MotivationNCT04751474
The Effect of Motivational Messages on Optimism, Hopelessness and Life Satisfaction
A study testing Motivational messages in people with Motivation and Optimism, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The Covid-19 pandemic has affected global health systems and required healthcare professionals to show high performance. In this process, the mental health of intensive care nurses, who undertake the biggest burden in health systems, is negatively affected by the high working hours and patient care burden during the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Motivation, Optimism, Hopelessness
- What is being tested?
- Motivational messages
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 93 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2021to 31 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- agreeing to participate in the study
- being a nurse
- working in intensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic
Who cannot join
- underfilling or not fill out forms and scales
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Motivational Messages on Optimism, Hopelessness and Life Satisfaction of Intensive Care Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic : A Randomized Controlled Study
The Covid-19 pandemic has affected global health systems and required healthcare professionals to show high performance. In this process, the mental health of intensive care nurses, who undertake the biggest burden in health systems, is negatively affected by the high working hours and patient care burden during the pandemic. When the literature is reviewed, pessimistic thinking, feeling hopeless and not enjoying life at more exacerbated levels can be observed in intensive care nurses. It is concluded that studies are needed to increase the motivation of intensive care nurses during the Covid-19 pandemic.In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effect of motivational messages on optimism, hopelessness and life satisfaction of intensive care nurses during the Covid-19 pandemic.
- Conditions
- Motivation, Optimism, Hopelessness, Life Satisfaction
- Being tested
- Motivational messages
- Medical subject headings
- Personal Satisfaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Motivational messagesOther
Participants in the motivational group were sent to motivational messages to their mobile phones for 21 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational messages | Experimental | Participants in the motivational group were sent to motivational messages to their mobile phones for 21 days. Receives: Other: Motivational messages |
| Control group | No intervention | The control group did not receive any intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Optimistic level assessed by the Life Orientation Test
The primary endpoint of this study was the difference between groups in terms of Life Orientation Test scores 21 days after. The scale consists of a total of 10 items. The range of scores obtained from the scale varies between 6-30 points. Low scores indicate pessimism, while high scores indicate optimism.
Measured: 21 days after from baseline
Hopelessness level assessed by the Beck Hopelessness Scale
The primary endpoint of this study was the difference between groups in terms of Beck Hopelessness Scale scores 21 days after. The scale consists of a total of 20 items..The range of scores obtained from the scale varies between 0-20 points. High scores indicate that the level of hopelessness is also high.
Measured: 21 days after from baseline
Life satisfaction assessed by the Satisfaction with Life Scale
The primary endpoint of this study was the difference between groups in terms of Satisfaction with Life Scale scores 21 days after. The scale consists of a total of 5 items.The range of scores obtained from the scale varies between 5-25 points. As the total score obtained from the scale increases, life satisfaction level also increases.
Measured: 21 days after from baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2021
- Study start1 Feb 2021
- Primary completion1 Mar 2021
- Study completion31 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MotivationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 93 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Elif Gezginci, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
- Investigators
- Elif Gezginci, RN, PhD, Principal investigator, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04751474
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021/47-31
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 8 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Shen X, Zou X, Zhong X, Yan J, Li L. Psychological stress of ICU nurses in the time of COVID-19. Crit Care. 2020 May 6;24(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02926-2. No abstract available.
PubMed 32375848Azoulay E, Cariou A, Bruneel F, Demoule A, Kouatchet A, Reuter D, Souppart V, Combes A, Klouche K, Argaud L, Barbier F, Jourdain M, Reignier J, Papazian L, Guidet B, Geri G, Resche-Rigon M, Guisset O, Labbe V, Megarbane B, Van Der Meersch G, Guitton C, Friedman D, Pochard F, Darmon M, Kentish-Barnes N. Symptoms of Anxiety, Depression, and Peritraumatic Dissociation in Critical Care Clinicians Managing Patients with COVID-19. A Cross-Sectional Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov 15;202(10):1388-1398. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2568OC.
