Colorectal CancerAMICONCT04754672
Aerobic Fitness or Muscle Mass Training to Improve Colorectal Cancer Outcome
A study testing Continuous aerobic and resistance exercise intervention and Continuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise intervention in people with Colorectal Cancer and Chemotherapeutic Toxicity, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 13 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Evidence from randomized controlled trials shows that exercise during cancer treatment benefits physical fitness, fatigue and quality of life. Since the effect of exercise on clinical outcome is currently unknown, exercise is not included as integral part of standard cancer care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer, Chemotherapeutic Toxicity, Survivorship
- What is being tested?
- Continuous aerobic and resistance exercise intervention and Continuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 228 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2021to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- mCRC with indication for palliative chemotherapy
- scheduled for treatment with first-line doublet or triplet chemotherapy, according to the national guideline
- able and willing to give written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- life expectancy <6 months
- unable to perform basic activities of daily living such as walking or biking
- presence of cognitive disorders or severe emotional instability (e.g., Schizophrenia, Alzheimer, alcohol addiction);
- presence of other disabling co-morbidities that might hamper physical exercise (e.g. heart failure (NYHA classes 3 and 4), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, gold 3 and 4), orthopaedic conditions and neurological disorders (e.g., hernia, paresis, amputation, active rheumatoid arthritis);
- insufficient mastery of the Dutch language;
- presence of serious cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary conditions (e.g. unstable angina, arrhythmia or valve disease) such that exercise safety is at risk, as judged by the treating physician.
- Already participating in structured vigorous aerobic and/or resistance exercise ≥ 2 times per week comparable to our intervention
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
13 sites in 1 country
Netherlands13 sites, 13 recruiting
- Recruiting
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, 5223 GZ
M. Wumkes, MD
M. Wumkes, MD
- Recruiting
Flevoziekenhuis
Almere Stad, 1315 RA
D. Sommeijer, MD
D. Sommeijer, MD
- Recruiting
Meander Medisch Centrum
Amersfoort, 3813TZ
H.M. Otten, MD
H.M. Otten, MD
- Recruiting
Ziekenhuis Amstelland
Amstelveen, 1186AM
A.A. v Zweeden, MD
A.A. v Zweeden, MD
- Recruiting
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, 1007MB
T.E. Buffart, MD
T.E. Buffart, MD
- Recruiting
Netherlands Cancer Institute
Amsterdam
K. Bolhuis, MD
K. Bolhuis, MD
- Recruiting
Rijnstate Ziekenhuis
Arnhem, 6815 AD
R. Koornstra, MD
R. Koornstra, MD
- Recruiting
Ziekenhuis Amphia
Breda, 4818CK
M. Streppel, MD
M. Streppel, MD
- Recruiting
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, 5623 EJ
G.J. Creemers, MD
G.J. Creemers, MD
- Recruiting
Spaarne Gasthuis
Hoofddorp, 2134TM
A. Beeker, MD
A. Beeker, MD
- Recruiting
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, 6525GA
L. Buffart, Dr.
E. Gootjes, MD
- Recruiting
Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis
Nijmegen, 6532SZ
J.J.B. Janssen, MD
J.J.B. Janssen, MD
- Recruiting
UMCU
Utrecht, 3508GA
A. May, Prof.
J. Roodhart, Dr.
About this study
Official title: Aerobic Fitness or Muscle Mass Training to Improve Colorectal Cancer Outcome (AMICO). The Effects of Exercise on Chemotherapy Dose Modification and Progression Free Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Evidence from randomized controlled trials shows that exercise during cancer treatment benefits physical fitness, fatigue and quality of life. Since the effect of exercise on clinical outcome is currently unknown, exercise is not included as integral part of standard cancer care. Moreover, evidence regarding the optimal exercise prescription in terms of type and dose is lacking.
To maintain quality of life in patients receiving palliative treatment with chemotherapy, toxicity-induced modifications in the prescribed chemotherapy dose are common. Such modifications - occurring in 40% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer - may reduce benefit of treatment. The investigators hypothesize that exercise prevents chemotherapy dose modifications by reducing toxicity and enhancing psychological strength. Additionally, based on studies in rodents and preliminary data in patients with cancer, the researchers hypothesize that exercise has beneficial effects on the functionality of the natural killer cells, which play an important role in the innate immune defense against cancer. Both, fewer dose modifications and improved immune function may improve progression-free survival.
