AzTrials
AzTrials

Hereditary AngioedemaPhase 3NCT04739059

Long-term Safety and Efficacy of CSL312 (Garadacimab) in the Prophylactic Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks

A Phase 3 study testing CSL312 in people with Hereditary Angioedema, run by CSL Behring at 44 sites in 14 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This phase 3b study will evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of CSL312 (also known as garadacimab) when administered subcutaneously (SC) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hereditary Angioedema
What is being tested?
CSL312
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
171 participants
Where
44 sitesin 14 countries
Study dates
29 Mar 2021to 21 Nov 2025
Phase
Phase 3

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males and females aged ≥ 12 years
  • Diagnosed with clinically confirmed C1-INH HAE
  • Experienced ≥ 3 HAE attacks during the 3 months before Screening
  • Participated in the Run-in Period for at least 1 month (CSL312-naïve subjects only)
  • Experienced at least an average of 1 HAE attack per month during the Run-in Period

Who cannot join

  • Concomitant diagnosis of another form of angioedema, such as idiopathic or acquired angioedema or recurrent angioedema associated with urticaria
  • Use of C1-INH products, androgens, antifibrinolytics or other small molecule medications for routine prophylaxis against HAE attacks at least 2 weeks before the first day of the Run-in Period
  • Use of monoclonal antibodies such as lanadelumab (Takhzyro®) 3 months before the first day of the Run-in Period.
  • Female subjects use estrogen-containing oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy within 4 weeks prior to screening
  • Female or male subjects who are fertile and sexually active not using or not willing to use an acceptable method of contraception to avoid pregnancy during the study and for 30 days after receipt of the last dose of CSL312
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding, or not willing to cease breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

44 sites in 14 countries.

44 sites in 14 countries

United States11 sites
  • Clinical Research Center of Alabama

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35209

  • Institute for Asthma and Allergy PC

    Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815

  • Bernstein Clinical Research Center, LLC

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45236

  • AARA Research Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • PennState Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

    Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033

  • Research Solutions of Arizona

    Litchfield Park, Arizona, 85340

  • Little Rock Allergy & Asthma Clinic

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Donald S. Levy M.D.

    Orange, California, 92868

  • Raffi Tachdjian MD, Inc.

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Medical Research of Arizona

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251

  • Allergy & Asthma Clinical Research

    Walnut Creek, California, 94598

Other trials in United States

Japan10 sites
  • St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital

    Kanagawa, Kawasaki-shi, 216-8511

  • Clover Hospital

    Kanagawa, Kugenumaishigami, Fujisawa-shi, 251-0025

  • Mie University Hospital

    Mie, Edobashi, Tsu-shi, Edobashi, Tsu-shi

  • Local Incorporated Administrative Agency Osaka City Hospital Organization Osaka City General Hospital

    Miyakojima-ku, Osaka-shi, 534-0021

  • Saga University Hospital

    Saga, Nebeshima, Saga-shi, 849-8501

  • Saitama Medical Center

    Saitama, Kamoda Kawagoe-shi, 350-8550

  • Saiyu Soka Hospital

    Saitama, Matsubara Soka-shi, 340-0041

  • Koga Community Hospital

    Shizuoka, Daikakuji Yaizu-shi, 425-0088

  • Juntendo University Hospital

    Tokyo, Hongo Bunkyo-ku, 113-8431

  • National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center

    Tokyo, Midoricho, Tachikawa-shi, 190-0014

Other trials in Japan

Canada5 sites
  • University of Alberta - Research Transition Facility

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7

  • McMaster University

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5

  • Montreal Clinical Research Institute

    Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1R7

  • Ottawa Allergy Research Corp

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 1E4

  • Gordon Sussman Clinical Research

    Toronto, Ontario, M3B 3S6

Other trials in Canada

Germany4 sites
  • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 10117

  • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt

    Frankfurt, 60590

  • Johannes Gutenberg-Universität KöR, Hautklinik und Poliklinik der Universitätsmedizin, Clinical Research Center

