AzTrials
AzTrials

CopdNCT04785469

Eccentric Training in Individuals With COPD

A study testing Low-load eccentric training in people with Copd, run by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Skeletal muscle dysfunction as a systemic consequence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has a major impact on quality of life, health care resource utilization, and mortality of patients with this disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Copd
What is being tested?
Low-load eccentric training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
13 Sep 2021to 30 Nov 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • COPD diagnosis (GOLD stage: II-III-IV), defined as post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity < 0.7 and FEV1 < 80% predicted.

Who cannot join

  • Restrictive lung disease, unstable conditions, recent exacerbation, infection, embolism, pneumothorax, thoracic or abdominal surgery (less than 3 months before recruitment).
  • Cardiologic conditions like myocardial infarction (less than 6 months before recruitment), heart failure, or severe angina.
  • Inability of perform the exercise training (e.g. orthopaedic conditions).
  • Incapability to understand the instructions required to carry out the tests and assessments planned.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi

    Milan, 20100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Impact of a Low-load Eccentric Training Program on Peripheral Muscle Function in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Skeletal muscle dysfunction as a systemic consequence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has a major impact on quality of life, health care resource utilization, and mortality of patients with this disease. In fact, a vicious circle of inactivity and disuse is established in the advanced stages of the disease, inducing a progressive decline in exercise tolerance and a loss of muscle mass (especially in locomotor muscles), resulting in the inability of patients to perform even the simplest daily activities.

In this context, the multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach includes not only recovery of exercise capacity but also training aimed at restoring muscle function in patients with COPD. However, there is considerable methodological variability among muscle resistance training programs used in clinical practice with patients with COPD. This is compounded by the need to identify alternative training strategies effective in inducing functional adaptation in skeletal muscle without increasing the degree of dyspnea or fatigue in those symptomatic patients with advanced stages of disease. Among these, eccentric exercise or negative work, i.e. the stretching of the muscle during the active contraction phase, represents a valid alternative to traditional concentric training in various rehabilitation contexts. The main advantages of this training method are: 1) eccentric contraction is able to produce greater forces than isometric and concentric contraction; 2) for the same resistance, eccentric contraction has a lower metabolic cost than concentric contraction. For these reasons, eccentric exercise is a valid method of muscle strengthening in rehabilitation and in particular in those subjects unable to sustain a high cardiorespiratory effort, as in the case of patients with moderate-severe COPD. Previous studies have also shown that eccentric exercise, even at low load, produces results equivalent if not superior to traditional training with respect to some particular characteristics of muscle function such as power and hypertrophy.

Read more

However, eccentric training programs for muscle dysfunction recovery in patients with COPD are underused in clinical practice, so far. In contrast, the so called iso-weight eccentric training, more suitable for clinical practice, could also be applied to rehabilitation programs designed for COPD patients.

The aim of this study is therefore to evaluate the reliability and efficacy of a low-load eccentric exercise training program compared to usual care for the improvement of muscle function in patients with COPD.

Conditions
Copd
Being tested
Low-load eccentric training, Usual care
Keywords
Copd, Pulmonary rehabilitation, Muscle strength, Resistance training
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Low-load eccentric trainingOther

    • Aerobic exercise training on a downhill walking treadmill with the following settings: 10% negative incline and constant speed corresponding to 75% of the average speed recorded during the initial 6-Minute walk test.
    • Resistance training: 5 minutes of warm-up on the manual ergometer, then 3 sets for 10 repetitions of the leg extension (performed unilaterally in eccentric phase) with a load of 75% of 1 repetition maximum (concentric) for the first two weeks. The following two weeks, 3 sets for 10 repetitions will be performed on the leg press (performed unilaterally in the eccentric phase) with 75% load of 1 repetition maximum (concentric). In addition, patients will perform 3 upper extremity strengthening exercises (free weights or elastic bands), including 2 sets of 10 repetitions for each exercise.
  • Usual careOther

    • Aerobic exercise training using the cycle ergometer at an intensity calculated as follows: 2 minutes with load equal to 20% of maximum load, then 25 minutes with initial load at 50% of maximum load calculated as 103.217 + (30.500xGender) + (-1.613xAge) + [0.002x6-Minute walk work (6MWW)]. [Sex: female = 0; male:1] [6MWW = 6-Minute walk distance x weight in kg].
    • Resistance training: 5 minutes of warm-up on the manual ergometer, then 5 exercises for upper and lower limbs performed with free weights or elastic bands. For the first 2 weeks will be performed 2 sets X 20 repetitions with 1 minute break between sets and a load that allows to perform no more than 20 repetitions. For the following 2 weeks, 3 sets of 10 repetitions x 10 repetitions with 2 min break between sets and a load that allows for no more than 10 repetitions.
Study groups in NCT04785469
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Eccentric training groupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Low-load eccentric training
Control groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Usual care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximal muscle strength

    Isometric peak torque of the quadriceps.

    Measured: Change from baseline up to 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Six-minute walk distance

    The distance that an individual can walk on an indoor 30-m flat corridor for a 6-min period.

    Measured: Change from baseline up to 4 weeks

  2. Mobility function

    The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a test made by 3 components (standing balance, 4-m gait speed, and 5-repetitions sit-to-stand) measured by total time and kinematic parameters.

    Measured: Change from baseline up to 4 weeks

  3. Muscle function

    Measures of muscle accuracy and steadiness intended as the ability to control muscle force performing submaximal contractions during standardized tasks.