PubMed 32866409Shechter A, Diaz F, Moise N, Anstey DE, Ye S, Agarwal S, Birk JL, Brodie D, Cannone DE, Chang B, Claassen J, Cornelius T, Derby L, Dong M, Givens RC, Hochman B, Homma S, Kronish IM, Lee SAJ, Manzano W, Mayer LES, McMurry CL, Moitra V, Pham P, Rabbani L, Rivera RR, Schwartz A, Schwartz JE, Shapiro PA, Shaw K, Sullivan AM, Vose C, Wasson L, Edmondson D, Abdalla M. Psychological distress, coping behaviors, and preferences for support among New York healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep-Oct;66:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
PubMed 32590254Murat M, Kose S, Savaser S. Determination of stress, depression and burnout levels of front-line nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Apr;30(2):533-543. doi: 10.1111/inm.12818. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
PubMed 33222350Chen Q, Liang M, Li Y, Guo J, Fei D, Wang L, He L, Sheng C, Cai Y, Li X, Wang J, Zhang Z. Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e15-e16. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30078-X. Epub 2020 Feb 19. No abstract available.
PubMed 32085839Lissoni B, Del Negro S, Brioschi P, Casella G, Fontana I, Bruni C, Lamiani G. Promoting resilience in the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: Psychological interventions for intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians and family members. Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S105-S107. doi: 10.1037/tra0000802. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
PubMed 32551763Schulte EE, Bernstein CA, Cabana MD. Addressing Faculty Emotional Responses during the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic. J Pediatr. 2020 Jul;222:13-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.04.057. Epub 2020 May 7. No abstract available.
PubMed 32387715Chung JPY, Yeung WS. Staff Mental Health Self-Assessment During the COVID-19 Outbreak. East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;30(1):34. doi: 10.12809/eaap2014. No abstract available.
PubMed 32229646Kose S, Gezginci E, Goktas S, Murat M. The effectiveness of motivational messages to intensive care unit nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Apr;69:103161. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103161. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
PubMed 34895798
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Motivational Messages on Optimism, Hopelessness and Life Satisfaction of Intensive Care Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic : A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04751474
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021/47-31
- Conditions
- Motivation, Optimism, Hopelessness, Life Satisfaction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 93 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Covid-19 pandemic has affected global health systems and required healthcare professionals to show high performance. In this process, the mental health of intensive care nurses, who undertake the biggest burden in health systems, is negatively affected by the high working hours and patient care burden during the pandemic. When the literature is reviewed, pessimistic thinking, feeling hopeless and not enjoying life at more exacerbated levels can be observed in intensive care nurses. It is concluded that studies are needed to increase the motivation of intensive care nurses during the Covid-19 pandemic.In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effect of motivational messages on optimism, hopelessness and life satisfaction of intensive care nurses during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational messages | Experimental | Other: Motivational messagesParticipants in the motivational group were sent to motivational messages to their mobile phones for 21 days. |
| Control group | No intervention | –The control group did not receive any intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- agreeing to participate in the study
- being a nurse
- working in intensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- underfilling or not fill out forms and scales
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational messagesParticipants in the motivational group were sent to motivational messages to their mobile phones for 21 days. | Other | Motivational messages |
Primary outcome
Optimistic level assessed by the Life Orientation Test
Time frame: 21 days after from baseline
The primary endpoint of this study was the difference between groups in terms of Life Orientation Test scores 21 days after. The scale consists of a total of 10 items. The range of scores obtained from the scale varies between 6-30 points. Low scores indicate pessimism, while high scores indicate optimism.
Hopelessness level assessed by the Beck Hopelessness Scale
Time frame: 21 days after from baseline
The primary endpoint of this study was the difference between groups in terms of Beck Hopelessness Scale scores 21 days after. The scale consists of a total of 20 items..The range of scores obtained from the scale varies between 0-20 points. High scores indicate that the level of hopelessness is also high.
