Ovarian NeoplasmsNCT04794322
Developing a Test of Uterine Lavage for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer
An observational study of Ovarian Neoplasms and Ovarian Epithelial Carcinoma, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 6 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The study aims to develop a test for early detection of ovarian cancer using DNA from a growth involving the ovary found in a washing of the uterus (womb), and proteins found in the blood. The samples of the wash and the blood will be taken before surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ovarian Neoplasms, Ovarian Epithelial Carcinoma, Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Uterine lavage, or a wash of the womb, Blood sample and Pap smear
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Apr 2020to 31 Aug 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Cohorts will be selected from patients scheduled for ovarian disorder-related surgeries across six sites: Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts; Luminis Health System in Annapolis, Maryland; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland; Kaiser Permanente - San Francisco in San Francisco, California; the Swedish Medical Center in Seattle, Washington; and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, Arkansas.
Who may be able to join
- Has intact uterus (no history of uterine ablation, tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy)
- Cohort 1 (n=200 participants): Women scheduled for surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected but undiagnosed ovarian/fallopian tube cancer
- Cohort 2 (n=50 participants): Known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carrier scheduled for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy
Who cannot join
- Current tissue or cytology diagnostic procedure positive for ovary cancer or any cancer
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Age less than 30 years
- Inability to obtain the minimum amount of blood
- Inability to obtain the minimum amount of uterine lavage sample
- At risk if blood were drawn (e.g. hemophilia, serious anemia- Hb less than 8.0 gm/dL)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Prior history of known ovarian or endometrial cancer
- Treatment less than 1 year (excluding hormonal therapy) for cancer that spread beyond its origin
- History of untreated high-grade cervical dysplasia (CIN3)
- History of treated high grade cervical dysplasia (CIN3) with a cytologically abnormal pap smear within the past year. If there is no post treatment Pap smear in the medical record, perform a Pap smear prior to the day of surgery. If this Pap smear is abnormal, the participant is ineligible.
- Currently pregnant
- Known Lynch syndrome
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
6 sites in 1 country
United States6 sites, 5 recruiting
- Recruiting
Anne Arundel Health System
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
Jaci Miller, 443-481-5738, jmiller9@aahs.org
Monica Jones, MD
- Recruiting
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21218
Rebecca Stone, MD, rstone15@jhmi.edu
Rebecca Stone, MD
- Recruiting
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Tina Colella, 617-643-5150, tcolella@partners.org
Amy Bregar, MD
- Recruiting
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Beth Scanlan, 501-686-8274, BScanlan@uams.edu
Kristin Zorn, MD
- Active, not recruiting
Kaiser Permanente - San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94115
- Recruiting
The Swedish Hospital
Seattle, Washington, 98122
Robert Pearhill, 206-667-3278, rpearhil@fredhutch.org
Charles Drescher, MD
About this study
Official title: Ovarian Cancer Detection by Uterine Lavage DNA and Serum Proteins: a Phase 2 Biomarker Study
The study aims to develop a test for early detection of ovarian cancer using DNA from a growth involving the ovary found in a washing of the uterus (womb), and proteins found in the blood. The samples of the wash and the blood will be taken before surgery. After surgery, doctors will determine whether the participant had ovarian cancer or a benign disease of the ovaries. The tests of the washings and the blood will be examined to see how much the participants with ovarian cancer can be separated from the participants with a benign ovarian disease by the tests. Small amounts from the washing and the blood samples will be sent to four sites for analysis.
Statistical analyses of these data will compare tumor DNA found in the washing of the uterus with proteins in the blood to detect cases of ovarian cancer. The primary goal is to find tests that are mostly positive for cases of ovarian cancer and mostly negative for patients with benign disease. It is hoped that if the tests work for participants with symptoms of the disease that these tests will also work when testing women who have no symptoms. A new study would be needed to see if the tests worked in this situation. If the tests work, this could lead to increasing the number of cases detected in early stage disease and decreasing the number of cases detected in late stage disease. If this change in late stage is large, it will likely reduce deaths due to ovarian cancer.
