Gastric CancerNCT04800991
NuGa (Nutrition for Gastric Cancer Patients)
A study testing Rhexium Onco Nutrition in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Rhexium Onco Nutrition, HDT-202 for post-operative care in patients who have undergone gastrectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Rhexium Onco Nutrition
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 17 Mar 2021to 8 Oct 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient who voluntarily signs the informed consent form for this study
- Age of ≥19 years old
- Patient who has undergone therapeutic gastrectomy after a diagnosis of gastric cancer
- Able to eat food orally after gastrectomy
- Patient who possesses an Android OS based mobile device and is capable of using the investigational device.
Who cannot join
- Other cancer or metastasis documented within 5 years prior to screening
- Ongoing or planned enteral tube feeding or total parenteral nutrition
- Other clinically significant medical or psychiatric findings based on which the individual is considered by the investigator to be ineligible
- Individual who possesses a mobile device on which the application is unable to be installed and/or run normally for technical reasons
- Individual who, in the opinion of the investigator, has difficulty understanding how to use the investigational device or is unlikely to comply with other study procedures
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 110-744
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Efficacy of Digital Health Technology for Postoperative Care With Gastrectomy-Treated Patients in Gastric Cancer
The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Rhexium Onco Nutrition, HDT-202 for post-operative care in patients who have undergone gastrectomy.
Read the detailed description
- A total of 4 visits will be performed.
- At the screening visit,subject's written informed consent, assessing the inclusion/exclusion criteria and assigning enrollment numbers to eligible subjects, demographic information taking, medical history/medication history taking, vital signs measuring, physical examination, height and body weight measuring, instructing how to install/use the investigational device, and administering quality of life questionnaires.
- During the treatment period, a total of 3 visits will be performed. To evaluate feasibility and efficacy, the following procedures will be carried out: vital signs measuring, physical examination, nutrition assessment/consultation, evaluation of feasibility for 'subjects', evaluation of feasibility for 'investigators', and adverse events (AEs)/concomitant medications checking and collecting.
- During the treatment period, telephone monitoring is conducted depending on the compliance of subjects.
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Being tested
- Rhexium Onco Nutrition
- Keywords
- Gastrectomy, postoperative care, nutrition, Digital health technology, Application
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rhexium Onco NutritionDevice
Also called HDT-202
The research devices in this study are classified into "subject mobile application" and "investigator web portal" with no invasive action on the human body
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rhexium Onco Nutrition(HDT-202) | Experimental | "subject mobile application" and "Investigator web portal" with no invasive action on the human body Receives: Device: Rhexium Onco Nutrition |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (application)' questionnaire for subjects
higher scores mean a better outcome
Measured: Week 2 (Visit 2)
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (application)' questionnaire for subjects
higher scores mean a better outcome
Measured: Week 6 (Visit 3),
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (application)' questionnaire for subjects
higher scores mean a better outcome
Measured: Week 10 (Visit 4)
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (website)' questionnaire for investigators
higher scores mean a better outcome
Measured: Week 6 (Visit 3)
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change from baseline (Visit 1) in 'EORTC QLQ-C30' score
Refer to Title
Measured: baseline (Visit 1), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Change from baseline (Visit 1) in 'EORTC QLQ-STO22' score
Refer to Title
Measured: baseline (Visit 1), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Change from baseline (Visit 1) in 'KOQUSS Index' score
Refer to Title
Measured: baseline (Visit 1), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Correlation between change from Day 1 in body weight at Week 10 (Visit 4) and calory goal achievement rate
Refer to Title
Measured: Week 10 (Visit 4)
Correlation between change from Day 1 in body weight at Week 10 (Visit 4) and protein intake goal achievement rate
Refer to Title
Measured: Week 10 (Visit 4)
Frequency of each symptom between visits after using the investigational device (application)
Refer to Title
Measured: Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by age
compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Measured: Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by gender
compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Measured: Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by surgery
compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Measured: Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by stage of disease
compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Measured: Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by body mass index [BMI] before discharge from hospital
weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2, compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Measured: Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by status of postoperative anticancer therapy
compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Measured: Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by underlying disease
compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Measured: Week 10 (Visit 4)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Mar 2021
- Study start17 Mar 2021
- Primary completion8 Oct 2021
- Study completion8 Oct 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- HDT-202(application)
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Han-Kwang Yang, Seoul National University Hospital
- Investigators
- Han-Kwang Yang, PhD, Principal investigator, Seoul National University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04800991
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HDT-202_F01
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Park JH, Lee HJ, Kim J, Cho YS, Lee S, Park S, Choe H, Song E, Kim Y, Kong SH, Park DJ, Nam BH, Yang HK. Development and Feasibility Assessment of Mobile Application-Based Digital Therapeutics for Postoperative Supportive Care in Gastric Cancer Patients Following Gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer. 2024 Oct;24(4):420-435. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2024.24.e37.
