Metachronous NeoplasmNCT04830618
Aberrant DNA Methylation to Predict Metachronous Gastric Neoplasms
An observational study of Metachronous Neoplasm and Gastric Cancer, run by Seoul National University Hospital.
Trial summary
The study is a prospective cohort study to investigate whether aberrant DNA methylation can be useful for the prediction of metachronous recurrence after endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasms (dysplasia or cancer). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Metachronous Neoplasm, Gastric Cancer, Gastric Neoplasm
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 11 Sep 2012to 31 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with gastric neoplasms (gastric dysplasia or early gastric cancer) which was curatively resected endoscopically.
Who may be able to join
- Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasms (dysplasia or early gastric cancer)
- All gastric neoplasms at diagnosis should be curatively resected before enrollment.
Who cannot join
- Previous history of all cancers.
- Previous history of gastrectomy
- Non-curative resection of gastric neoplasms
- Refusal to consent
About this study
Official title: Aberrant DNA Methylation Maker for Predicting Metachronous Recurrence After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Neoplasms
The study is a prospective cohort study to investigate whether aberrant DNA methylation can be useful for the prediction of metachronous recurrence after endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasms (dysplasia or cancer). From 2012 to 2017, 300 patients were prospectively enrolled after endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric dysplasia or early gastric cancer. All lesions were assessed by endoscopy and biopsy before ER. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed for gastric dysplasia and early gastric cancers which met the absolute indication (differentiated adenocarcinoma, intramucosal cancer, lesions < 20 mm, and no endoscopic evidence of ulceration). All lesions were curatively resected; if non-curatively resected, the patients were not enrolled from the study. All subjects, who provided informed consent, were asked to complete a questionnaire under the supervision of a well-trained interviewer. The questionnaire included questions regarding demographic data (age, sex), socioeconomic data (smoking, alcohol, and education), their family history of GC in first-degree relatives, and history of H. pylori eradication therapy. Also, MOS methylation level at baseline was measured from noncancerous gastric mucosae at corpus. When H. pylori was positive by CLOtest or histology at baseline or during the follow-up, eradication therapy was done. To evaluate whether H. pylori was eradicated, 13C-urea breath testing was performed at least 4 weeks after completion of the eradication therapy. All study subjects were closely followed up since recurrent tumors at previous endoscopic resection sites can be easily detected on endoscopy with biopsy and treated during follow-up. Patients with local recurrence underwent further treatments, including repeated ESD, APC, and gastrectomy based on pathology, and patients who refused treatment received supportive care. All patients underwent endoscopy with biopsy within 6 months, then at 12 months after ESD to check for metachronous lesions or local recurrences. After 12 months, endoscopy with biopsy was performed annually. In case of EGCs, abdominal CT scan was performed in the first year and biennially thereafter to detect lymph node or distant metastases. The definition of the completion of the study protocol was 1) endoscopic and/or radiologic follow-up for more than 3 years, or 2) development of metachronous gastric neoplasm (primary outcome: gastric dysplasia or cancer) during the follow-up. Metachronous recurrence was defined as secondary dysplasia or cancers detected > 1 year after initial diagnosis.
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Second Primary, Stomach Neoplasms
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Metachronous recurrence
Metachronous recurrence was defined as secondary dysplasia or cancers detected > 1 year after initial diagnosis.
