AzTrials
AzTrials

SedationNCT04820205

Comparison of Oral Chloral Hydrate and Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children

A study testing Intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine and Oral chloral hydrate in people with Sedation, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

In Korea, oral chloral hydrate is still widely used for pediatric procedural sedation. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) on the first-attempt success rate of pediatric procedural sedation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 7 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Sedation
What is being tested?
Intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine and Oral chloral hydrate
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
136 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
29 Oct 2021to 5 Mar 2024
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 7 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Pediatric patients who need procedural sedation (Age < 7 years)
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status 1-3

Who cannot join

  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status 4-5
  • History of hypersensitivity to Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, or Chloral hydrate
  • Recent administration of Alpha 2 adrenergic receptor agonist or antagonist
  • Cannot administrate oral medication (e.g. Swallowing difficulty)
  • Cannot administrate intranasal medication(e.g. Excessive rhinorrhea)
  • Unstable vital signs, Unstable arrhythmia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Jin-Tae Kim

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Oral Chloral Hydrate and Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial

In Korea, oral chloral hydrate is still widely used for pediatric procedural sedation. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) on the first-attempt success rate of pediatric procedural sedation. The hypothesis of this study is that the intranasal dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) will improve the success rate of adequate pediatric procedural sedation (PSSS=1,2,3) within 15 minutes. This is a prospective, parallel-arm, single-blinded, multi-center, randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) with oral chloral hydrate (50mg/kg) in pediatric patients undergoing procedural sedation. Prior to the procedure, each patient will be randomized in the control arm (oral chloral hydrate) or study arm (intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine).

Conditions
Sedation
Being tested
Intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine, Oral chloral hydrate
Keywords
pediatric, procedural sedation, chloral hydrate, intranasal dexmedetomidine, intranasal ketamine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamineDrug

    Intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) to increase the success rate of adequate pediatric procedural sedation (pediatric sedation state scale = 1,2,3)

  • Oral chloral hydrateDrug

    Oral chloral hydrate (50mg/kg) administration to induce adequate pediatric procedural sedation (pediatric sedation state scale = 1,2,3)

Study groups in NCT04820205
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
intranasal dexmedetomdine and kemtaineExperimentalIntranasal administration of dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) to increase the success rate of adequate pediatric procedural sedation (pediatric sedation state scale = 1,2,3)
Receives: Drug: Intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine
oral chloral hydrateActive comparatorOral chloral hydrate (50mg/kg) administration to induce adequate pediatric procedural sedation (pediatric sedation state scale = 1,2,3)
Receives: Drug: Oral chloral hydrate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Success rate of adequate sedation (PSSS= 1,2,3) within 15 minutes %

    Success rate of adequate sedation (Pediatric Sedation State Scale= 1,2,3) within 15 minutes after sedative administration. %

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 1 hour)

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Onset time of sedation (PSSS= 0,1,2,3) (min)

    Onset time of sedation (Pediatric Sedation State Scale= 1,2,3) after sedative administration.

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  2. Duration of sedation = Recovery time (PSSS= 4,5) (min)

    Pediatric Sedation State Scale= 4,5 after recovery of sedation

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  3. PSSS(Pediatric Sedation State Scale, 0-5)

    5 Patient is moving in a manner that impedes the proceduralist and requires forceful immobilization.

    4 Moving during the procedure that requires gentle immobilization for positioning.

    3 Expression of pain or anxiety on face, but not moving or impeding completion of the procedure.

    2 Quiet (asleep or awake), not moving during procedure, and no frown (or brow furrow) indicating pain or anxiety.

    1 Deeply asleep with normal vital signs, but requiring airway intervention and/or assistance 0 Sedation associated with abnormal physiologic parameters that require acute intervention q 10min

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  4. Heart rate during sedation (/min)

    HR(/min) at Baseline(T0), q 10min

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  5. SpO2 during sedation (%)

    SpO2(%) by pulse oximetry at Baseline(T0), q 10min

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  6. Respiratory rate during sedation (/min)

    RR(/min) at Baseline(T0), q 10min

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  7. the incidence of PSSS=0 (Abnormal physiologic parameter that require acute intervention) %

    the incidence of PSSS=0 (Abnormal physiologic parameter that require acute intervention) %

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  8. The incidence of respiratory intervention: Manual ventilation or Artificial airway %

