Pregnancy RelatedNCT04799587
Accupressure of P6 to Reduce Nausea During Cesarean Section
A study testing Magnet at P6 and Magnet applied to arm not at P6 pressure point. in people with Pregnancy Related and Cesarean Delivery, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the addition of P6 pressure point stimulation as opposed to sham-point stimulation will decrease intraoperative and postoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV and PONV) for patients undergoing non-emergent cesarean delivery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy Related, Cesarean Delivery, Nausea
- What is being tested?
- Magnet at P6 and Magnet applied to arm not at P6 pressure point.
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 May 2021to 30 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ≥18 years of age
- English-speaking
- Pregnant patients presenting for scheduled cesarean delivery of a full-term fetus (>37 weeks' gestation)
- Patients scheduled as ERAC
- Parturients undergoing spinal anesthesia
Who cannot join
- Patients requiring emergent delivery,
- Fetal demise
- Patients with adhesive allergy/sensitivity
- Patients with allergy/sensitivity to nickel,
- Patients with inability to consent,
- Patients with known abnormal placentation
- Patients with pacemakers/defibrillators
- Patients with positive COVID-19 tests
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
About this study
Official title: The Use of P6 Acupressure for the Reduction of Intraoperative and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: a Randomized Trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the addition of P6 pressure point stimulation as opposed to sham-point stimulation will decrease intraoperative and postoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV and PONV) for patients undergoing non-emergent cesarean delivery. We hypothesize that the addition of stimulation of the P6 pressure point to our institutional current standard of care (phenylephrine infusion, intravenous fluid bolus, and as needed intraoperative ondansetron) will decrease the occurrence of intraoperative emesis.
Read the detailed description
After obtaining written informed consent from the subject. They were then randomized to either the P6 acupressure or a sham acupressure group. Envelopes containing group assignment information were prepared prior to the start of the study by research personnel not involved in this study. Randomization occurred by selecting a sealed envelope that contained the group assignment, two acupressure 0.09-inch by 0.2-inch diameter devices, and a diagram of where to place the device from a pool of 200 envelopes. The acupressure devices used in this study are also used in clinical practice by Northwestern Medicine Osher Center for Integrative Medicine (Plaster - Accu Band 800 NP Magnets, Japan). Prior to the commencement of the study, the Center for Integrative Medicine acupuncturists educated study personnel on the placement of the devices and the proper patient-initiated stimulation method when the subject began to perceive nausea. Device placement took place in the preoperative room, prior to walking to the operating room for the surgical procedure, by research personnel not involved in the clinical care of study subjects. In the P6 acupressure group, the devices were placed two inches proximal to the flexor retinaculum, between the flexor carpi radialis and palmaras longus bilaterally. The small protrusion on the device was placed on the skin and held in place using an adhesive sticker at the stimulation point. In the sham acupressure group, the devices were placed distal and lateral to the P6 acupoint site, like in prior studies comparing the effectiveness of P6 acupressure to sham. This method of sham acupoint placement when compared to P6 acupoint placement has shown superiority of the P6 acupoint placement in 70% of studies that have used this point for sham.15 The devices are designed to maintain pressure at the point of placement without additional force applied. Research personnel also instructed subjects to apply additional pressure at the acupressure site for a period of 30 s-2 min if they perceived nausea. Subjects were then taken to the operating room where they received neuraxial anesthesia consisting of either a spinal anesthetic dosed with hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg plus fentanyl 15 mcg and morphine 150 mcg, or a combined spinal epidural with the same intrathecal dosing per institutional standard practice. Co-loading with a crystalloid solution occurred upon the start of the neuraxial procedure, and a phenylephrine infusion was started immediately after the cerebrospinal fluid was obtained. Maternal hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg, mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg, or mean arterial pressure less than 20% of the baseline mean arterial pressure. The baseline blood pressure was considered the average value of three blood pressure readings obtained by the nursing staff in the preoperative area. Subjects were asked to report any nausea, retching, or vomiting to the anesthesia care team. In addition, the anesthesia provider asked the study subject about nausea or vomiting at intervals corresponding to events that are associated with a greater prevalence of nausea and vomiting (e.g. neuraxial dose administration, uterine exteriorization, and following uterotonic administration) as well as when the anesthesia provider observed the subject massaging the acupressure point. After the first complaint of nausea, subjects were encouraged to apply additional pressure to the devices, an intravenous (IV) fluid bolus was administered, and phenylephrine or ephedrine was administered by IV bolus and/or by increasing the infusion rate of phenylephrine if hypotension was present. At the second complaint of nausea or emesis, study subjects were again encouraged to apply additional pressure on the devices. Following delivery of the fetus, ondansetron 8 mg IV and dexamethasone 8 mg IV were administered. If intraoperative nausea and/or vomiting continued, study subjects were again encouraged to apply additional acupressure. If this was ineffective, prochlorperazine, promethazine, metoclopramide, fentanyl, or propofol were administered at the anesthesiologist's discretion. If these antiemetic agents were ineffective, the anesthesiologist could provide additional medications.
