AzTrials
AzTrials

Cognitive Impairment, MildSHARPNCT04863378

Efficacy of a Multimodal Brain Health Intervention for Older African Americans

A study testing Walking conversational reminiscence in people with Cognitive Impairment, Mild and Cognitive Decline, run by Oregon Health and Science University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study tests the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a multimodal intervention (walking, social engagement, and reminiscence), including the use of wearable digital biomarkers, for cognitively healthy and mildly cognitively impaired African Americans aged 65 and older. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 110 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cognitive Impairment, Mild, Cognitive Decline
What is being tested?
Walking conversational reminiscence
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
13 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2022to 1 Oct 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 110 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Self-identified African American,
  • Age > 65 years old
  • Reside or resided for >10 years in Portland's historically Black neighborhoods (to be familiar with Memory Markers about this area),
  • Able to ambulate independently.
  • Meeting Cognition Criteria
  • Participants with MCI (Mild Cognitive Impairment) will meet criteria consistent with the criteria outlined by the NIA-Alzheimer's Association workgroup
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Participants without cognitive impairment will have a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score > 24 (and not meet MCI criteria). Participants' cognitive function should allow them to get to and from walk locations independently or with minimal assistance.
  • Cognitive function allows independent (or minimally assisted) travel to and from walk locations
  • In-home reliable broadband internet (for weekly online surveys).
  • Ability to read, speak, and understand English

Who cannot join

  • Self-reported or clinically diagnosed dementia
  • Significant disease of the central nervous system
  • Severely depressed (CES-D score > 16), significantly symptomatic psychiatric disorder
  • Advanced cardiovascular disease that would make walking difficult, including history of congestive heart failure
  • Unstable insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, received diagnosis Type 1 Diabetes, started insulin within past 3 months, hospitalized for hypoglycemia within past 6 months.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Oregon Health & Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of a Technology-Based Multimodal Brain Health Intervention for Older African Americans: The SHARP Study

This study tests the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a multimodal intervention (walking, social engagement, and reminiscence), including the use of wearable digital biomarkers, for cognitively healthy and mildly cognitively impaired African Americans aged 65 and older.

Read the detailed description

Cognitively healthy and mildly cognitively impaired participants engage in up to 8 weeks of baseline data collection and 4-16 weeks of triadic neighborhood walking using a group tablet device to access pre-programmed 1-mile routes. GPS (Global Positioning System)-triggered historical images of local Black culture and history along the route prompt conversational reminiscence about Portland, Oregon's historically Black neighborhoods. Digital biomarker technology (a continuously worn actigraph watch and an unobtrusive under-the-mattress sleep sensor) and weekly online surveys via a study Chromebook assess feasibility, acceptability, efficacy, and health outcomes. Intermittent discussions and check-ins with participants, and observational sessions will be used to elicit participant feedback.

Being tested
Walking conversational reminiscence
Keywords
social engagement, neighborhood walking, reminiscence, physical activity, African American, Mild cognitive impairment
Medical subject headings
Cognitive Dysfunction, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Walking conversational reminiscenceBehavioural

    Also called SHARP: Sharing History through Active Reminiscence and Photo-imagery

    Triadic walking with prompted conversational reminiscence

Study groups in NCT04863378
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cognitive healthy participantsExperimentalParticipants are Black/African American adults aged 65 or over who are cognitively healthy according to a baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of 24 or higher. Participants continuously wear an actigraph watch to assess activity level. Daily sleep behavior is captured on an under-the-mattress sleep sensor. Up to 8 weeks of baseline data is collected on participants prior to starting the walking component of the intervention. After the baseline data collection period, participants continue to wear the actigraph watch and continued to sleep on the sleep sensor, and walk 4-16 weeks with their triads. Triads walk 1-mile routes, three times a week while engaging in image-prompted conversational reminiscence recorded for a digital archive. Walking routes and GPS-linked reminiscence prompts (historical images with questions) are accessed via the SHARP Walking Application via a group Android tablet device.
Receives: Behavioral: Walking conversational reminiscence
Community stakeholder intervieweesNo interventionParticipants are Black/African American adults aged 55 and over who are individually interviewed to provide qualitative insight into salient historical landmarks and events to include in future walking routes for the Oakland area; Participants in this non-interventional group do not participate in study activities other than a qualitative interview.
Mildly Cognitively Impaired (MCI) participantsExperimentalParticipants are Black/African American adults aged 65 or over who are mildly cognitively impaired according to a baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment score below 24. Participants continuously wear an actigraph watch to assess activity level. Daily sleep behavior is captured on an under-the-mattress sleep sensor. Up to 8 weeks of baseline data is collected on participants prior to starting the walking component of the intervention. After the baseline data collection period, participants continue to wear the actigraph watch and continued to sleep on the sleep sensor, and walk 4-16 weeks with their triads. Triads walk 1-mile routes, three times a week while engaging in image-prompted conversational reminiscence recorded for a digital archive. Walking routes and GPS-linked reminiscence prompts (historical images with questions) are accessed via the SHARP Walking Application via a group Android tablet device.
Receives: Behavioral: Walking conversational reminiscence

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Daily Average Steps Recorded by Actigraphy Watch

    Daily steps are recorded on a continuously worn actigraphy watch (Withings), which measures 24-hour activity (gross motor activity).

    Measured: 24 weeks

  2. Daily Average Sleep Time Recorded by an Emfit QS Sleep Sensor

    Emfit QS under-the-mattress sleep sensor measured sleep-wake cycles per 24-hour period.

    Measured: 24 weeks

  3. Weekly Health Update Survey Response Time

    Participants completed a brief health update survey every week via their home computer or phone. Response time (the time it took each participant to complete the survey) was recorded in seconds.

    Measured: 24 weeks

  4. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire assessing sleep quality and sleep disturbances over a 1-month time period. The PQSI is composed of 19 query items, a combination of open-ended questions and Likert-type scales which are scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty), and includes 7 sleep components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. A global score is calculated from the sum of scores for each of the seven components. Total scores range from 0 to 21, a higher score indicates more acute sleep disturbances.

    Measured: 24 weeks

  5. Weekly Survey Completion Rate

    Healthy and mildly cognitively impaired participants completed a weekly online health update survey, receiving weekly reminders to complete it. Survey completion rates and completion times over the study's duration is another measure of cognitive change.

    Measured: 24 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Apr 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04863378
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00022363
Other IDs
KL2TR002370
Acronym
SHARP
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
21 Apr 2021
Last updated
6 Jan 2025
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

Publications

  • Croff RL, Witter Iv P, Walker ML, Francois E, Quinn C, Riley TC, Sharma NF, Kaye JA. Things Are Changing so Fast: Integrative Technology for Preserving Cognitive Health and Community History. Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):147-157. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny069.

    PubMed 29961887

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Walking conversational reminiscence in people with Cognitive Impairment, Mild and Cognitive Decline, run by Oregon Health and Science University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jan 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Daily Average Steps Recorded by Actigraphy Watch (time frame: 24 weeks). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04863378, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in