Read more
This study is a three-armed trial comparing resistance exercise, aerobic interval exercise and usual care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to select the optimal exercise prescription for preventing chemotherapy dose modifications. The trial will use a Bayesian adaptive multi-arm multi-stage design with several interim analyses after which an ineffective study arm can be dropped early. This novel design makes the trial more efficient and reduces patients' exposure to suboptimal study arms.
Evidence regarding the exercise effects on i) clinical outcome, ii) the optimal exercise prescription, and iii) the underlying mechanisms, elucidates the potential of exercise to boost benefit from chemotherapy treatment. This evidence provides leads to improve progression-free survival and quality of life of patients suffering from one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide.
Read the detailed description
First-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) generally includes the chemotherapies fluoropyrimidines in combination with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, known as doublet or triplet chemotherapy. A previous study showed that over 40% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer required dose modifications (including dose reductions, treatment delays or discontinuation) within the first three months of palliative treatment, and around 30% was admitted to hospital due to chemotherapy-related toxicity. Toxicity-induced dose modifications and hospitalization may reduce benefit of treatment. In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, reductions in muscle mass and lower physical activity levels (<9 metabolic equivalent of task hours/week) were found to be associated with more dose-limiting toxicity and shorter (progression-free) survival. However, the causality and underlying mechanisms linking physical activity and exercise to cancer outcome have not been elucidated. The immune system (by increased infiltration of activated natural killer cells into the tumour) might play a role as was shown in studies with rodents. In addition, studies among patients showed that exercise may counteract a variety of treatment toxicities (e.g. neutropenia, neuropathy, gastrointestinal side effects, fatigue), but optimal exercise type and dose are unknown.
In addition to the above-mentioned biophysiological effects by which exercise may prevent dose modifications, several studies demonstrated the positive effects of exercise during cancer treatment on quality of life. A recent study on patients' perceptions indicated that exercise helped patients to better cope with cancer treatments, as it gave them psychological strength (i.e. empowerment and resilience) next to physical strength. The investigators hypothesize that exercise reduces treatment-related toxicity and thereby reduces chemotherapy dose modifications and improves progression free survival.
randomised controlled trials are the gold standard for ascertaining treatment efficacy. Studying differences in effects on chemotherapy dose modifications between different exercise programs requires a multi-arm randomised controlled trial. Due to complex logistics and high costs, the conduct of a traditional adequately powered multi-arm exercise trial is difficult with available patients and resources. Therefore, a Bayesian adaptive flexible multi-arm multi-stage design will be used which allows for a number of interim analyses after which a treatment arm can be dropped early if it falls outside the pre-defined futility/efficacy boundaries. This reduces patients' exposure to suboptimal interventions and increases trial efficiency.
This study aims to examine whether:
- Exercise prevents chemotherapy dose modifications via reduced toxicity and enhanced psychological strength, and which exercise program yields largest benefits.
- Exercise improves immune function (e.g. functionality of natural killer cells).
- Benefits of exercise on dose modifications and immune function improves progression-free survival.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Chemotherapeutic Toxicity, Survivorship, Lifestyle
- Being tested
- Continuous aerobic and resistance exercise intervention, Continuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise intervention
- Keywords
- Exercise, Muscle strength, Cardiorespiratory fitness, Colorectal cancer, Chemotherapy dose modification, Progression free survival, Bayesian adaptive trial
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Continuous aerobic and resistance exercise interventionBehavioural
Also called AE+RE
Continuous aerobic and resistance exercises intervention
Continuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise interventionBehavioural
Also called AE+AI
Continuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous aerobic and resistance exercise (AE+RE) | Experimental | Two 60 min moderate-to-high intensity exercise sessions per week supervised by a physiotherapist.
Continuous aerobic exercise: 15-20 min continuous aerobic exercise (e.g. walking) of moderate intensity (Borg 13-14 'somewhat hard').
Resistance exercise (25 min): 6 exercises targeting large muscle groups vertical row, squat, bench press, pull over, abdominal crunch, and lunge. 2 sets of 10 repetitions at 70-80% of 1 RM. To ensure adequate training load over time, tests are repeated every 3/4 weeks aligned with the chemotherapy cycle.
