Airway DiseasePhase 2NCT04738422
Determining Airway pH by Compartmental Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels During Alkaline Buffer Challenge
A Phase 2 study testing Alkaline glycine in people with Airway Disease, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Airway pH imbalances cause numerous adverse physiological changes within the airways, including hyperreactivity, cough, bronchoconstriction, ciliopathy, decreased response to bronchodilators, bacterial growth, nitrosative/oxidative stress, neutrophilic/eosinophilic inflammation, and cell death. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Airway Disease
- What is being tested?
- Alkaline glycine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 Sep 2020to 15 Jul 2028
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- • Study sample will consist of individuals aged 18-60 with a diagnosis of acute or chronic respiratory disorders or normal subjects with no pulmonary disease.
- Healthy subjects may include:
- Adult males or females age ≥ 18 and ≤ 60 years at time of enrollment
- Non-smokers
- Person with no history of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or other chronic lung disease
- Person with no history of severe allergic/atopic disease requiring immunotherapy or immunomodulators
Show all 10Show fewer
- Subjects with pulmonary disease may include:
- Person with well-documented disease with objective diagnostics such a lung function or genetic testing.
- Person with FEV1 > 55% predicted on the day of study procedures.
- Person who is clinically stable with no significant changes in health status within 4 weeks.
Who cannot join
- • Subjects that are mechanically ventilated.
- Subjects that are unable or unwilling to cooperate with specimen collection.
- Subjects with diagnosis of any medical condition that in the investigator's opinion would make them unsuitable for study participation.
- Subjects who experienced a pulmonary exacerbation within the 4 weeks prior to visit.
- Subjects requiring continuous oxygen therapy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46219
About this study
Airway pH imbalances cause numerous adverse physiological changes within the airways, including hyperreactivity, cough, bronchoconstriction, ciliopathy, decreased response to bronchodilators, bacterial growth, nitrosative/oxidative stress, neutrophilic/eosinophilic inflammation, and cell death. Airway pH is known to be low (acidic) in chronic and acute pulmonary diseases. The gold standard approach to measuring airway pH is to bronchscopically obtain epithelial cell lining fluid using protected brush sampling. The expense and invasive nature of this approach is a barrier to fully characterizing the role of airway pH in the health and disease. In this study, we will evaluate non-invasive clinical methods that can be done using equipment standard in clinical pulmonary function laboratories for measuring airway pH.
Read the detailed description
Airway pH imbalances cause numerous adverse physiological changes within the airways, including hyperreactivity, cough, bronchoconstriction, ciliopathy, decreased response to bronchodilators, bacterial growth, nitrosative/oxidative stress, neutrophilic/eosinophilic inflammation, and cell death. Airway pH is known to be low (acidic) in chronic and acute pulmonary diseases. The gold standard approach to measuring airway pH is to bronchscopically obtain epithelial cell lining fluid using protected brush sampling. The expense and invasive nature of this approach is a barrier to fully characterizing the role of airway pH in the health and disease. In this study, the investigator will evaluate non-invasive clinical methods that can be done using equipment standard in clinical pulmonary function laboratories for measuring airway pH.
The study team has previously demonstrated that exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH and changes in fractional exhaled nitric oxide collected at 50mL/sec (FeNO50) after inhalation of an alkaline glycine buffer (AGB) indicate low airway pH. While EBC pH is the most common method and validated method for estimating airway pH, the investigators believes that the change in FeNO50 is the most sensitive test for general airway pH. Specifically, this proposed test makes use of the facts that the pH of nitrite/nitrous acid (NO2-/HNO2) is just under 4. Nitrous acid thus evolves nitric oxide (NO) when pH is less than 6.5, and NO evolution stops when pH is above 7. Because endogenous human airway NO2- levels are normally low μM, (32) NO2 protonation can be used as a noninvasive test for airway pH. Using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, the investigator can use these changes in NO to calculate pH. The investigator has now done studies with both inhaled phosphate buffer and AGB, both of which show that specific patients with asthma have a significant fall in FeNO50 following buffer inhalation. While FeNO50 is validated to represent the nitric oxide levels of the middle airways, sampling can be done at several different flowrates and times to evaluate the nitric oxide levels in different compartments of the lung. This can allow for regional airway pH measurement which would be helpful since many airway diseases are heterogeneous and regional. The investigator will further characterize the normal range of airway pH in health and disease compartmentally within the airways and in subsequent studies will evaluate the effects of clinically altering pH when it is abnormal.
