Injury;SportsDPLNCT04796753
Detection of Neuromuscular Deficits in Uninjured Youth Basketball Players
An observational study of Injury;Sports and Biomechanical Lesions, run by University Rovira i Virgili at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Basketball is an impact, coordination-opposition sport with continuous contact among players and it is considered a sport of medium-high injury incidence. Players are force to have a physical condition appropriate to their practice and the demand to which they must respond due to the intensity of the efforts this… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Injury;Sports, Biomechanical Lesions, Musculoskeletal Injury
- What is being tested?
- Basketball Injury Defense
- How many people
- 575 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2018to 31 May 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 17 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Study population: The participants were recruited through the Catalan Basketball Federation, and the study was carried out in the sports facilities of each club.
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 12 years and <18 years at testing.
- To be actively competing during the study.
Who cannot join
- Had suffered any injury in lower limbs before the screening.
- Presented any injury (overuse or acute) at the time of testing.
- Psychological or psychiatric diseases diagnosed.
- Oncological diseases diagnosed.
- Did not attend on the day of the assessment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Detection of Neuromuscular Deficits in Movement Pattern in Uninjured Federated Youth Basketball Players: a Cross-sectional Study
Basketball is an impact, coordination-opposition sport with continuous contact among players and it is considered a sport of medium-high injury incidence. Players are force to have a physical condition appropriate to their practice and the demand to which they must respond due to the intensity of the efforts this sport requires. In order to achieve this, it is necessary to establish an evaluation protocol that allows the detection of functional deficiencies, to guide and conduct in a specific and early way every moment of players' health and growth.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and detect federated youth basketball players' (U12 - U17) neuromuscular deficiencies in mobility, stability and landing technique in static and dynamic situations to simulate all the most important actions of basketball demands.
Read the detailed description
It is intended that the specific detection and individualized approach to neuromuscular deficiencies will decrease the prevalence of injuries and accidents and therefore, the performance of training basketball players will be improved. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and detect federated youth basketball players' (under 12 years until under 17 years) neuromuscular deficits in mobility, stability and landing technique in static and dynamic situations similar to simulate the most important actions of basketball demands.
This cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2018 to May 2019. A total of 778 basketball players were selected for the present study. In order to evaluate this specific tests and trials will be carried out on different teams from various clubs in the categories from under 12 years (U12) to under 17 (U17), both male and female. The evaluations will consist of a static physical measures and a dynamic one. These will be conducted throughout the season. Inclusion criteria were: age > 12 years and <18 years at testing, and to be actively competing during the study. Subjects were excluded if they had suffered any injury in lower limbs before the screening; presented any injury (overuse or acute) at the time of testing or if they suffered any oncological, psychological and/or psychiatric illnesses, or if they did not attend on the day of the assessment. The main outcomes were ankle joint dorsiflexion was analyzed with Weight-bearing Dorsiflexion Test; monopodial ankle stability was analyzed with Single Leg Balance Test. Dynamic lower extremity valgus was analyzed with Single Leg Squat Test, Modified Tuck Jump Test, Single Leg Squat Test and Hurdle Step Test were used to evaluate also Lumbopelvic stability and dynamic postural control. Neuromuscular deficits during continuous tuck jumps, landing technique flaws and Plyometric Technique were analyzed with Modified Tuck Jump Test. All these tests are scientifically validated for this purpose. All players were familiar with the procedures of all test before. Testing was performed in the same day, in the same order, at the same time of the day (18:00-20:00).