Routine postoperative orders, including antiemetic medications as needed, were placed by the anesthesiology team for postpartum use per our institution's current standard of care. Postoperative medications were administered and documented by the nursing staff. Study subjects were also encouraged to use additional acupressure as needed throughout their postoperative course, for up to 48 h or until discharge, whichever came first. A study team member replaced devices that were lost or removed the device if the study subject requested it. Prior to discharge, subjects were visited by study personnel and asked to complete a survey asking them to describe the incidence, duration, and severity of nausea and vomiting, interference of nausea/vomiting with the ability to care for themselves, and their rating and satisfaction of the acupressure therapy.
Baseline data collected were age, weight, height, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, race, ethnicity, history of nausea and vomiting, parity, and the number of prior cesarean delivery. Intraoperative data included the type of neuraxial anesthesia, initial blood pressure in the operating room, the lowest recorded blood pressure intraoperatively, total vasopressor use (expressed as phenylephrine equivalents),18 the number of hypotensive episodes, crystalloid administered, and duration of anesthesia. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting outcomes included the number of subjects with nausea and/or vomiting, the number of emesis episodes, and the need for rescue antiemetic administration in the operating room. Post delivery emesis and antiemetic treatments were recorded in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) in 0-24 h and 24-48 h periods. Study subject questionnaires were collected at the end of the study period.
- Conditions
- Pregnancy Related, Cesarean Delivery, Nausea, Vomiting
- Being tested
- Magnet at P6, Magnet applied to arm not at P6 pressure point.
- Keywords
- Accupressure, Cesarean Delivery, Nausea, Vomiting
- Medical subject headings
- Nausea, Vomiting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Magnet at P6Other
Magnet applied at P6 and attached with adhesive tape. The P6 pressure point is 2 inches proximal to the flexor retinaculum, between the flexor carpi radialis and palmaras longus.
Magnet applied to arm not at P6 pressure point.Other
Magnet applied to arm not at P6 pressure point and affixed with adhesive tape.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| P6 Accupressure Group | Active comparator | The pressure point will be stimulated by the presence of the magnet when positioned properly on the P6 acupressure point. Additional pressure may be applied as desired by the study subject but is not necessary for P6 stimulation. Receives: Other: Magnet at P6 |
| Sham Pressure Point | Sham comparator | The sham pressure point (distal to the P6 acupressure point). Receives: Other: Magnet applied to arm not at P6 pressure point. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Presence of Intraoperative Vomiting
Presence of intraoperative vomiting during scheduled cesarean delivery (intraoperative period).
Measured: Intraoperative Period
Presence of Intraoperative Nausea
Presence of intraoperative nausea during scheduled cesarean delivery (intraoperative period).
Measured: Intraoperative period
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of Emesis Episodes in the Intraoperative Period Period
The number of emesis episodes during the cesarean section intraoperative period.
Measured: Intraoperative period
Number of Rescue Antiemetic Doses Administered for the Treatment of Intraoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Reported total number (count) of rescue antiemetics administered per group during the intraoperative period. Rescue antiemetics are defined as the use of intravenous administered prochlorperazine, promethazine, or metoclopramide.
Measured: Intraoperative period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Mar 2021
- Study start26 May 2021
- Primary completion31 Aug 2023
- Study completion30 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pregnancy RelatedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Northwestern UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two group, sham vs actual location of pressure point.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Northwestern University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Feyce M. Peralta, MD, MS, Northwestern University
- Investigators
- Feyce Peralta, MD, Principal investigator, Northwestern University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04799587
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STU#: 00213854
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 6 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Balki M, Carvalho JC. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean section under regional anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Jul;14(3):230-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.004.
