AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-PumpNCT04795193

MInithoraCotomy vs Sternotomy for Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Partially Randomized Patient Preference Trial Assessing Quality of Life and Patency Outcomes

A study testing Minimal invasive coronary surgery and Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in people with Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump and Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This trial will address essential questions of the efficacy and safety of MICS-CABG in addition to the quality of life and patency rate of the grafts. The study will also address the impact of patients' preferences on external validity and internal validity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 85 years
What is being tested?
Minimal invasive coronary surgery and Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
248 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
15 Apr 2021to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Unstable preoperative hemodynamic status requiring emergency surgery
  • Severe emphysema, hypoxemia [post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<70% and FEV1%predicted<50% or partial pressure of oxygen (pO2)<60 mmHg or partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2)>40 mmHg without oxygen therapy]
  • Old large area myocardial infarction, no viable myocardium based on isotope and echocardiography examination, significant cardiac enlargement, cardiothoracic ratio>0.75, EF<30%, left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVDd)>60 mm, left ventricular aneurysm or severe arrhythmia, prone to experience unstable preoperative hemodynamic status during surgery
  • Severe pleural adhesion, chest deformity, or previous thoracic radiotherapy
  • Previous open heart surgery
  • Simultaneous valve or other cardiac surgery
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Planned cardiopulmonary bypass surgery
  • Poor condition of myocardial infarction (MI), extensive lesion, distal or entire diffuse stenosis, or inability to match lumen due to small diameter (<1.0 mm) or severe calcification
  • Others: Terminal cancer, uncontrolled infection, bleeding, progressive degenerative systemic disease, severe brain injury, multiple organ failure and other major organ dysfunction such as severe liver dysfunction, severe heart failure or cardiogenic shock, intolerance to surgery, and other contraindications of CABG

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site
  • Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Partially Randomized Patient Preference Trial to Assess the Quality of Life and Patency Rate After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: the MICS-CABG PRPP Trial

This trial will address essential questions of the efficacy and safety of MICS-CABG in addition to the quality of life and patency rate of the grafts. The study will also address the impact of patients' preferences on external validity and internal validity. In this study, patients with a preference will be allocated to treatment strategies accordingly, whereas only those patients without a distinct preference will be randomized. The randomized trial is a 248-patient controlled, randomized, investigator-blinded trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with MICS-CABG is beneficial in comparison to CABG. This study is aimed to establish the superiority hypothesis for the physical component summary (PCS) accompanied by the noninferiority hypothesis for overall graft patency. Patients with no treatment preference will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms. The primary efficacy endpoints are the PCS score at 30 days (1 month) after surgery and the overall patency rate of the grafts within 14 days ( before discharge) after surgery. Secondary outcome measures include the PCS score and patency rate at different time points. Safety endpoints include major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, complications, bleeding, wound infection, death, etc.

Read the detailed description

Objective and Hypothesis: The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the mid-term safety and efficacy end-points (SF-36 PCS at 30 days after surgery, etc.) in patients with complex coronary artery lesions (an indication of OPCAGB) who received MICS-CABG and those who received thoracotomy OPCABG. The investigators hypothesize that patients in MICS-CABG group have superior 1-month PCS score assessed by SF-36 post-surgery and noninferior postprocedural angiographic graft patency rate prior to discharge.

Intervention Methods:

