Calculus BiliaryNCT04758923
Management for Concomitant Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones.
A study testing Cholecystectomy in people with Calculus Biliary, run by Assiut University.
Trial summary
Choledocholithiasis is identified in approximately 3-10 % of patients with cholelithiasis. (1-3) While laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered the treatment of choice in patients with gall bladder stones, there is a debate about the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones, (4) and this has led to a range… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Calculus Biliary
- What is being tested?
- Cholecystectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2024to 1 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 16 to 70 years; Clinical presentation with biliary colic with or without jaundice; Serum elevation of at least one of the following enzymes: aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin; Radiological findings suggestive of gallstones and concomitant common bile duct stones, with abdominal ultrasound showing possible CBD stones or a dilated CBD >8 mm in diameter.
- only patients with MRCP evidence of a CBD stone(s) were eligible after meeting all the previous criteria.
Who cannot join
- active acute pancreatitis, pregnancy, septic shock, intrahepatic gallstones, malignant pancreatic or biliary tumors, prior sphincterotomy, unfit for anesthesia and surgery, contraindications to MRCP and ERCP, liver cirrhosis, previous history of abdominal surgery (e.g., gastrectomy), and inability to give informed consent.
About this study
Official title: Single-stage Versus Two-staged Management for Concomitant Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones
Choledocholithiasis is identified in approximately 3-10 % of patients with cholelithiasis. (1-3) While laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered the treatment of choice in patients with gall bladder stones, there is a debate about the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones, (4) and this has led to a range of therapeutic strategies for the management of concomitant gallstones and CBD stones patients. Two-stage endoscopic management using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common approach, although single-stage management by laparoscopic cholecystectomy with surgical exploration of the CBD is an alternative, with the single-stage approach more common in the open surgery era. Currently, it is unclear whether two-stage management is better than or at least equivalent to the single-stage surgical approach to choledocholithiasis. To address this, we undertook this study to compare these two approaches. The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to determine the best technique for the management of patients with concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones, by comparing the success rate, complication rates, and longer-term follow-up outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Single stage approach Under General anaesthesia a5 trocar method will be used to access the abdominal cavity. Aconventional approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be first udertaken with dissection of calot's triangle. The cystic duct will be pulled laterally to facilitate exposure of the anterior wall of the CBDand the CBD will be opened longitudinally for adistance of approximately 1to1.5 cm using laparoscopic scissors. A5mm flexible choledoscope will be used to identify the CBD stone(s) which will be removed by flushing sterile saline, passingastone basket, or electrohydraulic lithotrpsy as necessary to clear the CBD. A T-tube will be inserted into the CBD via the choledochotomy which will be closed by interrupted resorbable sutures, before completing the cholecystectomy. Cholangiography throuh T-tube be performed 14 14 days later and the T-tube will be removed immediately after Cholangiography if no residual CBD stones is identified. If residual stones are found then will be removed through the T-tube track using A choledoscope Two-stage approach The treatment process commenced with intial endoscopic treatment phase. This will be udertaken Under General anaesthesia and entailed ERCP and endoscopic sphincterectomy. The CBD stones will be removed using a basket or ballon, with lithotrpsy added if necessary. An endoscopic nasobiliary drainge will be inserted and kept in place until after laparoscopic cholecystectomy which perfermed 2 to 5 days later depending on the patients 's condition.. Surgery will be delsyed if urine amylase is elevated or significant abdominal pain is present. 2 to 5 days after the operation, Cholangiography will be performed via endoscopic nasobiliary drainge tube. And the endoscopic nasobiliary drainge tube wii be removed if no residual CBD stones are seen.
- Conditions
- Calculus Biliary
- Being tested
- Cholecystectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Cholecystolithiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CholecystectomyProcedure or surgery
Under General anaesthesia cholecystectomy and CBD exploration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Two-Stage | Active comparator | Two-stage approach The treatment process commenced with an intial treatment phase. This will be udertaken Under General anaesthesia and entailed ERCP and endoscopic sphincterectomy Receives: Procedure: Cholecystectomy |
| Single stage | Active comparator | Single stage approach Under General anaesthesia a5 trocar method will be used to access the abdominal cavity. Aconventional approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be first udertaken with dissection of calot's triangle. The cystic duct will be pulled laterally to facilitate exposure of the anterior wall of the CBD, and the CBD will be opened longitudinally for a distance of approximately 1 to 1.5 cm using laparoscopic scissors. A5 mm flexible choledoscope will be used to identify the cbd stone which will be removed by flushing with sterile saline, passing a stone basket or electrohydroulic lithotripsy as neccesary to clear the CBD. A T-tube will be inserted into the CBD via the choledochotomy which will be closed by interrupted resorbable sutures before completing the cholecystectomy. Receives: Procedure: Cholecystectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Surgical successful rates
The prospective clinical trial aims to determine the best technigue for the management of the patient with concomitant GB and CBD stones by comparing success rate and complication rates
Measured: 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2021
- Study start1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Calculus BiliaryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hossam Mahmoud Ibrahim, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04758923
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Assuit university hospital..