Read the detailed description
The study aims to elucidate the relative contributions to detection of ovarian cancer from tumor DNA in uterine lavage (UL) and protein biomarkers from blood using newly available detection and sample collection technologies. In this document, the term "ovarian cancer" includes fallopian tube cancer. In the first cohort, the study will enroll 200 participants. Enrolling participants prior to surgical diagnosis (e.g. laparoscopy or paracentesis) ensures the study will be "Prospective Collection of Samples, Blinded Evaluation" (PRoBE) compliant. The expectation is that ~50 of these participants will have pathologically confirmed ovarian cancer. In a second cohort, 50 participants will be enrolled. Based on published reports, it is expected that ~5 participants will have microscopic or low volume ovarian cancer. In each cohort, the participants with a pathologic invasive epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis will be defined as Cases and participants without any ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer (PPC), or other cancer identified due to the surgery, will be defined as Controls. Other cancer groups are: (i) PPC, (ii) non-invasive serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) lesions, (iii) non-epithelial ovarian cancers, and (iv) non-ovarian cancers.
Two sites will sequence DNA obtained from uterine lavages to detect tumor-derived DNA (tDNA): one will carry out Duplex Sequencing of TP53 and the second site will carry out Haloplex sequencing of an 18-gene panel. Two other sites will assay serum proteins: the first will use clinical grade assays for CA125 and HE4, and the second will use research grade assays for these two proteins plus four additional protein biomarker candidates. Statistical analyses of these data will evaluate the relative utility of tDNA and plasma proteins to detect Cases (sensitivity) while limiting detection of Controls (specificity) in these two cohorts. Remaining DNA from UL and blood based biospecimens in form of plasma, serum, and buffy coat will be stored at a biorepository at NCI Frederick for future biomarker investigations which include (but are not limited to) other methods of detecting tDNA from UL, tDNA from plasma, exosomal markers, and additional blood-based and UL biomarker candidates.
Primary objectives:
- To collect samples from 200 participants with suspected ovarian cancer (of which ~50 or more are expected to have pathologically confirmed ovarian cancer) and 50 participants undergoing a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (of which ~5 are expected to have microscopic or low volume ovarian cancer).
- To test the tDNA from uterine lavage samples for tumor-derived TP53 mutations, using Duplex sequencing, and for potential abnormalities in an 18-gene panel, using Haloplex sequencing
- To test the serum proteins with two assays: the first will use clinical grade assays for CA125 and HE4, and the second will use research grade assays for these two proteins plus four additional protein biomarker candidates.
Outline: Participants undergo two blood draws (one required, one optional) up to 31 days before surgery and a uterine lavage at the time of planned surgery. The tDNA and serum proteins are then extracted from the samples and sent for analysis.
- Conditions
- Ovarian Neoplasms, Ovarian Epithelial Carcinoma, Fallopian Tube Neoplasms, High Grade Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma, Stage I Ovarian Cancer, Stage II Ovarian Cancer
- Being tested
- Uterine lavage, or a wash of the womb, Blood sample, Pap smear
- Keywords
- Uterine Lavage, Tumor DNA, Serum proteins, Ovarian neoplasms, Ovarian epithelial carcinoma, Ovarian cancer, Ovarian epithelial cancer, Neoplasms, Ovarian diseases, Early detection
- Medical subject headings
- Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Fallopian Tube Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Ovarian Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Uterine lavage, or a wash of the wombDiagnostic test
Uterine lavage is performed during surgery using a flexible, 3-way balloon tipped catheter. The catheter is inserted through the cervix, the balloon expanded and the uterine cavity lavaged using 10 cc of sterile saline which is collected, processed and stored for later analysis.
