AzTrials
AzTrials

Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaNCT04807296

Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (TFLEP) vs HoLEP With Moses Technology (m-HoLEP)

A study testing TFLEP and m-HoLEP in people with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Enucleation of the prostate equips technology (usually laser) to effectively treat lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser is considered the gold standard laser used to perform enucleation of the prostate. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
What is being tested?
TFLEP and m-HoLEP
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
8 Sep 2021to Sep 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia : urinary retention, acute renal failure (post-renal), refractory hematuria, repeated urinary tract infections, refractory symptoms.
  • Prostates between 50-300 grams,
  • IPSS ≥ 8,
  • Inadequate response to previous medical treatments,
  • Qmax < 15 ml/sec and
  • Providing informed consent

Who cannot join

  • History of prostatic surgery,
  • History of prostate or bladder cancer,
  • Neurogenic bladder,
  • Urethral stricture,
  • Anticoagulant therapy (aspirin permitted), not ceased during surgery
  • Patients unfit for surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

    Montreal

    Naeem Bhojani, 514-890-8000

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Thulium Fiber Laser Compared to Holmium:YAG Laser With Moses Technology for Enucleation of the Prostate: A Prospective Study

Enucleation of the prostate equips technology (usually laser) to effectively treat lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser is considered the gold standard laser used to perform enucleation of the prostate. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) reduces hospital stay and hemoglobin drop while improving International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life, as well as other postoperative outcomes. HoLEP has been found to have a better enucleation efficiency rate and may have better hemostatic properties when combined with the modulated pulsed laser energy featured associated with Moses technology (m-HoLEP).

A novel laser technology called thulium fiber laser (TFL) delivers a pulsed laser at a more optimal wavelength and a shallower depth of tissue penetration leading to better hemostatic properties. However, the differences in clinical outcomes between TFL enucleation of the prostate (TFLEP) and m-HoLEP have yet to be described. This prospective study aims to compare the safety profile and clinical outcomes, peri-operatively up to one year post-operatively, between m-HoLEP and TFLEP with BPH and evidence of bladder obstruction.

Read the detailed description

Enucleation of the prostate equips technology (usually laser) to effectively treat lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser is the longest running and most studied laser used to perform this minimally invasive procedure.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) reduces hospital stay and hemoglobin drop while improving IPSS and quality of life, as well as other positive postoperative outcomes. HoLEP has been found to have a better enucleation efficiency rate and may have better hemostatic properties when combined with the modulated pulsed laser energy featured associated with Moses technology (m-HoLEP).

A novel laser technology called thulium fiber laser (TFL) delivers a pulsed laser at a more optimal wavelength and a shallower depth of tissue penetration leading to better hemostatic properties. However, the differences in clinical outcomes between TFL enucleation of the prostate (TFLEP) and m-HoLEP, to our knowledge, have yet to be described.

This prospective study aims to compare the safety profile and clinical outcomes, peri-operatively up to one year post-operatively, between m-HoLEP and TFLEP with BPH and evidence of bladder obstruction. Variables of particular interest include the length of hospital stay and the need for blood transfusion, which are benefits of both techniques compared to transurethral resection of the prostate, the current gold standard of BPH treatment according to American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines. The results of this study will guide urologists in selecting the most appropriate procedure from the growing armamentarium of treatments for BPH.

Being tested
TFLEP, m-HoLEP
Keywords
Lasers, Solid-State, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Hyperplasia, Urological Manifestations, Prostatic Disease
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Hyperplasia, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Hyperplasia, Urological Manifestations, Prostatic Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TFLEPProcedure or surgery

    Thulium fiber laser (TFL) is a novel laser technology that delivers a pulsed laser at a more optimal wavelength and a shallower depth of tissue penetration leading to better hemostatic properties. Patients will undergo thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (TFLEP) at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) as a treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia. The surgeon performing TFLEP is experienced in TFLEP procedures.

    Fifty (50) patients will undergo TFLEP.

  • m-HoLEPProcedure or surgery

    The holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser is the longest running and most studied laser used to perform this minimally invasive procedure. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate reduces hospital stay and hemoglobin drop while improving IPSS and quality of life, as well as other positive postoperative outcomes compared to the historical gold standard, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). HoLEP has been found to have a better enucleation efficiency rate and may have better hemostatic properties when combined with the modulated pulsed laser energy featured associated with Moses technology (m-HoLEP). Patients will undergo m-HoLEP at the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal as a treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia. The surgeon performing m-HoLEP is experienced in m-HoLEP procedures.