  1. MICS-CABG (experimental group): Off-pump multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting via left thoracotomy under minimally invasive conditions.
  2. Surgery preparation: General anesthesia, double lumen tracheal intubation. In the supine position, tilt 15° to the right. An automatic defibrillation electrode is attached to the right front and left rear chest wall, and the external defibrillator is connected. A small incision of 8-10 cm into the left anterior lateral 5th intercostal space was performed into the chest.
  3. Internal mammary artery acquisition: After entering the chest, the internal mammary artery (IMA) is exposed through a new minimal invasive retraction system. Single or bilateral IMA is obtained as needed. Separate the IMA From the middle segment (non-fat muscle coverage area) applied with an electric scalpel (15J), and the free range was up to the first rib to the fifth or sixth intercostal (IMA bifurcation).
  4. Bypass strategy: All procedures were performed under a non-cardiopulmonary situation, and vascular anastomosis was performed with the aid of a laparoscopic cardiac stabilizer. The stabilizer is smaller and does not occupy the operating space. The head of stabilizer can be rotated 360 degrees and the target vessel can be fixed at any angle. Bilateral internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein can be used as graft vessels. The bypass strategy is not particularly different from conventional bypass surgery, including aorta (AO)-saphenous vein graft (SVG) or radial artery (RA)-X1-X2-...( sequential anastomosis), left internal mammary artery (LIMA)-right internal mammary artery (RIMA) -RA or SVG(Y)-X, RIMA-left anterior descending (LAD), LIMA-RA or RIMA or SVG(I)-X1-X2 and so on.
  5. Vascular anastomosis: The target vessel is exposed through the pericardial suture, the heart is locally fixed with the aid of a cardiac stabilizer, and the target vessel is inserted shunt to avoid hemodynamic disorder and arrhythmia. Vascular anastomosis is performed by 8-0 polypropylene suture.
  6. Aortic exposure and proximal anastomosis: Place gauze behind the aorta, expose the aorta with the right pericardial suspension suture, temporary block aortic anterior wall with a soft-chain sidewall clamp, Punch on the aortic anterior wall with 3.5 mm puncher, anastomose SVG or RA on AO with 6-0 polypropylene suture.
  7. OPCABG (control group): Off-pump multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting with conventional thoracotomy.

Randomization Procedure:

Eligible patients will be randomized to MICS-CABG or OPCABG group with an allocation ratio of 1:1 after providing written informed consent. The randomization sequence will be generated by an independent statistician with block randomization method (block size=4 or 6). Each enrolled patient will be allocated to MICS-CABG or OPCABG group within 24-48 hours prior to surgery in the order of the assigned number in the allocation table uploaded in the electronic data capture (EDC) system. The allocation table will be concealed from researchers during research process.

Patient Selection:

Details are shown in the Eligibility Criteria part.

Measurements:

  1. Baseline Measurements:
  2. General Information: sex, age, body mass index.
  3. Medical History and Comorbidity: smoking status, history of diabetes (oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin therapy, HbA1c greater than 7.0%, postprandial blood glucose greater than 11.1 mmol/L, fasting plasma glucose greater than 7.0 mmol/L), previous stroke, hyperlipidemia (under drug therapy, serum cholesterol greater than 5.72 mmol/L or triglyceride greater than 1.7 mmol/L at admission), hypertension (blood pressure greater than 140/90 mmHg without medication), renal insufficiency (dialysis or serum creatinine level greater than 140 mmol/L or creatinine clearance rate less than 30 mL/min), peripheral vascular disease [preoperative ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) confirmed peripheral vascular stenosis greater than 50%], previous history of cardiac surgery, previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) history (balloon dilatation or stent implantation), previous myocardial infarction (MI) [pathological Q wave on ECG, definite evidence of elevation of creatine kinase (CK-MB) or troponin (cTnI) greater than 10 times of normal value with st-t segment elevation on cardiogram].
  4. Preoperative Status: SF-36, Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ) score, classification of angina (stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris, non st-t segment elevation myocardial infarction, st-t segment elevation myocardial infarction), New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart function classification, severe pulmonary insufficiency [post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<70% and FEV1%predicted<50% or partial pressure of oxygen (pO2)<60 mmHg or partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2)>40 mmHg without oxygen therapy].
  5. Preoperative Examination: creatinine (Cr), N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), preoperative cardiac function [ejection fraction (EF)%, left ventricular end-diastolic myocardial mass (LVEDm)], SYNTAX score (evaluated by two cardiologist).
  6. Preoperative Medication (within 1 week): aspirin, P2Y12 receptor antagonist (clopidogrel, ticagrelor), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban, etc.).
  7. Outcomes: Details are shown in the Outcome Measures part.

Follow-ups:

Patients will be followed at 7 days, 14 days, 30 days (1 month), 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery.

