercise prescription, and encouragement of progressive, low-intensity, submaximal fitness and endurance activities, such as walking.
Participants will be given a home program of exercises to be done daily and asked to engage in daily walking with a set goal based on the individual's capacity and current fitness level. Walking was selected as the aerobic exercise of focus for this treatment because it is recommended for patients with all levels of pain severity, is highly feasible to complete, and has shown effects on outcomes such as pain and disability.
Self -administered acupressureDevice
A device called the "AcuWand" will be used to administer the self-acupressure intervention for approximately 30 minutes daily for 8 weeks. Participants will use a mobile application (app) called "MeTime" that will have daily instructions on how to use the AcuWand. Research staff will show participants how to use the AcuWand and MeTime app. In addition, participants will keep a daily log to track at-home acupressure sessions.
DuloxetineDrug
Also called Cymbalta
For days 1-7, patients will take 30mg of duloxetine once a day, in the morning. Starting day 8, participants tolerating the medication will be escalated to 60mg once a day. They will also have the option of staying at 30mg, once a day or stopping the medication. At the end of the 8-week intervention period, participants will have the option to continue the medication commercially (non-study medication) under the care of their physician or taper off the medication. During the entire 8-week intervention, patients will be asked to keep a daily log of medication dosage, any missed doses, and any side-effects they may have experienced.
Pro-Diary monitorDevice
Also called Electronic wrist device that looks like a watch
Participants will wear during 5 separate 7-day "home monitoring" periods to assess physical activity (objectively measured via accelerometry), and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of mental and physical symptoms. EMA will be collected during Weeks 1, 6, 15, 24 and 36.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MBSR (mindfulness-based stress reduction) | Experimental | Participants receiving MBSR during Treatment 1 or 2. Receives: Behavioral: MBSR; Device: Pro-Diary monitor |
| PT and exercise | Experimental | Participants receiving PT during Treatment 1 or 2. Receives: Behavioral: PT and exercise; Device: Pro-Diary monitor |
| Acupressure | Experimental | Participants receiving Acupresure during Treatment 1 or 2. Receives: Device: Self -administered acupressure; Device: Pro-Diary monitor |
| Duloxetine | Experimental | Participants receiving Duloxetine during Treatment 1 or 2. Receives: Drug: Duloxetine; Device: Pro-Diary monitor |
| Run-In | Experimental | Pre-treatment run-in period with access to the PainGuide self management platform. Receives: Behavioral: PainGuide; Device: Pro-Diary monitor |
| Follow-Up | No intervention | Participants on Follow-Up at any timepoint throughout the study. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference 4a Between Week 6 (T2) to Week 15 (T3)
The PROMIS pain interference consists of 4 questions on a Likert scale ranging from 'Not at all" (1) to "Very much" (5). Total scores are between 4 and 20, with higher scores indicating increased pain interference.
Measured: week 6 (T2), week 15 (T3)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change in the Pain, Enjoyment, and General Activity Scale (PEG) From Week 6 (T2) to Week 15 (T3)
This is a 3 question scale where participants select a between 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain is bad and completely interferes). Higher the scores the worse the pain.
Measured: week 6 (T2), week 15 (T3)
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Week 6 (T2) to Week 15 (T3)
This is a 1 question item where participants described their perceived improvement between T2 and T3 by selecting a score between 1 and 7, where 1 indicated "very much improved" and 7 indicated "very much worse. The lower the score, the greater improvement in perceived pain.
Data is presented as count of participants who scored their improvement as a 1 or a 2 and those who scored their improvement as 3 or higher.
Measured: week 15 (T3)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2021
- Study start9 Jun 2021
- Primary completion15 Oct 2024
- Study completion14 Apr 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic Low-back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- Sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) design
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 494 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Afton Hassett, Psy.D., University of Michigan
- Investigators
- Afton Hassett, PsyD, Principal investigator, University of MichiganDaniel Clauw, MD, Principal investigator, University of Michigan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04870957
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HUM00180994
- Other IDs
- 1U19AR076734-01
- Acronym
- BACPAC
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 28 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 5 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data (including bio-specimens, omic data, raw imaging data, and other study data) will be shared with consortial partners. Data will be held at a Data Acquisition Center (DAC) hosted at the University of North Carolina. Omics data will be shared through NIH portals as required. Data dictionaries are harmonized across study sites and shared with consortial partners.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- University of Michigan Mechanistic Research Center -The Back Pain Consortium Research Program
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04870957
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BACPAC / HUM00180994
- Conditions
- Chronic Low-back Pain
- Keywords
- Pain, Back Pain
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 494 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
- Study start
- 9 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 5 Dec 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is being completed to better understand who benefits from different chronic pain treatments and how these treatments work.
