AzTrials
AzTrials

Muscle Type Temporomandibular DisordersPhase 2/3NCT04777838

Myofascial Pain Patients' Response to the Administration of Low Doses of Amitriptyline and Citalopram Compared With the Use of Bite Splint

A Phase 2/3 study testing Citalopram 10 MG, Amitriptyline and Bite Splint in people with Muscle Type Temporomandibular Disorders and Myofascial Pain of the Masticatory Muscles, run by University of Coimbra at 1 site in Portugal.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is evaluate the effectiveness of the use of antidepressants in the treatment of muscle type temporomandibular disorders, with a sample of 60 to 80 participants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Citalopram 10 MG, Amitriptyline and Bite Splint
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 sitePortugal
Study dates
Mar 2021to May 2021
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients treated at the Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC);
  • Patients who, according to the diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular disorder (DC/TMD) , present Myofascial pain in the masticatory muscles for more than 6 months;
  • Adult patients

Who cannot join

  • Under 18 years old;
  • Pregnants,
  • Patients who have related adverse effects to the citalopram and/or amitriptyline;
  • Patients presenting severe diseases like coronary pathology, renal insufficiency, active cancer, respiratory insufficiency;
  • Patients who have been treated to myofascial pain before

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Bruno M Sousa contact

+351962607005

bsousa@fmed.uc.pt

Portugal1 site
  • CHUC - Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra

    Coimbra, 3000-075

    Bruno M Sousa, PhD, +351962018985, bsousa@fmed.uc.pt

Other trials in Portugal

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of the Use of Antidepressants in the Treatment of Muscle Type Temporomandibular Disorders

The aim of this study is evaluate the effectiveness of the use of antidepressants in the treatment of muscle type temporomandibular disorders, with a sample of 60 to 80 participants.

Read the detailed description

Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) involve alterations of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), masticatory muscles, and related structures.

Epidemiologic data indicates that 33% of the general population has at least one symptom of a temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and 6% to 7% have TMDs severe enough to seek specific treatment.

The etiology of pain and disability in myofascial pain is understood via a bio- psychosocial model reflecting a complex interaction between physical, behavioral, social, and psychological factors. In turn, the treatment of myofascial pain is often multimodal.

Ongoing pain may be associated with co-morbid conditions such as anxiety, depression and sleeplessness. It is important to recognize and treat emotional distress as well as physical symptoms. Chronic pain and depression seem to share common neurochemical substrata and perhaps even similar dysfunctional alterations.

Chronic syndromes such as bruxism and TMD are commonly associated with depression. Research Investigator reported that 39% of patients with TMD are moderately to severely depressed and 55% have moderate to severe somatization symptoms. A cross-cultural study by List and Dworkin supported these findings, showing that 45% of Swedish patients and 51% of American patients who met the diagnostic criteria for TMD also suffered from moderate to severe depression.

If pain assumes a chronic nature, more centrally mediated mechanisms take effect, for which peripherally acting analgesics have less efficacy. The clinician must recognize the involved alterations in pain characteristics, such as quality, duration, and intensity, as peripheral pain becomes more continuous, diffuse, and difficult to localize. In such instances, the possibility of new targets for treatment emerges.

The prominence of tryciclic antidepressants (TCAs) as a first-line treatment has declined over time and the introduction of more tolerable medications such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has been done. TCAs are still used today, but they are most commonly prescribed for patients whose depression does not respond to SSRIs or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). TCAs are also used to treat depressed patients with somatization pain or insomnia, due to their low addictive risk and sedative and analgesic qualities; however, TCAs are associated with a high suicide risk when taken in overdose.

For the past several years, tricyclic antidepressants have been used successfully to manage and control a variety of chronic pain conditions. Research Investigators reported that a pharmacological protocol for the control of pain associated with chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMD) based on the use of amitriptyline and found that 25 mg/day of amitriptyline was sufficient to significantly reduce the pain of chronic TMD without producing side effects.

Research Investigator showed that 75 mg of amitriptyline provided significantly more pain relief than 25 or 50mg in patients with chronic pain. However, the patients on higher doses also had more adverse events such as dry mouth and drowsiness. It should also be kept in mind that no dose-response relation- ship has been demonstrated for the antidepressant or mood effects of amitriptyline.

Research Investigator compared the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and amitriptyline in combination and separately in patients with chronic TMD. They discovered improvements in all subgroups (CBT alone, amitriptyline alone, CBT plus amitriptyline, and the placebo group) with an average decrease in pain intensity of 55%. The combination group of CBT plus amitriptyline, however, was the only group that continued to show improved scores on the visual analog pain scale at the follow-up 4 weeks after treatment was completed.

The neurotransmitter serotonin regulates a wide range of functions including sleep, temperature, and mood. Based on that we could suggest that it has a positive impact on Chronic Pain patients. However, Serotonin also suppresses dopamine release from the mesocortical tract, which can result in serotonin-induced disinhibition of movement. In other words, dopamine functions to prevent spontaneous movements, but if serotonin inhibits the action of dopamine, then spontaneous movements can occur. This is thought to be one of the most plausible mechanisms involved in the repetitive muscle contractions seen in bruxism. This mechanism also explains how the SSRIs, which increase concentrations of serotonin, have the ability to deregulate movement and induce bruxism.

Being tested
Citalopram 10 MG, Amitriptyline, Bite Splint

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Citalopram 10 MGDrug

    10 mg of citalopram every day

  • AmitriptylineDrug

    25mg of Amitriptyline every

  • Bite SplintDevice

    Night use of occlusal splint

Study groups in NCT04777838
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CitalopramActive comparatorCitalopram 10mg
Receives: Drug: Citalopram 10 MG
AmitriptylineActive comparatorAmitritptyline 25 mg
Receives: Drug: Amitriptyline
Bite SplintActive comparatorMichigan Splint, nocturnal use
Receives: Device: Bite Splint

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain intensity

    Pain intensity according to a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  2. Pain intensity

    Pain intensity according to a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  3. Pain intensity

    Pain intensity according to a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10.

    Measured: 9 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2021
  2. Study startMar 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMay 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04777838
Sponsor's protocol ID
ADP2021
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
10 Feb 2021
Last updated
2 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Citalopram 10 MG, Amitriptyline and Bite Splint in people with Muscle Type Temporomandibular Disorders and Myofascial Pain of the Masticatory Muscles, run by University of Coimbra at 1 site in Portugal.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Bruno M Sousa (+351962607005, bsousa@fmed.uc.pt), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain intensity (time frame: 3 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in