Blood sampleDiagnostic test
Participants undergo two blood draws (one required, one optional) up to 31 days before surgery
Pap smearDiagnostic test
Participants undergo a standard Papanicolaou smear to collect cells and fluid from the cervix.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pelvic Mass Cohort (cohort #1) | 200 participants scheduled for surgery for suspected ovarian cancer due to a pelvic mass but without a confirmed tissue or cytology diagnosis. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Uterine lavage, or a wash of the womb; Diagnostic Test: Blood sample; Diagnostic Test: Pap smear | |
| BRCA1/2 Carriers Cohort (cohort #2) | 50 participants with an inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 deleterious mutation without suspected ovarian cancers who are scheduled for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to remove ovaries and fallopian tubes. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Uterine lavage, or a wash of the womb; Diagnostic Test: Blood sample; Diagnostic Test: Pap smear |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Genomic biomarkers assessing mutations and methylation of tumor DNA, and protein biomarkers measured as the concentration of a protein in pg/mL, both types of biomarkers measured in the collected biospecimens.
Biomarkers that distinguish between ovarian cancer and benign ovarian disease
Measured: From enrollment through to pathology results post-surgery (usually same day)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Mar 2021
- Study start13 Apr 2020
- Primary completion31 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ovarian NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins University, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Anne Arundel Health System Research Institute, University of Arkansas, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Kaiser Permanente, McGill University, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Swedish Medical Center, Early Detection Research Network
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Steven Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Christos Patriotis, PhD, Study director, National Cancer Institute (NCI)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04794322
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20-450
- Other IDs
- 5U01CA152990, U2CCA271871
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data is not anticipated to be shared.
Publications
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
PubMed 26742998Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Kalsi JK, Amso NN, Apostolidou S, Benjamin E, Cruickshank D, Crump DN, Davies SK, Dawnay A, Dobbs S, Fletcher G, Ford J, Godfrey K, Gunu R, Habib M, Hallett R, Herod J, Jenkins H, Karpinskyj C, Leeson S, Lewis SJ, Liston WR, Lopes A, Mould T, Murdoch J, Oram D, Rabideau DJ, Reynolds K, Scott I, Seif MW, Sharma A, Singh N, Taylor J, Warburton F, Widschwendter M, Williamson K, Woolas R, Fallowfield L, McGuire AJ, Campbell S, Parmar M, Skates SJ. Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):945-956. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01224-6. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
PubMed 26707054Skates SJ. Ovarian cancer screening: development of the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA) and ROCA screening trials. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 May;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S24-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318256488a.
PubMed 22543916Skates SJ, Greene MH, Buys SS, Mai PL, Brown P, Piedmonte M, Rodriguez G, Schorge JO, Sherman M, Daly MB, Rutherford T, Brewster WR, O'Malley DM, Partridge E, Boggess J, Drescher CW, Isaacs C, Berchuck A, Domchek S, Davidson SA, Edwards R, Elg SA, Wakeley K, Phillips KA, Armstrong D, Horowitz I, Fabian CJ, Walker J, Sluss PM, Welch W, Minasian L, Horick NK, Kasten CH, Nayfield S, Alberts D, Finkelstein DM, Lu KH. Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm with Frequent CA125 Testing in Women at Increased Familial Risk - Combined Results from Two Screening Trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3628-3637. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2750. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
PubMed 28143870Rosenthal AN, Fraser LSM, Philpott S, Manchanda R, Burnell M, Badman P, Hadwin R, Rizzuto I, Benjamin E, Singh N, Evans DG, Eccles DM, Ryan A, Liston R, Dawnay A, Ford J, Gunu R, Mackay J, Skates SJ, Menon U, Jacobs IJ; United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study collaborators. Evidence of Stage Shift in Women Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer During Phase II of the United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study. J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 1;35(13):1411-1420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9330. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
PubMed 28240969Maritschnegg E, Wang Y, Pecha N, Horvat R, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Vergote I, Heitz F, Sehouli J, Kinde I, Diaz LA Jr, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Speiser P, Zeillinger R. Lavage of the Uterine Cavity for Molecular Detection of Mullerian Duct Carcinomas: A Proof-of-Concept Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 20;33(36):4293-300. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.3083. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
PubMed 26552420Krimmel JD, Schmitt MW, Harrell MI, Agnew KJ, Kennedy SR, Emond MJ, Loeb LA, Swisher EM, Risques RA. Ultra-deep sequencing detects ovarian cancer cells in peritoneal fluid and reveals somatic TP53 mutations in noncancerous tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):6005-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601311113. Epub 2016 May 5.
