Myelodysplastic SyndromesPhase 2NCT04797000
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Eltrombopag in Lower-risk MDS Patients With Platelet Transfusion Dependence
A Phase 2 study testing Eltrombopag in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 20 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag monotherapy in Japanese adult patients with platelet transfusion-dependent lower-risk Myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- What is being tested?
- Eltrombopag
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 20 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- 25 May 2021to 2 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients diagnosed with MDS according to the WHO classification revised 4th edition by investigator assessment with one of the following prognostic risk categories, based on the International
- Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R):
- very low (0-1.5)
- low (2-3)
- intermediate risks (3.5-4.5) All following criteria for prognostic variables per IPSS-R should be met.
- Bone marrow blast < 5% (per both investigator's assessment and central review)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Cytogenetic very good, good or intermediate risk corresponding to IPSS-R
- Platelet transfusion dependence
- Refractory, intolerant to, or ineligible for MDS treatments
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status (PS) 0 or 1
Who cannot join
- Patients with a history of prior administration of eltrombopag, romiplostim, or other TPO-RA
- Therapy-related MDS per WHO classification revised 4th edition
- MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms including chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia per the WHO classification revised 4th edition
- MDS with excess blasts (EB) per WHO classification revised 4th edition
- Known history of IPSS-R high or very high risk MDS
- Currently receiving treatments for MDS (e.g., HMA, cyclosporine A (CsA) or lenalidomide). Supportive treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or erythroid mutation agent in anemic patients or granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with severe neutropenia and recurrent infections is allowed if at stable dosage for 3 months prior to screening and continued at the same dosing/schedule until the optimal dose of eltrombopag has been established.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients scheduled for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- Bone marrow fibrosis that leads to an inability to aspirate adequate bone marrow sample
- Known thrombophilic risk factors (except in cases where potential benefits of participating in the study outweighed potential risks of thromboembolic events (TEE), as determined by the investigator)
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
20 sites in 1 country.
20 sites in 1 country
Japan20 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Aomori, 0308553
Novartis Investigative Site
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 1138603
Novartis Investigative Site
Chiba, 2600852
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukushima, 9601295
Novartis Investigative Site
Gifu, 5008513
Novartis Investigative Site
Isehara, Kanagawa, 2591193
Novartis Investigative Site
Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken, 9208530
Novartis Investigative Site
Kumamoto, 8600008
Novartis Investigative Site
Kurume, Fukuoka, 8308543
Novartis Investigative Site
Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 8528501
Novartis Investigative Site
Narita, Chiba, 2868523
Novartis Investigative Site
Nishinomiya, Hyōgo, 6638501
Novartis Investigative Site
Ohtake, Hiroshima, 7390696
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, 5340021
Novartis Investigative Site
Sakai, Osaka, 5900197
Novartis Investigative Site
Sendai, Miyagi, 9808574
Novartis Investigative Site
Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi, 7500061
Novartis Investigative Site
tabashi City, Tokyo, 1738606
Novartis Investigative Site
Yamagata, 9909585
Novartis Investigative Site
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 2210855
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Japan Local Phase II Clinical Study Comparing Eltrombopag Monotherapy Versus Placebo in Adult Lower-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Patients With Platelet Transfusion Dependence
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag monotherapy in Japanese adult patients with platelet transfusion-dependent lower-risk Myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS).
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Japanese local phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag monotherapy in Japanese adult patients with platelet transfusion-dependent lower-risk MDS (IPSS-R very low, low, intermediate risk with bone marrow blast count < 5% and cytogenetic very good, good or intermediate risk). Platelet transfusion dependence at baseline is defined as receiving platelet transfusion regularly with a frequency of 2 or more times within 4 weeks prior to randomization. Platelet transfusion should be performed for a patient with platelet counts < 20 X 10^9/L, or with hemorrhagic symptoms and platelet counts < 30 X 10^9/L.
The primary objective is to demonstrate superiority of eltrombopag versus placebo in terms of the proportion of participants who achieve platelet transfusion independence at Week 24.
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Being tested
- Eltrombopag, Placebo
- Keywords
- Phase II, eltrombopag, ETB115, lower-risk MDS patients with platelet transfusion dependence, TPO-RA, placebo, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), platelet transfusion dependence
- Medical subject headings
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EltrombopagDrug
Also called ETB115
Eltrombopag comes in 12.5 mg \& 25 mg tablets and is taken orally once per day (QD)
PlaceboDrug
Placebo comes in 12.5 mg \& 25 mg tablets and is taken orally once per day (QD)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Eltrombopag Arm | Experimental | Participants randomized to a 1: 1 ratio will take eltrombopag. Receives: Drug: Eltrombopag |
| Placebo Arm | Placebo comparator | Participants randomized to a 1: 1 ratio will take Placebo. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of participants who achieve platelet transfusion independence at Week 24
Platelet transfusion independence is defined as the absence of platelet transfusion for at least 8 weeks. Platelet count should be higher than the baseline count.