Sample Size:

  1. Superiority Hypothesis: Objective: To establish the superiority hypothesis for PCS (Physical Component Score). Margin of Superiority: Set at 2, based on clinically and statistically significant differences, ethical considerations, cost, and feasibility. Assumptions: Difference between groups: 7. Estimated standard deviation: 10. Confidence interval: Two-sided 95%. Power: 90%. Calculated Sample Size: 172 patients (86 per group). Dropout Rate: Anticipated at 10%. Total Sample Size Required: 190 patients (95 per group).
  2. Non-Inferiority Hypothesis: Objective: To establish the non-inferiority hypothesis for the overall patency rate of grafts. Margin of Non-Inferiority: Set at 6%. Assumptions: Expected overall patency rate: 96% in both MICS-CABG and sternotomy CABG. Power: 90%. Type 1 error: One-sided, 2.5%. Reduction in MICS-CABG: 0%. Calculated Sample Size: 496 grafts (248 per group). Dropout Rate: Allows for 10% loss to follow-up. Patients Required: Based on an average of at least 2 grafts per patient, a sample size of 248 patients (124 per group) is necessary. Total Sample Size Required: 248 patients with equal allocation to two arms.
  3. Summary:

Totally, 248 patients ensure adequate power for both hypotheses.

Statistical Analysis:

The primary endpoint is SF-36 PCS at 30 days and graft patency after surgery. The analysis on the primary endpoint will be conducted according to the basic principle of ITT.

For baseline characteristics, mean and standard deviation will be described for continuous data with normal distribution, while median and interquartile range (IQR) will be used to depict continuous skewed data. Frequencies and percentages will be demonstrated for categorical variables. For group comparisons, t-test will be used for normal distributed variables, Mann-Whitney U test will be applied for skewed variables, while Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test will be conducted for categorical variables.

For the primary endpoint: For the PCS score superiority test will be adopted, while for the patency rate of the graft, non-inferiority test will be used.

For secondary endpoints, t-test will be used for normal distributed variables, Mann-Whitney U test will be applied for skewed variables, while Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test will be conducted for categorical variables. Survival analysis will be applied for time-to-event data [time to the first major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) within1, 3, 6, 12 ,36 and 60 months after surgery].

Statistical significance is defined as the two-sided p-value less than 0.05. All analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 or Statistical Analysis System (SAS) version 9.4 or later.

Being tested
Minimal invasive coronary surgery, Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
Keywords
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Coronary Artery Bypass

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Minimal invasive coronary surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Off-pump multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting via left thoracotomy under minimally invasive conditions.

  • Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Off-pump multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting with conventional thoracotomy.

Study groups in NCT04795193
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MICS-CABG (minithoractomy CABG)ExperimentalPatients undergoing MICS-CABG(minithoractomy CABG)
Receives: Procedure: Minimal invasive coronary surgery
CABG (sterotomy CABG)Active comparatorPatients undergoing CABG (sterotomy CABG)
Receives: Procedure: Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. SF-36 PCS score (Physical component summary of medical outcomes study-short form 36-item scores) at 30 days (1month) after surgery

    The SF-36 is a concise health test that features Physical Functioning (PF), Roe-Physical (RP), Bodily Pain, General Health (GH), Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Roe-Emotional (Emotional) and Mental Health (MH) functioning and comprehensively summarizes the quality of life of the respondents across 8 aspects. The PCS and mental component summary (MCS) can be calculated from the eight abovementioned indicators with different weights. The PCS and the MCS each range from 0 to 50, with a lower score indicating worse quality of life (QoL) and a higher score indicating better QoL.

    Measured: 30 days (1 month) after surgery

  2. Overall patency rate of the grafts

    the patency rates of the LIMA, RIMA, saphenous vein graft (SVG) and radial artery (RA) will be evaluated by the Fitzgibbon A+B grade

    Measured: within 14 days after surgery (before discharge)

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Perioperative transfusion volume

    Perioperative transfusion number (U) of red blood cell

    Measured: Intraoperative and 14 days after surgery

  2. Incidence of cardiopulmonary bypass conversion

    Perioperative incidence of cardiopulmonary bypass conversion

    Measured: 14 days after surgery

  3. Percentage of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) usage

    Perioperative percentage of IABP and ECMO usage

    Measured: 14 days after surgery

  4. Incidence of secondary surgery

    All cause secondary surgery event such as bleeding, hemodynamic instability, sternum fracture or wound infection, etc.

