AzTrials
AzTrials

Cognitive ImpairmentNCT04773015

A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of VIZAMYL™ Reader Training Programme in Europe

An observational study of Cognitive Impairment, run by GE Healthcare at 10 sites in 5 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a study to determine the effectiveness of the VIZAMYL™ reader training programme in clinical practice in Europe Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cognitive Impairment
How many people
227 participants
Where
10 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
11 Dec 2018to 7 Dec 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: tertiary referral

Who may be able to join

  • The subject is an adult (aged 18 years or older) of any race or gender and has been referred for a VIZAMYL™ PET brain scan as part of the assessment of his/her cognitive impairment.
  • The VIZAMYL™ scan was ordered as part of the clinical care of the subject and is not exclusively for a clinical trial.
  • If informed consent is required by the local IEC, the subject, or his/her legally authorised representative, is willing and able to sign consent for use of their de-identified VIZAMYL™ PET images and associated anatomic images (brain CT and/or MRI) used in the interpretation of the VIZAMYL™ images as well as de-identified demographic information.

Who cannot join

  • If informed consent is required by the local IEC, the subject (or representative) is not willing to consent to their de-identified images and other data being used in this study.

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 5 countries.

10 sites in 5 countries

Italy3 sites
  • Ospedal Mons Dimicolli - Barletta

    Barletta, 70051

  • U.O. Medicina Nucleare- ASSST Spedali Civili P.O. di Brescia

    Brescia, 25123

  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - S.O.D. Patologia Medica

    Florence, 50134

Other trials in Italy

Spain3 sites
  • Vall d'Hebron University Hospital

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

    Barcelona, 08907

  • Clinica Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona, 31008

Other trials in Spain

Austria2 sites
  • Kepler Universittsklinikum Neuromed Campus

    Linz, Wagner-Jauregg-Weg, 4020

  • Landeskrankenhaus Vocklabruck

    Vöcklabruck, 4840

Other trials in Austria

Finland1 site
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital

    Helsinki, 00209

Other trials in Finland

Netherlands1 site
  • Catharina Ziekenhuis

    Eindhoven, 5623

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: A Post-Authorisation Safety Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of VIZAMYL™ Reader Training in Europe

This is a study to determine the effectiveness of the VIZAMYL™ reader training programme in clinical practice in Europe

Read the detailed description

This study is a combination of Prospective and Retrospective models.

Keywords
Vizamyl, flutemetamol, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive impairment, dementia
Medical subject headings
Cognitive Dysfunction, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of VIZAMYL™ PET Image Interpretations Made by Clinical Readers

    Accuracy was estimated as 100 percent (%) *(number of true positives [TP] + number of true negatives [TN]) / (number of TP + number of TN + number of false positives [FP] + number of false negatives [FN]). The data presented are the point estimates representing percentage of accuracy, with Measure Type "Number" and 95% exact binomial confidence interval. These have been estimated using Clopper-Pearson method.

    Measured: Up to 1093 days

  2. Sensitivity of VIZAMYL™ PET Image Interpretations Made by Clinical Readers

    Sensitivity was defined as 100%*number of TP / (number of TP + number of FN). The data presented are the point estimates representing percentage sensitivity, with Measure Type "Number" and 95% exact binomial confidence interval. These have been estimated using Clopper-Pearson method.

    Measured: Up to 1093 days

  3. Specificity of VIZAMYL™ PET Image Interpretations Made by Clinical Readers

    Specificity was defined as 100%*number of TN / (number of TN + number of FP). The data presented are the point estimates representing the percentage specificity, with Measure Type "Number" and 95% exact binomial confidence interval. These have been estimated using Clopper-Pearson method.

    Measured: Up to 1093 days

  4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of VIZAMYL™ PET Image Interpretations Made by Clinical Readers

    The PPV was defined as 100%*number of TP / (number of TP + number of FP). The data presented are the point estimates representing percentage PPV, with Measure Type "Number" and 95% exact binomial confidence interval. These have been estimated using Clopper-Pearson method.

    Measured: Up to 1093 days

  5. Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of VIZAMYL™ PET Image Interpretations Made by Clinical Readers

    The NPV was defined as 100%*number of TN/ (number of TN + number of FN). The data presented are the point estimates representing percentage NPV, with Measure Type "Number" and 95% exact binomial confidence interval. These have been estimated using Clopper-Pearson method.

    Measured: Up to 1093 days

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Correlation Coefficient Between Clinical Reader Age and Accuracy

    Correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between clinical reader age and accuracy. A scatterplot of clinical reader accuracy vs. reader age was plotted to check correlation (coefficient) between accuracy and age.

    Measured: Up to 1093 days

  2. Number of Participants With Accuracy Less Than (<) 0.9333 or Greater Than Equal to (>=) 0.9333 in Terms of Sex of Clinical Readers

    Number of participants with accuracy < 0.9333 or >= 0.9333 in terms of sex of clinical readers were reported.

    Measured: Up to 1093 days

  3. Number of Participants With Association of Electronic Training (With or Without In-Person Training) With Clinical Reader Accuracy

    Number of participants with association of electronic training (with or without In-person training) with clinical reader accuracy were reported.

    Measured: Up to 1093 days

  4. Number of Participants With Association of In-Person Training (With or Without Electronic Training) With Clinical Reader Accuracy

    Number of participants with association of In-person training (with or without electronic training) with clinical reader accuracy were reported.

    Measured: Up to 1093 days

  5. Number of Participants With Association of Training Type With Clinical Reader Accuracy (Excluding Readers Who Took Both Types)

    Number of participants with association of training type with clinical reader accuracy (excluding readers who took both types) were reported.

    Measured: Up to 1093 days

  6. Time From Last Training

    Time from last training was reported. Number of readers remaining at timepoint was number of readers with accuracy greater than or equal to 0.9333. All readers met this criterion at time 0 hence, data for all clinical reader is reported. All 18 readers were trained in interpretation of Vizamyl images \& as part of their training, had their interpretation accuracy tested using 15 test images. To pass test, a reader had to interpret atleast 14 of 15 images correctly. 14 represents 0.9333 of 15, so each reader had to have an accuracy of atleast 0.9333 in order to pass test. Date on which a reader took his/her test is considered to be Time 0. Each reader's accuracy at a later time was assessed in study.

    Measured: Retrospective data covering up to 8.1 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Feb 2021
  2. Study start11 Dec 2018
  3. Primary completion7 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion7 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
227 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04773015
Sponsor's protocol ID
GE-067-027
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
23 Feb 2021
Last updated
10 Oct 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cognitive Impairment, run by GE Healthcare at 10 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in Italy, Spain, Austria, Finland, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of VIZAMYL™ PET Image Interpretations Made by Clinical Readers (time frame: Up to 1093 days). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT04773015 | AzTrials