Permanent His Bundle PacingHIS-STORYNCT04816864
Safety and Efficacy of His Bundle Pacing Validated by Extracardiac Vagal Nerve Stimulation
A study testing extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) + EPS in people with Permanent His Bundle Pacing and Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing, run by 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland at 3 sites in Poland.
Trial summary
Different studies for extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) have been published and confirmed the influence of the vagus nerve on automaticity and conduction properties of the sinus node, atria, atrioventricular node, as well as the His-Purkinje system (HPS) and ventricles. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Permanent His Bundle Pacing, Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing
- What is being tested?
- extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) + EPS
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesPoland
- Study dates
- 2 Jan 2021to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- signed informed consent form
- effective and stable HB or LBB pacing
- sinus rhythm during the intervention procedure
Who cannot join
- contraindications to invasive EPS
- contraindications to general anesthesia
- contraindications to atropine administration (e.g., glaucoma)
- persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
- pregnancy
- diseases that may cause autonomic system neuropathy
Show all 9Show fewer
- use of medications that may affect the parasympathetic system
- a history of cardiac surgery
- a history of ablation due to arrhythmia
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Poland3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Mazovian Speciality Hospital, Cardiology Department
Radom, Masovian Voivodeship, 26-617
Jarosław Kosior, MD, PhD, +48 3613676, jaroslaw.kosior@icloud.com
Jarosław Kosior, MD, PhD
- Recruiting
Subcarpathian Center for Cardiovascular Intervention
Sanok, Podkarpackie Voivodeship, 38-500
Sebastion Stec, prof, MD, +48 600298022, smstec@wp.pl
Sebastian Stec, prof, MD
- Recruiting
4th Military Hospital, Cardiology Department
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 50-981
Krystian Josiak, MD, PhD, +48 261660223, kjosiak@4wsk.pl
Dorota Zyśko, prof, MD
About this study
Official title: Safety and Efficacy of HIs Bundle Pacing Validated by electrophySiological STudy, autonOmic Tests and extRacardiac Vagal Nerve Stimulation (HIS-STORY)
Different studies for extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) have been published and confirmed the influence of the vagus nerve on automaticity and conduction properties of the sinus node, atria, atrioventricular node, as well as the His-Purkinje system (HPS) and ventricles. However, there are limited data on the clinical value and impact of ECANS as well as vagus nerve activity on the parameters of permanent His-bundle (HB) or left bundle branch (LBB) pacing. Moreover, there have been no prospective studies evaluating the feasibility and efficacy of ECANS and the management of ECANS-induced scenarios, such as an exit block, increase in pacing threshold, as well as vagally mediated arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities in patients with physiological conduction system pacing (HB/LBB pacing).
The objective of the HIS-STORY study in humans is to evaluate the clinical value of ECANS in patients with HB/LBB pacing for further development of patient-centered management strategy.
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, interventional study enrolling patients with indications for permanent cardiac pacing according to the current European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on Cardiac Pacing. All participants will undergo permanent pacemaker implantation for HB or LBB pacing. Subsequently, an invasive electrophysiological study (EPS) and ECANS will be performed. The 2 x 2 randomisation will be performed, i.e. right vs left side superior ECANS and blinded for operator ultrasonography guided effective vs ineffective inferior vagal nerve stimulation). The randomisation will prove the feasibility and efficacy of superior ECANS and feasibility, efficacy, and reproducibility of ultrasonography guided inferior ECANS. All the measured parameters as well as demographic and clinical data will be recorded in the study database. Patients with an exit block or an increase in a pacing threshold of an HB/LBB electrode will be further managed by electrophysiologists from the research group. The management will be based on clinical assessment and patient's decision and may involve pacemaker reprogramming, pacemaker upgrade with a back-up pacing electrode implantation, or cardio-neuro-ablation.