    Mainz, 55131

  • HZRM Haemophilie Zentrum Rhein Main GmbH

    Mörfelden-Walldorf, 64546

Other trials in Germany

Australia3 sites
  • Campbelltown Hospital / Western Sydney University

    Campbelltown, New South Wales, 2560

  • The Alfred Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3004

  • Fiona Stanley Hospital, Department of Clinical Immunology

    Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150

Other trials in Australia

Czechia2 sites
  • University hospital St. Anna Ustav klinicke imunologie a alergologie, Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně

    Brno, 65691

  • University Hospital Motol

    Prague, 150 06

Other trials in Czechia

Spain2 sites
  • Hospital Universitari General de La Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona, 8035

  • Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Alergia

    Madrid, 28007

Other trials in Spain

Hong Kong1 site
  • The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

Hungary1 site
  • Semmelweis Egyetem Altalanos Orvostudományi Kar Belgyógyászati és Hematológiai Klinika

    Budapest, 1088

Other trials in Hungary

Israel1 site
  • Barzilai University Medical Center

    Ashkelon, 7830604

Other trials in Israel

Netherlands1 site
  • Amsterdam UMC, location AMC

    Amsterdam, 1105

Other trials in Netherlands

New Zealand1 site
  • Auckland City Hospital

    Grafton, Auckland, 1023

Other trials in New Zealand

Russia1 site
  • NRC Institute of Immunology FMBA Russia

    Moscow, 115522

Other trials in Russia

Taiwan1 site
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital

    Taichung, 407

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: An Open-label Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of CSL312 (Garadacimab) in the Prophylactic Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema

This phase 3b study will evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of CSL312 (also known as garadacimab) when administered subcutaneously (SC)

Being tested
CSL312
Medical subject headings
Angioedemas, Hereditary

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CSL312Biological

    Also called Factor XIIa inhibitor monoclonal antibody, garadacimab

    Fully human immunoglobulin G subclass 4/lambda recombinant inhibitor monoclonal antibody

Study groups in NCT04739059
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CSL312ExperimentalFully human immunoglobulin G subclass 4/lambda recombinant inhibitor monoclonal antibody administered subcutaneously
Receives: Biological: CSL312

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  2. Percentage of Participants With TEAE

    The percentage of participants was rounded to one place of decimal.

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  3. Number of TEAE

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  4. TEAE Rates Per Injection

    The TEAE rate per injection was calculated as the number of TEAE/ total number of injections. The number of injections was defined as the total injections received by participants during the respective safety evaluation period.

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  5. TEAE Rates Per Participant Year

    The TEAE rate per participant year was calculated as the total number of TEAE/ participant years. Participant years was defined as the sum of the time (in years) that participant were exposed to study treatment during the respective safety evaluation period.

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. The Time-normalized Number (Per Month) of Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks During the Run-in Period and Treatment Period

    Time-normalized number of HAE attacks per month during treatment was calculated per participant as: [number of HAE attacks / length of participant treatment in days]*30.4375.

    Measured: Run-in Period: Up to Day 60 and Treatment Period: Approximately up to 52 months

  2. The Time-normalized Number (Per Year) of HAE Attacks During Treatment Period

    Time-normalized number of HAE attacks per year during treatment was calculated per participant as: [number of HAE attacks / length of participant treatment in days]*365.25.

    Measured: Approximately up to 52 months

  3. Percentage Reduction in the Attack Rate During the Treatment Period Compared to the Run-in Period

    The percentage reduction in the time-normalized number of HAE attacks was calculated within a participant as: 100*(1- time normalized number of HAE attacks per month during Treatment Period/time-normalized number of HAE attacks per month during Run-in Period).

