AzTrials
AzTrials

Dysfunctional BreathingNCT04734795

The Prevalence of Dysfunctional Breathing in Children and Adolescents With Asthma

An observational study of Dysfunctional Breathing and Asthma in Children, run by Kolding Sygehus at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate the prevalence of dysfunctional breathing in children and adolescents with asthma in a hospital outpatient clinic. Participants are invited to take the Nijmegen Questionnaire and the Asthma Control Questionnaire. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 17 years
How many people
363 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
5 Feb 2021to 1 May 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • Child

Study population: Children and adolecents with asthma in a hospital outpatient clinic

Who may be able to join

  • Asthma diagnosed by lung function tests and/or typical symptoms.
  • Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in minimum 3 months.

Who cannot join

  • Other significant cardiopulmonary or muscoluskeletal conditions.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Kolding Sygehus

    Kolding, 6000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

The purpose of the study is to investigate the prevalence of dysfunctional breathing in children and adolescents with asthma in a hospital outpatient clinic.

Participants are invited to take the Nijmegen Questionnaire and the Asthma Control Questionnaire. The prevalence of dysfunctional breathing defined as NQ score >= 23 is calculated, and demographics are compared between children with and without dysfunctional breathing.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of the study is to investigate the prevalence of dysfunctional breathing in children and adolecents with asthma in a hospital outpatient clinic.

Participants are invited to take the Nijmegen Questionnaire and the Asthma Control Questionnaire, during appointments at the outpatient clinic. For this study purpose, each participant only takes the questionnairres once.

Patient data regarding age, sex, asthma medication, lung function, allergic sensitization, method of asthma diagnose, Height, weight and Body mass index is registered from the electronical patient journal.

The prevalence of dysfunctional breathing in the cohort is calculated as the fraction of children with a NQ score >= 23.

The group of children and adolescents with dysfunctional breathing is characterized and compared to the group without dysfunctional breathing, regarding the descriptives mentioned above.

Keywords
Dysfunctional breathing, Asthma in children, Asthma in adolescents
Medical subject headings
Asthma

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prevalence of children with dysfunctional breathing defined as Nijmegen Questionnaire ( NQ) Score >= 23

    Nijmegen Questionnaire is a 16 point questionnairre addressing dysfunctional breathing. Each question is scored from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). NQ score is summarized between 0-64 points. NQ score >= 23 predicts dysfunctional breathing.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Mask score

    Because of the ongoing COVID19 pandemic, face mask is acquired in public, and many children are homeschooled. We therefore generated an 8 question survey about the frequency of wearing mask, breathing difficulties while wearing a mask, and weather there is a lock down of school and sports while survey is taken. Questions are scored from 0-3 points, where 0 is Best and 3 is worst

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Asthma Control Questionnaire ( ACQ5)

    ACQ5 contains 5 questions regarding asthma symptoms. Each question is scored between 0-6 points, where 0 represents very good asthma control and 6 represents poor asthma control. Total ACQ score is calculates as an average of points.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Age

    Age in years of study subjects

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Sex

    Sex of study subjects

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Standardised body mass index (BMI_SDS)

    Body mass index is calculated as weight ( kg)/ Height ( m) ^2. As BMI changes with age, BMI standard deviation BMI_SDS is calculated from Danish Reference Material : (Tinggaard J, Aksglaede L, Sørensen K, et al (2014) The 2014 Danish references from birth to 20 years for height, weight and body mass index. Acta Paediatr Int J Paediatr. doi: 10.1111/apa.12468)

    Measured: 1 year

  6. The reported use of rescue Beta2 agonist in puffs per week

    The reported use of short acting beta 2 agonist in puffs per week the last week.

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Forced expiratory volume inthe first second in percent of expected Value. ( FEV1%)

    Spirometry is performed according to guidelines. FEV1% is calculated by the spirometry software.

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Method of asthma diagnose

    Fraction of subjects where asthma was diagnosed objectively from lung function variability (reversibility to beta2 agonist OR positive exercise challenge OR positive mannitol challenge). Method of asthma diagnose is noted from the electronical patient journal

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Feb 2021
  2. Study start5 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion1 May 2022
  4. Study completion1 May 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
363 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04734795
Sponsor's protocol ID
S-2020-0101-a
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
21 Jan 2021
Last updated
13 Oct 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data that underlie published results, after deidentification.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Dysfunctional Breathing and Asthma in Children, run by Kolding Sygehus at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prevalence of children with dysfunctional breathing defined as Nijmegen Questionnaire ( NQ) Score >= 23 (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in