AzTrials
AzTrials

Muscle StrengthPhase 2NCT04814225

Investigation of the Efficacy and Safety of Three Test Products and Comparator on Muscular Performance After the Initiation of a Resistance Training Program

A Phase 2 study testing Test Product 1, Test Product 2 and Test Product 3 in people with Muscle Strength, run by Roquette Canada, LTD. at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this randomized, triple-blind, comparator controlled, parallel clinical trial is to investigate the functional equivalence of three test products compared to whey protein on muscular performance in a healthy, sedentary adult population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Muscle Strength
What is being tested?
Test Product 1, Test Product 2 and Test Product 3
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Apr 2021to 18 Apr 2022
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males \& females between 30 and <60 years of age, inclusive
  • Waist circumference < 102 cm (40 inches) in men and < 88 cm (35 inches) in women
  • Female participant is not of child-bearing potential, defined as females who have undergone a sterilization procedure (e.g. hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, complete endometrial ablation) or have been post-menopausal for at least 1 year prior to screening
  • Or,
  • Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative baseline urine pregnancy test and agree to use a medically approved method of birth control for the duration of the study. All hormonal birth control must have been in use for a minimum of three months. Acceptable methods of birth control include:
  • Hormonal contraceptives including oral contraceptives, hormone birth control patch (Ortho Evra), vaginal contraceptive ring (NuvaRing), injectable contraceptives (Depo-Provera, Lunelle), or hormone implant (Norplant System)
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Double-barrier method
  • Intrauterine devices
  • Non-heterosexual lifestyle or agrees to use contraception if planning on changing to heterosexual partner(s)
  • Vasectomy of partner at least 6 months prior to screening
  • Participant having a sedentary lifestyle defined as not engaging in greater than 60 minutes of regular and structured moderate to vigorous exercise per week
  • Self-reported stable body weight for the past 3 months defined as not having gained or lost more than 5 kg of body weight throughout the 3 months prior to baseline
  • Agrees to follow and is able to complete the exercise guidelines for the duration of the study
  • Motivated to comply with exercise guidelines as assessed by the Self-Motivation Questionnaire at screening
  • Agrees to avoid vigorous exercise outside of regular routine for 48 hours prior to and after exercise challenge
  • Agrees to maintain their daily caloric intake
  • Willingness to complete questionnaires, records and diaries associated with the study and to complete all study assessments
  • Willing to refrain from taking NSAID for 24 hours prior to and 72 post study appointments
  • Provided voluntary, written, informed consent to participate in the study
  • Healthy as determined by medical history, laboratory results and electrocardiogram (ECG), as assessed by Qualified Investigator (QI)

Who cannot join

  • Women who are pregnant, breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study
  • Allergy, sensitivity, or intolerance to the investigational product's active or inactive ingredients. Adheres to a vegan diet
  • Engaged in regular and structured resistance training (≥2x times per week) as assessed by the QI
  • Currently experiencing any medical condition that interferes with the ability to undergo physical strength testing during the study and/or ability to complete exercise guidelines as assessed by the QI
  • Metal implants that may affect the DEXA scan results as assessed on case-by-case basis by the QI
  • Participants who have followed a specific diet (e.g. ketogenic, paleo, etc.) or have had a change of diet within 30 days of baseline as assessed by the QI
Show all 19Show fewer
  • Current regular use of a protein supplement unless willing to washout (Section 7.3.2)
  • Current use of over-the-counter medications, dietary supplements, foods/drinks for muscle building or function unless willing to washout (Section 7.3.2)
  • Current use of prescribed medications for muscle building or function (see Section 7.3.1)
  • Current use of prescribed steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (see Section 7.3.1), or anti-inflammatory over-the-counter medications or supplements (see Section 7.3.2) unless willing to washout
  • Significant cardiovascular event or revascularization in the past 6 months. Participants with history of cardiovascular event or revascularization will be assessed case by case by the QI. Participants with no significant cardiovascular event on stable medication may be included after assessment by the QI on a case-by-case basis.
  • History of kidney stones will be assessed by the QI on a case-by-case basis
  • Self-reported confirmation of a HIV-, Hepatitis B- or C-positive diagnosis, autoimmune disease or those that are immune compromised
  • Self-reported confirmation of blood/bleeding disorders
  • Alcohol intake >2 standard drinks per day
  • Blood donation 30 days prior to screening, during the study, or a planned donation within 30 days of the last study appointment as assessed by the QI
  • Participation in other pharmaceutical, weight loss/diet, exercise intervention or clinical research studies 30 days prior to enrollment as assessed by the QI
  • Individuals who are unable to give informed consent
  • Any other condition, chronic disease or lifestyle factor, that, in the opinion of the QI, may adversely affect the participant's ability to complete the study or its measures or pose significant risk to the participant

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • KGK Science

    London, Ontario, N6A 5R8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Triple-blind, Comparator Controlled, Parallel Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Three Test Products and Comparator on Muscular Performance in a Healthy, Sedentary Adult Population After the Initiation of a Resistance Training Program

The objective of this randomized, triple-blind, comparator controlled, parallel clinical trial is to investigate the functional equivalence of three test products compared to whey protein on muscular performance in a healthy, sedentary adult population.