- Being tested
- extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) + EPS
- Keywords
- His bundle pacing, left bundle branch pacing, extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) + EPSDiagnostic test
The study intervention will consist of 3 steps, all of which will be performed under general anesthesia:
- EPS with the measurement of parameters of atrioventricular conduction and programmed atrial and ventricular pacing.
- ECANS of the right and the left vagus nerve (from the right and left internal jugular vein, respectively; patients will be randomized to start from the right or the left side) performed during: 1) the patient's spontaneous heart rhythm (if present); 2) HB/LBB pacing with permanently programmed impulse parameters; 3) HB/LBB pacing at a pacing threshold of +0.1 V; and 4) 5 minutes after intravenous injection of atropine (0.02-0.04 mg/kg).
- EPS with the measurement of parameters of atrioventricular conduction and programmed atrial and ventricular pacing.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ECANS started from the right vagus nerve | Active comparator | superior ECANS and ultrasonography guided inferior ECANS Receives: Diagnostic Test: extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) + EPS |
| ECANS started from the left vagus nerve | Active comparator | superior ECANS and ultrasonography guided inferior ECANS Receives: Diagnostic Test: extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) + EPS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Loss of HB/LBB capture or significant increase in pacing threshold
significant increase in pacing threshold = above the permanently programmed impulse amplitude of HB/LBB electrode induced by ECANS
Measured: 0-12 months after HB/LBB pacemaker implantation
Secondary outcomes (2)
A nonsignificant increase in pacing threshold
below the permanently programmed impulse amplitude of HB/LBB electrode induced by ECANS
Measured: 0-12 months after HB/LBB pacemaker implantation
Prolongation of the stimulus-QRS interval during HB/LBB pacing induced by ECANS
Measured: 0-12 months after HB/LBB pacemaker implantation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2021
- Study start2 Jan 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Permanent His Bundle PacingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Subcarpathian Center for Cardiovascular Intervention, Mazovian Speciality Hospital, Wroclaw Medical University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Krystian Josiak, 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland
- Investigators
- Krystian Josiak, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04816864
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4thMilitaryH
- Acronym
- HIS-STORY
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 21 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Abdelrahman M, Subzposh FA, Beer D, Durr B, Naperkowski A, Sun H, Oren JW, Dandamudi G, Vijayaraman P. Clinical Outcomes of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2319-2330. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.048. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
PubMed 29535066Kronborg MB, Mortensen PT, Poulsen SH, Gerdes JC, Jensen HK, Nielsen JC. His or para-His pacing preserves left ventricular function in atrioventricular block: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. Europace. 2014 Aug;16(8):1189-96. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu011. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
PubMed 24509688Dandamudi G, Vijayaraman P. How to perform permanent His bundle pacing in routine clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jun;13(6):1362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.040. Epub 2016 Mar 22. No abstract available.
PubMed 27016475Josiak K, Nowak K, Fuglewicz A, Jagielski D, Banasiak W, Ponikowski P. Does right ventricular pacing increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator? Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(4):381-4. doi: 10.5603/KP.2014.0073. No abstract available.
PubMed 24733700Sharma PS, Dandamudi G, Naperkowski A, Oren JW, Storm RH, Ellenbogen KA, Vijayaraman P. Permanent His-bundle pacing is feasible, safe, and superior to right ventricular pacing in routine clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Feb;12(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
PubMed 25446158Burri H, Jastrzebski M, Vijayaraman P. Electrocardiographic Analysis for His Bundle Pacing at Implantation and Follow-Up. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;6(7):883-900. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.03.005.
PubMed 32703577Zysko D, Gajek J, Kozluk E, Mazurek W. Electrocardiographic characteristics of atrioventricular block induced by tilt testing. Europace. 2009 Feb;11(2):225-30. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun299. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
PubMed 18987129Klank-Szafran M, Stec S, Sledz J, Janion M. [Radiofrequency ablation and cardioneuroablation for AVNRT and atrioventricular block]. Kardiol Pol. 2010 Jun;68(6):720-4. Polish.
