AzTrials
AzTrials

Occult BleedingNCT04814810

A 48 Subject Study Using Non-invasive Multi-Technology Measurements for Early Detection of Ongoing Hemorrhage

An observational study of Occult Bleeding and Hemorrhage, run by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Early detection of ongoing hemorrhage (OH) before onset of hemorrhagic shock is a universally acknowledged great unmet need, and particularly important after traumatic injury. Delays in the detection of OH are associated with a "failure to rescue" and a dramatic deterioration in prognosis once the onset of clinically… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Occult Bleeding, Hemorrhage, Hemorrhagic Shock
How many people
7 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2021to 15 Apr 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing liver resection

Who may be able to join

  • Adults 18 years or older
  • Patients undergoing liver resection.
  • Ability to give informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Pre-existing systemic illness, likely to alter systemic cardiovascular response to hemorrhage. Including congestive heart failure, and a paced cardiac rhythm.
  • Pregnant
  • Prisoner status

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Development of a Multiplex Precision Medicine System for Early Warning of Progression Toward Shock After Trauma: Non-invasive Measurement During Hepatectomy With Low Central Venous Pressure

Early detection of ongoing hemorrhage (OH) before onset of hemorrhagic shock is a universally acknowledged great unmet need, and particularly important after traumatic injury. Delays in the detection of OH are associated with a "failure to rescue" and a dramatic deterioration in prognosis once the onset of clinically frank shock has occurred. An early alert to the presence of OH would save countless lives.

This is a single site study, enrolling 48 patients undergoing liver resection in a "no significant risk" prospective clinical trial to: 1) further identify a minimal subset of noninvasive measurement technologies necessary for the desired diagnostic performance, 2) validate the performance of our Phase I algorithm, and 3) re-train the algorithm to a Phase II human iteration.

The main outcome variables are non-invasive measurements that will be used for machine learning, not real-time patient management. The data generated will be used later for discovery and validation in traditional and innovative machine learning.

Read the detailed description

Hemorrhagic shock remains a leading cause of death on the battlefield as well in civilian communities. Early detection of ongoing hemorrhage before progression to frank shock would allow early intervention. It is widely appreciated that the classic medical vital signs perform poorly until late in the progression to shock after traumatic injury. Currently available techniques, including intermittent vital sign monitoring, laboratory analysis, and single measurement devices have poor performance before clinically obvious physiologic distress.

The overall goal of this project is to develop a multi-technology noninvasive system for early detection of ongoing hemorrhage. The underlying hypothesis is that deep learning developed algorithms obtaining diagnostic signals from multiple sources will outperform single technology solutions.

While the promise of innovative noninvasive testing has received wide attention, development of effective bedside technologies has thus far been limited and their performance disappointing. In 2014, Kim et al stated that "The results from this meta-analysis found that inaccuracy and imprecision of continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring devices are larger than what was defined as acceptable" and noninvasive blood pressure measurement is among the most fully developed of these technologies. The failure of noninvasive technologies in the detection or diagnosis of complex disease states has been essentially complete. The investigators believe that this failure reflects the limitations of uniplex systems (a single sensor in a single-location) and patient-to-patient variation in physiologic response. Uniplex systems sacrifice the entire diagnostic signal in anatomic-temporal patterns, which likely has significant discriminant power.

To date, technological innovation in early detection of ongoing hemorrhage has been of two broad categories: 1) a search to discover a single new measurement of tissue or organ status or 2) application of more sophisticated mathematical techniques based on machine learning and signal processing.

The investigators propose to develop a system that combines state-of-the-art noninvasive sensing technologies and advanced multivariable statistical algorithms. This system will be developed from its inception to be inexpensive and easily applied, even in austere settings.

To avoid the unnecessary use of blood products, hepatectomies are performed with low central venous pressure (CVP). This is accomplished through restrictive use of intravenous fluids and at times medications to lower the central venous pressure. Low central venous pressure during hepatectomy is an excellent model for development of technologies such as ours and has not been previously used for this purpose.

During each procedure, the investigators will obtain a full ensemble of noninvasive optical, electromagnetic and impedance physiological signals during the LCVPLR procedure. The work proposed herein will evaluate these technologies during standard low central venous pressure liver resections (LCVPLR). These data will be utilized for further machine learning-based algorithm development. The proposed study will be low risk since the measured data will not be available to the clinicians.