This study will include a four week run-in period for all cLBP participants. After completing the PainGuide (online or smart phone accessible website) run-in period, participants will be assessed using either the light or light plus deep phenotyping assessment battery and those who minimal or modest improvement in their pain (based on PGIC) will be randomized to one of four 8-week treatments (mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), physical therapy (PT) and exercise, acupressure self-management, or duloxetine).
In addition, participants will complete study visits including physical exams, complete surveys, provide samples (blood,saliva, etc.), wear an electronic wrist device at certain times, and have Magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) during the study.
Following one of the 4 treatments (8 weeks) if participants have a certain level of pain (that meets eligibility for more treatment) they will be then randomized to complete one of the 3 treatments that was not already assigned to them.
The study hypothesizes the following:
that this interventional response phenotyping can identify individuals with different underlying mechanisms for their pain who thus respond differentially to evidence-based interventions for chronic lower back pain (cLBP).
Detailed description
In addition, the following mechanistic hypothesis and Aims are included:
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction:
Aim 2: the study predicts that patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) will preferentially respond to this therapy if PROs indicate higher levels of pain catastrophizing, as measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, or lower scores on the Experiences Questionnaire.
Aim 3: the study hypothesizes that cLBP patients with decreased activation in response to pain in the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) and Prefrontal Cortex and increased activation in somatosensory cortex (S1) and thalamus will respond preferentially to MBSR.
Physical Therapy (PT) and Exercise
Aim 2: The primary hypothesis for the light phenotyping protocol is those individuals with the highest scores on the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and lowest scores for PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms will be most likely to improve from PT/Exercise program.
Aim 3: the study hypothesis that low vagal tone and high basal inflammation will predict responsiveness to the PT/Exercise program.
Acupressure:
Aim 2: The study hypothesizes that females with cLBP will respond better to acupressure than men, as will those with higher scores on the 2011 Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire.
Aim 3: The study predicts that cLBP patients with higher posterior insula glutamate and/or greater insula - Default Mode Network (DMN) connectivity (as well as increased DMN-S1 connectivity
Duloxetine:
Aim 2: the study hypothesizes that it will replicate previous studies suggesting that participants with cLBP will preferentially respond to this therapy if patient reported outcomes indicate stronger elements of either neuropathic pain (indicated by a high PainDETECT score) or centralized/nociplastic pain (indicated by more widespread pain on the 2011 Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire).
Aim 3: the study anticipates then that deficient pain inhibition on quantitative sensory testing, decreased periaqueductal gray (PAG)-insula connectivity, and elevated stimulated inflammatory responses will be associated with a positive response to centrally-acting duloxetine.
Additionally, a subset of individuals (n=160) from these groups will be asked to participate in an expanded phenotyping study that will include structural and functional brain neuroimaging, quantitative sensory testing (QST), plasma measures of inflammation, and digital measurement of autonomic tone.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
- Model description
- Sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) design
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MBSR (mindfulness-based stress reduction) | Experimental | Behavioral: MBSR, Device: Pro-Diary monitorParticipants receiving MBSR during Treatment 1 or 2. |
| PT and exercise | Experimental | Behavioral: PT and exercise, Device: Pro-Diary monitorParticipants receiving PT during Treatment 1 or 2. |
| Acupressure | Experimental | Device: Self -administered acupressure, Device: Pro-Diary monitorParticipants receiving Acupresure during Treatment 1 or 2. |
| Duloxetine | Experimental | Drug: Duloxetine, Device: Pro-Diary monitorParticipants receiving Duloxetine during Treatment 1 or 2. |
| Run-In | Experimental | Behavioral: PainGuide, Device: Pro-Diary monitorPre-treatment run-in period with access to the PainGuide self management platform. |
| Follow-Up | No intervention | –Participants on Follow-Up at any timepoint throughout the study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PainGuideA 4-week, online, self-management program for pain known as PainGuide (online or smart phone). Participants will use this during the run-in period as well as after the run-in period. | Behavioural | Run-In |