- Conditions
- Injury;Sports, Biomechanical Lesions, Musculoskeletal Injury
- Being tested
- Basketball Injury Defense
- Keywords
- Basketball, Physical Therapy, Youth athletes
- Medical subject headings
- Athletic Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Basketball Injury DefenseOther
To establish a specific evaluation protocol for youth basketball players.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Youth basketball players who belonged to basketball developmental teams (U12, U14,U16,U17). | All participants completed the same ten-minute neuromuscular warm-up consisting of the following exercises: joint mobility exercises, dynamic stretching exercises, jumps, multidirectional displacements and changes of direction. Following, subjects were allowed three practice trials for each test. Consistent feedback was provided throughout to ensure proper technique. The performance of each test was recorded using two cameras (Iphone XS, Apple). To allow visible tracking of the different joints, participants were required to wear shorts with the hem at approximately mid-thigh. When scoring performance, each test was viewed in both planes (sagittal and frontal views). Receives: Other: Basketball Injury Defense |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ankle joint dorsiflexion
Weight-bearing dorsiflexion test. Ankle dorsiflexion was evaluated through the LegMotion system (LegMotion, your Motion®, Albacete, Spain). Each player started with their hands on their hips, and put the assigned foot on the middle of the longitudinal line just behind the transversal line on the platform. The alternate foot was positioned off the platform with toes at the edge of the platform. Each trial consisted of flexing the ankle as much as possible without raising the heel of the assessed ankle trying to touch a marker, situated just behind the patella, with their knee. The distance achieved was recorded in centimeters. Three trials were allowed with each ankle (i.e., left and right) with 10 seconds of passive recovery between trials. The third value in each ankle was used in subsequent analysis of weight-bearing dorsiflexion.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Ankle stability
Single Leg Balance Test. It was considered stable if the foot remained in neutral position during movement. However, if excessive pronation of the foot was evident during movement or external rotation of the leg/foot it was scored as unstable.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Dynamic lower extremity valgus
Single Leg Squat Test. An aligned knee-ankle position was considered when the patella was aligned with the second toe. Five consecutive attempts were performed with each limb, and the correct alignment between the knee and the second toe in loading was assessed to analyze an excess of knee valgus.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Lumbopelvic stability
Single Leg Squat Test. It was considered stable if there was minimal movement in all three planes and the sacroiliac joints were aligned. On the other hand, it was considered unstable if the sacroiliac joints were not aligned in the frontal plane or if there was evidence of anteroposterior tilt or rotation in the sagittal plane as well as anterior trunk flexion or increased lumbar lordosis.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Dynamic postural control
Hurdle Step Test. For this purpose, the deviation of the trunk with respect to the center of gravity was observed. A smaller displacement or deviation implied a better postural stability.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Neuromuscular deficits during continuous tuck jumps
Modified Tuck Jump Test. Lower extremity valgus at landing, Thighs do not reach parallel (peak of jump), Thighs not equal side-to-side during flight
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Landing technique flaws
Modified Tuck Jump Test. Foot placement not shoulder width apart, Foot placement not parallel (front to back), Foot contact timing not equal (Asymmetrical landing), Excessive landing contact noise.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Plyometric Technique
Modified Tuck Jump Test. Pause between jumps, Technique declines prior 10 seconds, Does not land in same foot print (Consistent point of landing)
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary outcomes (9)
Age
Years
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Age categories
Under 12, Under 14, Under 16 or Under 17
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Body Mass Index (BMI)
kg/m2
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Generalized hipermobility
The presence of hypermobile confirmed by Beighton's criteria. Considering hypermobile as those who obtained a score of > 7 points out of a total of 9 points
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Gender
Female or male
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Weight
Kilograms
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Height
Centimeters
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Wingspan
Centimeters
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Lower limb dominance
Dominant leg / non dominant leg
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Mar 2021
- Study start1 Oct 2018
- Primary completion31 May 2019
- Study completion31 May 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (48)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Injury;SportsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 575 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Rovira i Virgili
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, CRISTINA ADILLÓN, University Rovira i Virgili
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04796753
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 123/2018
- Acronym
- DPL
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 3 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 15 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Drakos MC, Domb B, Starkey C, Callahan L, Allen AA. Injury in the national basketball association: a 17-year overview. Sports Health. 2010 Jul;2(4):284-90. doi: 10.1177/1941738109357303.
PubMed 23015949Hootman JM, Dick R, Agel J. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train. 2007 Apr-Jun;42(2):311-9.
PubMed 17710181Rodas G, Bove T, Caparros T, Langohr K, Medina D, Hamilton B, Sugimoto D, Casals M. Ankle Sprain Versus Muscle Strain Injury in Professional Men's Basketball: A 9-Year Prospective Follow-up Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jun 21;7(6):2325967119849035. doi: 10.1177/2325967119849035. eCollection 2019 Jun.
PubMed 31259184Cherni Y, Jlid MC, Mehrez H, Shephard RJ, Paillard T, Chelly MS, Hermassi S. Eight Weeks of Plyometric Training Improves Ability to Change Direction and Dynamic Postural Control in Female Basketball Players. Front Physiol. 2019 Jun 13;10:726. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00726. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31263427Taylor JB, Wright AA, Dischiavi SL, Townsend MA, Marmon AR. Activity Demands During Multi-Directional Team Sports: A Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2017 Dec;47(12):2533-2551. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0772-5.