PubMed 27152024Risques RA, Kennedy SR. Aging and the rise of somatic cancer-associated mutations in normal tissues. PLoS Genet. 2018 Jan 4;14(1):e1007108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007108. eCollection 2018 Jan.
PubMed 29300727Gilbert L, Basso O, Sampalis J, Karp I, Martins C, Feng J, Piedimonte S, Quintal L, Ramanakumar AV, Takefman J, Grigorie MS, Artho G, Krishnamurthy S; DOvE Study Group. Assessment of symptomatic women for early diagnosis of ovarian cancer: results from the prospective DOvE pilot project. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):285-91. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70333-3. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
PubMed 22257524Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15. doi: 10.1038/nature10166.
PubMed 21720365Kinde I, Bettegowda C, Wang Y, Wu J, Agrawal N, Shih IeM, Kurman R, Dao F, Levine DA, Giuntoli R, Roden R, Eshleman JR, Carvalho JP, Marie SK, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Diaz LA Jr. Evaluation of DNA from the Papanicolaou test to detect ovarian and endometrial cancers. Sci Transl Med. 2013 Jan 9;5(167):167ra4. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004952.
PubMed 23303603Pepe MS "The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction". Oxford University Press (2003)
Gilbert L, Revil T, Meunier C, Jardon K, Zeng X, Martins C, Arseneau J, Fu L, North K, Schiavi A, Ehrensperger E, Artho G, Lee T, Morris D, Ragoussis J. The empress of subterfuge: cancer of the fallopian tube presenting with malapropism. Lancet. 2017 Sep 2;390(10098):1003-1004. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31586-6. No abstract available.
PubMed 28872014Greenwood A, Woodruff ER, Nguyen C, Piper C, Clauset A, Brubaker LW, Behbakht K, Bitler BG. Early Ovarian Cancer Detection in the Age of Fallopian Tube Precursors: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar 1;143(3):e63-e77. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005496. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
PubMed 38176019
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ovarian Cancer Detection by Uterine Lavage DNA and Serum Proteins: a Phase 2 Biomarker Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04794322
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20-450
- Conditions
- Ovarian Neoplasms, Ovarian Epithelial Carcinoma, Fallopian Tube Neoplasms, High Grade Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma, Stage I Ovarian Cancer, Stage II Ovarian Cancer
- Keywords
- Uterine Lavage, Tumor DNA, Serum proteins, Ovarian neoplasms, Ovarian epithelial carcinoma, Ovarian cancer, Ovarian epithelial cancer, Neoplasms
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins University, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Anne Arundel Health System Research Institute, University of Arkansas, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Kaiser Permanente, McGill University, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Swedish Medical Center, Early Detection Research Network
- Study start
- 13 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aims to develop a test for early detection of ovarian cancer using DNA from a growth involving the ovary found in a washing of the uterus (womb), and proteins found in the blood. The samples of the wash and the blood will be taken before surgery. After surgery, doctors will determine whether the participant had ovarian cancer or a benign disease of the ovaries. The tests of the washings and the blood will be examined to see how much the participants with ovarian cancer can be separated from the participants with a benign ovarian disease by the tests. Small amounts from the washing and the blood samples will be sent to four sites for analysis.
