AzTrials
AzTrials

Sexual Function DisturbancesIMAPSEXNCT04752241

Preservation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Could Improve Sexual Function After Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Diverticular Disease

A study testing Inferior Mesenteric Artery Preservation and Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation in people with Sexual Function Disturbances, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to evaluate whether IMA sparing may represent an advantage in terms of reduced incidence and severity of sexual dysfunctions after colorectal resections for diverticular disease (DD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Sexual Function Disturbances
What is being tested?
Inferior Mesenteric Artery Preservation and Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Jan 2012to 1 Jan 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • diverticular disease
  • Diverticulitis
  • BMI under 35 Kg/mq
  • ASA score from I to III
  • Standardized sigmoid, left colon or rectal resection

Who cannot join

  • complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey III-IV)
  • previous abdominal surgery or prostatic and/or gynecological resections
  • adverse local condition or the need of multiorgan resection or stoma creation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea

    Rome, 00188

Other trials in Italy

About this study

This study aims to evaluate whether IMA sparing may represent an advantage in terms of reduced incidence and severity of sexual dysfunctions after colorectal resections for diverticular disease (DD).

Read the detailed description

Enrolled patients were randomly divided into 2 treatment groups. In the first group (IMAP) the IMA was preserved sectioning the sigmoid arteries near colonic wall while, in the second group (IMAS) the IMA was sectioned immediately below the origin of the left colic artery. Incidence and severity of sexual dysfunction and QoL were assessed by four validated questionnaire administered 6,12 months and 5 and 8 years after surgery.

Being tested
Inferior Mesenteric Artery Preservation, Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation
Keywords
Sexual function, Colonic diverticular disease, Inferior mesenteric artery-preserving, Neosigmoid Denervation, Postoperative sexual dysfunction
Medical subject headings
Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Inferior Mesenteric Artery PreservationProcedure or surgery

    Performing left hemicolectomy the IMA was preserved ligating close to the colonic wall the sigmoids arteries.

  • Inferior Mesenteric Artery LigationProcedure or surgery

    Performing left hemicolectomy the IMA is ligated and sectioned after the origin of left colic artery

Study groups in NCT04752241
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IMAPExperimentalInferior Mesenteric Artery Preservation Performing left hemicolectomy and anterior rectal resection the IMA was preserved ligating close to the colonic wall the sigmoids arteries.
Receives: Procedure: Inferior Mesenteric Artery Preservation
IMASActive comparatorInferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation Performing left hemicolectomy the IMA is ligated and sectioned after the origin of left colic artery
Receives: Procedure: Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sexual disfunction 1

    Presence of sexual disfunction ( defined through the evaluation of sexual desire ,arousal, lubrication , orgasmic function, overall satisfaction, pain, intercourse satisfaction , erectile function)

    Measured: 12 months after surgery

  2. Sexual disfunction 2

    Presence of sexual disfunction ( defined through the evaluation of sexual desire ,arousal, lubrication , orgasmic function, overall satisfaction, pain, intercourse satisfaction , erectile function)

    Measured: 6 years after surgery

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Sexual Function Male 1

    assess the patients' sexual disorders with International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) 15-items test

    Measured: 12 month after surgery

  2. Sexual Function Male 2

    assess the patients' sexual disorders with International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) 15-items test

    Measured: 6 years after surgery

  3. Sexual Function Female 1

    assess the patients' sexual disorders withFemale Sexual Function Index (FSFI) a 19-item test (score below 26.55 indicates the presence of sexual dysfunctions)

    Measured: 12 months after surgery

  4. Sexual Function Female 2

    assess the patient's sexual disorders with Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) 19-item test (score below 26.55 indicates the presence of sexual dysfunctions)

    Measured: 6 years after surgery

  5. Quality of Life 1

    The impact of sexual disorders in QoL was evaluated using EORTC QLQ-30 ( European organisation for research and treatment of cancer- quality of life questionnaire)

    Measured: 12 months after surgery

  6. Quality of Life 2

    The impact of sexual disorders in QoL was evaluated using EORTC QLQ-30( European organisation for research and treatment of cancer- quality of life questionnaire)

    Measured: 6 years after surgery

  7. Quality of life SF-36 1

    The impact of sexual disorders in QoL was evaluated using SF-36 score (Short Form Health Survey 36)

    Measured: 12 months after surgery

  8. Quality of life SF-36 2

    The impact of sexual disorders in QoL was evaluated using SF- 36 score ( Short Form Health Survey 36 )

    Measured: 6 years after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Feb 2021
  2. Study start1 Jan 2012
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2018
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04752241
Sponsor's protocol ID
DS-041
Acronym
IMAPSEX
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
8 Feb 2021
Last updated
24 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Inferior Mesenteric Artery Preservation and Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation in people with Sexual Function Disturbances, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sexual disfunction 1 (time frame: 12 months after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in