Measured: Week 24
Secondary outcomes (19)
Time to platelet transfusion independence
This is defined as time from the date of randomization to the first day of a platelet transfusion-free period lasting at least 8 weeks.
Measured: Year 1, Year 2
Duration of platelet transfusion independence
This is defined for participants who have achieved platelet transfusion independence only and will be calculated from the first date of platelet transfusion-free resulting in achievement of transfusion independence to the date before becoming platelet transfusion dependent.
Measured: Year 1, Year 2
Percentage of participants with platelet transfusion independence
Platelet transfusion independence is defined as the absence of platelet transfusion for at least 8 weeks. Platelet count should be higher than the baseline count.
Measured: Year 1, Year 2
Percentage of participants with platelet transfusion frequency reduction at Week 24
This is defined as a reduction by at least 50 percent during the 4 prior weeks as compared to the 4 weeks prior to randomization.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of participants with platelet response (Hematologic improvement (HI) - platelet))
Platelet response is defined as HI-platelet per International Working Group criteria.
Measured: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Time to platelet response
This is defined as time from the date of randomization to the first date of achieving the platelet response criteria per modified IWG criteria.
Measured: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Duration of platelet response
This is defined for participants who have achieved platelet response and will be calculated from the first date of achieving the platelet response criteria to the date before loss of platelet response per modified IWG criteria.
Measured: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Percentage of hematologic improvement-erythroid and -neutrophil
per modified IWG criteria at 24 weeks, Year 1 and 2
Measured: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Percentage of participants with disease progression excluding relapse after HI
This is with regards to blast counts for both investigator assessment and central review per modified IWG criteria.
Measured: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Percentage of participants with relapse after HI and transfusion independence
The percentage of participants with relapse after HI and transfusion independence at Week 24, Year 1 and 2.
Measured: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Percentage of participants with progression to Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
This is defined as ≥ 20% blasts at Week 24, Year 1 and 2 for both investigator assessment and central review per WHO classification revised 4th edition.
Measured: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Leukemia free survival (LFS)
This is defined as time from the date of randomization to progression to AML per WHO classification revised 4th edition of ≥ 20 percent blasts or death due to any cause for both investigator assessment and central review.
Measured: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Clinically significant bleeding events
This is defined as ≥ grade 2 events as per WHO bleeding scale.
Measured: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Overall survival (OS)
OS is defined as time from randomization to death due to any cause.
Measured: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Quality of Life measured using QLQ-C30
The changes from baseline to each visit where measured using QLQ-C30. EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Subject's responses to 28 questions about their physical functioning, disease symptoms, global health status and utilities are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much), a low score indicates a high / healthy level of functioning. And the responses to 2 questions about health-related QoL are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very poor to 7=Excellent), a high score indicates a high / healthy level of functioning.
Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100.
Measured: Baseline, every 4 weeks until week 52, every 8 weeks after week 52 up to end of treatment or end of post-treatment follow-up, approximately 3.5 years.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Cmax
Full PK profile of eltrombopag over 24 hours at steady state at the initial dose, and at 125 mg and 150 mg when applicable, in subset of participants.
Measured: Intensive: pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose. Trough: 15th days after starting the initial dose or each dose modification until reaching the maximum dose.
PK: Tmax
Full PK profile of eltrombopag over 24 hours at steady state at the initial dose, and at 125 mg and 150 mg when applicable, in subset of participants.
Measured: Intensive: pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose. Trough: 15th days after starting the initial dose or each dose modification until reaching the maximum dose.
PK: AUC
Full PK profile of eltrombopag over 24 hours at steady state at the initial dose, and at 125 mg and 150 mg when applicable, in subset of participants.
Measured: Intensive: pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose. Trough: 15th days after starting the initial dose or each dose modification until reaching the maximum dose.