It has been recently discovered that airway pH is integral to airway cell entry and replication of SARS-CoV-2 virus. Specifically, one of the pathways by which the virus enters cells and replicates is blocked by intracellular alkalinization. The investigator therefore tested to determine whether AGB would cause intracellular alkalinization in cultured primary human airway epithelial cells. It did; and the drug was well-tolerated by the cells in vitro (as it is in vivo).
The investigators believes that the next step is to determine whether AGB inhibits viral replication and viral entry in our primary human airway epithelial cultures. To do this, the investigator is partnering with the Indiana University BSL3 virology lab. The investigator has acquired the virus, completed preparations of it, and has infected human airway epithelial cultures with it. The study team is awaiting preliminary results of the effects of AGB on viral entry and replication. If in fact AGB inhibits viral cell entry and, thereby, replication, the investigator intends to expand the IND with the FDA, allowing a trial in patients at risk for respiratory distress associated with known COVID-2 respiratory disease. Ultimately, outcomes of this trial would be proposed to include: mortality (primary); as well as ICU length of stay and oxygen saturation index area under the curve (secondary). The investigator has submitted grants to the NIH, the DoD, and several other agencies for this project.
The study proposed here will not only provide further insight into the use of AGB in a larger population but also will allow for evaluation of airway pH in those receiving it which could be used to guide therapy.
- Conditions
- Airway Disease
- Being tested
- Alkaline glycine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Alkaline glycineDrug
Also called Optate
Subjects will inhale alkaline glycine via nebulizer. Alkaline glycine is an alkaline medication designed for medication.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Alkaline glycine Inhalation | Experimental | Subjects inhale alkaline glycine Receives: Drug: Alkaline glycine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compartmental FeNO
Measuring compartmental FeNO before inhaled alkaline glycine and after inhaled alkaline glycine
Measured: Study is a single visit, lasting less than two hours
Calculated compartmental airway pH
Calculating compartmental FeNO before inhaled alkaline glycine and after inhaled alkaline glycine
Measured: Study is a single visit, lasting less than two hours
Exhaled Breath Condensate (EBC) pH
Measuring the pH of EBC before and after inhaled alkaline glycine
Measured: Study is a single visit, lasting less than two hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Feb 2021
- Study start11 Sep 2020
- Primary completion15 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jul 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Airway DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Indiana UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael D. Davis, Indiana University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04738422
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2003838272
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Determining Airway pH by Compartmental Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels During Alkaline Buffer Challenge
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04738422
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2003838272
- Conditions
- Airway Disease
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Airway pH imbalances cause numerous adverse physiological changes within the airways, including hyperreactivity, cough, bronchoconstriction, ciliopathy, decreased response to bronchodilators, bacterial growth, nitrosative/oxidative stress, neutrophilic/eosinophilic inflammation, and cell death. Airway pH is known to be low (acidic) in chronic and acute pulmonary diseases. The gold standard approach to measuring airway pH is to bronchscopically obtain epithelial cell lining fluid using protected brush sampling. The expense and invasive nature of this approach is a barrier to fully characterizing the role of airway pH in the health and disease. In this study, we will evaluate non-invasive clinical methods that can be done using equipment standard in clinical pulmonary function laboratories for measuring airway pH.
Detailed description
Airway pH imbalances cause numerous adverse physiological changes within the airways, including hyperreactivity, cough, bronchoconstriction, ciliopathy, decreased response to bronchodilators, bacterial growth, nitrosative/oxidative stress, neutrophilic/eosinophilic inflammation, and cell death. Airway pH is known to be low (acidic) in chronic and acute pulmonary diseases. The gold standard approach to measuring airway pH is to bronchscopically obtain epithelial cell lining fluid using protected brush sampling. The expense and invasive nature of this approach is a barrier to fully characterizing the role of airway pH in the health and disease. In this study, the investigator will evaluate non-invasive clinical methods that can be done using equipment standard in clinical pulmonary function laboratories for measuring airway pH.