PubMed 28801751Zuckerman SL, Wegner AM, Roos KG, Djoko A, Dompier TP, Kerr ZY. Injuries sustained in National Collegiate Athletic Association men's and women's basketball, 2009/2010-2014/2015. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;52(4):261-268. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096005. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
PubMed 27364907Andreoli CV, Chiaramonti BC, Buriel E, Pochini AC, Ejnisman B, Cohen M. Epidemiology of sports injuries in basketball: integrative systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Dec 27;4(1):e000468. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000468. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30687514Pasanen K, Ekola T, Vasankari T, Kannus P, Heinonen A, Kujala UM, Parkkari J. High ankle injury rate in adolescent basketball: A 3-year prospective follow-up study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Jun;27(6):643-649. doi: 10.1111/sms.12818. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
PubMed 28033652Leppanen M, Pasanen K, Kannus P, Vasankari T, Kujala UM, Heinonen A, Parkkari J. Epidemiology of Overuse Injuries in Youth Team Sports: A 3-year Prospective Study. Int J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;38(11):847-856. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-114864. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
PubMed 28895620Emery CA. Risk factors for injury in child and adolescent sport: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Jul;13(4):256-68. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200307000-00011.
PubMed 12855930Agresta C, Church C, Henley J, Duer T, O'Brien K. Single-Leg Squat Performance in Active Adolescents Aged 8-17 Years. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 May;31(5):1187-1191. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001617.
PubMed 27575249Moseid CH, Myklebust G, Slaastuen MK, Bar-Yaacov JB, Kristiansen AH, Fagerland MW, Bahr R. The association between physical fitness level and number and severity of injury and illness in youth elite athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Nov;29(11):1736-1748. doi: 10.1111/sms.13498. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
PubMed 31206837Monfort SM, Comstock RD, Collins CL, Onate JA, Best TM, Chaudhari AM. Association between ball-handling versus defending actions and acute noncontact lower extremity injuries in high school basketball and soccer. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):802-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546514564541. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
PubMed 25596616Bahr R, Krosshaug T. Understanding injury mechanisms: a key component of preventing injuries in sport. Br J Sports Med. 2005 Jun;39(6):324-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.018341.
PubMed 15911600Clifton DR, Hertel J, Onate JA, Currie DW, Pierpoint LA, Wasserman EB, Knowles SB, Dompier TP, Comstock RD, Marshall SW, Kerr ZY. The First Decade of Web-Based Sports Injury Surveillance: Descriptive Epidemiology of Injuries in US High School Girls' Basketball (2005-2006 Through 2013-2014) and National Collegiate Athletic Association Women's Basketball (2004-2005 Through 2013-2014). J Athl Train. 2018 Nov;53(11):1037-1048. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-150-17.
PubMed 30715913
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Detection of Neuromuscular Deficits in Movement Pattern in Uninjured Federated Youth Basketball Players: a Cross-sectional Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04796753
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DPL / 123/2018
- Conditions
- Injury;Sports, Biomechanical Lesions, Musculoskeletal Injury
- Keywords
- Basketball, Physical Therapy, Youth athletes
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 575 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Rovira i VirgiliUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Basketball is an impact, coordination-opposition sport with continuous contact among players and it is considered a sport of medium-high injury incidence. Players are force to have a physical condition appropriate to their practice and the demand to which they must respond due to the intensity of the efforts this sport requires. In order to achieve this, it is necessary to establish an evaluation protocol that allows the detection of functional deficiencies, to guide and conduct in a specific and early way every moment of players' health and growth.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and detect federated youth basketball players' (U12 - U17) neuromuscular deficiencies in mobility, stability and landing technique in static and dynamic situations to simulate all the most important actions of basketball demands.
Detailed description
It is intended that the specific detection and individualized approach to neuromuscular deficiencies will decrease the prevalence of injuries and accidents and therefore, the performance of training basketball players will be improved. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and detect federated youth basketball players' (under 12 years until under 17 years) neuromuscular deficits in mobility, stability and landing technique in static and dynamic situations similar to simulate the most important actions of basketball demands.
This cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2018 to May 2019. A total of 778 basketball players were selected for the present study. In order to evaluate this specific tests and trials will be carried out on different teams from various clubs in the categories from under 12 years (U12) to under 17 (U17), both male and female. The evaluations will consist of a static physical measures and a dynamic one. These will be conducted throughout the season. Inclusion criteria were: age > 12 years and <18 years at testing, and to be actively competing during the study. Subjects were excluded if they had suffered any injury in lower limbs before the screening; presented any injury (overuse or acute) at the time of testing or if they suffered any oncological, psychological and/or psychiatric illnesses, or if they did not attend on the day of the assessment. The main outcomes were ankle joint dorsiflexion was analyzed with Weight-bearing Dorsiflexion Test; monopodial ankle stability was analyzed with Single Leg Balance Test. Dynamic lower extremity valgus was analyzed with Single Leg Squat Test, Modified Tuck Jump Test, Single Leg Squat Test and Hurdle Step Test were used to evaluate also Lumbopelvic stability and dynamic postural control. Neuromuscular deficits during continuous tuck jumps, landing technique flaws and Plyometric Technique were analyzed with Modified Tuck Jump Test. All these tests are scientifically validated for this purpose. All players were familiar with the procedures of all test before. Testing was performed in the same day, in the same order, at the same time of the day (18:00-20:00).
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Youth basketball players who belonged to basketball developmental teams (U12, U14,U16,U17). | – | Other: Basketball Injury DefenseAll participants completed the same ten-minute neuromuscular warm-up consisting of the following exercises: joint mobility exercises, dynamic stretching exercises, jumps, multidirectional displacements and changes of direction. Following, subjects were allowed three practice trials for each test. Consistent feedback was provided throughout to ensure proper technique. The performance of each test was recorded using two cameras (Iphone XS, Apple). To allow visible tracking of the different joints, participants were required to wear shorts with the hem at approximately mid-thigh. When scoring performance, each test was viewed in both planes (sagittal and frontal views). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- The participants were recruited through the Catalan Basketball Federation, and the study was carried out in the sports facilities of each club.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age ≥ 12 years and <18 years at testing.
- To be actively competing during the study.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Had suffered any injury in lower limbs before the screening.
- Presented any injury (overuse or acute) at the time of testing.
- Psychological or psychiatric diseases diagnosed.
- Oncological diseases diagnosed.
- Did not attend on the day of the assessment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Basketball Injury DefenseTo establish a specific evaluation protocol for youth basketball players. | Other | Youth basketball players who belonged to basketball developmental teams (U12, U14,U16,U17). |
Primary outcome
Ankle joint dorsiflexion
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Weight-bearing dorsiflexion test. Ankle dorsiflexion was evaluated through the LegMotion system (LegMotion, your Motion®, Albacete, Spain). Each player started with their hands on their hips, and put the assigned foot on the middle of the longitudinal line just behind the transversal line on the platform. The alternate foot was positioned off the platform with toes at the edge of the platform. Each trial consisted of flexing the ankle as much as possible without raising the heel of the assessed ankle trying to touch a marker, situated just behind the patella, with their knee. The distance achieved was recorded in centimeters. Three trials were allowed with each ankle (i.e., left and right) with 10 seconds of passive recovery between trials. The third value in each ankle was used in subsequent analysis of weight-bearing dorsiflexion.
Ankle stability
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Single Leg Balance Test. It was considered stable if the foot remained in neutral position during movement. However, if excessive pronation of the foot was evident during movement or external rotation of the leg/foot it was scored as unstable.
Dynamic lower extremity valgus
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Single Leg Squat Test. An aligned knee-ankle position was considered when the patella was aligned with the second toe. Five consecutive attempts were performed with each limb, and the correct alignment between the knee and the second toe in loading was assessed to analyze an excess of knee valgus.
Lumbopelvic stability
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Single Leg Squat Test. It was considered stable if there was minimal movement in all three planes and the sacroiliac joints were aligned. On the other hand, it was considered unstable if the sacroiliac joints were not aligned in the frontal plane or if there was evidence of anteroposterior tilt or rotation in the sagittal plane as well as anterior trunk flexion or increased lumbar lordosis.
Dynamic postural control
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Hurdle Step Test. For this purpose, the deviation of the trunk with respect to the center of gravity was observed. A smaller displacement or deviation implied a better postural stability.
Neuromuscular deficits during continuous tuck jumps
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Modified Tuck Jump Test. Lower extremity valgus at landing, Thighs do not reach parallel (peak of jump), Thighs not equal side-to-side during flight
Landing technique flaws
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Modified Tuck Jump Test. Foot placement not shoulder width apart, Foot placement not parallel (front to back), Foot contact timing not equal (Asymmetrical landing), Excessive landing contact noise.