    Fifty (50) patients will undergo m-HoLEP

Study groups in NCT04807296
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TFLEPActive comparatorThulium fiber laser (TFL) is a novel laser technology that delivers a pulsed laser at a more optimal wavelength and a shallower depth of tissue penetration leading to better hemostatic properties. Patients will undergo thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (TFLEP) at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) as a treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia. The surgeon performing TFLEP is experienced in TFLEP procedures.
Receives: Procedure: TFLEP
m-HoLEPActive comparatorThe holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser is the longest running and most studied laser used to perform this minimally invasive procedure. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate reduces hospital stay and hemoglobin drop while improving IPSS and quality of life, as well as other positive postoperative outcomes compared to the historical gold standard, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). HoLEP has been found to have a better enucleation efficiency rate and may have better hemostatic properties when combined with the modulated pulsed laser energy featured associated with Moses technology (m-HoLEP). Patients will undergo m-HoLEP at the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal as a treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia. The surgeon performing m-HoLEP is experienced in m-HoLEP procedures.
Receives: Procedure: m-HoLEP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To compare the hospital stay between the thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (TFLEP) and the holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate with Moses technology (m-HoLEP).

    Length of hospital stay following surgery, measured in hours and minutes.

    Measured: 1 day post-operatively

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. To compare intraoperative adverse events between cohorts

    Incidence of bleeding and blood transfusion, injury or perforation of the bladder or urinary tract

    Measured: During surgery

  2. To compare enucleation and morcellation time between cohorts

    Enucleation time and morcellation time, measured in minutes.

    Measured: During surgery

  3. To compare enucleation rate of instrumentation between cohorts

    Enucleation rate, measured in enucleated tissue (mL) / time (minutes)

    Measured: During surgery

  4. To compare operative time between cohorts

    Operative time, measured in hours

    Measured: During surgery

  5. To compare catheterization time between cohorts

    Time until catheter was removed from participant post-surgery, measured in hours and minutes

    Measured: Up to 7-days post-operatively

  6. To compare drop in International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) between cohorts

    The International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms and one question concerning quality of life. Each question concerning urinary symptoms allows the patient to choose one out of six answers indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The answers are assigned points from 0 to 5. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic).

    Measured: Up to 1-year post-operatively

  7. To measure increase of Quality of life (QoL) between cohorts

    IPSS includes one question pertaining to QoL which asks: "If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that? Scored from 0-6 with 0 being "delighted" and 6 being "terrible". Higher the score, the lower the quality of life.

    Measured: Up to 1-year post-operatively

  8. To compare peak urine flow rates (Qmax) between cohorts

    Indicates the maximum urine flow rate. In men peak flow rates (Qmax) less than 15 ml/second are considered abnormal. This is measured by uroflowmetry, which measures the flow and force of urine stream during urination.

    Measured: Up to 1-year post-operatively

  9. To compare change in erectile function (IIEF) between cohorts

    The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is standardised and validated 15-item self-evaluation scale provides pre-post treatment clinic evaluations of erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, satisfaction in sexual intercourse and general satisfaction.

    Measured: Up to 1-year post-operatively

  10. To compare post-void residual urine volume (PVR) between cohorts

    Amount of urine retained in the bladder after a voluntary void.

    Measured: Up to 1-year post-operatively

  11. To compare the impact of incontinence (ICIQ-short form) between cohorts

    The International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) reflects the impact of urinary incontinence on QoL. Three (3) items are summed up (frequency of urinary incontinence, amount of leakage, overall impact of urinary incontinence) to provide a score between 0 \& 21. Higher scores reflect increased urinary incontinence and poorer QoL.

    Measured: Up to 1-year post-operatively

  12. To compare prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels between cohorts

    PSA levels

    Measured: Up to 1-year post-operatively

  13. To compare postoperative complications levels between cohorts

    Incidence of urinary tract infection and stress or urge incontinence

    Measured: Up to 1-year post-operatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Mar 2021
  2. Study start8 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completionSep 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Each arm will consist of 50 patients: one undergoing Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (TFLEP) and the other undergoing Holmium:YAG Laser Enucleation of the Prostate with Moses Technology (m-HoLEP).Two surgeons will be involved in this study. One surgeon with experience with TFLEP will perform all 50 TFLEP procedures and one surgeon with experience with m-HoLEP will perform all 50 m-HoLEP procedures.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04807296
Sponsor's protocol ID
MP-02-2021-9505
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
17 Mar 2021
Last updated
26 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: We do not plan to share individual data. We do plan to present our findings at conferences however all patient information will be anonymized.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing TFLEP and m-HoLEP in people with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To compare the hospital stay between the thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (TFLEP) and the holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate with Moses technology (m-HoLEP). (time frame: 1 day post-operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in