Read the detailed description

Whey, a by-product of cheese manufacturing, is commonly used as an ingredient in meat products, dairy products, baked goods, snacks, beverages, and infant formula. Its widespread use is due to its advantageous effects on health, economics, and high nutritional value by containing lactose, minerals, vitamins, and soluble proteins. Due to allergies, dietary restrictions and/or personal dietary choices there is a need for an alternative protein source(s), and plant-based protein options are in demand for these reasons. Roquette produces the NUTRALYS® Pea Protein family of ingredients, supplying the widest range of pea protein ingredients to the food industry suitable for use in a plethora of plant-based foods. Few studies have examined the equivalence between pea protein and whey on muscle performance in sedentary adults. The objective of this randomized, triple-blind, comparator controlled, parallel clinical trial is to investigate the functional equivalence of three test products compared to whey protein on muscular performance in a healthy, sedentary adult population.

Conditions
Muscle Strength
Being tested
Test Product 1, Test Product 2, Test Product 3, Comparator
Keywords
pea protein, oat protein, whey protein

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Test Product 1Other

    Pea Protein powder

  • Test Product 2Other

    Pea \& Oat Protein Powder

  • Test Product 3Other

    Oat Protein Powder

  • ComparatorOther

    Whey Protein Isolate

Study groups in NCT04814225
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pea Protein PowderExperimentalParticipants will be instructed to mix the IP with 250 mL room temperature water once/day for 12 weeks.
Receives: Other: Test Product 1
Pea & Oat Protein PowderExperimentalParticipants will be instructed to mix the IP with 250 mL room temperature water once/day for 12 weeks.
Receives: Other: Test Product 2
Oat Protein PowderExperimentalParticipants will be instructed to mix the IP with 250 mL room temperature water once/day for 12 weeks.
Receives: Other: Test Product 3
Whey Protein IsolateActive comparatorParticipants will be instructed to mix the IP with 250 mL room temperature water once/day for 12 weeks.
Receives: Other: Comparator

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The difference in composite whole-body muscle strength

    The difference in composite whole-body muscle strength, as assessed by the sum of handgrip, elbow flexion and extension and knee flexion and extension strength from baseline to day 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator.

    Measured: From baseline to day 84

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. The difference in change in handgrip strength

    The difference in change in muscle strength as assessed by handgrip strength from baseline to days 28, 56 and 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From baseline to days 28, 56 and 84

  2. The difference in change in isometric leg strength

    The difference in change in muscle strength as assessed by isometric leg strength from baseline to days 28, 56 and 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From baseline to days 28, 56 and 84

  3. The difference in change in upper body strength

    The difference in change in muscle strength as assessed by upper body strength from baseline to days 28, 56 and 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From baseline to days 28, 56 and 84

  4. The difference in change in weight

    The difference in change in body composition: weight from baseline to day 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From baseline to day 84

  5. The difference in change in waist circumference

    The difference in change in body composition: waist circumference as assessed by physical measurements from baseline to day 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From baseline to day 84

  6. The difference in change in android/gynoid fat ratio

    The difference in change in body composition: android/gynoid fat ratio as assessed by DXA from baseline to day 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From baseline to day 84

  7. The difference in change in fat mass (% or g)

    The difference in change in body composition: fat mass (% or g) as assessed by DXA from baseline to day 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From baseline to day 84

  8. The difference in change in muscle mass (% or g)

    The difference in change in body composition: muscle mass (% or g) as assessed by DXA from baseline to day 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From baseline to day 84

  9. The difference in change in endurance performance

    The difference in change in endurance performance as assessed by Treadmill Walk Test from baseline to days 28, 56 and 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From baseline to days 28, 56 and 84

  10. The difference in change in quality of life

    The difference in change in quality of life as assessed by RAND SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire from baseline to days 28, 56 and 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From baseline to days 28, 56 and 84

  11. The difference in change in blood CRP concentrations

    The difference in change in blood CRP concentrations from baseline to days 28, 56 and 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From baseline to days 28, 56 and 84

  12. The difference in change in immune function

    The difference in change in immune function as assessed by white blood cell (WBC), lymphocyte and neutrophil counts from screening to day 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From screening to day 84

  13. The difference in change in product tolerability

    The difference in change in product tolerability as assessed by Modified Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) from baseline to days 28, 56 and 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: From baseline to days 28, 56 and 84

  14. The difference in product perception

    The difference in product perception as assessed by the Product Perception Questionnaire at day 84 between IPs 1, 2, 3 and comparator

    Measured: At day 84

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Mar 2021
  2. Study start1 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion18 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion18 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A randomized, triple-blind, comparator controlled, parallel clinical trial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04814225
Sponsor's protocol ID
21PMHR
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
22 Mar 2021
Last updated
27 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Test Product 1, Test Product 2 and Test Product 3 in people with Muscle Strength, run by Roquette Canada, LTD. at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The difference in composite whole-body muscle strength (time frame: From baseline to day 84). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in