    Measured: Run-in Period: Up to 60 days and Treatment Period: Approximately up to 52 months

  4. Number of Participants With Percentage Reduction (of >=50%, >=70%, >=90%, and 100%) in HAE Attacks

    The number of participants who achieved a percentage reduction in HAE attacks of >=50% (also considered as responders), >=70%, >=90%, and 100% (attack free) during the Treatment Period compared with the Run-in Period. The percentage reduction in the time-normalized number of HAE attacks per month was calculated as 100*[1 - (time-normalized number of HAE attacks per month under CSL312 treatment / time-normalized number of HAE attacks per month during Run-in Period)].

    Measured: Run-in Period: Up to Day 60 and Treatment Period: Approximately up to 52 months

  5. The Time-normalized Number (Per Month) of HAE Attacks Requiring On-demand Treatment

    Time-normalized number of HAE attacks per month requiring on demand treatment was calculated per participant as: [number of HAE attacks requiring on demand treatment during treatment period / length of participant treatment in days]*30.4375.

    Measured: Approximately up to 52 months

  6. The Time-normalized Number (Per Year) of HAE Attacks Requiring On-demand Treatment

    Time-normalized number of HAE attacks requiring on demand treatment per year was calculated per participant as: [number of HAE attacks requiring on demand treatment during treatment period / length of participant treatment in days]*365.25.

    Measured: Approximately up to 52 months

  7. The Time-normalized Number (Per Month) of Moderate and/or Severe HAE Attacks

    Time-normalized number of moderate or severe HAE attacks per month during treatment period was calculated per participant as: [number of moderate or severe HAE attacks / length of participant treatment in days]*30.4375.

    Measured: Approximately up to 52 months

  8. The Time-normalized Number (Per Year) of Moderate and/or Severe HAE Attacks

    Time-normalized number of moderate or severe HAE attacks per year during treatment period was calculated per participant as: [number of moderate or severe HAE attacks /length of participant treatment in days]*365.25.

    Measured: Approximately up to 52 months

  9. Number of Participants Rating Their Response to Therapy as Good or Excellent

    Number of participants rating their response to therapy as good or excellent was evaluated as per Subject's Global Assessment of Response to Therapy (SGART) questionnaire. SGART is a patient-reported outcome that represents the participant's overall response to treatment using the following ratings: (0) none: worse or no response at all, not acceptable, (1) poor: very little response, not acceptable, (2) fair: some response, acceptable but could be better, (3) good: good response, acceptable, and (4) excellent: excellent response, as good as can be imagined. Cumulative responses as "Good or Excellent" are reported for this outcome measure.

    Measured: At Months 12, 24, and 36

  10. Percentage of Participants Rating Their Response to Therapy as Good or Excellent

    Percentage of participants rating their response to therapy as good or excellent was evaluated as per SGART questionnaire. SGART is a patient-reported outcome that represents the participant's overall response to treatment using the following ratings: (0) none: worse or no response at all, not acceptable, (1) poor: very little response, not acceptable, (2) fair: some response, acceptable but could be better, (3) good: good response, acceptable, and (4) excellent: excellent response, as good as can be imagined. Cumulative responses as "Good or Excellent" are reported for this outcome measure. The percentage of participants was rounded to one place of decimal.

    Measured: At Months 12, 24, and 36

  11. Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAE), Experiencing Death, Related TEAE, TEAE Leading to Study Discontinuation

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  12. Percentage of Participants Experiencing SAE, Experiencing Death, Related TEAE, TEAE Leading to Study Discontinuation

    The percentage of participants was rounded to one decimal place.

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  13. Number of Participants Experiencing TEAE by Severity

    Severity of AE was assessed by the investigator and categorized as mild, moderate and severe. A mild AE that is usually transient and may require only minimal treatment or therapeutic intervention. The event does not generally interfere with usual activities of daily living. A moderate AE that is usually alleviated with additional specific therapeutic intervention. The event interferes with usual activities of daily living, causing discomfort but poses no significant or permanent risk of harm to the research participant. A severe AE that interrupts usual activities of daily living, significantly affects clinical status, or may require intensive therapeutic intervention.