Trough concentrations of eltrombopag at steady state
at each dose level in all the participants
Measured: Intensive: pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose. Trough: 15th days after starting the initial dose or each dose modification until reaching the maximum dose.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Mar 2021
- Study start25 May 2021
- Primary completion26 Apr 2025
- Study completion2 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Myelodysplastic SyndromesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04797000
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CETB115L11201
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Japan Local Phase II Clinical Study Comparing Eltrombopag Monotherapy Versus Placebo in Adult Lower-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Patients With Platelet Transfusion Dependence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04797000
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CETB115L11201
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Keywords
- Phase II, eltrombopag, ETB115, lower-risk MDS patients with platelet transfusion dependence, TPO-RA, placebo, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), platelet transfusion dependence
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 25 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag monotherapy in Japanese adult patients with platelet transfusion-dependent lower-risk Myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS).
Detailed description
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Japanese local phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag monotherapy in Japanese adult patients with platelet transfusion-dependent lower-risk MDS (IPSS-R very low, low, intermediate risk with bone marrow blast count < 5% and cytogenetic very good, good or intermediate risk). Platelet transfusion dependence at baseline is defined as receiving platelet transfusion regularly with a frequency of 2 or more times within 4 weeks prior to randomization. Platelet transfusion should be performed for a patient with platelet counts < 20 X 10^9/L, or with hemorrhagic symptoms and platelet counts < 30 X 10^9/L.
The primary objective is to demonstrate superiority of eltrombopag versus placebo in terms of the proportion of participants who achieve platelet transfusion independence at Week 24.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Eltrombopag Arm | Experimental | Drug: EltrombopagParticipants randomized to a 1: 1 ratio will take eltrombopag. |
| Placebo Arm | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants randomized to a 1: 1 ratio will take Placebo. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patients diagnosed with MDS according to the WHO classification revised 4th edition by investigator assessment with one of the following prognostic risk categories, based on the International
- very low (0-1.5)
- low (2-3)
- intermediate risks (3.5-4.5) All following criteria for prognostic variables per IPSS-R should be met.
- Bone marrow blast < 5% (per both investigator's assessment and central review)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patients with a history of prior administration of eltrombopag, romiplostim, or other TPO-RA
- Therapy-related MDS per WHO classification revised 4th edition
- MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms including chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia per the WHO classification revised 4th edition
- MDS with excess blasts (EB) per WHO classification revised 4th edition
- Known history of IPSS-R high or very high risk MDS
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EltrombopagAlso: ETB115Eltrombopag comes in 12.5 mg \& 25 mg tablets and is taken orally once per day (QD) | Drug | Eltrombopag Arm |
| PlaceboPlacebo comes in 12.5 mg \& 25 mg tablets and is taken orally once per day (QD) | Drug | Placebo Arm |
Primary outcome
Percentage of participants who achieve platelet transfusion independence at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Platelet transfusion independence is defined as the absence of platelet transfusion for at least 8 weeks. Platelet count should be higher than the baseline count.
19 secondary outcomes
Time to platelet transfusion independence
Time frame: Year 1, Year 2
Duration of platelet transfusion independence
Time frame: Year 1, Year 2
Percentage of participants with platelet transfusion independence
Time frame: Year 1, Year 2
Percentage of participants with platelet transfusion frequency reduction at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of participants with platelet response (Hematologic improvement (HI) - platelet))
Time frame: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Time to platelet response
Time frame: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Duration of platelet response
Time frame: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Percentage of hematologic improvement-erythroid and -neutrophil
Time frame: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Percentage of participants with disease progression excluding relapse after HI
Time frame: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Percentage of participants with relapse after HI and transfusion independence
Time frame: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Percentage of participants with progression to Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
Time frame: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Leukemia free survival (LFS)
Time frame: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Clinically significant bleeding events
Time frame: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: Week 24, Year 1, Year 2
Quality of Life measured using QLQ-C30
Time frame: Baseline, every 4 weeks until week 52, every 8 weeks after week 52 up to end of treatment or end of post-treatment follow-up, approximately 3.5 years.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Cmax
Time frame: Intensive: pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose. Trough: 15th days after starting the initial dose or each dose modification until reaching the maximum dose.
PK: Tmax
Time frame: Intensive: pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose. Trough: 15th days after starting the initial dose or each dose modification until reaching the maximum dose.
PK: AUC
Time frame: Intensive: pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose. Trough: 15th days after starting the initial dose or each dose modification until reaching the maximum dose.
Trough concentrations of eltrombopag at steady state
Time frame: Intensive: pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose. Trough: 15th days after starting the initial dose or each dose modification until reaching the maximum dose.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Omacetaxine + Azacitidine in Untreated Patients With High Grade MDS
High Grade Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
20 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Eltrombopag in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 20 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 20 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of participants who achieve platelet transfusion independence at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2026.