One additional (third) session from home at moderate intensity for at least 30 min.
A brochure with exercise guidelines is provided. Receives: Behavioral: Continuous aerobic and resistance exercise intervention |
| Continuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise (AE+AI) | Experimental | Continuous aerobic exercise: 15-20 min continuous aerobic exercise (e.g. walking) of moderate intensity (Borg 13-14 'somewhat hard').
Aerobic interval (25 min): cycling with high intensity intervals alternated with recovery intervals. Intensity of the interval: between 85% and 95% of estimated maximum heart rate, adjusted to Borg 16-18 'hard - very hard'. In between the intervals, light intensity cycling will be performed for active recovery at 30% of Wmax estimated from Steep ramp test and adjusted to Borg < 12.
One additional (third) session from home at moderate intensity for at least 30 min.
A brochure with exercise guidelines is provided. Receives: Behavioral: Continuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise intervention |
| Usual care control group | No intervention | Patients in the usual care group receive care as usual. In addition, a brochure with exercise guidelines for cancer survivors is provided |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Chemotherapy dose modifications
Number of patients requiring dose modifications (i.e. dose reductions, treatment delay, discontinuation or switch)
Measured: between baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch. Cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks.
Progression free survival
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression
Measured: between baseline and time to progression (up to 2 years)
Secondary outcomes (12)
NK-cell functionality
degranulation and cytotoxicity of NK-cells on peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Measured: change from baseline to 6th treatment cycle or treatment switch (Cycle duration is 3 weeks)
Hospitalization
Number of patients requiring hospitalisation assessed from medical records
Measured: during treatment (6 treatment cycles of 3 weeks per cycle or 8 treatment cycles of 2 weeks per cycle)
Treatment-related toxicity
severity of treatment-related toxicity assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
Measured: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Aerobic fitness
Astrand-Rhyming test
Measured: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Maximum short exercise capacity
Steep ramp test
Measured: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Muscle strength
indirect 1 repetition maximum for leg press
Measured: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Muscle mass
Computed Tomogrophy scans
Measured: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Health-related quality of life
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionaire Core 30. Score from 0-100, higher scores indicate better functioning
Measured: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Fatigue
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionaire- Fatigue 12. Score 0-100, higher scores indicate higher levels of fatigue
Measured: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Resilience
Resilience Evaluation Scale, score 0-40, higher scores indicate better resilience
Measured: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Empowerment
Self-efficacy-28, score 4-28, higher scores indicate better empowerment
Measured: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Physical activity
Short QUestionnaire to ASsess Health enhancing physical activity, higher scores indicate higher physical activity levels
Measured: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Feb 2021
- Study start2 Mar 2021
- Primary completionMar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomised controlled trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 228 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- UMC Utrecht, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA), Rijnstate Hospital, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Flevoziekenhuis, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Meander Medical Center, Ziekenhuis Amstelland, Amphia Hospital, Spaarne Gasthuis, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04754672
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-6867
- Other IDs
- NL72482.091.20, 09150171910017
- Acronym
- AMICO
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 4 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 18 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD will be shared via the POLARIS consortium see PROSPERO registry CRD42013003805 or paper: Buffart et al. Systematic Reviews 2013; 2: 75.
Publications
Brouwer CG, Tusscher MRT, de Roos BM, Gootjes EC, Buffart TE, Versteeg KS, Mast IH, Streppel MM, Werter IM, May AM, Verheul HMW, Buffart LM; AMICO Consortium. Experiences of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer participating in a supervised exercise intervention during chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jan 8;33(2):82. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09101-1.
PubMed 39779537
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Aerobic Fitness or Muscle Mass Training to Improve Colorectal Cancer Outcome (AMICO). The Effects of Exercise on Chemotherapy Dose Modification and Progression Free Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04754672
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMICO / 2020-6867
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Chemotherapeutic Toxicity, Survivorship, Lifestyle
- Keywords
- Exercise, Muscle strength, Cardiorespiratory fitness, Colorectal cancer, Chemotherapy dose modification, Progression free survival, Bayesian adaptive trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 228 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- UMC Utrecht, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA), Rijnstate Hospital, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Flevoziekenhuis, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Meander Medical Center, Ziekenhuis Amstelland, Amphia Hospital, Spaarne Gasthuis, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evidence from randomized controlled trials shows that exercise during cancer treatment benefits physical fitness, fatigue and quality of life. Since the effect of exercise on clinical outcome is currently unknown, exercise is not included as integral part of standard cancer care. Moreover, evidence regarding the optimal exercise prescription in terms of type and dose is lacking.