| MBSRIn this group (mindfulness-based stress reduction) participants will take part in 9 group sessions. The groups sessions will be divided into 8 weekly 2-hour groups sessions and one 6-hour "retreat". During the sessions participants will practice mindfulness exercises directed by the a MBSR therapist. Additionally, participants will also be asked to practice daily formal mindfulness at home using audio recordings of 30-45 minute guided meditation exercises. These audio recordings can be accessed online. The sessions may take place in-person or virtually. | Behavioural | MBSR (mindfulness-based stress reduction) |
| PT and exerciseParticipants will take part in 10 physical therapy visits over the course of 8 weeks. Participants will meet with the physical therapist twice a week for a 1-hour session for weeks 1 and 2 and then weekly for the remaining 6 weeks. The physical therapist will tailor a program to the participant's needs according to recommended PT practice guidelines that will include in-person treatment, home exercise prescription, and encouragement of progressive, low-intensity, submaximal fitness and endurance activities, such as walking. Participants will be given a home program of exercises to be done daily and asked to engage in daily walking with a set goal based on the individual's capacity and current fitness level. Walking was selected as the aerobic exercise of focus for this treatment because it is recommended for patients with all levels of pain severity, is highly feasible to complete, and has shown effects on outcomes such as pain and disability. | Behavioural | PT and exercise |
| Self -administered acupressureA device called the "AcuWand" will be used to administer the self-acupressure intervention for approximately 30 minutes daily for 8 weeks. Participants will use a mobile application (app) called "MeTime" that will have daily instructions on how to use the AcuWand. Research staff will show participants how to use the AcuWand and MeTime app. In addition, participants will keep a daily log to track at-home acupressure sessions. | Device | Acupressure |
| DuloxetineAlso: CymbaltaFor days 1-7, patients will take 30mg of duloxetine once a day, in the morning. Starting day 8, participants tolerating the medication will be escalated to 60mg once a day. They will also have the option of staying at 30mg, once a day or stopping the medication. At the end of the 8-week intervention period, participants will have the option to continue the medication commercially (non-study medication) under the care of their physician or taper off the medication. During the entire 8-week intervention, patients will be asked to keep a daily log of medication dosage, any missed doses, and any side-effects they may have experienced. | Drug | Duloxetine |
| Pro-Diary monitorAlso: Electronic wrist device that looks like a watchParticipants will wear during 5 separate 7-day "home monitoring" periods to assess physical activity (objectively measured via accelerometry), and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of mental and physical symptoms. EMA will be collected during Weeks 1, 6, 15, 24 and 36. | Device | Acupressure, Duloxetine, MBSR (mindfulness-based stress reduction), PT and exercise, Run-In |
Primary outcome
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference 4a Between Week 6 (T2) to Week 15 (T3)
Time frame: week 6 (T2), week 15 (T3)
The PROMIS pain interference consists of 4 questions on a Likert scale ranging from 'Not at all" (1) to "Very much" (5). Total scores are between 4 and 20, with higher scores indicating increased pain interference.
2 secondary outcomes
Change in the Pain, Enjoyment, and General Activity Scale (PEG) From Week 6 (T2) to Week 15 (T3)
Time frame: week 6 (T2), week 15 (T3)
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Week 6 (T2) to Week 15 (T3)
Time frame: week 15 (T3)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Dec 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data (including bio-specimens, omic data, raw imaging data, and other study data) will be shared with consortial partners. Data will be held at a Data Acquisition Center (DAC) hosted at the University of North Carolina. Omics data will be shared through NIH portals as required. Data dictionaries are harmonized across study sites and shared with consortial partners.
Related trials for Chronic Low-back Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Veterans' Intervention Blending NeuRomodulation and YogA for Chronic Low BackPaiN Treatment: VIBRANT
Chronic Low Back Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin-Assisted Physical Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), Physical Therapy
Not yet recruiting
Empowering Pain Psychology Access and Collaboration (EPPAC) to Improve Treatment Engagement Among Medicaid-insured Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Not yet recruiting
Dual-Task Core Stabilization Training in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
The Intervention Effect of Exercise on Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Injuries
Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain With Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Injury or Dysfunction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Afton Hassett, PsyD principal investigator
University of Michigan
Daniel Clauw, MD principal investigator
University of Michigan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing PainGuide, MBSR and PT and exercise in people with Chronic Low-back Pain, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference 4a Between Week 6 (T2) to Week 15 (T3) (time frame: week 6 (T2), week 15 (T3)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.