Statistical analyses of these data will compare tumor DNA found in the washing of the uterus with proteins in the blood to detect cases of ovarian cancer. The primary goal is to find tests that are mostly positive for cases of ovarian cancer and mostly negative for patients with benign disease. It is hoped that if the tests work for participants with symptoms of the disease that these tests will also work when testing women who have no symptoms. A new study would be needed to see if the tests worked in this situation. If the tests work, this could lead to increasing the number of cases detected in early stage disease and decreasing the number of cases detected in late stage disease. If this change in late stage is large, it will likely reduce deaths due to ovarian cancer.
Detailed description
The study aims to elucidate the relative contributions to detection of ovarian cancer from tumor DNA in uterine lavage (UL) and protein biomarkers from blood using newly available detection and sample collection technologies. In this document, the term "ovarian cancer" includes fallopian tube cancer. In the first cohort, the study will enroll 200 participants. Enrolling participants prior to surgical diagnosis (e.g. laparoscopy or paracentesis) ensures the study will be "Prospective Collection of Samples, Blinded Evaluation" (PRoBE) compliant. The expectation is that ~50 of these participants will have pathologically confirmed ovarian cancer. In a second cohort, 50 participants will be enrolled. Based on published reports, it is expected that ~5 participants will have microscopic or low volume ovarian cancer. In each cohort, the participants with a pathologic invasive epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis will be defined as Cases and participants without any ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer (PPC), or other cancer identified due to the surgery, will be defined as Controls. Other cancer groups are: (i) PPC, (ii) non-invasive serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) lesions, (iii) non-epithelial ovarian cancers, and (iv) non-ovarian cancers.
Two sites will sequence DNA obtained from uterine lavages to detect tumor-derived DNA (tDNA): one will carry out Duplex Sequencing of TP53 and the second site will carry out Haloplex sequencing of an 18-gene panel. Two other sites will assay serum proteins: the first will use clinical grade assays for CA125 and HE4, and the second will use research grade assays for these two proteins plus four additional protein biomarker candidates. Statistical analyses of these data will evaluate the relative utility of tDNA and plasma proteins to detect Cases (sensitivity) while limiting detection of Controls (specificity) in these two cohorts. Remaining DNA from UL and blood based biospecimens in form of plasma, serum, and buffy coat will be stored at a biorepository at NCI Frederick for future biomarker investigations which include (but are not limited to) other methods of detecting tDNA from UL, tDNA from plasma, exosomal markers, and additional blood-based and UL biomarker candidates.
Primary objectives:
- To collect samples from 200 participants with suspected ovarian cancer (of which ~50 or more are expected to have pathologically confirmed ovarian cancer) and 50 participants undergoing a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (of which ~5 are expected to have microscopic or low volume ovarian cancer).
- To test the tDNA from uterine lavage samples for tumor-derived TP53 mutations, using Duplex sequencing, and for potential abnormalities in an 18-gene panel, using Haloplex sequencing
- To test the serum proteins with two assays: the first will use clinical grade assays for CA125 and HE4, and the second will use research grade assays for these two proteins plus four additional protein biomarker candidates.