To maintain quality of life in patients receiving palliative treatment with chemotherapy, toxicity-induced modifications in the prescribed chemotherapy dose are common. Such modifications - occurring in 40% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer - may reduce benefit of treatment. The investigators hypothesize that exercise prevents chemotherapy dose modifications by reducing toxicity and enhancing psychological strength. Additionally, based on studies in rodents and preliminary data in patients with cancer, the researchers hypothesize that exercise has beneficial effects on the functionality of the natural killer cells, which play an important role in the innate immune defense against cancer. Both, fewer dose modifications and improved immune function may improve progression-free survival.
This study is a three-armed trial comparing resistance exercise, aerobic interval exercise and usual care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to select the optimal exercise prescription for preventing chemotherapy dose modifications. The trial will use a Bayesian adaptive multi-arm multi-stage design with several interim analyses after which an ineffective study arm can be dropped early. This novel design makes the trial more efficient and reduces patients' exposure to suboptimal study arms.
Evidence regarding the exercise effects on i) clinical outcome, ii) the optimal exercise prescription, and iii) the underlying mechanisms, elucidates the potential of exercise to boost benefit from chemotherapy treatment. This evidence provides leads to improve progression-free survival and quality of life of patients suffering from one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide.
Detailed description
First-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) generally includes the chemotherapies fluoropyrimidines in combination with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, known as doublet or triplet chemotherapy. A previous study showed that over 40% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer required dose modifications (including dose reductions, treatment delays or discontinuation) within the first three months of palliative treatment, and around 30% was admitted to hospital due to chemotherapy-related toxicity. Toxicity-induced dose modifications and hospitalization may reduce benefit of treatment. In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, reductions in muscle mass and lower physical activity levels (<9 metabolic equivalent of task hours/week) were found to be associated with more dose-limiting toxicity and shorter (progression-free) survival. However, the causality and underlying mechanisms linking physical activity and exercise to cancer outcome have not been elucidated. The immune system (by increased infiltration of activated natural killer cells into the tumour) might play a role as was shown in studies with rodents. In addition, studies among patients showed that exercise may counteract a variety of treatment toxicities (e.g. neutropenia, neuropathy, gastrointestinal side effects, fatigue), but optimal exercise type and dose are unknown.
In addition to the above-mentioned biophysiological effects by which exercise may prevent dose modifications, several studies demonstrated the positive effects of exercise during cancer treatment on quality of life. A recent study on patients' perceptions indicated that exercise helped patients to better cope with cancer treatments, as it gave them psychological strength (i.e. empowerment and resilience) next to physical strength. The investigators hypothesize that exercise reduces treatment-related toxicity and thereby reduces chemotherapy dose modifications and improves progression free survival.
randomised controlled trials are the gold standard for ascertaining treatment efficacy. Studying differences in effects on chemotherapy dose modifications between different exercise programs requires a multi-arm randomised controlled trial. Due to complex logistics and high costs, the conduct of a traditional adequately powered multi-arm exercise trial is difficult with available patients and resources. Therefore, a Bayesian adaptive flexible multi-arm multi-stage design will be used which allows for a number of interim analyses after which a treatment arm can be dropped early if it falls outside the pre-defined futility/efficacy boundaries. This reduces patients' exposure to suboptimal interventions and increases trial efficiency.
This study aims to examine whether:
- Exercise prevents chemotherapy dose modifications via reduced toxicity and enhanced psychological strength, and which exercise program yields largest benefits.
- Exercise improves immune function (e.g. functionality of natural killer cells).