PubMed 15935649Chooi C, Cox JJ, Lumb RS, Middleton P, Chemali M, Emmett RS, Simmons SW, Cyna AM. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 4;8(8):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub3.
PubMed 28976555Ho CM, Tsai HJ, Chan KH, Tsai SK. P6 acupressure does not prevent emesis during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):900-3. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195553.82409.00.
PubMed 16492848Albooghobeish M, Mohtadi A, Saidkhani V, Fallah H, Behaein K, Nesionpour S, Nikbakht R. Comparison Between Effects of Acupuncture and Metoclopramide on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Gynaecological Laparoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Aug 22;7(5):e12876. doi: 10.5812/aapm.12876. eCollection 2017 Oct.
PubMed 29696109Lee A, Fan LT. Stimulation of the wrist acupuncture point P6 for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003281.pub3.
PubMed 19370583Matthews A, Haas DM, O'Mathuna DP, Dowswell T. Interventions for nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 8;2015(9):CD007575. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007575.pub4.
PubMed 26348534Allen TK, Habib AS. P6 stimulation for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1308-12. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1864.
PubMed 18806045Habib AS, Itchon-Ramos N, Phillips-Bute BG, Gan TJ; Duke Women's Anesthesia (DWA) Research Group. Transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation with the ReliefBand for the prevention of nausea and vomiting during and after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):581-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000189217.19600.5c.
PubMed 16428565El-Deeb AM, Ahmady MS. Effect of acupuncture on nausea and/or vomiting during and after cesarean section in comparison with ondansetron. J Anesth. 2011 Oct;25(5):698-703. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1198-0. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
PubMed 21761206Tan JY, Suen LK, Wang T, Molassiotis A. Sham Acupressure Controls Used in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Critique. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 15;10(7):e0132989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132989. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26177378Wengritzky R, Mettho T, Myles PS, Burke J, Kakos A. Development and validation of a postoperative nausea and vomiting intensity scale. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):158-66. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep370. Epub 2009 Dec 26.
PubMed 20037151Boogaerts JG, Vanacker E, Seidel L, Albert A, Bardiau FM. Assessment of postoperative nausea using a visual analogue scale. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 Apr;44(4):470-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440420.x.
PubMed 10757584Sheldon RR, Loughren MJ, Marenco CW, Winters JR, Bingham JR, Martin MJ, Eckert MJ, Burney RO. Microdermal Implants Show No Effect on Surrounding Tissue During Surgery With Electrocautery. J Surg Res. 2019 Sep;241:72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.039. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
PubMed 31009888A DM, A K. Effect of acupressure on post-operative nausea and vomiting in cesarean section: a randomised controlled trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Oct;7(10):2247-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5702.3485. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
PubMed 24298488
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of P6 Acupressure for the Reduction of Intraoperative and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: a Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04799587
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STU#: 00213854
- Conditions
- Pregnancy Related, Cesarean Delivery, Nausea, Vomiting
- Keywords
- Accupressure, Cesarean Delivery, Nausea, Vomiting
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Northwestern UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 26 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 6 Jun 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the addition of P6 pressure point stimulation as opposed to sham-point stimulation will decrease intraoperative and postoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV and PONV) for patients undergoing non-emergent cesarean delivery. We hypothesize that the addition of stimulation of the P6 pressure point to our institutional current standard of care (phenylephrine infusion, intravenous fluid bolus, and as needed intraoperative ondansetron) will decrease the occurrence of intraoperative emesis.