Outline: Participants undergo two blood draws (one required, one optional) up to 31 days before surgery and a uterine lavage at the time of planned surgery. The tDNA and serum proteins are then extracted from the samples and sent for analysis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pelvic Mass Cohort (cohort #1) | – | Diagnostic Test: Uterine lavage, or a wash of the womb, Diagnostic Test: Blood sample, Diagnostic Test: Pap smear200 participants scheduled for surgery for suspected ovarian cancer due to a pelvic mass but without a confirmed tissue or cytology diagnosis. |
| BRCA1/2 Carriers Cohort (cohort #2) | – | Diagnostic Test: Uterine lavage, or a wash of the womb, Diagnostic Test: Blood sample, Diagnostic Test: Pap smear50 participants with an inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 deleterious mutation without suspected ovarian cancers who are scheduled for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to remove ovaries and fallopian tubes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Cohorts will be selected from patients scheduled for ovarian disorder-related surgeries across six sites: Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts; Luminis Health System in Annapolis, Maryland; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland; Kaiser Permanente - San Francisco in San Francisco, California; the Swedish Medical Center in Seattle, Washington; and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, Arkansas.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Has intact uterus (no history of uterine ablation, tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy)
- Cohort 1 (n=200 participants): Women scheduled for surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected but undiagnosed ovarian/fallopian tube cancer
- Cohort 2 (n=50 participants): Known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carrier scheduled for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Current tissue or cytology diagnostic procedure positive for ovary cancer or any cancer
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Age less than 30 years
- Inability to obtain the minimum amount of blood
- Inability to obtain the minimum amount of uterine lavage sample
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Uterine lavage, or a wash of the wombUterine lavage is performed during surgery using a flexible, 3-way balloon tipped catheter. The catheter is inserted through the cervix, the balloon expanded and the uterine cavity lavaged using 10 cc of sterile saline which is collected, processed and stored for later analysis. | Diagnostic test | BRCA1/2 Carriers Cohort (cohort #2), Pelvic Mass Cohort (cohort #1) |
| Blood sampleParticipants undergo two blood draws (one required, one optional) up to 31 days before surgery | Diagnostic test | BRCA1/2 Carriers Cohort (cohort #2), Pelvic Mass Cohort (cohort #1) |
| Pap smearParticipants undergo a standard Papanicolaou smear to collect cells and fluid from the cervix. | Diagnostic test | BRCA1/2 Carriers Cohort (cohort #2), Pelvic Mass Cohort (cohort #1) |
Primary outcome
Genomic biomarkers assessing mutations and methylation of tumor DNA, and protein biomarkers measured as the concentration of a protein in pg/mL, both types of biomarkers measured in the collected biospecimens.
Time frame: From enrollment through to pathology results post-surgery (usually same day)
Biomarkers that distinguish between ovarian cancer and benign ovarian disease
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2025.
- Background: PubMed 26742998Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
- Background: PubMed 26707054Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Kalsi JK, Amso NN, Apostolidou S, Benjamin E, Cruickshank D, Crump DN, Davies SK, Dawnay A, Dobbs S, Fletcher G, Ford J, Godfrey K, Gunu R, Habib M, Hallett R, Herod J, Jenkins H, Karpinskyj C, Leeson S, Lewis SJ, Liston WR, Lopes A, Mould T, Murdoch J, Oram D, Rabideau DJ, Reynolds K, Scott I, Seif MW, Sharma A, Singh N, Taylor J, Warburton F, Widschwendter M, Williamson K, Woolas R, Fallowfield L, McGuire AJ, Campbell S, Parmar M, Skates SJ. Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):945-956. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01224-6. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
- Background: PubMed 22543916Skates SJ. Ovarian cancer screening: development of the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA) and ROCA screening trials. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 May;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S24-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318256488a.
