AzTrials
AzTrials

Child, PreschoolMAGICNCT04823650

Monitoring Activity And Gait In Children

An observational study of Child, Preschool and Child, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

COHORT A: To study whether a digital health tool called Actigraph can be used to collect information on gait and physical activity in healthy children aged 3-17. The study will be conducted at the Pfizer Innovation Research Laboratory (PfIRe Lab) in Cambridge MA. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Child, Preschool, Child, Adolescent
What is being tested?
COHORT A: Actigraph and Panoramic Bracelet and GENEActiv
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
87 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
23 Aug 2021to 28 Oct 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: Healthy children and adolescents aged 3-17.

Who may be able to join

  • Ambulatory
  • No significant health problems that would impair the completion of the physical activity tasks, does not carry any diagnosis of developmental delay and/or significant co-morbid medical conditions as determined by a medically qualified individual during medical history review

Who cannot join

  • Participation in other studies involving digital devices within 1 week and/or treatment with an investigational drug (Phases 1-4) within 30 days or 5 half-lives before the current study begins and/or during study participation.
  • Participants with implanted medical devices.
  • Minor participants who reach the age of majority during the study, as recognized under local law.
  • Any medical or psychiatric condition that may increase the risk of study participation or, in the investigator's judgment, make the participant inappropriate for the study.
  • Participants with known allergies to components as specified by device manufacturer if applicable (eg, plastic, stainless steel and silicone).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Pfizer Innovation Research, PfIRe, Lab

    Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Low-Interventional Study to Record Gait and Physical Activity Using ActiGraph Devices in Children Ages 3-17.

COHORT A: To study whether a digital health tool called Actigraph can be used to collect information on gait and physical activity in healthy children aged 3-17. The study will be conducted at the Pfizer Innovation Research Laboratory (PfIRe Lab) in Cambridge MA. In the lab at the first visit, we will ask participants to do activities such as walking on different surfaces as well as to roll a dice and move between different activity stations. Children will wear 2 Actigraph devices, one as a watch and one as a belt. They will then go home and do usual daily activities while answering a brief daily activity diary for approximately 2 weeks. The conclusion of the study will be over the telephone and include questions on the comfort and wearability of the device. The analysis of gait and physical activity as well as adherence and wearability will be looked across three different age groups 3-5, 6-11, and 12-17.

COHORT B: Cohort B of the study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the Panoramic Bracelet and associated algorithms such as SleepPy and GaitPy compared to the GENEActiv device and to evaluate the comfort and wearability of the Panoramic Bracelet. The results of this study will enable the use of novel devices in future clinical trials measuring scratch and sleep. . In the lab at the first visit, we will ask participants to do activities such as walking on different surfaces as well as to roll a dice and move between different activity stations. They will then go home and do usual daily activities while wearing both devices in the same wrist at different times stipulated in the protocol, answering a brief daily activity and sleep diary for approximately 2 weeks. Cohort B includes questions on the comfort and wearability of the Panoramic device on Day 7 approximately. The conclusion of the study will be over the telephone.The analysis will be looked across three different age groups 3-5, 6-11, and 12-17

Being tested
COHORT A: Actigraph, Panoramic Bracelet and GENEActiv
Keywords
COHORT A :, Gait, Activity, Actigraphy, COHORT B:, Sleep
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • COHORT A: ActigraphDevice

    The ActiGraph CentrePoint Insight Watch is a small worn activity monitor designed for documenting physical movement associated with applications in physiological monitoring.

  • Panoramic Bracelet and GENEActivDevice

    Panoramic Bracelet:

    The Panoramic Digital Health Bracelet is a wearable inertial measurement unit "intended for use by researchers and healthcare professionals for high frequency or continuous collection of physical data in home and professional healthcare settings during research studies." It includes a 3 axis accelerometer and gyroscope, as well as magnetometer, pressure, and temperature sensors. The bracelet has no interface or screen for participants to interact with.

    GENEActiv:

    The GENEActiv device is a wearable inertial measurement unit "designed for public health research and clinical trials." The device is a circular unit with attachable wrist-bands, and has no interface or screen for participants to interact with. The GENEActiv device is FDA 510(k) exempt. The device records acceleration data and can collect data remotely for up to 1 month.

Study groups in NCT04823650
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ages 3-5COHORT A and B
Receives: Device: COHORT A: Actigraph; Device: Panoramic Bracelet and GENEActiv
Ages 6-11COHORT A and B
Receives: Device: COHORT A: Actigraph; Device: Panoramic Bracelet and GENEActiv
Ages 12-17COHORT A and B
Receives: Device: COHORT A: Actigraph; Device: Panoramic Bracelet and GENEActiv

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  2. Cohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  3. Cohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Single support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometery data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  4. Cohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  5. Cohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Swing time was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  6. Cohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes of Day 1

  7. Cohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit on Day 1 during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  8. Cohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  9. Cohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  10. Cohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 1], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 2]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  11. Cohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Single support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 1], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 2]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  12. Cohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 1], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 2]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  13. Cohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Swing duration was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 1], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 2]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  14. Cohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 1], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 2]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  15. Cohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-lab simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 1], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 2]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  16. Cohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 1], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 2]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  17. Cohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 1], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 2]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  18. Cohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 1], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 2]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  19. Cohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 1], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities [activity block 2]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  20. Cohort B: Total Sleep Time During the At-Home Period

    Total sleep time for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's total sleep opportunity (TSO) window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  21. Cohort B: Percentage of Time Asleep During the At-Home Period

    The percentage of time asleep for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  22. Cohort B: Number of Wake Bouts During the At-Home Period

    Number of wake bouts for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  23. Cohort B: Sleep Onset Latency During the At-Home Period

    Sleep onset latency which is time to transition from full wakefulness to sleep, for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  24. Cohort B: Wake After Sleep Onset During the At-Home Period

    Wake after sleep onset is time for which participants were awake after having initially fallen asleep, for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  25. Cohort B: Total Scratch Duration During the At-Home Period

    Total scratch duration for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  26. Cohort B: Total Scratch Episodes During the At-Home Period

    Total scratch episodes for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  27. Cohort B: Number of Available Minutes During the At-Home Period

    Available minutes represented any recorded accelerometer data per day per device in minutes. Number of available minutes for GENEActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the in-house built Sci-kit Digital Health (SKDH) package.