Detailed description
After obtaining written informed consent from the subject. They were then randomized to either the P6 acupressure or a sham acupressure group. Envelopes containing group assignment information were prepared prior to the start of the study by research personnel not involved in this study. Randomization occurred by selecting a sealed envelope that contained the group assignment, two acupressure 0.09-inch by 0.2-inch diameter devices, and a diagram of where to place the device from a pool of 200 envelopes. The acupressure devices used in this study are also used in clinical practice by Northwestern Medicine Osher Center for Integrative Medicine (Plaster - Accu Band 800 NP Magnets, Japan). Prior to the commencement of the study, the Center for Integrative Medicine acupuncturists educated study personnel on the placement of the devices and the proper patient-initiated stimulation method when the subject began to perceive nausea. Device placement took place in the preoperative room, prior to walking to the operating room for the surgical procedure, by research personnel not involved in the clinical care of study subjects. In the P6 acupressure group, the devices were placed two inches proximal to the flexor retinaculum, between the flexor carpi radialis and palmaras longus bilaterally. The small protrusion on the device was placed on the skin and held in place using an adhesive sticker at the stimulation point. In the sham acupressure group, the devices were placed distal and lateral to the P6 acupoint site, like in prior studies comparing the effectiveness of P6 acupressure to sham. This method of sham acupoint placement when compared to P6 acupoint placement has shown superiority of the P6 acupoint placement in 70% of studies that have used this point for sham.15 The devices are designed to maintain pressure at the point of placement without additional force applied. Research personnel also instructed subjects to apply additional pressure at the acupressure site for a period of 30 s-2 min if they perceived nausea. Subjects were then taken to the operating room where they received neuraxial anesthesia consisting of either a spinal anesthetic dosed with hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg plus fentanyl 15 mcg and morphine 150 mcg, or a combined spinal epidural with the same intrathecal dosing per institutional standard practice. Co-loading with a crystalloid solution occurred upon the start of the neuraxial procedure, and a phenylephrine infusion was started immediately after the cerebrospinal fluid was obtained. Maternal hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg, mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg, or mean arterial pressure less than 20% of the baseline mean arterial pressure. The baseline blood pressure was considered the average value of three blood pressure readings obtained by the nursing staff in the preoperative area. Subjects were asked to report any nausea, retching, or vomiting to the anesthesia care team. In addition, the anesthesia provider asked the study subject about nausea or vomiting at intervals corresponding to events that are associated with a greater prevalence of nausea and vomiting (e.g. neuraxial dose administration, uterine exteriorization, and following uterotonic administration) as well as when the anesthesia provider observed the subject massaging the acupressure point. After the first complaint of nausea, subjects were encouraged to apply additional pressure to the devices, an intravenous (IV) fluid bolus was administered, and phenylephrine or ephedrine was administered by IV bolus and/or by increasing the infusion rate of phenylephrine if hypotension was present. At the second complaint of nausea or emesis, study subjects were again encouraged to apply additional pressure on the devices. Following delivery of the fetus, ondansetron 8 mg IV and dexamethasone 8 mg IV were administered. If intraoperative nausea and/or vomiting continued, study subjects were again encouraged to apply additional acupressure. If this was ineffective, prochlorperazine, promethazine, metoclopramide, fentanyl, or propofol were administered at the anesthesiologist's discretion. If these antiemetic agents were ineffective, the anesthesiologist could provide additional medications.
Routine postoperative orders, including antiemetic medications as needed, were placed by the anesthesiology team for postpartum use per our institution's current standard of care. Postoperative medications were administered and documented by the nursing staff. Study subjects were also encouraged to use additional acupressure as needed throughout their postoperative course, for up to 48 h or until discharge, whichever came first. A study team member replaced devices that were lost or removed the device if the study subject requested it. Prior to discharge, subjects were visited by study personnel and asked to complete a survey asking them to describe the incidence, duration, and severity of nausea and vomiting, interference of nausea/vomiting with the ability to care for themselves, and their rating and satisfaction of the acupressure therapy.
Baseline data collected were age, weight, height, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, race, ethnicity, history of nausea and vomiting, parity, and the number of prior cesarean delivery. Intraoperative data included the type of neuraxial anesthesia, initial blood pressure in the operating room, the lowest recorded blood pressure intraoperatively, total vasopressor use (expressed as phenylephrine equivalents),18 the number of hypotensive episodes, crystalloid administered, and duration of anesthesia. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting outcomes included the number of subjects with nausea and/or vomiting, the number of emesis episodes, and the need for rescue antiemetic administration in the operating room. Post delivery emesis and antiemetic treatments were recorded in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) in 0-24 h and 24-48 h periods. Study subject questionnaires were collected at the end of the study period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two group, sham vs actual location of pressure point.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| P6 Accupressure Group | Active comparator | Other: Magnet at P6The pressure point will be stimulated by the presence of the magnet when positioned properly on the P6 acupressure point. Additional pressure may be applied as desired by the study subject but is not necessary for P6 stimulation. |
| Sham Pressure Point | Sham comparator | Other: Magnet applied to arm not at P6 pressure point.The sham pressure point (distal to the P6 acupressure point). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- ≥18 years of age
- English-speaking
- Pregnant patients presenting for scheduled cesarean delivery of a full-term fetus (>37 weeks' gestation)
- Patients scheduled as ERAC
- Parturients undergoing spinal anesthesia
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients requiring emergent delivery,
- Fetal demise
- Patients with adhesive allergy/sensitivity
- Patients with allergy/sensitivity to nickel,
- Patients with inability to consent,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Magnet at P6Magnet applied at P6 and attached with adhesive tape. The P6 pressure point is 2 inches proximal to the flexor retinaculum, between the flexor carpi radialis and palmaras longus. | Other | P6 Accupressure Group |
| Magnet applied to arm not at P6 pressure point.Magnet applied to arm not at P6 pressure point and affixed with adhesive tape. | Other | Sham Pressure Point |
Primary outcome
Presence of Intraoperative Vomiting
Time frame: Intraoperative Period
Presence of intraoperative vomiting during scheduled cesarean delivery (intraoperative period).