    Measured: 14 days after surgery

  5. Incidence of adverse events of wound healing

    Adverse events of wound healing include redness, exudation, cracking, delayed healing that need surgical suture

    Measured: 14 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery

  6. Incidence of perioperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)

    Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event which is a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke and death

    Measured: 30 days after surgery

  7. Incidence of atrial fibrillation

    Perioperative incidence of atrial fibrillation

    Measured: 30 days after surgery

  8. Incidence of renal failure

    Perioperative incidence of renal failure

    Measured: 30 days after surgery

  9. Incidence of re-intubation

    Perioperative incidence of re-intubation

    Measured: 14 days after surgery

  10. Length of stay after surgery (days)

    Perioperative number of days staying in hospitals after surgery

    Measured: 14 days after surgery

  11. Intensive care unit (ICU) duration after surgery (hours)

    Perioperative duration of ICU stay after surgery

    Measured: 14 days after surgery

  12. Duration of mechanical ventilation application (hours)

    Perioperative duration of mechanical ventilation application

    Measured: 14 days after surgery

  13. Physical limitation score of Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ)

    The SAQ quantifies 5 domains measuring the impact of angina on patients' health status: physical limitation (9 items), angina stability (1 item), angina frequency (2 items), treatment satisfaction (4 items), and disease perception (3 items). Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function.

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery

  14. Angina stability score of Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ)

    The SAQ quantifies 5 domains measuring the impact of angina on patients' health status: physical limitation (9 items), angina stability (1 item), angina frequency (2 items), treatment satisfaction (4 items), and disease perception (3 items). Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function.

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery

  15. Angina frequency score of Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ)

    The SAQ quantifies 5 domains measuring the impact of angina on patients' health status: physical limitation (9 items), angina stability (1 item), angina frequency (2 items), treatment satisfaction (4 items), and disease perception (3 items). Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function.

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery

  16. Treatment satisfaction score of Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ)

    The SAQ quantifies 5 domains measuring the impact of angina on patients' health status: physical limitation (9 items), angina stability (1 item), angina frequency (2 items), treatment satisfaction (4 items), and disease perception (3 items). Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function.

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery

  17. Disease perception score of Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ)

    The SAQ quantifies 5 domains measuring the impact of angina on patients' health status: physical limitation (9 items), angina stability (1 item), angina frequency (2 items), treatment satisfaction (4 items), and disease perception (3 items). Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function.

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery

  18. Time to the first major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) after surgery

    Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event which is a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke and death

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 36months and 60 months after surgery

  19. Incidence of readmission due to myocardial infarction (MI)

    Incidence of readmission due to MI during follow-ups

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery

  20. Incidence of readmission due to heart failure

    Incidence of readmission due to heart failure during follow-ups

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery

  21. Percentage of mid-term graft patency (evaluated by CT or angiography)

    Percentage of mid-term graft patency evaluate by angiography or CT angiography

    Measured: 12 months after surgery

  22. SF-36 PCS scores

    Measured: 7-14 days (0.5 month) , 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery

  23. SF-36 MCS scores

    Measured: 7-14 days, 1month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery

  24. Patency rate of the different material grafts

    the patency rates of the LIMA, RIMA, saphenous vein graft (SVG) and radial artery (RA) will be evaluated by the Fitzgibbon A+B grade

    Measured: 14 days (before discharge) and 1 year after surgery

  25. Bypass surgical variation index

    The actual graft number is compared with the preoperative strategy. If the actual number of grafts is less than that in the preoperative plan, the results will be recorded.

    Measured: within 7 days after surgery

  26. Intrahospital RBC transfusion volume

    the amount of red blood cells (U) to be transfused during hospitalization.

    Measured: before discharge

  27. Number of Participants with re-exploration for bleeding or other causes (not including wound-related causes)

    the requirement to return to the operating room for reopening of sternotomy or MICS CABG incision for any reason, such as bleeding, postoperative acute myocardial ischemia and unexplained circulatory instability. Debridement for DSWI or infection of anterior-lateral wounds will be excluded.

    Measured: within 1 year after surgery

  28. Wound infection rate

    wound dehiscence, effusion and secondary debridement and suture

    Measured: within 3 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Mar 2021
  2. Study start15 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
248 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04795193
Sponsor's protocol ID
MICS-CABG PRPP Trial
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
3 Mar 2021
Last updated
16 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data that underlie the results (text, tables, figures, and appendices) reported in the publication of summary data, study protocol, statistical analysis plan (SAP), analytic code will be shared from 6 months to 3 years following article publication. All above could be shared with researches who provide a methodologically sound and feasible proposal approved by principal investigator (email address: yunpengling@163.com) and a signed data access agreement.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Minimal invasive coronary surgery and Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in people with Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump and Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

SF-36 PCS score (Physical component summary of medical outcomes study-short form 36-item scores) at 30 days (1month) after surgery (time frame: 30 days (1 month) after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in