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  28. Cohort B: Number of Minutes of Wear During the At-Home Period

    Number of minutes of wear include the total number of minutes the device is worn including sleep time and awake time. The wear time parameter (number of minutes of wear) for GENEActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the in-house built SKDH package.

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  29. Cohort B: Number of Wear Minutes While Awake During the At-Home Period

    The wear time parameter (number of wear minutes while awake) for GENEActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the in-house built SKDH package.

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  30. Cohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7

    Wearability/comfort questionnaire included a total of 10 items for which the participants (12 to 17 years) or their caregivers (participants aged 3 to 11 years) were required to provide a response on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = strongly disagree, and 4 = strongly agree, higher scores indicated more comfort, except for questions 5 ("The device changes the way I move") and 6 ("The device changes the way I behave") , where 0 = strongly agree and 4 = strongly disagree, higher scores indicate more comfort. Number of participants according to response to each item of the wearability/comfort questionnaire is reported.

    Measured: Day 7

  31. Cohort A: Number of Days to Complete Enrollment

    Number of days to complete enrollment corresponded to the total number of days it took to enroll all study participants within the age groups of 3-5 years, 6-11 years and 12-17 years.

    Measured: Up to approximately 8 months

Secondary outcomes (27)
  1. Cohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time

    Number of participants enrolled at specified month intervals in the study is reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Up to approximately 8 months

  2. Cohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based Tasks

    Number of participants who were able to perform each of the 7 tasks (i.e., walking at natural, slow and fast speeds, tile and carpet walks, 2 sessions of in-lab simulated activities) is reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  3. Cohort A: Percentage of Tasks Completed (From a Total of 7 Tasks)

    Percentage of tasks completed from a total of 7 tasks (i.e., walking at natural, slow and fast speeds, tile and carpet walks, 2 sessions of in-lab simulated activities) is reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  4. Cohort A: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Lumbar and Wrist Devices

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days)

  5. Cohort A: Number of Days With More Than 10 Hours of Wear Time for Lumbar Device

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days)

  6. Cohort A: Number of Days With More Than 18 Hours of Wear Time for Wrist Device

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days)

  7. Cohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1

    Wearability/comfort questionnaire included a total of 10 items for which the participants (12 to 17 years) or their caregivers (participants aged 3 to 11 years) were required to provide a response on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = strongly disagree, and 4 = strongly agree, higher scores indicate more comfort except for questions 5 ("The device changes the way I move") and 6 ("The device changes the way I behave") , where 0 = strongly agree and 4 = strongly disagree, higher scores indicate more comfort. Number of participants according to response to each item of the wearability/comfort questionnaire is reported.

    Measured: Day 1

  8. Cohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study Evaluation

    Wearability/comfort questionnaire included a total of 10 items for which the participants (12 to 17 years) or their caregivers (participants aged 3 to 11 years) were required to provide a response on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = strongly disagree, and 4 = strongly agree, higher scores indicate more comfort except for questions 5 ("The device changes the way I move") and 6 ("The device changes the way I behave") , where 0 = strongly agree and 4 = strongly disagree, higher scores indicate more comfort. Number of participants according to response to each item of the wearability/comfort questionnaire is reported.

    Measured: Day 15 (+ 3 days)

  9. Cohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

    Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  10. Cohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

    Single limb support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  11. Cohort A: Stance Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

    Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  12. Cohort A: Swing Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

    Swing time was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  13. Cohort A: Stride Length Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

    Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  14. Cohort A: Step Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

    Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  15. Cohort A: Cadence Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

    Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  16. Cohort A: Gait Speed Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

    Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  17. Cohort A: Stride Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

    Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  18. Cohort B: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Panoramic Bracelet Devices at Home

    Measured: From Day 1 up to Day 7

  19. Cohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  20. Cohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Single support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  21. Cohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  22. Cohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Swing time was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  23. Cohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  24. Cohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  25. Cohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  26. Cohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Task

    Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  27. Cohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Apr 2021
  2. Study start23 Aug 2021
  3. Primary completion28 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion28 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
87 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04823650
Sponsor's protocol ID
X9001263
Other IDs
MAGIC
Acronym
MAGIC
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
18 Mar 2021
Last updated
11 Dec 2025
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Di J, Tuttle PG, Adamowicz L, Lin W, Zhang H, Psaltos D, Selig J, Bai J, Karahanoglu FI, Sheriff P, Seelam V, Williams B, Ghafoor S, Demanuele C, Santamaria M, Cai X. Monitoring Activity and Gait in Children (MAGIC) using digital health technologies. Pediatr Res. 2024 Aug;96(3):750-758. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03147-x. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

    PubMed 38514860

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Child, Preschool and Child, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks (time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1). The study lists 31 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04823650, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in