Measured: at least > 1 year after enrollment (initial diagnosis), from enrollment to Dec 2020
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Apr 2021
- Study start11 Sep 2012
- Primary completion16 Nov 2017
- Study completion31 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metachronous NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dong Ho Lee, Seoul National University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04830618
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B-1204/152-004
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 31 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 5 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Shin CM, Kim N, Yoon H, Choi YJ, Park JH, Park YS, Lee DH. Aberrant DNA Methylation Maker for Predicting Metachronous Recurrence After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Neoplasms. Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Oct;54(4):1157-1166. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.997. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
PubMed 35038821
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Aberrant DNA Methylation Maker for Predicting Metachronous Recurrence After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Neoplasms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04830618
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B-1204/152-004
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Sep 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is a prospective cohort study to investigate whether aberrant DNA methylation can be useful for the prediction of metachronous recurrence after endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasms (dysplasia or cancer). From 2012 to 2017, 300 patients were prospectively enrolled after endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric dysplasia or early gastric cancer. All lesions were assessed by endoscopy and biopsy before ER. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed for gastric dysplasia and early gastric cancers which met the absolute indication (differentiated adenocarcinoma, intramucosal cancer, lesions < 20 mm, and no endoscopic evidence of ulceration). All lesions were curatively resected; if non-curatively resected, the patients were not enrolled from the study. All subjects, who provided informed consent, were asked to complete a questionnaire under the supervision of a well-trained interviewer. The questionnaire included questions regarding demographic data (age, sex), socioeconomic data (smoking, alcohol, and education), their family history of GC in first-degree relatives, and history of H. pylori eradication therapy. Also, MOS methylation level at baseline was measured from noncancerous gastric mucosae at corpus. When H. pylori was positive by CLOtest or histology at baseline or during the follow-up, eradication therapy was done. To evaluate whether H. pylori was eradicated, 13C-urea breath testing was performed at least 4 weeks after completion of the eradication therapy. All study subjects were closely followed up since recurrent tumors at previous endoscopic resection sites can be easily detected on endoscopy with biopsy and treated during follow-up. Patients with local recurrence underwent further treatments, including repeated ESD, APC, and gastrectomy based on pathology, and patients who refused treatment received supportive care. All patients underwent endoscopy with biopsy within 6 months, then at 12 months after ESD to check for metachronous lesions or local recurrences. After 12 months, endoscopy with biopsy was performed annually. In case of EGCs, abdominal CT scan was performed in the first year and biennially thereafter to detect lymph node or distant metastases. The definition of the completion of the study protocol was 1) endoscopic and/or radiologic follow-up for more than 3 years, or 2) development of metachronous gastric neoplasm (primary outcome: gastric dysplasia or cancer) during the follow-up. Metachronous recurrence was defined as secondary dysplasia or cancers detected > 1 year after initial diagnosis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with gastric neoplasms (gastric dysplasia or early gastric cancer) which was curatively resected endoscopically.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasms (dysplasia or early gastric cancer)
- All gastric neoplasms at diagnosis should be curatively resected before enrollment.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Previous history of all cancers.
- Previous history of gastrectomy
- Non-curative resection of gastric neoplasms
- Refusal to consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Metachronous recurrence
Time frame: at least > 1 year after enrollment (initial diagnosis), from enrollment to Dec 2020
Metachronous recurrence was defined as secondary dysplasia or cancers detected > 1 year after initial diagnosis.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Apr 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35038821Shin CM, Kim N, Yoon H, Choi YJ, Park JH, Park YS, Lee DH. Aberrant DNA Methylation Maker for Predicting Metachronous Recurrence After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Neoplasms. Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Oct;54(4):1157-1166. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.997. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
Related trials for Metachronous Neoplasm
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Local Ablation Plus Systemic Therapy for Metachronous Liver and/or Lung Oligometastases From Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Neoplasm Metastasis
RecruitingObservational study
Helicobacter Pylori Infection Status and Pathological Features for Predicting Gastric Cancer Biological Behavior and Prognosis: A Real-World Observational Study
Helicobacter Pylori, Early Gastric Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
High-Risk Metachronous Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Trial
Prostate Cancer, Oligometastatic Disease
Recruiting
Cohort Evaluation of Body Fluids Early Detection of Cancer in High-risk Individuals
Risk of Breast Cancer, Risk of Gynaecological Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Study of miRNA 371 in Patients With Germ Cell Tumors
Germ Cell Tumor, Metachronous Malignant Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Metachronous Neoplasm and Gastric Cancer, run by Seoul National University Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Metachronous recurrence (time frame: at least > 1 year after enrollment (initial diagnosis), from enrollment to Dec 2020). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04830618, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2021.