Acute Myocardial InfarctionCMR-AMINCT04788940
Clinical Implication CMR in AMI Registry
An observational study of Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
1. To evaluate the clinical implication of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction 2. To determine factors affecting the 6-month remodeling index assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 8 Mar 2021to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: About 500 patients with acute myocardial infarction and who underwent PCI.
Who may be able to join
- Subjects diagnosed as type 1 myocardial infarction the presence of acute myocardial injury detected by abnormal cardiac biomarkers in the setting of evidence of acute myocardial ischemia.
Who cannot join
- Patients who cannot perform cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
- Target vessel is not suitable for coronary intervention
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06351
Young Bin Song, MD, PhD, 82-10-3410-3419, youngbin.song@gmail.com
Ki Hong Choi, MD, 82-10-8875-1648, cardiokh@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Clinical Implication of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Prospective Observational Study
- To evaluate the clinical implication of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction
- To determine factors affecting the 6-month remodeling index assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Read the detailed description
To date, advances in medical treatment and reperfusion therapy led to markedly decreased morbidity and mortality rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Nevertheless, there is a deterioration of left ventricular systolic function or development of heart failure in 40-50% of surviving patients with AMI after the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and it is related to infarct size at the index procedure. Conventional methods of measuring the infarct size included electrocardiogram, peak cardiac enzyme, and echocardiography, but these do not indicate the exact irreversible tissue damage and only suggest indirect parameters. However, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) provides information on infarct size, microvascular obstruction, transmurality, and salvage index, and discriminative function between viable and non-viable myocardium with high spatial resolution. Also, magnetic resonance imaging is used as a gold standard for the evaluation of the myocardial remodeling index. However, it is not well known in which patients occur adverse remodeling for the myocardium and in which patients occur reverse remodeling. Therefore, the investigators sought to evaluate the clinical implication of CMR and to determine factors affecting the 6-month remodeling index assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging through the current registry.
- Conditions
- Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Keywords
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous Coronary InterventionProcedure or surgery
Patients with AMI who underwent PCI and CMR at index hospitalization and 6-month follow-up
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AMI patients treated with PCI | Acute myocardial infarction patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging Receives: Procedure: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in proportion of adverse/reverse remodeling at 6 months
Remodeling index assessed by baseline and follow-up CMR
Measured: at 6-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (28)
Infarct size
Infarct size assessed by baseline CMR
Measured: 72 hours after the index procedure
Myocardial salvage index
Myocardial salvage index assessed by baseline CMR
Measured: 72 hours after the index procedure
Microvascular obstruction
Microvascular obstruction assessed by baseline CMR
Measured: 72 hours after the index procedure
Hemorrhagic infarct
Hemorrhagic infarct assessed by baseline CMR
Measured: 72 hours after the index procedure
Transmurality
Transmurality assessed by baseline CMR
Measured: 72 hours after the index procedure
Peak cardiac enzyme
Peak cardiac enzyme at index hospitalization
Measured: 72 hours after the index procedure
TIMI flow
TIMI flow grade after culprit vessel PCI
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
Changes of LVEDV on CMR
∆left ventricular end diastolic volume assessed by baseline and follow-up CMR
Measured: at 6-month follow-up
Changes of LVESV on CMR
∆left ventricular end systolic volume assessed by baseline and follow-up CMR
Measured: at 6-month follow-up
6-month Infarct size
Infarct size assessed by 6-month CMR
Measured: at 6-month follow-up
6-month myocardial salvage index
myocardial salvage index assessed by 6-month CMR
Measured: at 6-month follow-up
6-month microvascular obstruction
6-month microvascular obstruction assessed by 6-month CMR
Measured: at 6-month follow-up
6-month hemorrhagic infarct
6-month hemorrhagic infarct assessed by 6-month CMR
Measured: at 6-month follow-up
Changes of LVEDV on echocardiography
∆left ventricular end diastolic volume assessed by baseline and follow-up echocardiography
Measured: at 6-month follow-up
Changes of LVESV on echocardiography
∆left ventricular end systolic volume assessed by baseline and follow-up echocardiography
Measured: at 6-month follow-up
Changes of LVEF on echocardiography
∆left ventricular ejection fraction assessed by baseline and follow-up echocardiography
Measured: at 6-month follow-up
Cardiac death or heart failure readmission
Cardiac death or heart failure readmission during follow-up
Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment
All-cause death or heart failure readmission
All-cause death or heart failure readmission during follow-up
Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Target lesion failure
a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization
Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment
target vessel failure
a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization
Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment
All-cause death
Rate of all-cause death during follow-up
Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Cardiac death
Rate of cardiac death during follow-up
Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Myocardial infarction
Myocardial infarction during follow-up
Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Target vessel myocardial infarction
Rate of Target vessel myocardial infarction during follow-up
Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Target lesion revascularization
Rate of target lesion revascularization during follow-up
Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Target vessel revascularization
Rate of target vessel revascularization during follow-up
Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Heart failure readmission
Rate of heart failure readmission during follow-up
Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Any readmission
Rate of any readmission during follow-up
Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2021
- Study start8 Mar 2021
- Primary completion30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Samsung Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Young Bin Song, Samsung Medical Center
- Investigators
- Young Bin Song, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Samsung Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04788940
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CMR-AMI 2021
- Acronym
- CMR-AMI
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 12 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Implication of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Prospective Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04788940
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CMR-AMI / CMR-AMI 2021
- Conditions
- Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Keywords
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- To evaluate the clinical implication of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction
- To determine factors affecting the 6-month remodeling index assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Detailed description
To date, advances in medical treatment and reperfusion therapy led to markedly decreased morbidity and mortality rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Nevertheless, there is a deterioration of left ventricular systolic function or development of heart failure in 40-50% of surviving patients with AMI after the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and it is related to infarct size at the index procedure. Conventional methods of measuring the infarct size included electrocardiogram, peak cardiac enzyme, and echocardiography, but these do not indicate the exact irreversible tissue damage and only suggest indirect parameters. However, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) provides information on infarct size, microvascular obstruction, transmurality, and salvage index, and discriminative function between viable and non-viable myocardium with high spatial resolution. Also, magnetic resonance imaging is used as a gold standard for the evaluation of the myocardial remodeling index. However, it is not well known in which patients occur adverse remodeling for the myocardium and in which patients occur reverse remodeling. Therefore, the investigators sought to evaluate the clinical implication of CMR and to determine factors affecting the 6-month remodeling index assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging through the current registry.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AMI patients treated with PCI | – | Procedure: Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAcute myocardial infarction patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- About 500 patients with acute myocardial infarction and who underwent PCI.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subjects diagnosed as type 1 myocardial infarction the presence of acute myocardial injury detected by abnormal cardiac biomarkers in the setting of evidence of acute myocardial ischemia.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who cannot perform cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
- Target vessel is not suitable for coronary intervention
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous Coronary InterventionPatients with AMI who underwent PCI and CMR at index hospitalization and 6-month follow-up | Procedure or surgery | AMI patients treated with PCI |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in proportion of adverse/reverse remodeling at 6 months
Time frame: at 6-month follow-up
Remodeling index assessed by baseline and follow-up CMR
28 secondary outcomes
Infarct size
Time frame: 72 hours after the index procedure
Myocardial salvage index
Time frame: 72 hours after the index procedure
Microvascular obstruction
Time frame: 72 hours after the index procedure
Hemorrhagic infarct
Time frame: 72 hours after the index procedure
Transmurality
Time frame: 72 hours after the index procedure
Peak cardiac enzyme
Time frame: 72 hours after the index procedure
TIMI flow
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
Changes of LVEDV on CMR
Time frame: at 6-month follow-up
Changes of LVESV on CMR
Time frame: at 6-month follow-up
6-month Infarct size
Time frame: at 6-month follow-up
6-month myocardial salvage index
Time frame: at 6-month follow-up
6-month microvascular obstruction
Time frame: at 6-month follow-up
6-month hemorrhagic infarct
Time frame: at 6-month follow-up
Changes of LVEDV on echocardiography
Time frame: at 6-month follow-up
Changes of LVESV on echocardiography
Time frame: at 6-month follow-up
Changes of LVEF on echocardiography
Time frame: at 6-month follow-up
Cardiac death or heart failure readmission
Time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment
All-cause death or heart failure readmission
Time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Target lesion failure
Time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment
target vessel failure
Time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment
All-cause death
Time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Cardiac death
Time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Myocardial infarction
Time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Target vessel myocardial infarction
Time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Target lesion revascularization
Time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Target vessel revascularization
Time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Heart failure readmission
Time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Any readmission
Time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Apr 2023.
Related trials for Acute Myocardial Infarction
RecruitingObservational study
Changes in Skeletal Muscle Thickness in Patients With Acute Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Muscle Atrophy
Recruiting
Routine Versus Provisional Distal Perfusion Catheter Placement in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support
Cardiogenic Shock, Acute Myocardial Infarction of Inferior Wall
Recruiting
Ezetimibe Utilization Early After Acute Myocardial Infarction, "EzAMI Trial"
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Dyslipidemias
Not yet recruitingObservational study
iLITE, Clinical Performance of the Angiolite™ Drug-Eluting Stent
PCI Patients, de Novo Coronary Lesions
Active, not recruiting
Point-of-Care Troponin Testing in the Emergency Department
Acute Coronary Syndromes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Young Bin Song, MD, PhD principal investigator
Samsung Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Young Bin Song, MD, PhD (82-2-3410-1246, youngbin.song@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in proportion of adverse/reverse remodeling at 6 months (time frame: at 6-month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2023.