Plyometric Technique
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Modified Tuck Jump Test. Pause between jumps, Technique declines prior 10 seconds, Does not land in same foot print (Consistent point of landing)
9 secondary outcomes
Age
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Age categories
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Generalized hipermobility
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Gender
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Weight
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Height
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Wingspan
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Lower limb dominance
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Mar 2021.
- Background: PubMed 23015949Drakos MC, Domb B, Starkey C, Callahan L, Allen AA. Injury in the national basketball association: a 17-year overview. Sports Health. 2010 Jul;2(4):284-90. doi: 10.1177/1941738109357303.
- Background: PubMed 17710181Hootman JM, Dick R, Agel J. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train. 2007 Apr-Jun;42(2):311-9.
- Background: PubMed 31259184Rodas G, Bove T, Caparros T, Langohr K, Medina D, Hamilton B, Sugimoto D, Casals M. Ankle Sprain Versus Muscle Strain Injury in Professional Men's Basketball: A 9-Year Prospective Follow-up Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jun 21;7(6):2325967119849035. doi: 10.1177/2325967119849035. eCollection 2019 Jun.
- Background: PubMed 31263427Cherni Y, Jlid MC, Mehrez H, Shephard RJ, Paillard T, Chelly MS, Hermassi S. Eight Weeks of Plyometric Training Improves Ability to Change Direction and Dynamic Postural Control in Female Basketball Players. Front Physiol. 2019 Jun 13;10:726. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00726. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 28801751Taylor JB, Wright AA, Dischiavi SL, Townsend MA, Marmon AR. Activity Demands During Multi-Directional Team Sports: A Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2017 Dec;47(12):2533-2551. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0772-5.
- Background: PubMed 27364907Zuckerman SL, Wegner AM, Roos KG, Djoko A, Dompier TP, Kerr ZY. Injuries sustained in National Collegiate Athletic Association men's and women's basketball, 2009/2010-2014/2015. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;52(4):261-268. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096005. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
- Background: PubMed 30687514Andreoli CV, Chiaramonti BC, Buriel E, Pochini AC, Ejnisman B, Cohen M. Epidemiology of sports injuries in basketball: integrative systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Dec 27;4(1):e000468. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000468. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 28033652Pasanen K, Ekola T, Vasankari T, Kannus P, Heinonen A, Kujala UM, Parkkari J. High ankle injury rate in adolescent basketball: A 3-year prospective follow-up study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Jun;27(6):643-649. doi: 10.1111/sms.12818. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
- Background: PubMed 28895620Leppanen M, Pasanen K, Kannus P, Vasankari T, Kujala UM, Heinonen A, Parkkari J. Epidemiology of Overuse Injuries in Youth Team Sports: A 3-year Prospective Study. Int J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;38(11):847-856. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-114864. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
- Background: PubMed 12855930Emery CA. Risk factors for injury in child and adolescent sport: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Jul;13(4):256-68. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200307000-00011.
- Background: PubMed 27575249Agresta C, Church C, Henley J, Duer T, O'Brien K. Single-Leg Squat Performance in Active Adolescents Aged 8-17 Years. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 May;31(5):1187-1191. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001617.
- Background: PubMed 31206837Moseid CH, Myklebust G, Slaastuen MK, Bar-Yaacov JB, Kristiansen AH, Fagerland MW, Bahr R. The association between physical fitness level and number and severity of injury and illness in youth elite athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Nov;29(11):1736-1748. doi: 10.1111/sms.13498. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Injury;Sports
Not yet recruiting
Supporting Athletes' Return to Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Study of a Psychological Readiness Program
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Functional Recovery After a Recent Lateral Ankle Sprain With Early Initiation of Rehabilitation: Changes in the Ankle-GO Score and Its Association With Return to Sport and Recurrent Sprains.
Ankle Sprain
Recruiting
Enovis High Ankle Sprain Brace Testing
Athletes in Cutting Sports
Not yet recruiting
Integrating Sport-Specific Comprehensive Training to Upscale Performance in Women and Girls
Sport Injuries, Performance in Sport
Not yet recruiting
PNF Effects on Volleyball Performance
Sport Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Injury;Sports and Biomechanical Lesions, run by University Rovira i Virgili at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ankle joint dorsiflexion (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04796753, which also lists 48 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2021.