The study team has previously demonstrated that exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH and changes in fractional exhaled nitric oxide collected at 50mL/sec (FeNO50) after inhalation of an alkaline glycine buffer (AGB) indicate low airway pH. While EBC pH is the most common method and validated method for estimating airway pH, the investigators believes that the change in FeNO50 is the most sensitive test for general airway pH. Specifically, this proposed test makes use of the facts that the pH of nitrite/nitrous acid (NO2-/HNO2) is just under 4. Nitrous acid thus evolves nitric oxide (NO) when pH is less than 6.5, and NO evolution stops when pH is above 7. Because endogenous human airway NO2- levels are normally low μM, (32) NO2 protonation can be used as a noninvasive test for airway pH. Using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, the investigator can use these changes in NO to calculate pH. The investigator has now done studies with both inhaled phosphate buffer and AGB, both of which show that specific patients with asthma have a significant fall in FeNO50 following buffer inhalation. While FeNO50 is validated to represent the nitric oxide levels of the middle airways, sampling can be done at several different flowrates and times to evaluate the nitric oxide levels in different compartments of the lung. This can allow for regional airway pH measurement which would be helpful since many airway diseases are heterogeneous and regional. The investigator will further characterize the normal range of airway pH in health and disease compartmentally within the airways and in subsequent studies will evaluate the effects of clinically altering pH when it is abnormal.
It has been recently discovered that airway pH is integral to airway cell entry and replication of SARS-CoV-2 virus. Specifically, one of the pathways by which the virus enters cells and replicates is blocked by intracellular alkalinization. The investigator therefore tested to determine whether AGB would cause intracellular alkalinization in cultured primary human airway epithelial cells. It did; and the drug was well-tolerated by the cells in vitro (as it is in vivo).
The investigators believes that the next step is to determine whether AGB inhibits viral replication and viral entry in our primary human airway epithelial cultures. To do this, the investigator is partnering with the Indiana University BSL3 virology lab. The investigator has acquired the virus, completed preparations of it, and has infected human airway epithelial cultures with it. The study team is awaiting preliminary results of the effects of AGB on viral entry and replication. If in fact AGB inhibits viral cell entry and, thereby, replication, the investigator intends to expand the IND with the FDA, allowing a trial in patients at risk for respiratory distress associated with known COVID-2 respiratory disease. Ultimately, outcomes of this trial would be proposed to include: mortality (primary); as well as ICU length of stay and oxygen saturation index area under the curve (secondary). The investigator has submitted grants to the NIH, the DoD, and several other agencies for this project.
The study proposed here will not only provide further insight into the use of AGB in a larger population but also will allow for evaluation of airway pH in those receiving it which could be used to guide therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Alkaline glycine Inhalation | Experimental | Drug: Alkaline glycineSubjects inhale alkaline glycine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- • Study sample will consist of individuals aged 18-60 with a diagnosis of acute or chronic respiratory disorders or normal subjects with no pulmonary disease.
- Adult males or females age ≥ 18 and ≤ 60 years at time of enrollment
- Non-smokers
- Person with no history of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or other chronic lung disease
- Person with no history of severe allergic/atopic disease requiring immunotherapy or immunomodulators
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- • Subjects that are mechanically ventilated.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Alkaline glycineAlso: OptateSubjects will inhale alkaline glycine via nebulizer. Alkaline glycine is an alkaline medication designed for medication. | Drug | Alkaline glycine Inhalation |
Primary outcome
Compartmental FeNO
Time frame: Study is a single visit, lasting less than two hours
Measuring compartmental FeNO before inhaled alkaline glycine and after inhaled alkaline glycine
Calculated compartmental airway pH
Time frame: Study is a single visit, lasting less than two hours
Calculating compartmental FeNO before inhaled alkaline glycine and after inhaled alkaline glycine
Exhaled Breath Condensate (EBC) pH
Time frame: Study is a single visit, lasting less than two hours
Measuring the pH of EBC before and after inhaled alkaline glycine
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2025.
Related trials for Airway Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Monthly Dosing Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Breathing Problems During Sleep and Overweight or Obesity Who Do Not Use a Breathing Machine (PAP) (VESPER-OSA 2)
Apnea, Sleep Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Not yet recruiting
Influence of Patient Positioning During Nasal Lavage
Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infections, Nasal Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Alkaline glycine in people with Airway Disease, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compartmental FeNO (time frame: Study is a single visit, lasting less than two hours). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2025.