- Background: PubMed 28143870Skates SJ, Greene MH, Buys SS, Mai PL, Brown P, Piedmonte M, Rodriguez G, Schorge JO, Sherman M, Daly MB, Rutherford T, Brewster WR, O'Malley DM, Partridge E, Boggess J, Drescher CW, Isaacs C, Berchuck A, Domchek S, Davidson SA, Edwards R, Elg SA, Wakeley K, Phillips KA, Armstrong D, Horowitz I, Fabian CJ, Walker J, Sluss PM, Welch W, Minasian L, Horick NK, Kasten CH, Nayfield S, Alberts D, Finkelstein DM, Lu KH. Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm with Frequent CA125 Testing in Women at Increased Familial Risk - Combined Results from Two Screening Trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3628-3637. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2750. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
- Background: PubMed 28240969Rosenthal AN, Fraser LSM, Philpott S, Manchanda R, Burnell M, Badman P, Hadwin R, Rizzuto I, Benjamin E, Singh N, Evans DG, Eccles DM, Ryan A, Liston R, Dawnay A, Ford J, Gunu R, Mackay J, Skates SJ, Menon U, Jacobs IJ; United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study collaborators. Evidence of Stage Shift in Women Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer During Phase II of the United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study. J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 1;35(13):1411-1420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9330. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
- Background: PubMed 26552420Maritschnegg E, Wang Y, Pecha N, Horvat R, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Vergote I, Heitz F, Sehouli J, Kinde I, Diaz LA Jr, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Speiser P, Zeillinger R. Lavage of the Uterine Cavity for Molecular Detection of Mullerian Duct Carcinomas: A Proof-of-Concept Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 20;33(36):4293-300. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.3083. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
- Background: PubMed 27152024Krimmel JD, Schmitt MW, Harrell MI, Agnew KJ, Kennedy SR, Emond MJ, Loeb LA, Swisher EM, Risques RA. Ultra-deep sequencing detects ovarian cancer cells in peritoneal fluid and reveals somatic TP53 mutations in noncancerous tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):6005-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601311113. Epub 2016 May 5.
- Background: PubMed 29300727Risques RA, Kennedy SR. Aging and the rise of somatic cancer-associated mutations in normal tissues. PLoS Genet. 2018 Jan 4;14(1):e1007108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007108. eCollection 2018 Jan.
- Background: PubMed 22257524Gilbert L, Basso O, Sampalis J, Karp I, Martins C, Feng J, Piedimonte S, Quintal L, Ramanakumar AV, Takefman J, Grigorie MS, Artho G, Krishnamurthy S; DOvE Study Group. Assessment of symptomatic women for early diagnosis of ovarian cancer: results from the prospective DOvE pilot project. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):285-91. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70333-3. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
- Background: PubMed 21720365Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15. doi: 10.1038/nature10166.
- Background: PubMed 23303603Kinde I, Bettegowda C, Wang Y, Wu J, Agrawal N, Shih IeM, Kurman R, Dao F, Levine DA, Giuntoli R, Roden R, Eshleman JR, Carvalho JP, Marie SK, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Diaz LA Jr. Evaluation of DNA from the Papanicolaou test to detect ovarian and endometrial cancers. Sci Transl Med. 2013 Jan 9;5(167):167ra4. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004952.
- BackgroundPepe MS "The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction". Oxford University Press (2003)
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data is not anticipated to be shared.
Related trials for Ovarian Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Culturally-Informed Counseling in Latinas at High Risk for Hereditary Breast or Ovarian Cancer
No Evidence of Disease, BRCA1 Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Surgery and Chemotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy After Surgery in Treating Patients With Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Uterine, or Peritoneal Cancer
FIGO Stage IVA Ovarian Cancer, FIGO Stage IVB Ovarian Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Targeted Therapy Directed by Genetic Testing in Treating Patients With Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors, Lymphomas, or Multiple Myeloma (The MATCH Screening Trial)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Administering Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes Transduced With a CD70-Binding Chimeric Antigen Receptor to People With CD70 Expressing Cancers
Pancreatic Cancer, Renal Cell Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Hydrochloride With Atezolizumab and/or Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
Fallopian Tube High Grade Serous Adenocarcinoma, Ovarian High Grade Serous Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Christos Patriotis, PhD study director
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Ovarian Neoplasms and Ovarian Epithelial Carcinoma, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 6 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jackie Dahlgren (206 667 3438, jdahlgre@fredhutch.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Genomic biomarkers assessing mutations and methylation of tumor DNA, and protein biomarkers measured as the concentration of a protein in pg/mL, both types of biomarkers measured in the collected biospecimens. (time frame: From enrollment through to pathology results post-surgery (usually same day)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04794322, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.