Pain ManagementNCT04750538
A Non-invasive Intervention (BreEStim) for Management of Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) After Limb Amputation (Experiment 2)
A study testing BreEStim 120 and BreEStim 240 in people with Pain Management, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of innovative intervention of breathing controlled electrical stimulation (BreEStim) and conventional electrical stimulation (EStim) in management of neuropathic phantom limb pain in patients after limb amputation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain Management
- What is being tested?
- BreEStim 120 and BreEStim 240
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Apr 2021to 19 May 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- has phantom limb pain (PLP) after amputation of one limb, upper or lower limb;
- has chronic pain, >3 months;
- is stable on oral pain medications at least two weeks. (patients are allowed to continue their pain medications, i.e., no change in pain medications.)
Who cannot join
- currently adjusting oral pain medications for their PLP;
- has pain, but not PLP (e.g., from inflammation at the incision wound of the residual limb);
- has a pacemaker, or other metal and/or implanted devices;
- has cognitive impairment from brain injury or are not able to follow commands, or to give consent;
- has amputation in multiple limbs;
- have asthma or other pulmonary diseases;
Show all 10Show fewer
- are not medically stable;
- have preexisting psychiatric disorders;
- alcohol or drug abuse;
- have a history of seizures/Epilepsy, or taking benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
The University of Texas Health Science Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
About this study
Official title: A Non-invasive Intervention (BreEStim) for Management of Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) After Limb Amputation
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of innovative intervention of breathing controlled electrical stimulation (BreEStim) and conventional electrical stimulation (EStim) in management of neuropathic phantom limb pain in patients after limb amputation.
- Conditions
- Pain Management
- Being tested
- BreEStim 120, BreEStim 240
- Keywords
- Phantom Limb Pain, BreEStim
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia, Phantom Limb
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BreEStim 120Device
120 BreEStim stimuli will applied for about 10-15 minutes.
BreEStim 240Device
240 BreEStim stimuli will applied for about 20-30 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BreEStim 120, then BreEStim 240 | Experimental | BreEStim is voluntary breathing controlled transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. 120 vs 240 BreEStim electrical stimuli will be compared to examine the impact of different stimuli "dose" on pain reduction in this experiment. Receives: Device: BreEStim 120; Device: BreEStim 240 |
| BreEStim 240, then BreEStim 120 | Experimental | BreEStim is voluntary breathing controlled transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. 120 vs 240 BreEStim electrical stimuli will be compared to examine the impact of different stimuli "dose" on pain reduction in this experiment. Receives: Device: BreEStim 120; Device: BreEStim 240 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Pain Level as Measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
VAS Scores are recorded from 0 to 10 with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "worst pain", a higher score indicating a higher level of pain. Change is reported as [(VAS score at baseline) - (VAS Score 10 minutes after intervention)] - a positive value indicates that the score (and pain level) decreased
Measured: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change in Sensation Threshold on Amputated Limb Measured by Electrical Sensation Threshold (EST)
Electrical Sensation Threshold (EST) is the minimum electrical current intensity that a person can reliably perceive as a sensation on their skin. This threshold is self-reported by the subjects, and electrical intensity values are recorded when participants first detect the electrical stimulation. Change is reported as [(EST at 5 minutes after intervention) - (EST at baseline)] - a positive value indicates a decrease in sensation perception.
Measured: Baseline, 5 minutes after intervention
Change in Pain Threshold on Amputated Limb Measured by Electrical Pain Detection Threshold (EPT)
An Electrical Pain Threshold (EPT) refers to the minimum intensity of electrical stimulation required to produce a perceptible pain sensation on a person's skin, essentially measuring the point at which an electrical current becomes painful. The EPT is self-reported by subjects when they feel the electrical intensity begins to cause pain. Change is reported as [(EPT at 5 minutes after intervention) - (EPT at baseline)] - a positive value indicates an increase in pain threshold.
Measured: Baseline, 5 minutes after intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2021
- Study start2 Apr 2021
- Primary completion19 May 2023
- Study completion19 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Pain ManagementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sheng Li, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Investigators
- Sheng Li, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04750538
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSC-MS-20-1032 (Experiment 2)
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Non-invasive Intervention (BreEStim) for Management of Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) After Limb Amputation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04750538
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HSC-MS-20-1032 (Experiment 2)
- Conditions
- Pain Management
- Keywords
- Phantom Limb Pain, BreEStim
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research
- Study start
- 2 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 20 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of innovative intervention of breathing controlled electrical stimulation (BreEStim) and conventional electrical stimulation (EStim) in management of neuropathic phantom limb pain in patients after limb amputation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BreEStim 120, then BreEStim 240 | Experimental | Device: BreEStim 120, Device: BreEStim 240BreEStim is voluntary breathing controlled transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. 120 vs 240 BreEStim electrical stimuli will be compared to examine the impact of different stimuli "dose" on pain reduction in this experiment. |
| BreEStim 240, then BreEStim 120 | Experimental | Device: BreEStim 120, Device: BreEStim 240BreEStim is voluntary breathing controlled transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. 120 vs 240 BreEStim electrical stimuli will be compared to examine the impact of different stimuli "dose" on pain reduction in this experiment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- has phantom limb pain (PLP) after amputation of one limb, upper or lower limb;
- has chronic pain, >3 months;
- is stable on oral pain medications at least two weeks. (patients are allowed to continue their pain medications, i.e., no change in pain medications.)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- currently adjusting oral pain medications for their PLP;
- has pain, but not PLP (e.g., from inflammation at the incision wound of the residual limb);
- has a pacemaker, or other metal and/or implanted devices;
- has cognitive impairment from brain injury or are not able to follow commands, or to give consent;
- has amputation in multiple limbs;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BreEStim 120120 BreEStim stimuli will applied for about 10-15 minutes. | Device | BreEStim 120, then BreEStim 240, BreEStim 240, then BreEStim 120 |
| BreEStim 240240 BreEStim stimuli will applied for about 20-30 minutes. | Device | BreEStim 120, then BreEStim 240, BreEStim 240, then BreEStim 120 |
Primary outcome
Change in Pain Level as Measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Time frame: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention
VAS Scores are recorded from 0 to 10 with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "worst pain", a higher score indicating a higher level of pain. Change is reported as [(VAS score at baseline) - (VAS Score 10 minutes after intervention)] - a positive value indicates that the score (and pain level) decreased
2 secondary outcomes
Change in Sensation Threshold on Amputated Limb Measured by Electrical Sensation Threshold (EST)
Time frame: Baseline, 5 minutes after intervention
Change in Pain Threshold on Amputated Limb Measured by Electrical Pain Detection Threshold (EPT)
Time frame: Baseline, 5 minutes after intervention
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain Management
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Laparoscopic-Assisted TAP Block in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Blockades Neuromuscular
Recruiting
Photobiomodulation for Management of Temporomandibular Disorder Pain
Pain Related to TMD
Recruiting
SIRI Levels Following PENG Block in Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Dysplasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sheng Li, MD, PhD principal investigator
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing BreEStim 120 and BreEStim 240 in people with Pain Management, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Pain Level as Measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). (time frame: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2025.