Specific Aims:

  1. Evaluate the performance of existing non-invasive sensing technologies and multivariable algorithms in LCVPLR.
  2. Obtain human model training and validation data sets during LCVPLR for further refinement of the algorithms.

Power and Sample Size: The investigators anticipate acquiring data from every enrolled subject. The data obtained before onset of parenchymal transection will be utilized as the "no hemorrhage" control. Power and sample size calculations indicate that a sample size of 48 subjects should be sufficient to: 1) further identify the minimal subset of noninvasive measurement technologies necessary for the desired diagnostic performance, 2) validate the existing algorithms, and 3) initially train a human clinical iteration of the algorithms, with a sufficient degree of accuracy (p < 0.05 for ROC-AUC).

As a minimal risk study, there will be no change from standard of care for patients undergoing surgery. The surgical procedures and pharmacotherapies will proceed as per standard clinical management. Enrolled patients will undergo standard preoperative, anesthetic, and postoperative physiological monitoring.

Keywords
Occult Bleeding, Hemorrhage, Hemorrhagic Shock, Trauma Injury, Trauma, Multiple, Trauma Blunt, Precision Medicine, Triage, Bioimpedance, Electrical Impedance Tomography, Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Medical subject headings
Hemorrhage, Shock, Hemorrhagic, Accidental Injuries, Multiple Trauma, Wounds, Nonpenetrating

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Non-invasive measurements that will be used for machine learning

    Continuous-wave Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (CW-NIRS)

    Measured: 2-3 hours

  2. Non-invasive measurements that will be used for machine learning

    Electrical Impedance Tomography

    Measured: 2-3 hours

  3. Non-invasive measurements that will be used for machine learning

    Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy

    Measured: 2-3 hours

  4. Non-invasive measurements that will be used for machine learning

    Intrathoracic Hemodynamic Bioreactance Signatures

    Measured: 2-3 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Mar 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2021
  4. Study completion15 Apr 2021

Why it stopped: Research model determined to be ineffective for capturing machine-learning appropriate data

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
7 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04814810
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY02000394
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
17 Mar 2021
Last updated
5 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Shackelford SA, Colton K, Stansbury LG, Galvagno SM Jr, Anazodo AN, DuBose JJ, Hess JR, Mackenzie CF. Early identification of uncontrolled hemorrhage after trauma: current status and future direction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Sep;77(3 Suppl 2):S222-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000198. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24770559
  • Parks JK, Elliott AC, Gentilello LM, Shafi S. Systemic hypotension is a late marker of shock after trauma: a validation study of Advanced Trauma Life Support principles in a large national sample. Am J Surg. 2006 Dec;192(6):727-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.034.

    PubMed 17161083
  • Wo CC, Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Bishop MH, Kram HB, Hardin E. Unreliability of blood pressure and heart rate to evaluate cardiac output in emergency resuscitation and critical illness. Crit Care Med. 1993 Feb;21(2):218-23. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199302000-00012.

    PubMed 8428472
  • Convertino VA, Moulton SL, Grudic GZ, Rickards CA, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Gerhardt RT, Blackbourne LH, Ryan KL. Use of advanced machine-learning techniques for noninvasive monitoring of hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1 Suppl):S25-32. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182211601.

    PubMed 21795890
  • Convertino VA. Blood pressure measurement for accurate assessment of patient status in emergency medical settings. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012 Jun;83(6):614-9. doi: 10.3357/asem.3204.2012.

    PubMed 22764618
  • Kim SH, Lilot M, Sidhu KS, Rinehart J, Yu Z, Canales C, Cannesson M. Accuracy and precision of continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring compared with invasive arterial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2014 May;120(5):1080-97. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000226.

    PubMed 24637618
  • Soller BR, Yang Y, Soyemi OO, Ryan KL, Rickards CA, Walz JM, Heard SO, Convertino VA. Noninvasively determined muscle oxygen saturation is an early indicator of central hypovolemia in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Feb;104(2):475-81. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00600.2007. Epub 2007 Nov 15.

    PubMed 18006869
  • Belle A, Ansari S, Spadafore M, Convertino VA, Ward KR, Derksen H, Najarian K. A Signal Processing Approach for Detection of Hemodynamic Instability before Decompensation. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0148544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148544. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 26871715

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Occult Bleeding and Hemorrhage, run by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Research model determined to be ineffective for capturing machine-learning appropriate data). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Non-invasive measurements that will be used for machine learning (time frame: 2-3 hours). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04814810, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in