PubMed 39375057
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Efficacy of Digital Health Technology for Postoperative Care With Gastrectomy-Treated Patients in Gastric Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04800991
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HDT-202_F01
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Keywords
- Gastrectomy, postoperative care, nutrition, Digital health technology, Application
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Oct 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Rhexium Onco Nutrition, HDT-202 for post-operative care in patients who have undergone gastrectomy.
Detailed description
- A total of 4 visits will be performed.
- At the screening visit,subject's written informed consent, assessing the inclusion/exclusion criteria and assigning enrollment numbers to eligible subjects, demographic information taking, medical history/medication history taking, vital signs measuring, physical examination, height and body weight measuring, instructing how to install/use the investigational device, and administering quality of life questionnaires.
- During the treatment period, a total of 3 visits will be performed. To evaluate feasibility and efficacy, the following procedures will be carried out: vital signs measuring, physical examination, nutrition assessment/consultation, evaluation of feasibility for 'subjects', evaluation of feasibility for 'investigators', and adverse events (AEs)/concomitant medications checking and collecting.
- During the treatment period, telephone monitoring is conducted depending on the compliance of subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- HDT-202(application)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rhexium Onco Nutrition(HDT-202) | Experimental | Device: Rhexium Onco Nutrition"subject mobile application" and "Investigator web portal" with no invasive action on the human body |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient who voluntarily signs the informed consent form for this study
- Age of ≥19 years old
- Patient who has undergone therapeutic gastrectomy after a diagnosis of gastric cancer
- Able to eat food orally after gastrectomy
- Patient who possesses an Android OS based mobile device and is capable of using the investigational device.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Other cancer or metastasis documented within 5 years prior to screening
- Ongoing or planned enteral tube feeding or total parenteral nutrition
- Other clinically significant medical or psychiatric findings based on which the individual is considered by the investigator to be ineligible
- Individual who possesses a mobile device on which the application is unable to be installed and/or run normally for technical reasons
- Individual who, in the opinion of the investigator, has difficulty understanding how to use the investigational device or is unlikely to comply with other study procedures
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rhexium Onco NutritionAlso: HDT-202The research devices in this study are classified into "subject mobile application" and "investigator web portal" with no invasive action on the human body | Device | Rhexium Onco Nutrition(HDT-202) |
Primary outcome
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (application)' questionnaire for subjects
Time frame: Week 2 (Visit 2)
higher scores mean a better outcome
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (application)' questionnaire for subjects
Time frame: Week 6 (Visit 3),
higher scores mean a better outcome
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (application)' questionnaire for subjects
Time frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
higher scores mean a better outcome
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (website)' questionnaire for investigators
Time frame: Week 6 (Visit 3)
higher scores mean a better outcome
13 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline (Visit 1) in 'EORTC QLQ-C30' score
Time frame: baseline (Visit 1), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Change from baseline (Visit 1) in 'EORTC QLQ-STO22' score
Time frame: baseline (Visit 1), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Change from baseline (Visit 1) in 'KOQUSS Index' score
Time frame: baseline (Visit 1), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Correlation between change from Day 1 in body weight at Week 10 (Visit 4) and calory goal achievement rate
Time frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
Correlation between change from Day 1 in body weight at Week 10 (Visit 4) and protein intake goal achievement rate
Time frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
Frequency of each symptom between visits after using the investigational device (application)
Time frame: Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by age
Time frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by gender
Time frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by surgery
Time frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by stage of disease
Time frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by body mass index [BMI] before discharge from hospital
Time frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by status of postoperative anticancer therapy
Time frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by underlying disease
Time frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39375057Park JH, Lee HJ, Kim J, Cho YS, Lee S, Park S, Choe H, Song E, Kim Y, Kong SH, Park DJ, Nam BH, Yang HK. Development and Feasibility Assessment of Mobile Application-Based Digital Therapeutics for Postoperative Supportive Care in Gastric Cancer Patients Following Gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer. 2024 Oct;24(4):420-435. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2024.24.e37.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
GK01 Cell Therapy in Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis
Gastric Cancer (GC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Neoadjuvant-adjuvant Durvalumab and FLOT Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab in Chinese Patients With Resectable GC/GEJC.
Gastric, Esophagogastric Junction
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Han-Kwang Yang, PhD principal investigator
Seoul National University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rhexium Onco Nutrition in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (application)' questionnaire for subjects (time frame: Week 2 (Visit 2)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04800991, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2021.