PubMed 20806214Pachon JC, Pachon EI, Pachon JC, Lobo TJ, Pachon MZ, Vargas RN, Jatene AD. "Cardioneuroablation"--new treatment for neurocardiogenic syncope, functional AV block and sinus dysfunction using catheter RF-ablation. Europace. 2005 Jan;7(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.10.003.
PubMed 15670960Stec S, Dobaj L, Sledz A, Stepien-Walek AM, Ton V, Sledz J. Cardioneuroablation for management of cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope and pacemaker complications. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2020 May 11;6(8):531-534. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2020.04.021. eCollection 2020 Aug. No abstract available.
PubMed 32817835
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Efficacy of HIs Bundle Pacing Validated by electrophySiological STudy, autonOmic Tests and extRacardiac Vagal Nerve Stimulation (HIS-STORY)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04816864
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HIS-STORY / 4thMilitaryH
- Keywords
- His bundle pacing, left bundle branch pacing, extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, PolandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Subcarpathian Center for Cardiovascular Intervention, Mazovian Speciality Hospital, Wroclaw Medical University
- Study start
- 2 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Different studies for extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) have been published and confirmed the influence of the vagus nerve on automaticity and conduction properties of the sinus node, atria, atrioventricular node, as well as the His-Purkinje system (HPS) and ventricles. However, there are limited data on the clinical value and impact of ECANS as well as vagus nerve activity on the parameters of permanent His-bundle (HB) or left bundle branch (LBB) pacing. Moreover, there have been no prospective studies evaluating the feasibility and efficacy of ECANS and the management of ECANS-induced scenarios, such as an exit block, increase in pacing threshold, as well as vagally mediated arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities in patients with physiological conduction system pacing (HB/LBB pacing).
The objective of the HIS-STORY study in humans is to evaluate the clinical value of ECANS in patients with HB/LBB pacing for further development of patient-centered management strategy.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, interventional study enrolling patients with indications for permanent cardiac pacing according to the current European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on Cardiac Pacing. All participants will undergo permanent pacemaker implantation for HB or LBB pacing. Subsequently, an invasive electrophysiological study (EPS) and ECANS will be performed. The 2 x 2 randomisation will be performed, i.e. right vs left side superior ECANS and blinded for operator ultrasonography guided effective vs ineffective inferior vagal nerve stimulation). The randomisation will prove the feasibility and efficacy of superior ECANS and feasibility, efficacy, and reproducibility of ultrasonography guided inferior ECANS. All the measured parameters as well as demographic and clinical data will be recorded in the study database. Patients with an exit block or an increase in a pacing threshold of an HB/LBB electrode will be further managed by electrophysiologists from the research group. The management will be based on clinical assessment and patient's decision and may involve pacemaker reprogramming, pacemaker upgrade with a back-up pacing electrode implantation, or cardio-neuro-ablation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ECANS started from the right vagus nerve | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) + EPSsuperior ECANS and ultrasonography guided inferior ECANS |
| ECANS started from the left vagus nerve | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) + EPSsuperior ECANS and ultrasonography guided inferior ECANS |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- signed informed consent form
- effective and stable HB or LBB pacing
- sinus rhythm during the intervention procedure
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- contraindications to invasive EPS
- contraindications to general anesthesia
- contraindications to atropine administration (e.g., glaucoma)
- persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
- pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) + EPSThe study intervention will consist of 3 steps, all of which will be performed under general anesthesia: 1. EPS with the measurement of parameters of atrioventricular conduction and programmed atrial and ventricular pacing. 2. ECANS of the right and the left vagus nerve (from the right and left internal jugular vein, respectively; patients will be randomized to start from the right or the left side) performed during: 1) the patient's spontaneous heart rhythm (if present); 2) HB/LBB pacing with permanently programmed impulse parameters; 3) HB/LBB pacing at a pacing threshold of +0.1 V; and 4) 5 minutes after intravenous injection of atropine (0.02-0.04 mg/kg). 3. EPS with the measurement of parameters of atrioventricular conduction and programmed atrial and ventricular pacing. | Diagnostic test | ECANS started from the left vagus nerve, ECANS started from the right vagus nerve |
Primary outcome
Loss of HB/LBB capture or significant increase in pacing threshold
Time frame: 0-12 months after HB/LBB pacemaker implantation
significant increase in pacing threshold = above the permanently programmed impulse amplitude of HB/LBB electrode induced by ECANS
2 secondary outcomes
A nonsignificant increase in pacing threshold
Time frame: 0-12 months after HB/LBB pacemaker implantation
Prolongation of the stimulus-QRS interval during HB/LBB pacing induced by ECANS
Time frame: 0-12 months after HB/LBB pacemaker implantation
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Dec 2022.