    Measured: Change from baseline up to 4 weeks

  4. Body composition

    Fat-free mass Index (FFM; calculated as the sum of lean mass and bone mineral mass)

    Measured: Change from baseline up to 4 weeks

  5. Airways resistance

    Measure of airway Resistance [Rrs (cmH2O/L/s)]

    Measured: Change from baseline up to 4 weeks

  6. Airways reactance

    Measure of airway Reactance [Xrs (cmH2O/L/s)]

    Measured: Change from baseline up to 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2021
  2. Study start13 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2022
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04785469
Sponsor's protocol ID
Eccentric Training_COPD_FDG
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
2 Mar 2021
Last updated
16 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Maltais F, Decramer M, Casaburi R, Barreiro E, Burelle Y, Debigare R, Dekhuijzen PN, Franssen F, Gayan-Ramirez G, Gea J, Gosker HR, Gosselink R, Hayot M, Hussain SN, Janssens W, Polkey MI, Roca J, Saey D, Schols AM, Spruit MA, Steiner M, Taivassalo T, Troosters T, Vogiatzis I, Wagner PD; ATS/ERS Ad Hoc Committee on Limb Muscle Dysfunction in COPD. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: update on limb muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 May 1;189(9):e15-62. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0373ST.

    PubMed 24787074
  • Barreiro E, Gea J. Respiratory and Limb Muscle Dysfunction in COPD. COPD. 2015 Aug;12(4):413-26. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2014.974737.

    PubMed 25438125
  • Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, ZuWallack R, Nici L, Rochester C, Hill K, Holland AE, Lareau SC, Man WD, Pitta F, Sewell L, Raskin J, Bourbeau J, Crouch R, Franssen FM, Casaburi R, Vercoulen JH, Vogiatzis I, Gosselink R, Clini EM, Effing TW, Maltais F, van der Palen J, Troosters T, Janssen DJ, Collins E, Garcia-Aymerich J, Brooks D, Fahy BF, Puhan MA, Hoogendoorn M, Garrod R, Schols AM, Carlin B, Benzo R, Meek P, Morgan M, Rutten-van Molken MP, Ries AL, Make B, Goldstein RS, Dowson CA, Brozek JL, Donner CF, Wouters EF; ATS/ERS Task Force on Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct 15;188(8):e13-64. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST.

    PubMed 24127811
  • Bourbeau J, De Sousa Sena R, Taivassalo T, Richard R, Jensen D, Baril J, Rocha Vieira DS, Perrault H. Eccentric versus conventional cycle training to improve muscle strength in advanced COPD: A randomized clinical trial. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020 May;276:103414. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2020.103414. Epub 2020 Feb 9.

    PubMed 32050099
  • Roig M, Shadgan B, Reid WD. Eccentric exercise in patients with chronic health conditions: a systematic review. Physiother Can. 2008 Spring;60(2):146-60. doi: 10.3138/physio.60.2.146. Epub 2008 Oct 10.

    PubMed 20145778
  • LaStayo P, Marcus R, Dibble L, Frajacomo F, Lindstedt S. Eccentric exercise in rehabilitation: safety, feasibility, and application. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Jun 1;116(11):1426-34. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2013. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

    PubMed 23823152
  • Ellis R, Shields N, Lim K, Dodd KJ. Eccentric exercise in adults with cardiorespiratory disease: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Dec;29(12):1178-97. doi: 10.1177/0269215515574783. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

    PubMed 25758944
  • Raj IS, Bird SR, Westfold BA, Shield AJ. Effects of eccentrically biased versus conventional weight training in older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jun;44(6):1167-76. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182442ecd.

    PubMed 22143107
  • Douglas J, Pearson S, Ross A, McGuigan M. Chronic Adaptations to Eccentric Training: A Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2017 May;47(5):917-941. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0628-4.

    PubMed 27647157
  • Franchi MV, Maffiuletti NA. Distinct modalities of eccentric exercise: different recipes, not the same dish. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019 Sep 1;127(3):881-883. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00093.2019. Epub 2019 May 9. No abstract available.

    PubMed 31070957
  • Luxton N, Alison JA, Wu J, Mackey MG. Relationship between field walking tests and incremental cycle ergometry in COPD. Respirology. 2008 Nov;13(6):856-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2008.01355.x.

    PubMed 18811884
  • Medina-Mirapeix F, Bernabeu-Mora R, Llamazares-Herran E, Sanchez-Martinez MP, Garcia-Vidal JA, Escolar-Reina P. Interobserver Reliability of Peripheral Muscle Strength Tests and Short Physical Performance Battery in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Observational Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Nov;97(11):2002-2005. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 30.

    PubMed 27255806
  • Franssen FM, Rutten EP, Groenen MT, Vanfleteren LE, Wouters EF, Spruit MA. New reference values for body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis in the general population: results from the UK Biobank. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jun;15(6):448.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 Apr 20.

    PubMed 24755478
  • Tracy BL, Enoka RM. Older adults are less steady during submaximal isometric contractions with the knee extensor muscles. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Mar;92(3):1004-12. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00954.2001.

    PubMed 11842033
  • Puente-Maestu L, Palange P, Casaburi R, Laveneziana P, Maltais F, Neder JA, O'Donnell DE, Onorati P, Porszasz J, Rabinovich R, Rossiter HB, Singh S, Troosters T, Ward S. Use of exercise testing in the evaluation of interventional efficacy: an official ERS statement. Eur Respir J. 2016 Feb;47(2):429-60. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00745-2015. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

    PubMed 26797036

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Low-load eccentric training in people with Copd, run by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximal muscle strength (time frame: Change from baseline up to 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04785469, which also lists 17 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in