Life satisfaction assessed by the Satisfaction with Life Scale
Time frame: 21 days after from baseline
The primary endpoint of this study was the difference between groups in terms of Satisfaction with Life Scale scores 21 days after. The scale consists of a total of 5 items.The range of scores obtained from the scale varies between 5-25 points. As the total score obtained from the scale increases, life satisfaction level also increases.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 32375848Shen X, Zou X, Zhong X, Yan J, Li L. Psychological stress of ICU nurses in the time of COVID-19. Crit Care. 2020 May 6;24(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02926-2. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32866409Azoulay E, Cariou A, Bruneel F, Demoule A, Kouatchet A, Reuter D, Souppart V, Combes A, Klouche K, Argaud L, Barbier F, Jourdain M, Reignier J, Papazian L, Guidet B, Geri G, Resche-Rigon M, Guisset O, Labbe V, Megarbane B, Van Der Meersch G, Guitton C, Friedman D, Pochard F, Darmon M, Kentish-Barnes N. Symptoms of Anxiety, Depression, and Peritraumatic Dissociation in Critical Care Clinicians Managing Patients with COVID-19. A Cross-Sectional Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov 15;202(10):1388-1398. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2568OC.
- Background: PubMed 32590254Shechter A, Diaz F, Moise N, Anstey DE, Ye S, Agarwal S, Birk JL, Brodie D, Cannone DE, Chang B, Claassen J, Cornelius T, Derby L, Dong M, Givens RC, Hochman B, Homma S, Kronish IM, Lee SAJ, Manzano W, Mayer LES, McMurry CL, Moitra V, Pham P, Rabbani L, Rivera RR, Schwartz A, Schwartz JE, Shapiro PA, Shaw K, Sullivan AM, Vose C, Wasson L, Edmondson D, Abdalla M. Psychological distress, coping behaviors, and preferences for support among New York healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep-Oct;66:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
- Background: PubMed 33222350Murat M, Kose S, Savaser S. Determination of stress, depression and burnout levels of front-line nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Apr;30(2):533-543. doi: 10.1111/inm.12818. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
- Background: PubMed 32085839Chen Q, Liang M, Li Y, Guo J, Fei D, Wang L, He L, Sheng C, Cai Y, Li X, Wang J, Zhang Z. Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e15-e16. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30078-X. Epub 2020 Feb 19. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32551763Lissoni B, Del Negro S, Brioschi P, Casella G, Fontana I, Bruni C, Lamiani G. Promoting resilience in the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: Psychological interventions for intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians and family members. Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S105-S107. doi: 10.1037/tra0000802. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
- Background: PubMed 32387715Schulte EE, Bernstein CA, Cabana MD. Addressing Faculty Emotional Responses during the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic. J Pediatr. 2020 Jul;222:13-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.04.057. Epub 2020 May 7. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32229646Chung JPY, Yeung WS. Staff Mental Health Self-Assessment During the COVID-19 Outbreak. East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;30(1):34. doi: 10.12809/eaap2014. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34895798Kose S, Gezginci E, Goktas S, Murat M. The effectiveness of motivational messages to intensive care unit nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Apr;69:103161. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103161. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Motivation
Recruiting
Sustainability of the Effects of an Adapted Physical Activity Program on Physical Fitness and Psycho-behavioral Factors in Patients With Chronic Diseases
Adapted Physical Activity, Smartwatches
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Two Different Generative AI Tools on Nursing Students' Patient Counseling Skills and Motivation Regarding Instructional Materials
Artifical Intelligence, Generative Artificial Intelligence
Recruiting
Behavioural Study in Chronic Pain : Creativity and Motivation, and Circuits Involved in Functional MRI
Chronic Pain
Active, not recruiting
Flipped Classroom vs. Flip-Jigsaw in Theoretical Physiotherapy Education
Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Educational Technology
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
PREVENT HPV -Related Cancers Trial
HPV Vaccination, Uptake Vaccination
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elif Gezginci, RN, PhD principal investigator
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Motivational messages in people with Motivation and Optimism, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Optimistic level assessed by the Life Orientation Test (time frame: 21 days after from baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04751474, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2021.