AzTrials
AzTrials

Radiofrequency AblationNCT04801719

Endoluminal Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Stenosis

A study testing Habib™ EndoHPB; Boston Scientific, US; former EMcision Ltd., UK in people with Radiofrequency Ablation and Biliary Tract Cancer, run by Brno University Hospital at 1 site in Czechia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The rationale of the study is to explore the safety and efficacy of endoluminal radiofrequency ablation prior metal stent insertion in patiens with malignant biliary stenosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Habib™ EndoHPB; Boston Scientific, US; former EMcision Ltd., UK
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
76 participants
Where
1 siteCzechia
Study dates
4 Jan 2010to 31 Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • histologically verified malignant stenosis of bile ducts
  • indication of implantation of SEMS by multidisciplinary indication committee
  • signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • life expectancy of less than 3 months
  • Karnofsky performance status of <80%
  • history or concomitant treatment with intraarterial oncologic therapies (eg, hepatic arterial infusion, chemoembolization)
  • ongoing infections resistant to antibiotic therapy
  • clinical or biochemical signs of liver or renal failure
  • INR ≥ 1.3, serum albumin ≤ 35 g/l, haemoglobin ≤ 100 g/l, serum creatinine ≥ 200μmol/l

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Czechia1 site
  • Brno University Hospital

    Brno, 62500

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

Official title: Endoluminal Radiofrequency Ablation of Tumors Affecting the Bile Ducts

The rationale of the study is to explore the safety and efficacy of endoluminal radiofrequency ablation prior metal stent insertion in patiens with malignant biliary stenosis.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this randomized study was to analyze survival rate in patients with malignant biliary obstruction treated with metal stent insertion with or without previous endoluminal radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Secondary endpoint was to analyze metal stent patency rate and survival rate in the subgroup of infiltrative hilar cholangiocarcinomas standardly treated by brachytherapy and metal stenting.

All patients underwent percutaneous cholangiography followed by transhepatic drainage, all patients underwent histopathologic verification of the stenosis.

Randomised patients in selected arm received endoluminal RFA by 8F catheter (Habib™ EndoHPB; EMcision Ltd., London, UK) before stenting procedure. Repeated ablations were processed through stenotic areas (10W, 90-120s, Rita 1500, Angiodynamics Ltd), all drained biliary tracts were used for introducing catheter and performance of ablation.

In experimental group ablation procedure was followed with uncovered self-expandable metal stent insertion.

Brachytherapy procedure (performed in case of cholangiocarcinoma as institutional treatment standard) was performed through 5F applicator by after loading system of iridium radiation source (HDR brachytherapy, applicator temporarily placed into a drain for 3-4 days). Prescribed dose was 15-24Gy at distance of 1.0cm in 3-4 fractions.

Analyzed characteristics:

Specific therapeutic procedures e.g. systemic chemotherapy, brachytherapy indicated by multidisciplinary tumor board were recorded. Laboratory tests were evaluated withing 24 hours before and after the RFA (AMS, INR, APTT, GMT, total bilirubin, ALP, ALT, AST). The time of initial diagnosis, drainage procedures, ablation and stenting were referred to patient survival. Patients underwent repeated ambulatory follow-up in 3months period (dedicated ultrasound performed by interventional radiologist, in case of bilirubin and obstructive enzymes elevation intensified follow up was performed). Patients time of death was gathered from record of central database of insured persons or from hospital information system. Procedural complications were graded in consensus by interventional radiologists and oncologist according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

Primary stent patency:

Stent patency was defined as the duration from the insertion of the stent until the date of closure. If the cause of death was directly related to stent failure, the date of death was defined as time of stent closure. If no stent failure occurred (i.e. the absence of increased total serum bilirubin levels or the absence of dilation of intrahepatic bile ducts on CT or US examination even if total serum bilirubin level was increased), stent patency was considered as censored at the date of death or at the end of the study period.

Statistical methods:

Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Basic characteristics were summarized by absolute and relative frequencies and compared using Fisher's exact test (categorical variables), continuous characteristics compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Survival parameters were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methodology, differences in survival were evaluated by log-rank test. Relationships between survival parameters and endoluminal biliary pathway ablation prior to stent insertion were modelled using one-dimensional Cox regression models and described using a risk ratio (HR) of 95% CI for HR and a p-value corresponding to the relevant regression coefficient. The level of statistical significance in all analyses was set at α = 0.05.

Being tested
Habib™ EndoHPB; Boston Scientific, US; former EMcision Ltd., UK
Medical subject headings
Biliary Tract Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Habib™ EndoHPB; Boston Scientific, US; former EMcision Ltd., UKDevice

    Randomised patients in selected arm received endoluminal RFA by 8F catheter (Habib™ EndoHPB; Boston Scientific, US; former EMcision Ltd., UK) before stenting procedure. Repeated ablations were processed through stenotic areas of bile ducts (10W, 90-120s, Rita 1500, Angiodynamics Ltd), all drained biliary tracts were used for introducing catheter and performance of ablation. Ablation procedure was followed with uncovered self-expandable metal stent insertion.

Study groups in NCT04801719
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental arm - endoluminal RFAExperimentalstandard treatment protocol for malignant biliary stenosis + endoluminal RFA prior metal stent insertion
Receives: Device: Habib™ EndoHPB; Boston Scientific, US; former EMcision Ltd., UK
Control armNo interventionstandard treatment protocol for malignant biliary stenosis which includes metal stent insertion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Stent patency

    Analysis of metal stent patency since insertion in both study arms (measured in months, Kaplan-Meier estimate).

    Measured: up to month 36 or death of the patient

  2. Overall survival

    Analysis of overall survival since the diagnosis, initial drainage, and metal stent insertion in both study arms (measured in months, Kaplan-Meier estimate).

    Measured: up to month 36 or death of the patient

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Complications of endoluminal RFA of biliary tract

    Procedural complications were graded in consensus by interventional radiologists and oncologist according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0.

    Measured: up to day 30

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2021
  2. Study start4 Jan 2010
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two study arms with histologically proven malignant biliary stenosis treated either by endoluminal radiofrequency ablation with subsequent metal stent insertion or metal stent insertion only.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
76 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04801719
Sponsor's protocol ID
FNBKRNM0002
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
9 Mar 2021
Last updated
17 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Habib™ EndoHPB; Boston Scientific, US; former EMcision Ltd., UK in people with Radiofrequency Ablation and Biliary Tract Cancer, run by Brno University Hospital at 1 site in Czechia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Stent patency (time frame: up to month 36 or death of the patient). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in