- Results publication: PubMed 29535066Abdelrahman M, Subzposh FA, Beer D, Durr B, Naperkowski A, Sun H, Oren JW, Dandamudi G, Vijayaraman P. Clinical Outcomes of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2319-2330. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.048. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 24509688Kronborg MB, Mortensen PT, Poulsen SH, Gerdes JC, Jensen HK, Nielsen JC. His or para-His pacing preserves left ventricular function in atrioventricular block: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. Europace. 2014 Aug;16(8):1189-96. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu011. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 27016475Dandamudi G, Vijayaraman P. How to perform permanent His bundle pacing in routine clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jun;13(6):1362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.040. Epub 2016 Mar 22. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 24733700Josiak K, Nowak K, Fuglewicz A, Jagielski D, Banasiak W, Ponikowski P. Does right ventricular pacing increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator? Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(4):381-4. doi: 10.5603/KP.2014.0073. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 25446158Sharma PS, Dandamudi G, Naperkowski A, Oren JW, Storm RH, Ellenbogen KA, Vijayaraman P. Permanent His-bundle pacing is feasible, safe, and superior to right ventricular pacing in routine clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Feb;12(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 32703577Burri H, Jastrzebski M, Vijayaraman P. Electrocardiographic Analysis for His Bundle Pacing at Implantation and Follow-Up. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;6(7):883-900. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.03.005.
- Results publication: PubMed 18987129Zysko D, Gajek J, Kozluk E, Mazurek W. Electrocardiographic characteristics of atrioventricular block induced by tilt testing. Europace. 2009 Feb;11(2):225-30. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun299. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 20806214Klank-Szafran M, Stec S, Sledz J, Janion M. [Radiofrequency ablation and cardioneuroablation for AVNRT and atrioventricular block]. Kardiol Pol. 2010 Jun;68(6):720-4. Polish.
- Results publication: PubMed 15670960Pachon JC, Pachon EI, Pachon JC, Lobo TJ, Pachon MZ, Vargas RN, Jatene AD. "Cardioneuroablation"--new treatment for neurocardiogenic syncope, functional AV block and sinus dysfunction using catheter RF-ablation. Europace. 2005 Jan;7(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.10.003.
- Results publication: PubMed 32817835Stec S, Dobaj L, Sledz A, Stepien-Walek AM, Ton V, Sledz J. Cardioneuroablation for management of cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope and pacemaker complications. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2020 May 11;6(8):531-534. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2020.04.021. eCollection 2020 Aug. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Krystian Josiak, MD, PhD principal investigator
4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing extracardiac vagal nerve stimulation (ECANS) + EPS in people with Permanent His Bundle Pacing and Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing, run by 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland at 3 sites in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Krystian Josiak, MD, PhD (+48 516625985, kjosiak@4wsk.pl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Loss of HB/LBB capture or significant increase in pacing threshold (time frame: 0-12 months after HB/LBB pacemaker implantation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04816864, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2022.