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  14. Percentage of Participants Experiencing TEAE by Severity

    Severity of AE was assessed by the investigator and categorized as mild, moderate and severe. A mild AE that is usually transient and may require only minimal treatment or therapeutic intervention. The event does not generally interfere with usual activities of daily living. A moderate AE that is usually alleviated with additional specific therapeutic intervention. The event interferes with usual activities of daily living, causing discomfort but poses no significant or permanent risk of harm to the research participant. A severe AE that interrupts usual activities of daily living, significantly affects clinical status, or may require intensive therapeutic intervention. The percentage of participants was rounded to one decimal place.

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  15. Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

    The AESI defined for this study were thromboembolic events, abnormal bleeding events, and severe hypersensitivity including anaphylaxis. The AESI reported have been identified by investigators.

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  16. Percentage of Participants Experiencing AESI

    The AESI defined for this study were thromboembolic events, abnormal bleeding events, and severe hypersensitivity including anaphylaxis. The AESI reported have been identified by investigators.

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  17. Number of Participants With Laboratory Findings Reported as TEAE

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  18. Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Findings Reported as TEAE

    The percentage of participant was rounded to one place of decimal.

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  19. Number of Participants With Normal C1-esterase Inhibitor (nC1-INH) Experiencing TEAE

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  20. Percentage of Participants With nC1-INH Experiencing TEAE

    Measured: Approximately up to 54 months

  21. Number of Participants With Anti-CSL312 Antibodies

    Measured: At Day 1, Months 6, 12, 36 and 43 (end of treatment [EOT])

  22. Percentage of Participants With Anti-CSL312 Antibodies

    The percentage of participants was rounded to one decimal place.

    Measured: At Day 1, Months 6, 12, 36 and 43 (EOT)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Feb 2021
  2. Study start29 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion21 Nov 2025
  4. Study completion21 Nov 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
171 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04739059
Sponsor's protocol ID
CSL312_3002
Other IDs
2020-003918-12
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
1 Feb 2021
Last updated
2 Jun 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: CSL will consider requests to share Individual Patient Data (IPD) from systematic review groups or bona-fide researchers. For information on the process and requirements for submitting a voluntary data sharing request for IPD, please contact CSL at clinicaltrials@cslbehring.com. Applicable country specific privacy and other laws and regulations will be considered and may prevent sharing of IPD. If the request is approved and the researcher has executed an appropriate data sharing agreement, IPD that has been appropriately anonymized will be available.

Publications

  • Craig TJ, Guilarte M, Li HH, Anderson J, Martinez Saguer I, Jacobs JS, Tachdjian R, Farkas H, Yang WH, Ohsawa I, Hakl R, Pollen M, Pragst I, Lawo JP, Shetty H, Nenci C, Magerl M. Long-Term Integrated Safety and Efficacy of Garadacimab for Hereditary Angioedema Prophylaxis. Adv Ther. 2026 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s12325-026-03628-x. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42268494
  • Guilarte M, Lumry WR, Magerl M, Martinez Saguer I, Reshef A, Sobotkova M, Braverman J, Lawo JP, Wieman L, Nenci C, Katelaris CH. Garadacimab improves long-term health-related quality of life in patients with hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025 May 1;46(3):192-199. doi: 10.2500/aap.2025.46.250027.

    PubMed 40380363
  • Staubach P, Craig TJ, Fukuda T, Aygoren-Pursun E, Hakl R, Braverman J, Lawo JP, Pollen M, Nenci C, Li PH, Farkas H. Becoming attack-free further improves health-related quality of life in patients with hereditary angioedema receiving garadacimab. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025 May 1;46(3):200-208. doi: 10.2500/aap.2025.46.250026.

    PubMed 40380356

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in