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 4 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Single-stage Versus Two-staged Management for Concomitant Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04758923
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Assuit university hospital..
- Conditions
- Calculus Biliary
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Choledocholithiasis is identified in approximately 3-10 % of patients with cholelithiasis. (1-3) While laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered the treatment of choice in patients with gall bladder stones, there is a debate about the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones, (4) and this has led to a range of therapeutic strategies for the management of concomitant gallstones and CBD stones patients. Two-stage endoscopic management using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common approach, although single-stage management by laparoscopic cholecystectomy with surgical exploration of the CBD is an alternative, with the single-stage approach more common in the open surgery era. Currently, it is unclear whether two-stage management is better than or at least equivalent to the single-stage surgical approach to choledocholithiasis. To address this, we undertook this study to compare these two approaches. The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to determine the best technique for the management of patients with concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones, by comparing the success rate, complication rates, and longer-term follow-up outcomes.
Detailed description
Single stage approach Under General anaesthesia a5 trocar method will be used to access the abdominal cavity. Aconventional approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be first udertaken with dissection of calot's triangle. The cystic duct will be pulled laterally to facilitate exposure of the anterior wall of the CBDand the CBD will be opened longitudinally for adistance of approximately 1to1.5 cm using laparoscopic scissors. A5mm flexible choledoscope will be used to identify the CBD stone(s) which will be removed by flushing sterile saline, passingastone basket, or electrohydraulic lithotrpsy as necessary to clear the CBD. A T-tube will be inserted into the CBD via the choledochotomy which will be closed by interrupted resorbable sutures, before completing the cholecystectomy. Cholangiography throuh T-tube be performed 14 14 days later and the T-tube will be removed immediately after Cholangiography if no residual CBD stones is identified. If residual stones are found then will be removed through the T-tube track using A choledoscope Two-stage approach The treatment process commenced with intial endoscopic treatment phase. This will be udertaken Under General anaesthesia and entailed ERCP and endoscopic sphincterectomy. The CBD stones will be removed using a basket or ballon, with lithotrpsy added if necessary. An endoscopic nasobiliary drainge will be inserted and kept in place until after laparoscopic cholecystectomy which perfermed 2 to 5 days later depending on the patients 's condition.. Surgery will be delsyed if urine amylase is elevated or significant abdominal pain is present. 2 to 5 days after the operation, Cholangiography will be performed via endoscopic nasobiliary drainge tube. And the endoscopic nasobiliary drainge tube wii be removed if no residual CBD stones are seen.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Two-Stage | Active comparator | Procedure: CholecystectomyTwo-stage approach The treatment process commenced with an intial treatment phase. This will be udertaken Under General anaesthesia and entailed ERCP and endoscopic sphincterectomy |
| Single stage | Active comparator | Procedure: CholecystectomySingle stage approach Under General anaesthesia a5 trocar method will be used to access the abdominal cavity. Aconventional approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be first udertaken with dissection of calot's triangle. The cystic duct will be pulled laterally to facilitate exposure of the anterior wall of the CBD, and the CBD will be opened longitudinally for a distance of approximately 1 to 1.5 cm using laparoscopic scissors. A5 mm flexible choledoscope will be used to identify the cbd stone which will be removed by flushing with sterile saline, passing a stone basket or electrohydroulic lithotripsy as neccesary to clear the CBD. A T-tube will be inserted into the CBD via the choledochotomy which will be closed by interrupted resorbable sutures before completing the cholecystectomy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age 16 to 70 years; Clinical presentation with biliary colic with or without jaundice; Serum elevation of at least one of the following enzymes: aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin; Radiological findings suggestive of gallstones and concomitant common bile duct stones, with abdominal ultrasound showing possible CBD stones or a dilated CBD >8 mm in diameter.
- only patients with MRCP evidence of a CBD stone(s) were eligible after meeting all the previous criteria.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- active acute pancreatitis, pregnancy, septic shock, intrahepatic gallstones, malignant pancreatic or biliary tumors, prior sphincterotomy, unfit for anesthesia and surgery, contraindications to MRCP and ERCP, liver cirrhosis, previous history of abdominal surgery (e.g., gastrectomy), and inability to give informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CholecystectomyUnder General anaesthesia cholecystectomy and CBD exploration | Procedure or surgery | Single stage, Two-Stage |
Primary outcome
Surgical successful rates
Time frame: 2 weeks
The prospective clinical trial aims to determine the best technigue for the management of the patient with concomitant GB and CBD stones by comparing success rate and complication rates
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Sep 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Calculus Biliary
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Prophylactic Dexamethasone vs Placebo on Airway Dimensions Assessed by Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Airway Edema, Postoperative Complications
Not yet recruiting
Two Bupivacaine Concentrations for Recto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Analgesic Strategies for Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC)
Gallstones, Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Electrosurgical Patterns and Learning Curve in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholelithiasis
Recruiting
Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis
Acute Pancreatitis, Cholelithiasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cholecystectomy in people with Calculus Biliary, run by Assiut University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Surgical successful rates (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2024.