Presence of Intraoperative Nausea
Time frame: Intraoperative period
Presence of intraoperative nausea during scheduled cesarean delivery (intraoperative period).
2 secondary outcomes
Number of Emesis Episodes in the Intraoperative Period Period
Time frame: Intraoperative period
Number of Rescue Antiemetic Doses Administered for the Treatment of Intraoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Time frame: Intraoperative period
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jun 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 15935649Balki M, Carvalho JC. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean section under regional anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Jul;14(3):230-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.004.
- Background: PubMed 28976555Chooi C, Cox JJ, Lumb RS, Middleton P, Chemali M, Emmett RS, Simmons SW, Cyna AM. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 4;8(8):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 16492848Ho CM, Tsai HJ, Chan KH, Tsai SK. P6 acupressure does not prevent emesis during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):900-3. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195553.82409.00.
- Background: PubMed 29696109Albooghobeish M, Mohtadi A, Saidkhani V, Fallah H, Behaein K, Nesionpour S, Nikbakht R. Comparison Between Effects of Acupuncture and Metoclopramide on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Gynaecological Laparoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Aug 22;7(5):e12876. doi: 10.5812/aapm.12876. eCollection 2017 Oct.
- Background: PubMed 19370583Lee A, Fan LT. Stimulation of the wrist acupuncture point P6 for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003281.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 26348534Matthews A, Haas DM, O'Mathuna DP, Dowswell T. Interventions for nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 8;2015(9):CD007575. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007575.pub4.
- Background: PubMed 18806045Allen TK, Habib AS. P6 stimulation for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1308-12. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1864.
- Background: PubMed 16428565Habib AS, Itchon-Ramos N, Phillips-Bute BG, Gan TJ; Duke Women's Anesthesia (DWA) Research Group. Transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation with the ReliefBand for the prevention of nausea and vomiting during and after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):581-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000189217.19600.5c.
- Background: PubMed 21761206El-Deeb AM, Ahmady MS. Effect of acupuncture on nausea and/or vomiting during and after cesarean section in comparison with ondansetron. J Anesth. 2011 Oct;25(5):698-703. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1198-0. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
- Background: PubMed 26177378Tan JY, Suen LK, Wang T, Molassiotis A. Sham Acupressure Controls Used in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Critique. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 15;10(7):e0132989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132989. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 20037151Wengritzky R, Mettho T, Myles PS, Burke J, Kakos A. Development and validation of a postoperative nausea and vomiting intensity scale. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):158-66. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep370. Epub 2009 Dec 26.
- Background: PubMed 10757584Boogaerts JG, Vanacker E, Seidel L, Albert A, Bardiau FM. Assessment of postoperative nausea using a visual analogue scale. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 Apr;44(4):470-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440420.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pregnancy Related
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Methamphetamine Use Disorder During Pregnancy
Methamphetamine Use Disorder, Pregnancy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Study to Assess Pregnancy, Neonatal and Infant Outcomes in Participants Exposed to Nipocalimab
Pregnancy Related, Pregnancy
Not yet recruiting
Justice Core Trial
Pregnancy, Substance Use Disorder (SUD)
Active, not recruiting
Assessing the Use of Wearable Activity Trackers in a Pregnancy Cohort
Pregnancy Related
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Feyce Peralta, MD principal investigator
Northwestern University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Magnet at P6 and Magnet applied to arm not at P6 pressure point. in people with Pregnancy Related and Cesarean Delivery, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Presence of Intraoperative Vomiting (time frame: Intraoperative Period). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04799587, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2025.