AzTrials
AzTrials

Living Kidney DonationNCT04791670

eHealth Usability in Living Kidney Donation

An observational study of Living Kidney Donation, run by Helsinki University Central Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Several web portals for patients are available, but an assessment of their performance is scarce. This is of particular interest among candidates for kidney living donation. A crucial aspect of living donation is to provide standardized information about the risks of the procedure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Living Kidney Donation
What is being tested?
survey study
How many people
122 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Mar 2021to Oct 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All living donor candidates who contacted the living donor transplant coordinator, and were considered initially suitable for kidney donation.

Who may be able to join

  • Living donor candidates from Helsinki area, from 2019 onwards

Who cannot join

  • Living donor candidates from other areas of the country
  • non-Finnish speakers

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Fernanda Ortiz, PhD, MD contact

+358504270795

fernanda.ortiz@hus.fi

Guido Giunti, PhD, MD contact

+358469213799

guido.giunti@oulu.fi

About this study

Official title: USABILITY OF AN INTERACTIVE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY FOR KIDNEY LIVING DONORS ASSESSMENT: TOWARDS A STANDARDIZED INFORMED PROCESS

Several web portals for patients are available, but an assessment of their performance is scarce. This is of particular interest among candidates for kidney living donation. A crucial aspect of living donation is to provide standardized information about the risks of the procedure. In 2019 it was launched a personalized digital care path for kidney living candidates, which contains information about the donation process and facilitates the communication between clinicians, transplant coordinators, and patients, enabling telemedicine.

We aim to investigate living donor candidates' experience with the Health Village web portal and the digital care path for living donor candidates. The secondary aim is to investigate their attitude of living donor candidates to eHealth services.

Read the detailed description

Background. Several web portals for kidney patients are available, but an assessment of their performance is scarce. This is of particular interest among candidates for kidney living donation. A crucial aspect of living donation is to provide standardized information about the risks of the procedure. In Finland, the web portal Health Village contains general information about kidney diseases. In 2019 it was launched a personalized digital care path for kidney living candidates, which contains information about the donation process and facilitates the communication between clinicians, transplant coordinators, and patients, enabling telemedicine. The performance of this eHealth service has not yet been studied.

Objectives. to investigate living donor candidates' experience with the web portal Health Village and the digital care path for living donor candidates. The secondary aim is to investigate their attitude of living donor candidates to eHealth services.

Methods. A prospective cross sectional survey study. Participants will be all kidney donor candidates who have used the digital care path since its implementation in January 2019 up to 1.3.2021 (N=122). The surveys will include general data, the type of electronic devices in possession and the purpose of use. eHealth literacy will be assessed with the eHeals questionnaire. Platform's ease of use will be assessed with the System Usability Scale, and participants´ opinion about the digital path utility with six questions. These items will be answered with a Likert-scale. Finally, we added an open question for qualitative analysis.

Being tested
survey study
Keywords
eHealth, value-based healthcare

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • survey studyOther

    The surveys will include general data, the type of electronic devices in possession and the purpose of use. eHealth literacy will be assessed with the eHeals questionnaire. Platform's ease of use will be assessed with the System Usability Scale, and participants´ opinion about the digital path utility with six questions. These items will be answered with a Likert-scale. Finally, we added an open question for qualitative analysis.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient´s experience

    Measured with Likert scale

    Measured: 4 months

  2. Patient´s e-Health literature

    Measured with Likert scale

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Gender differences

    to assess gender differences in the use of eHealth

    Measured: 4 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2021
  2. Study startMar 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMay 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
122 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04791670
Sponsor's protocol ID
eHealth/HUS/501
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
7 Mar 2021
Last updated
10 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: In the near future, we plan to extend the use of the digital care path nationwide. This might allow the participation of other centers in the future.

Publications

  • Ortiz F, Grasberger J, Ekstrand A, Helantera I, Giunti G. Interactive Health Technology Tool for Kidney Living Donor Assessment to Standardize the Informed Consent Process: Usability and Qualitative Content Analysis. JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 9;8:e47785. doi: 10.2196/47785.

    PubMed 38981119
  • Ortiz F, Giunti G. Usability assessment of an interactive health technology for kidney living donors: protocol for a prospective cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 3;12(1):e051166. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051166.

    PubMed 34980611

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Living Kidney Donation, run by Helsinki University Central Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Fernanda Ortiz, PhD, MD (+358504270795, fernanda.ortiz@hus.fi), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient´s experience (time frame: 4 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04791670, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in