AzTrials
AzTrials

Nursing Students Education on Neonatal ResuscitationNCT04748341

The Impact of Pedagogical Framework in Education of Neonatal Resuscitation

A study testing Pedagogical Framework (Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, and Maintain) and Traditional Method in people with Nursing Students Education on Neonatal Resuscitation, run by University of Lahore at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Virtually 10% of newborns suffer respiratory distress at birth thus need intervention from proficient health professionals. Pakistan is one of the top ten countries that carry two-thirds of the global burden of neonatal deaths. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Pedagogical Framework (Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, and Maintain) and Traditional Method
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
62 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
10 Feb 2021to 25 Mar 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Are currently enrolled in the Bachelor of Science in Nursing (4 years) 3rd and 4th Professional.
  • Those willing to attend the full course of neonatal resuscitation.
  • Having age 18-25 years.
  • Those willing to give informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Will be on leave from that period
  • Have already received any educational training on neonatal resuscitation.
  • Working as Nursing Assistants in Clinical Setting.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • College of Nursing, Allama Iqbal Medical College.

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: The Efficacy of Pedagogical Framework (Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, Maintain) on Knowledge, Skill, and Self-Efficacy of Nursing Students Regarding Neonatal Resuscitation.

Virtually 10% of newborns suffer respiratory distress at birth thus need intervention from proficient health professionals. Pakistan is one of the top ten countries that carry two-thirds of the global burden of neonatal deaths. It is suggested that most of these deaths can be prevented through the provision of trained emergency birth attendants, in which education plays an integral role. Since its inception in the neonatal resuscitation program, we are still in the struggle to find out the best strategies to disseminate NRP knowledge, training, and guidelines that promise the best outcome. Hence, little published data on this phenomenon is available regarding undergraduate students. That determines the best way to educate them in performing the skills that urgently require an infrequent needed such as neonatal resuscitation. Therefore, this study intended to address this gap in the education of neonatal resuscitation through two different approaches. One is a traditional 2-step method and the other is an adapted Pedagogical framework (Lean, See, Practice, Prove, Do and Maintain).

Read the detailed description

Globally, nurses are the largest workforce in the healthcare system that are directly engaged in the provision of newborn care. They should be conversant and competent in neonatal resuscitation. However, the majority of nurses are not skillful in the respective field. The situation is not very different when we are talking about nursing students. Who are our future workforce, hence are found incompetent in emergency newborn management and neonatal resuscitation. It is well documented that effective educational programs in preservice settings such as schools of midwifery, nursing, and medicine, established more active forms of lifelong learning to improve the quality of care. While the transformation of theoretical knowledge into clinical practice requires effective teaching in the field of resuscitation is a vital element for all undergraduate students. However, like many other developing countries in Pakistan, mostly traditional methods are following in nursing education. While the traditional method of teaching is insufficient to meet the educational demands of nursing students in clinical practice. Hence, Nursing students often are unprepared and lacking confidence in simple, yet life-saving procedures such as neonatal resuscitation. Therefore, incorporating an effective model and framework in nursing education is needed that could enhance nursing students' skills and improve clinical outcomes. The "Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, and Maintain" (LSPPDM) pedagogy is one of such frameworks synthesized after intensely reviewing the literature. This framework is acting as a guiding path for educators in teaching and learning procedural skills. As Knowledge is considering a prerequisite for competence in skill performance and to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational program self -efficacy measurement is an important tool. Thus, the important variables knowledge, self-efficacy, and skill have been selected for this study. Thus, the study objective will be:

To compare the knowledge, skill, and self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing students learning of neonatal resuscitation through "Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, Maintain pedagogy" as compared to those who will learn through the traditional method.

This study will contribute essentially to determine the effectiveness of an adapted pedagogical framework in the teaching and learning of neonatal resuscitation skills, especially in a resource-limited society. Moreover, the study findings will help the organization to develop strategies for improving nursing education.

Being tested
Pedagogical Framework (Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, and Maintain), Traditional Method

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pedagogical Framework (Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, and Maintain)Other

    The "Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, and Maintain" (LSPPDM) pedagogy is acting as a guiding path for educators in teaching and learning procedural skills. It is synthesized after intensely reviewing the literature comprises steps. In the 1st step, learners learn through didactic lectures, further proceeding to see procedural videos. The 3rd step, "Practice" expose learners to perform the skill on a simulator. In the 4th step "Prove" the learner proves the skill. The 5th step Do comprise real-life exposure through the clinical rotation. Then, finally the 6th step"Maintain" the learner maintains skill supplemented with simulation as needed.

  • Traditional MethodOther

    The traditional method group learns through 2-step method.

    1. didactic lectures on neonatal resuscitation were delivered.
    2. Practice skill on mannequins
Study groups in NCT04748341
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Traditional GroupActive comparatorGroup A will be taught through the two steps traditional method (2 lectures/week + 1 skill lab/week). First, learn through didactic Lectures and then practice skills on the Mannequins. The educational lecture content will be the same for both groups.
Receives: Other: Traditional Method
Pedagogical GroupExperimentalGroup B will learn through the 5-step method [ 2 lectures/week + video + 2skill lab/week (1 session under instructor + 1 session for skill maintenance)], learn skill, see the video on resuscitation, practice on simulator, prove through practice, observe skill on clinical rotation and lastly maintain it through clinical supplemented with simulation.
Receives: Other: Pedagogical Framework (Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, and Maintain)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Knowledge Questionnaire

    knowledge is considering awareness of Neonatal resuscitation. It will be measured through a 17-item multiple-choice question adopted from Knowledge Question total score ranged from 0 to 17. A higher score means have more knowledge.

    Measured: before intervention and 6 weeks after intervention

  2. Self-efficacy for Neonatal Resuscitation (SENR)

    The SENR instrument is a 23-item scale that measured nursing students' perception of confidence in their capabilities in neonatal resuscitation. All SENR items were valued on a 10-point Likert scale. The total score ranged from 0 to 230. A higher score means have more self-efficacy.

    Measured: before intervention and 6 weeks after intervention

  3. Neonatal Resuscitation Checklist

    A 30 items checklist will be used. Each of the correct actions was graded as 1=yes and for wrong action 0=no. The total score ranged from 0 to 30. The total score ranged from 0 to 30. A higher score means have more skill.

    Measured: before intervention and 6 weeks after intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2021
  2. Study start10 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion22 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion25 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study design is a Single-blind randomized control trial conducted in the College of Nursing, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan. A sample size of 72 nursing students (36 in each group) will be taken through simple random sampling. The students allocated from each professional in group A and group B through the Lottery method. Allocation of participants was concealed using envelop method. A total of 6 weeks of intervention will be provided to both groups. Group A will be taught through the two steps traditional method (2 lectures/week + 1 skill lab/week). On the contrary Group B will learn through the 6-step method constituted 2 lecture/week + video + 2skill lab/week (1 session under instructor + 1 session for skill maintenance).
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
62 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04748341
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB-UOL-FAHS/775/2020
Status last verified
May 2021
First submitted
3 Feb 2021
Last updated
18 May 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Liaqat M, Hussain M, Afzal M, Altaf M, Khan S, Gilani SA, Liaqat I. Efficacy of pedagogical framework in neonatal resuscitation skill learning in a resource-limited setting: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 18;21(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02846-x.

    PubMed 34407810

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pedagogical Framework (Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, and Maintain) and Traditional Method in people with Nursing Students Education on Neonatal Resuscitation, run by University of Lahore at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 May 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Knowledge Questionnaire (time frame: before intervention and 6 weeks after intervention). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04748341, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in