    The incidence of respiratory intervention: Manual ventilation or Artificial airway

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  9. The incidence of significant desaturation (SpO2 < 95% or -10% from baseline, >10 seconds) %

    The incidence of significant desaturation (SpO2 < 95% or -10% from baseline, >10 seconds) %

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  10. The incidence of significant apnea (>20seconds) %

    The incidence of significant apnea (>20seconds) %

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  11. The lowest SpO2 value (%)

    The lowest SpO2 value (%)

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  12. The incidence of hemodynamic intervention: fluid management, intravenous medication %

    The incidence of hemodynamic intervention: fluid management, intravenous medication %

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  13. The incidence of significant bradycardia (-30% from baseline) %

    The incidence of significant bradycardia (-30% from baseline) %

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  14. The incidence of significant hypotension (-30% from baseline) %

    The incidence of significant hypotension (-30% from baseline) %

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  15. Patients' acceptance (1=excellent, 2=good, 3=fair, 4=poor)

    Patients' acceptance (1=excellent, 2=good, 3=fair, 4=poor)

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  16. Separation anxiety (1=easy, 2=whimper, 3=cry, 4=cry and cling to parents)

    Separation anxiety (1=easy, 2=whimper, 3=cry, 4=cry and cling to parents)

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  17. Physicians' satisfaction (1=excellent, 2=good, 3=fair, 4=poor)

    Physicians' satisfaction (1=excellent, 2=good, 3=fair, 4=poor)

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  18. The incidence of other side effects (Ex: Nausea/Vomit, Allergic reaction, Etc)

    Other side effects (Ex: Nausea/Vomit, Allergic reaction, Etc)

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  19. The incidence of failure of adequate sedation (PSSS= 0, 4,5) after 30 min %

    Failure of adequate sedation (PSSS= 0, 4,5) after 30 min %

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  20. The incidence of completion of procedure

    Completion of procedure

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)

  21. Total cost of sedation (KRW), optional

    Total cost of sedation (KRW), if applicable

    Measured: During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 1 day)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Mar 2021
  2. Study start29 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion5 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion5 Mar 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04820205
Sponsor's protocol ID
IN DEXKET first
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
19 Mar 2021
Last updated
9 Oct 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Zhang W, Wang Z, Song X, Fan Y, Tian H, Li B. Comparison of rescue techniques for failed chloral hydrate sedation for magnetic resonance imaging scans--additional chloral hydrate vs intranasal dexmedetomidine. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Mar;26(3):273-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12824. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

    PubMed 26714442
  • Cao Q, Lin Y, Xie Z, Shen W, Chen Y, Gan X, Liu Y. Comparison of sedation by intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral chloral hydrate for pediatric ophthalmic examination. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Jun;27(6):629-636. doi: 10.1111/pan.13148. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

    PubMed 28414899
  • Sheta SA, Al-Sarheed MA, Abdelhalim AA. Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Feb;24(2):181-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12287. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

    PubMed 24237879
  • Zanaty OM, El Metainy SA. A comparative evaluation of nebulized dexmedetomidine, nebulized ketamine, and their combination as premedication for outpatient pediatric dental surgery. Anesth Analg. 2015 Jul;121(1):167-171. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000728.

    PubMed 25822924
  • Zhang W, Fan Y, Zhao T, Chen J, Zhang G, Song X. Median Effective Dose of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Rescue Sedation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Anesthesiology. 2016 Dec;125(6):1130-1135. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001353.

    PubMed 27627818
  • Jun JH, Kim KN, Kim JY, Song SM. The effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Sep;64(9):947-961. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0917-x. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

    PubMed 28639236
  • Abdel-Ghaffar HS, Kamal SM, El Sherif FA, Mohamed SA. Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Aug;121(2):445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.039. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

    PubMed 30032884
  • Poonai N, Canton K, Ali S, Hendrikx S, Shah A, Miller M, Joubert G, Rieder M, Hartling L. Intranasal ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in children: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0173253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173253. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28319161
  • Jang YE, Joo EY, Lee JH, Kim EH, Kang P, Park JB, Kim HS, Kim JT. Two-center randomized controlled trial comparing oral chloral hydrate and intranasal combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine for procedural sedation in children: study protocol. Trials. 2023 Jan 3;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07033-x.

    PubMed 36597163

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in