- Benefits of exercise on dose modifications and immune function improves progression-free survival.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Randomised controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous aerobic and resistance exercise (AE+RE) | Experimental | Behavioral: Continuous aerobic and resistance exercise interventionTwo 60 min moderate-to-high intensity exercise sessions per week supervised by a physiotherapist. Continuous aerobic exercise: 15-20 min continuous aerobic exercise (e.g. walking) of moderate intensity (Borg 13-14 'somewhat hard'). Resistance exercise (25 min): 6 exercises targeting large muscle groups vertical row, squat, bench press, pull over, abdominal crunch, and lunge. 2 sets of 10 repetitions at 70-80% of 1 RM. To ensure adequate training load over time, tests are repeated every 3/4 weeks aligned with the chemotherapy cycle. One additional (third) session from home at moderate intensity for at least 30 min. A brochure with exercise guidelines is provided. |
| Continuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise (AE+AI) | Experimental | Behavioral: Continuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise interventionContinuous aerobic exercise: 15-20 min continuous aerobic exercise (e.g. walking) of moderate intensity (Borg 13-14 'somewhat hard'). Aerobic interval (25 min): cycling with high intensity intervals alternated with recovery intervals. Intensity of the interval: between 85% and 95% of estimated maximum heart rate, adjusted to Borg 16-18 'hard - very hard'. In between the intervals, light intensity cycling will be performed for active recovery at 30% of Wmax estimated from Steep ramp test and adjusted to Borg < 12. One additional (third) session from home at moderate intensity for at least 30 min. A brochure with exercise guidelines is provided. |
| Usual care control group | No intervention | –Patients in the usual care group receive care as usual. In addition, a brochure with exercise guidelines for cancer survivors is provided |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- mCRC with indication for palliative chemotherapy
- scheduled for treatment with first-line doublet or triplet chemotherapy, according to the national guideline
- able and willing to give written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- life expectancy <6 months
- unable to perform basic activities of daily living such as walking or biking
- presence of cognitive disorders or severe emotional instability (e.g., Schizophrenia, Alzheimer, alcohol addiction);
- presence of other disabling co-morbidities that might hamper physical exercise (e.g. heart failure (NYHA classes 3 and 4), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, gold 3 and 4), orthopaedic conditions and neurological disorders (e.g., hernia, paresis, amputation, active rheumatoid arthritis);
- insufficient mastery of the Dutch language;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous aerobic and resistance exercise interventionAlso: AE+REContinuous aerobic and resistance exercises intervention | Behavioural | Continuous aerobic and resistance exercise (AE+RE) |
| Continuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise interventionAlso: AE+AIContinuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise intervention | Behavioural | Continuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise (AE+AI) |
Primary outcome
Chemotherapy dose modifications
Time frame: between baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch. Cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks.
Number of patients requiring dose modifications (i.e. dose reductions, treatment delay, discontinuation or switch)
Progression free survival
Time frame: between baseline and time to progression (up to 2 years)
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression
12 secondary outcomes
NK-cell functionality
Time frame: change from baseline to 6th treatment cycle or treatment switch (Cycle duration is 3 weeks)
Hospitalization
Time frame: during treatment (6 treatment cycles of 3 weeks per cycle or 8 treatment cycles of 2 weeks per cycle)
Treatment-related toxicity
Time frame: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Aerobic fitness
Time frame: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Maximum short exercise capacity
Time frame: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Muscle strength
Time frame: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Muscle mass
Time frame: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Fatigue
Time frame: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Resilience
Time frame: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Empowerment
Time frame: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Physical activity
Time frame: change from baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch (cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Nov 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39779537Brouwer CG, Tusscher MRT, de Roos BM, Gootjes EC, Buffart TE, Versteeg KS, Mast IH, Streppel MM, Werter IM, May AM, Verheul HMW, Buffart LM; AMICO Consortium. Experiences of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer participating in a supervised exercise intervention during chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jan 8;33(2):82. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09101-1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD will be shared via the POLARIS consortium see PROSPERO registry CRD42013003805 or paper: Buffart et al. Systematic Reviews 2013; 2: 75.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Continuous aerobic and resistance exercise intervention and Continuous aerobic and aerobic interval exercise intervention in people with Colorectal Cancer and Chemotherapeutic Toxicity, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 13 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Laurien M Buffart, PhD (+31243613674, laurien.buffart@radboudumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Chemotherapy dose modifications (time frame: between baseline to 3rd/4th and 6th/8th treatment cycle or treatment switch. Cycle duration is 2 or 3 weeks.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04754672, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2023.